References

• Albright, J.L., Stricklin, W.R., 1989. Recent developments in the provision for cattle welfare. Butterworth and Co. Publishers, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, H.R., Jensen, L.R., Munksgaard, L., Ingvartsen, K.L., 1997. Influence of floor space allowance and access sites to feed trough on the production of calves and young bulls and on the cade on animal health and performance induced by overcrowding. Moreover, this solution is likely to increase farm income without any additional cost by reducing medical treatment and culling. carcass and meat quality of young bulls. Acta Agr. Scand. A-An. 47:48–56.
   Google Scholar
• Bartussek, H., 1999. A review of the animal needs index (ANI) for the assessment of animals‘ well-being in the housing systems for Austrian proprietary products and legislation. Livest. Prod. Sci.61:179–192.
   Google Scholar
• Béranger, C., 1986. Pathologie des jeunes bovins à l’engrais. In: D. Micol (ed.) Production de viande bovine. INRA Publ., Paris, France, pp 401–416.
   Google Scholar
• Botreau, R., Bonde, M., Butterworth, A., Perny, P., Bracke, M.B.M., Capdeville, J., Veissier, I., 2007. Aggregation of measures to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare. Part 1: a review of existing methods. Animal 1:1179–1187.
   Google Scholar
• Boxberger, J., 1983. Important aspects of cow behaviour as a basis for the improvement of cattle housing. Max-Eyth Agrotechnik Society ed., Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, B., Kramer, S., 1995. Prophylactic tail docking in fattening bulls. Dtsch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 102:127–129.
   Google Scholar
• Capdeville, J., Veissier, I., 2001. A method of assessing welfare in loose housed dairy cows at farm level, focusing on animal observations. Acta Agr. Scand. A-An. 51:62–68.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe, 1978. European Convention for the Protection of Animals kept for Farming Purposes, 78/923/EEC. In: Official Journal, L 323, 17/11/1978, pp 14–22.
   Google Scholar
• Cozzi, G., Gottardo, F., 2005. Feeding behaviour and diet selection of finishing limousin bulls under intensive rearing system. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 91:181–192.
   Google Scholar
• Cozzi, G., Ricci, R., Dorigo, M., Zanet, D., 2005. Growth performance, cleanliness and lameness of finishing charolais bulls housed in littered pens of different design. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 4(suppl.2):251–253.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2000. White paper on food safety. Home page address: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/library/pub/pub06_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EU-SCAHAW, 2001. The Welfare of Cattle Kept for Beef Production. Home page address: http://europa.Eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scah/out54 en
   Google Scholar
• Gonyou, H.W., 1986. Assessment of comfort and well-being in farm animals. J. Anim. Sci. 62:1796–1775.
   Google Scholar
• Gottardo, F., Ricci, R., Preciso, S., Ravarotto, L., Cozzi, G., 2004. Effect of the manger space on welfare and meat quality of beef cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 89:277–285.
   Google Scholar
• Grandin, T., 1997. Assessment of stress during handling and transport. J. Anim. Sci. 75:249–257.
   Google Scholar
• Lensink, B.J., Boivin, X., Pradel, P., le Neindre, P., Veissier, I., 2000. Reducing veal calves’ reactivity to people by providing additional human contact. J. Anim. Sci. 78:1213–1218.
   Google Scholar
• Lensink, B.J., Fernandez, X., Cozzi, G., Florand, L., Veissier, I., 2001a. The influence of farmers’ behavior on calves’ reactions to transport and quality of veal meat. J. Anim. Sci. 79:642–652.
   Google Scholar
• Lensink, B.J., Raussi, S., Boivin, X., Pyykkonen, M., Veissier, I., 2001b. Reactions of calves to handling depend on housing condition and previous experience with humans. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 70:187–199.
   Google Scholar
• Main, D.C.J., Kent, J.P., Wemelsfelder, F., Ofner, E., Tuyttens, F.A.M., 2003. Applications for methods of on-farm welfare assessment. Anim. Welfare 12:523–528.
   Google Scholar
• McGlone, J.J., 2001. Farm animal welfare in the context of other society issues: Toward sustainable systems. Livest. Prod. Sci. 72:75–81.
   Google Scholar
• Metzner, M., Hofmann, W., Heckert, H. P., Koberg, J., Raue, F., 1994. Epidemiology of inflammation of the tail tip in fattening bulls. Tierarztl. Umsch. 49:348–355.
   Google Scholar
• Mounier, L., Veissier, I., Boissy, A., 2005. Behavior, physiology, and performance of bulls mixed at the onset of finishing to form uniform body weight groups. J. Anim. Sci. 83:1696–1704.
   Google Scholar
• SAS, 2001. Statistical Analysis System User’s Guide, version 8.2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Schrader, L., Roth, H.R., Winterling, C., Brodmann, N., Langhans, W., Geyer, H., Graf, B., 2001. The occurrence of tail tip alterations in fattening bulls kept under different husbandry conditions. Anim. Welfare 10:119–130.
   Google Scholar
• Sundrum, A., Andersson, R., Postler G., 1994. Tiergerech-theitsindex 200, Ein Leitfaden zur Beurteilung von Haltungssystemen für Rinder, Kälber, Legehenen und Schweine. Verlag Köllen, Bonn, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Sundrum, A., Rubelowski, I., 2001. The meaningfulness of design criteria in relation to the mortality of fattening bulls. Acta Agr. Scand. A-An. 51:48–52.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomisto, L., Ahola, L., Martiskainen, P., 2006. Effect of animal density, group size and pen floor material on the growth and welfare of growing cattle - a literature review. Suom. Elainl. 112:635–641.
   Google Scholar
• Veissier, I., Boissy, A., de Passille, A.M., Rushen, J., van Reenen, C.G., Roussel, S., Andanson, S., Pradel, P., 2001. Calves’ responses to repeated social regrouping and relocation. J. Anim. Sci. 79:2580–2593.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, A.J.F., Main, D.C.J., Whay, H.R., 2004. Welfare assessment: Indices from clinical observation. Anim. Welfare 13:S93–S98.
   Google Scholar
• Winckler, C., 2006. On-farm welfare assessment in cattle from basic concepts to feasible assessment systems. pp 493–500 in Proc. 24th World Buiatrics Congr., Nice, France.
   Google Scholar