References

• Agricultural Development and Advisory Service (ADAS), 1986. Condition scoring of dairy cows. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food ed., Lion House, Alnwick, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., 2003. Cow Behaviour to Judge Free Stall and Tie Stall Barns. Home page address: http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/livestock/dairy/facts/info
   Google Scholar
• Appleby, M.C., 2005. The relationship between food prices and animal welfare. J. Anim. Sci. 83(Suppl. E):E9-E12.
   Google Scholar
• Appleby, M.C., Hughes, B.O., 1997. Introduction and Discussion. In: M.C. Appleby and B.O. Hughes (eds.) Animal welfare, CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp XI-XIII; pp 265–268.
   Google Scholar
• Bartussek, H., 1999. A review of the animal needs index (ANI) for the assessment of animals’ well-being in the housing systems for Austrian proprietary products and legislation. Livest. Prod. Sci. 61:179–192.
   Google Scholar
• Bartussek, H., 2001. An historical account of the development of the animal needs index ANI-35L as part of the attempt to promote and regulate farm animal welfare in Austria: an example of the interaction between animal welfare science and society. Acta Agr. Scand. A-AN 30 (Suppl.):34–41.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, G., 1998. Corn silage. Home page address: www.utextension.utk.edu/sdfiles/sp434.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beerda, B., Kornalijnslijper, J.E., van der Werf, T.N., Noordhuizen-Stassen, E.N., Hopster, H., 2004. Effects of Milk Production Capacity and Metabolic Status on HPA Function in Early Postpartum Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 87:2094–2102.
   Google Scholar
• Bernabucci, U., Calamari, L., 1998. Effects of heat stress on bovine milk yield and composition. Zoot. Nutr. Anim. 24:247–257.
   Google Scholar
• Bertoni, G., 1998. Effects of heat stress on endocrine-metabolic and reproductive status of the dairy cows. Zoot. Nutr. Anim. 24:273–282.
   Google Scholar
• Bertoni, G., Calamari, L., 2001. Animal welfare and human needs: are they contradictory? pp 23-30 in Proc. 3rd Int. Congr. of European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics, Firenze, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Bertoni, G., Calamari, L., 2005. Strumenti di valutazione del benessere negli allevamenti di bovine da latte. Proc. 37th Nat. Congr. SIB, Carrù (CN), Italy, 37:423–440.
   Google Scholar
• Bertoni, G., Calamari, L., 2006. Valutazione del benessere animale. Quaderni dei Georgofili, Avenue Media, Bologna, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Bertoni, G., Calamari, L., Maianti, M.G., 2003. Factors of welfare status in dairy cows and the relationship with milk features. In: G.F. Greppi and G. Enne (eds.) Proc. Int. Symp. on Milk and Research, Lodi, Italy, pp 63–94.
   Google Scholar
• Bertoni, G., Calamari, L., Trevisi, E., 1999. Valutazione del benessere delle lattifere. Inform. Agr. 55(Suppl.):5–66.
   Google Scholar
• Bertoni, G., Calamari, L., Trevisi, E., 2007. How to define and evaluate welfare in modern dairy farms. pp 590-606 in Proc. 13th Int. Conf. on Production Diseases in Farm Animals, Leipzig, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Blosser, T.H., 1987. Introduction to the Symposium on Dairy animal welfare. J. Dairy Sci. 70:2705–2707.
   Google Scholar
• Bono, G., 2001. Discomfort and stress indicators in farm animals. pp 18-30 in SISVet Annual Meeting selected abstracts, year III, Riva del Garda (TN), Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Bouissou, M.F., Boissy, A., Le Neindre, P., Veissier, I., 2001. The social behaviour of cattle. In: L.J. Keeling and H.W. Gonyoy (eds.) Social Behaviour of Farm Animals. CABI International,Wallingford, UK, pp 113–145.
   Google Scholar
• Bracke, M.B.M., Spruijt, B.M, Metz, J.H.M., 1999. Overall animal welfare assessment reviewed. Part 1: Is it possible?. Neth. J. Agr. Sci. 47:279–291.
   Google Scholar
• Bracke, M.B.M., Spruijt, B.M., Metz, J.H.M., Schouten, W.G.P., 2002. Decision support system for overall welfare assessment in pregnant sows A: model structure and weighting procedure. J. Anim. Sci. 80:1819–1834.
   Google Scholar
• Broom, D.M., 1997. Welfare evaluation. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 54:21–23.
   Google Scholar
• Broom, D.M., 2003. Transport stress in cattle and sheep with details of physiological, ethological and other indicators. Dtsch. Tierärztl. Wochenschr. 110:83–89.
