3,243
Views
71
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Positive indicators of cattle welfare and their applicability to on-farm protocols

Problematiche Di Benessere Nella Specie Equina

, , &
Pages 355-365 | Received 24 Jul 2007, Accepted 02 Dec 2007, Published online: 09 Mar 2016

References

  • Bahrs, E., 2005. Verhalten und Gesundheitsstatus von Mastbullen auf Gummispaltenboden. Degree Diss., Universität München, Germany.
  • Bekoff, M., Allen, C., 1997. Intentional communication and social play: how and why animals negotiate and agree to play. In: M. Bekoff and A. Byers (eds.) Animal play: evolutionary, comparative and ecological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 97–114.
  • Blackshaw, J.K., Swain, A.J., Blackshaw, A.W., Thomas, F.J.M., Gillies, K.J., 1997. The development of playful behaviour in piglets from birth to weaning in three farrowing environment. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 55:37–49.
  • Boccia, M.L., Reite, M., Laudenslager, M., 1989. On the physiology of grooming in a pigtail macaque. Physiol. Behav. 45:667–670.
  • Bock, C., 1990. Zur beurteilung tiergerechter Laufstalle fur Milchvieh. KTLB-Schrift 339. Kuratorium fur Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft, Darmstad, Germany.
  • Bouissou, M.F., 1985. Contribution à l’étude des relations interindividuelles chez les bovins domestiques femelles (Bos taurus L.). PhD degree Diss., Université de Paris, France.
  • Bouissou, M.F., Boissy, A., Le Neindre, P., Veissier, I., 2001. The social behaviour of cattle. In: L. Keeling and H. Gonyou (eds.) Social behaviour in farm animals. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp 113–145.
  • Broom, D.M., Johnson, K.G., 1993. Stress and animal welfare. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
  • Calcagnetti, D.J., Schechter, M.D., 1992. Place conditioning reveals the rewarding aspects of social interaction in in juvenile rats. Physiol. Behav. 51:667–672.
  • Carter, C.S., 1998. Neuroendocrine perspectives on social attachment and love. Psychoneuroendocrinology 23:779–818.
  • Dannenman, K., Buchenauer, D., Fliegner, H., 1985. The behaviour of calves under four levels of lighting. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 13:243–258.
  • Dellmeier, G.R., Friend, T.H., Gbur, E.E., 1985. Comparison of four methods of calf confinement. II. Behavior. J. Anim. Sci. 60:1102–1109.
  • De Pasillé, A.M., Rushen, J., 1995. Effects of spacial restriction and behavioural deprivation on openfield responses, growth and adrenocortical reactivity of calves. Page 207 (abstr.) in Proc. 29th Int. Congr. ISAE (S.M. Rutter, J. Rushen, H.D. Randle, J.C. Eddison eds.), UFAW, Potters Bar, UK.
  • De Rosa, G., Napolitano, F., Grasso, F., Bordi, A., Wemelsfelder, F., 2003. The qualitative assessment of water buffalo (Bubalus Bubalis) behaviour. Page 149 in Proc. 37th Int. Congr ISAE, Abano Terme, Italy.
  • Emmering, H., 2004. Behavioural indicators of good welfare in dairy cows: an exploratory approach. Degree Diss., University of Kassel, Germany.
  • Fagen, R.M., 1981. Animal play behaviour. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
  • Fregonesi, J.A., Leaver, J.D., 2001. Behaviour, performance and health indicators of welfare for dairy cows housed in strawyard or cubicle system. Livest. Prod. Sci. 68:205–216.
  • Fraser, A.F., Broom, D.M., 1990. Farm animal behaviour and welfare. 3rd ed. Baillière Tindall, London, UK.
  • Friend, T.H., Dellmeier, G.R., Gbur, E.E., 1985. Comparison of four methods of calf confinement. I. Physiology. J. Anim. Sci. 60:1095–1101.
  • Gomendio, M., 1988. The development of different types of play in gazelles: implications for the nature and functions of play. Anim. Behav. 36:825–836.
  • Jensen, M.B., 1999. Effects of confinement on rebounds of locomotor behaviour of calves and heifers , and the spatial preferences of calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 62:43–56.
  • Jensen, M.B., Kyhin, R., 2000. Play behaviour in group-housed dairy calves, the effect of space allowance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 67:35–46.
  • Jensen, M.B., Vestergaard, K.S., Krohn, C.C., 1998. Play behaviour in dairy calves kept in pens: the effect of social contact and space allowance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 56:97–108.
  • Kaiser, S., Classen, D., Sachser, N., 1999. Auswirkungen unterschiedlicher struktureller Anreicherungen auf das Spontanverhalten weiblicher Labormause (Stamm NMRI). KTBL-Schrift 382:56–62.
  • Keverne, E.B., Martensz, N.D., Tuite, B., 1989. Betaendorphin concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid of monkies are influenced by grooming relationships. Psychoneuroendocrinology 14:155–161.
  • Knierim, U., Carter, C.S., Fraser, D., Gartner, K., Lutgendorf, S.K., Mineka, S., Panksepp, J., Sachser, N., 2001. Group report: good welfare. Improving quality of life. In: D.M. Broom (ed.) Welfare in animals including humans. Dahlem University Press, Berlin, Germany, pp 79–100.
  • Krohn, C.C., 1994. Behaviour of dairy cows kept in extensive (loose housing/pasture) or intensive (tie stall) environments. III. Grooming, exploration and abnormal behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 42:73–86.
  • Laister, S., Regner, A.M., Zenger, K., Winckler, C., Hesse, N., Quast, R., Knierim, U., 2006. Validation of social licking as an indicator for positive emotions using heart rate measurements. EU-project Welfare Quality. Home page address: http://www.welfarequality.net.