   Google Scholar
• Broom, D.M., 2006. Behaviour and welfare in relation to pathology. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 97:73–83.
   Google Scholar
• Broom, D.M., Johnson, K.G., 1993. Stress and animal welfare. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, W.R., 2000. Nutritional interactions with reproductive performance in dairy cattle. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 60/61:449–457.
   Google Scholar
• Caddel, J.L., Allen, E., 1993. Hay judging. Home page address: http://pods.dasnr.okstate.edu/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-2556/F-2588web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Calamari, L., Bionaz, M., Bertoni, G., 2003. A new model to evaluate the welfare status in the dairy farms. pp 77-80 in Proc. 4th Int. Congr. of European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics, Toulouse, France.
   Google Scholar
• Calamari, L., Bionaz, M., Trevisi, E., Bertoni, G., 2004. Preliminary study to validate a model of animal welfare assessment in dairy farms. pp 38-42 in Proc. 5th Int. Congr. of European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics, Leuven, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Calamari, L., Mariani, P., 1998. Effects of the hot environment conditions on the main milk cheesemaking properties. Zoot. Nutr. Anim. 24:259–271.
   Google Scholar
• Capdeville, J., Veissier, I., 2001. A method of assessing welfare in loose, housed dairy cows at farm level, focusing on animal observations. Acta Agr. Scand. A-AN 30 (Suppl.):62–68.
   Google Scholar
• Carenzi, C., Verga, M., 2009. Animal welfare: review of the scientific concept and definition. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 8 (Suppl.1):21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, N.B., Bennett, T.B., Nordlund, K.V., 2005. Monitoring Indices of Cow Comfort in Free-Stall-Housed Dairy Herds. J. Dairy Sci. 88:3876–3885.
   Google Scholar
• Darwash, A.O., Lamming, G.E., Woolliams, J.A., 1999. The potential for identifying heritable endocrine parameters associated with fertility in post-partum diary cows. Anim. Sci 68:333–347.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, M.S., 1980. Animal Suffering: The Science of Animal Welfare. Chapman and Hall ed., New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Elsasser, T.H., Klasing, K.C., Filipov, N., Thompson, F., 2000. The metabolic consequences of stress: targets for stress and priorities of nutrient use. In: G.P. Moberg and J.A. Mench.(eds.) The biology of animal stress. Basic principles and implications for animal welfare. CABI Publishing, New York, NY, USA, pp 77–110.
   Google Scholar
• Esselmont, R.J., Eddy, R.G., 1977. The control of cattle fertility: the use of computerized records. Brit. Vet. J. 133:346–355.
   Google Scholar
• Essl, A., 1998. Longevity in dairy cattle breeding: a review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 57:79–89.
   Google Scholar
• FAWC, 1993. Second report on priorities for research and development in farm animal welfare. MAFF ed., London, Tolworth, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Faye, B., Barnouin, J., 1985. Objectivation de la propreté des vaches laitières et des stabulations. L’indice de propreté. Bull. Tech. CRZV, Theix, INRA. 59:61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, D., 1995. Science, values and animal welfare: exploring the ‘inextricable connection’. Anim. Welfare 4:103–117.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, A.F, Broom, D.M., 1990. Farm animal behaviour and welfare. 3rd ed. Baillière Tindall, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, D., Weary, D.M., Pajor, E.A., Milligan, B.N., 1997. A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Anim. Welfare 6:187–205.
   Google Scholar
• Frazzi, E., Calamari, L., 1988. Il controllo dell’ambiente nei ricoveri per bovini e suini. Prontuari monografici. RDB ed., Piacenza, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Fregonesi, J.A., Leaver, J.D. 2001. Behaviour, performance and health indicators of welfare for dairy cows housed in strawyard or cubicle systems. Livest. Prod. Sci. 68:205–216.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R.J., Albright, J.L., 2000. Feeding behaviour. In: J.P.F. D’Mello (ed.) Farm animal metabolism and nutrition. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R.J., Albright, J.L., 2001. Effect of animal grouping on feeding behavior and intake of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 84(Suppl. E):E156-E163.
   Google Scholar
• Hemsworth, P.H., Barnett, J.L., Treacy, D., Madgwick, P., 1990. The heritability of the trait fear of and the association between this trait and the subsequent reproductive performance of gilts. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 25:85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Hemsworth, P.H., Price, E.O., Borgwardt, R., 1996. Behavioural responses of domestic pigs and cattle to humans and novel stimuli. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 50:43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Heringstad, B., Klemetsdal, G., Ruane, J., 2000. Selection for mastitis resistance in dairy cattle: a review with focus on the situation in the Nordic countries. Livest. Prod. Sci. 64:95–106.
   Google Scholar
• Ingvartsen, K.L., Dewhurst, R.J., Friggens, N.C., 2003. On the relationship between lactational performance and health: is it yield or metabolic imbalance that cause production diseases in dairy cattle? A position paper. Livest. Prod. Sci. 83:277–308.
   Google Scholar
• Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 1988. Alimentation des bovines, ovins et caprins. INRA ed., Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, P.F., Johannesson, T., Sandøe, P., 2001. Assessment of Farm Animal Welfare at Herd Level: Many Goals, Many Methods. Acta Agr. Scand. A-AN 30(Suppl.):26–33.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.W., Finck, B.N., 2001. TNFα and leptin: two players in an animal’s metabolic and immunologic responses to infection. J. Anim. Sci. 79(Suppl. E):E118-E127.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, C.H., 2001. Lactation and gestation in dairy cows: flexibility avoids nutritional extremes. P. Nutr. Soc. 60:527–537.
   Google Scholar
• Main, D.C.J., Kent, J.P., Wemesfelder, F., Ofner, E., Tuyttens, F.A.M., 2003. Applications for methods of on-farm welfare assessment. Anim. Welfare 12:523–528.
   Google Scholar
• Main, D.C.J., Whay, H.R., Leeb, C., Webster, A.J.F., 2007. Formal animal-based welfare assessment in UK certification schemes. Anim. Welfare 16:233–236.
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, D.F., 2003. Freestall design. Cow recommended refinements. pp 131-138 in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Dairy Housing, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
   Google Scholar
• McInerney, J., 1991. Quantitative - and molecular - genetic effects on animal well-being: adaptive mechanisms. J. Anim. Sci. 72:1641–1653.
   Google Scholar
• Mein, G.A., Neijenhuis, F., Morgan, W.F., Reinemann, D.J., Hillerton, J.E., Baines, J.R., Ohnstad, I., Rasmussen, M.D., Timms, L., Britt, J.S., Farnsworth, R., Cook, N., Hemling, T., 2001. Evaluation of bovine teat condition in commercial dairy herds: 1. Non-infectious factors. pp 347-351 in Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. on Mastitis and Milk quality, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Mormède, P., Dantzer, R., 1988. La réponse non spéficique de l’organisme aux agressions: du stress a la psychobiologie de l’adaptation. Recl. Méd. Vét. 164:707–714.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council, 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th rev. ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Neijenhuis, F., Barkema, H.W., Hogeveen, H., Noordhuizen, J.P.T.M., 2000. Classification and longitudinal examination of callused teat ends in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2795–2804.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A.J., 1996. On-farm nutrition diagnostics. pp 76-85 in Proc. 29th Annu. Conf. on Am. Bovine Pract., San Diego, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Nordlund, K.V., Cook, N.B., 2003. A flowchart for evaluating dairy cow free stalls. Agri-Practice 37:89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Oertli, B., Troxler, J., Friedli K. 1995. The development of and epidemiologically based on-farm welfare assessment system for use with dairy cows. Acta Agr. Scand. A-AN 30(Suppl.):73–77.
   Google Scholar
• Overton, M.W., Moore, D.A., Sischo, W.M., 2003. Comparison of commonly used indices to evaluate dairy cattle lying behavior. pp 125-130 in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Dairy Housing, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Price, E.O., 1984. Behavioral aspects of animal domestication. Q. Rev. Biol. 59:1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Rauw, W.M., Kanis, E., Noordhuizen-Stassen, E.N., Grommers, F.J., 1998. Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 56:15–33.
   Google Scholar
• Rollin, B.E., 2004. Annual meeting keynote address: animal agriculture and emerging social ethics for animals. J. Anim. Sci. 82:955–964.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P., Gastaldo, A., 2006. L’indice di benessere dell’allevamento. Inform. Zootec. 53(13):46–52.
   Google Scholar
• Rousing, T., Bonde, M., Sørensen, T., 2000. Indicators for the assessment of animal welfare in a dairy cattle herd with a cubicle housing system. In: H.J. Blokhuis, E.D. Ekkel and B. Wechsler (eds.) Improving health and welfare in animal production. EAAP Publ. No. 102, Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Rousing, T., Bonde, M., Sørensen, T., 2001. Aggregating welfare indicators into an operational welfare assessment system: a bottom-up approach. Acta Agr. Scand. A-AN 30 (Suppl.): 53–57.