  • Lawrence, A., 1987. Consumer demand theory and the assessment of animal welfare. Anim. Behav. 35:293–295.
  • Menke, C.A., 1996. Laufstalhaltung mit behornten Milchkuhen. Degree Diss. No. 11379, Eidgenossiche Technische Hochschule Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Metz, J.H.M., 1983. Food Competition in cattle. In: S.H. Baxter, M.R. Baxter and J.A.C. MacCormack (eds.) Farm Animal Housing and Welfare. Martinus Nijhoff Publ., Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 164–170.
  • Miller, M.N., Byers, J.A., 1991. Energetic cost of locomotor play in pronghorn fawns. Anim. Behav. 41:1007–1013.
  • Napolitano, F., De Rosa, G., Braghieri, A., Grasso, F., Bordi, A., Wemelsfelder, F., 2008. The qualitative assessment of responsiveness to environmental challenge in horses and ponies. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 109:342–354.
  • Newberry, R.C., Wood-Gush, D.G.M., Hall, J.W., 1988. Playful behaviour of piglets. Behav. Process. 17:205–216.
  • Niesink, R.J.M., van Ree, J.M., 1989. Involvement of opioid and dopaminergic systems in isolation-induced pinning and social grooming of young rats. Neuropharmacology 28:411–418.
  • Reinhardt, V., 1980. Untersuchung zum Sozialverhalten des Rindes. Eine zweijährige Beobachtung an einer halb-wilden Rinderherde (Bos indicus). Birkhäuser Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Reinhardt, V., Mutiso, F.M., Reinhardt, A., 1978. Social behaviour and social relationships between female and male prepubertal bovine calves. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 4:43–54.
  • Reinhardt, V., Reinhardt, A., 1982. Mock fighting in cattle. Behaviour 81:1–13.
  • Rousing, T., Wemelsfelder, F., 2006. Qualitative assessment of social behaviour of dairy cows housed in loose housing systems. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 101:40–53.
  • Sachser, N., Hierzel, D., Durschlag, M., 1998. Social relationships and the management of stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology 23:891–904.
  • Sato, S., 1984. Social licking pattern and its rrelationships to social dominance and live weight gain in weaned calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 12:25–32.
  • Sato, S., Sako, S., Maeda, A., 1991. Social licking patterns in cattle (Bos taurus): influence of environmental and social factors. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 32:3–12.
  • Sato, S., Tarumizu, K., Hatae, K., 1993. The influence of social factors on allogrooming in cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 38:235–244.
  • Schino, G., Scucci, S., Maestripieri, D., Turillazzi, P.G., 1988. Allogrooming as a tension-reduction mechanism: a behavioural approach. Am. J. Primatol.16:43–50.
  • Schmidt, M., Alder, H.C., 1981. Danish studies on behaviour of early weaned piglets: preliminary results. In: W. Sybesma (ed.) The welfare of pigs. Martin Nijhoff Publ., The Hague, Netherlands, pp 211–223.
  • Vila, B.L., 1994. Aspects of play behaviour in vicuna, Vicugna vicugna. Small Ruminant Res. 14:245–248.
  • Vitale, A.F., Tenucci, M., Papini, M., Lovari, S., 1986. Social behaviour of the calves of semi-wild Maremma cattle. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 16:217–231.
  • Waiblinger, S., Boivin, X., Pedersen, V., Tosi, M.V., Janczak, A.M., Visser, E.K., Jones, R.B., 2006. Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: A critical review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 101:185–242.
  • Waiblinger, S., Fresdorf, A., Spitzer, G., 2002. The role of social licking in cattle for conflict resolution. Page 122 (abstr.) in Proc.1st Eur. Conf. on Behavioural biology, Münster, Germany.
  • Wasilewski, A., 2003. Friendship in ungulates? Sociopositive relationships between non-related herd members of the same species. Home page address: http://archiv.ub.uni-marburg.de/diss/z2003/0639.
  • Wemelsfelder, F., De Rosa, G., Napolitano, F., 2006. Qualitative indicators for the on-farm monitoring of cattle welfare. EU-project Welfare Quality. Home page address: http://www.welfarequality.net.
  • Wemelsfelder, F., Hunter, E.A., Mendl, M.T., Lawrence, A.B., 2001. Assessing the ‘whole animal’: a free-choice-profiling approach. Anim. Behav. 62:209–220.
  • Wiepkema, P.R., 1985. Abnormal behaviours in farm animals: ethological implications. Neth. J. Zool. 35:279–299.
  • Wierenga, H.K., 1983. The influence of the space for walking and lying in a cubic system on the behaviour of dairy cattle. In: S.H. Baxter, M.R. Baxter and J.A.C. MacCormack (eds.) Farm animal housing and welfare. Martinus Nijhoff Publ., Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 171–180.
  • Wierenga, H.K., Metz, J.H.M., Hopster, H., 1985. The effect of extra space on the behaviour of dairy cows kept in a cubic house. In: R. Zayan (ed.) Social space for domestic animals. Martinus. Nijhoff Publ., Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 160–170.
  • Winckler, C., Buehnemann, A., Seidel, K., 2002. Social behaviour of commercial dairy herds as a parameter for on-farm welfare assessment. Page 86 (abstr.) in Proc. 36th Int. Congr. ISAE, Egmond aan Zee, The Netherlands.
  • Winckler, C., Capdeville, J., Gebresenbet, G., Horning, B., Roiha, U., Tosi, M., Waiblinger, S., 2003. Selection of parameters for on-farm wefare-assessment protocols in cattle and buffalo. Anim. Welfare 12:619–624.
  • Wood, M.T., 1977. Social grooming patterns in two herds of monozygotic twin dairy cows. Anim. Behav. 25:635–642.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.