   Google Scholar
• Rousing, T., Waiblinger, S., 2004. Evaluation of on-farm methods for testing the human-animal relationship in dairy herds with cubicle loose housing systems-test-retest and inter-observer reliability and consistency to familiarity of test person. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 85:215–231.
   Google Scholar
• Rushen, J, de Passillé, A.M.B., 1998. Behaviour, welfare and productivity of dairy cattle. Canad. J. Anim. Sci. 78 (Suppl.):3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sandem, A.I., Braastad, B.O., Be, K.E., 2002. Eye white may indicate emotional state on a frustration-contentedness axis in dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 79:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sandøe, P., Munksgaard, L., Badsgard, N.P., Jensen, K.H., 1997. How to manage the management factor - assessing animal welfare at the farm level. pp 221-230 in Proc. 4th Int. Symp. on Livestock farming systems, Foulum, Denmark, EAAP Publ. N. 89, Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M.E., Nolan, A.M., Fitzpatrick, J.L., 2001. Conceptual and methodological issues related to welfare assessment: a framework for measurement. Acta Agric. Scand. A 30 (Suppl.):5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Skidmore, A.L., Peeters, K.A.M., Sniffen, C.J., Brand, A., 1996. Monitoring dry period management. In: A. Brand, J.P.T.M. Noordhuizen and Y.H. Schukken (eds.) Herd health and production management in dairy practice. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 171–201.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J.F., Harner, J.P., Brouk, M.J., Armstrong, D.V., Gamroth, M.J., Meyer, M.J., 2000. Effect of animal grouping on feeding behavior and intake of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 84(Suppl. E):E156-E163.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, J.T., Sandøe, P., Halberg, H., 2001. Animal welfare as one among several values to be considered at farm level: the idea of an ethical account for livestock farming. Acta Agr. Scand. A-AN 30(Suppl.):11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Sprecher, D.J., Hostetler, D.E., Kaneene, J.B., 1997. A lameness scoring system that uses posture and gait to predict dairy cattle reproductive performance. Theriogenology 47:1179–1187.
   Google Scholar
• Tosi, M.V., Canali, E., Gregoretti, L., Ferrante, V., Rusconi, C., Verga, M., Carenzi., C., 2001. A descriptive analysis of welfare indicators measured on Italian dairy farms: preliminary results. Acta Agr. Scand. A-AN 30(Suppl.):69–72.
   Google Scholar
• Trevisi, E., Bionaz, M., Piccioli-Cappelli, F., Bertoni, G., 2006. The management of intensive dairy farms can be improved for better welfare and milk yield. Livest. Sci. 103:231–236.
   Google Scholar
• Trevisi, E., Gubbiotti, A., Bertoni, G., 2007. Effects of inflammation in peripartum dairy cows on milk yield, energy balance and efficiency. pp 395-396 in Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. on Energy and Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, Vichy, France.
   Google Scholar
• Trevisi, E., Pasquali, S., Archetti, I., Bertoni, G., 2001. On some welfare factors in the intensive dairy cows farms. pp 515-516 in Proc. 3rd Int. Congr. of European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics, Firenze, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Veissier, I., Boissy, A., Capdeville, J., Sarignac, C., 2000. Le bien-être des animaux d’élevage: comment peut-on le définir et l’évaluer? Point Vet. 31:25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Veissier, I., Capdevillle, J., Delval, E., 2004. Cubicle housing systems for cattle: Comfort of dairy cows depends on cubicle adjustment. J. Dairy Sci. 82:3321–3337.
   Google Scholar
• Veissier, I., Sarignac, C., Capdeville, J., 1999. Methods of assessing the welfare of domestic animals. Prod. Anim. 12:113–121.
   Google Scholar
• Verga, M., Canali, E., Ferrante, V., Mattiello, S., Monti, F., Gottardo, F., Cozzi, G., Andrighetto, I., 2000. Provision of a solid supplement to veal calves reared in individual crate or group pen. 2. Behavioural, physiological and pathological indicators. Zoot. Nutr. Anim. 26:243–252.
   Google Scholar
• Waiblinger, S., Knierim, U., Winklker, C., 2001. The development of and epidemiologically based on-farm welfare assessment system for use with dairy cows. Acta Agr. Scand. A-AN 30(Suppl.):73–77.
   Google Scholar
• Weary, D.M., Taszkun, I., 2000. Hock Lesions and Free-Stall Design. J. Dairy Sci. 83:697–702.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J., 1994. Animal welfare. A cool eye towards Eden. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Wemelsfelder, F., Lawrence, A.B., 2001. Qualitative assessment of animal behaviour as an on-farm welfare-monitoring tool. Acta Agric. Scand. A-AN 30 (Suppl.):21–25.
   Google Scholar