100
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Main Paper

Harmonization of welfare standards for the protection of pigs with the EU rules: the case of Croatia

Armonizzazione Con Gli Standard Di Benessere Animale Dell’Unione Europea Per I Suini: Il Caso Studio Della Croazia

, , , &
Pages 21-38 | Published online: 09 Mar 2016

References

  • Akos, K., Bilkei, G., 2004. Comparison of the reproductive performance of sows kept outdoors in Croatia with that of sows kept indoors. Livest. Prod. Sci. 85:293–298.
  • Amon, B., Kryvoruchko, V., Fröhlich, M., Amon, T., Pöllinger, A., Mösenbacher, I., Hausleitner, A., 2007. Ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from a straw flow system for fattening pigs: Housing and manure storage. Livest. Sci. 112:199–207.
  • Anderson, I. L., Bøe, K. E., 1999. Straw bedding or concrete floor for loose-housed pregnant sows: Consequences for aggression, production and physical health. Acta Agr. Scand. 49:190–195.
  • Antunovic, B., Kralik, G., Florijancic, T., 2004a. Ethological and ecological aspects of pig production in
  • Croatia. Acta Agr. Slov. Suppl. 1:15–20. Home page address: http://www.bfro.uni-lj.si/zoo/publikacije/zbornik/suplementi/sup1/PDF/1–2004-15–20.pdf
  • Antunovic, B., Kralik, G., Margeta, V., 2004b. Adjustment of swine housing conditions to EU member countries legislation. Krmiva 46:313–320.
  • Blackshaw, J.K., Thomas, F.J., Lee, J.A., 1997. The effect of a fixed or free toy on the growth rate and aggressive behaviour of weaned pigs and the influence of hierarchy on initial investigation of the toys. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 53:203–212.
  • Blanes-Vidal, V., Hansen, M.N., Pedersen, S., Rom, H.B., 2008. Emissions of ammonia, methane and nitrous oxide from pig houses and slurry: Effects of rooting material, animal activity and ventilation flow. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 124:237–244.
  • Bracke, M.B.M., 2007a. Recreational devices. In: A. Verlade and R. Geers (ed.) On-farm monitoring of pig welfare. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp 141–145.
  • Bracke, M.B.M., 2007b Animal-based parameters are no panacea for on-farm monitoring of farm animal welfare. Anim. Wel. 16:229–231.
  • CBSRC-Central Bureau of Statistics - Republic of Croatia, 2009. Number of livestock and poultry. In: Communication, 1.1.10., 31/03/2009. Home page address: http://www.dzs.hr/hrv/publication/2009/1–1-10_1h2009.htm
  • Courboulay, V., 2007. Cleanliness. In: A. Verlade and R. Geers (ed.) On-farm monitoring of pig welfare. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp 117–120.
  • Dawkins, M.S., 2006. Through animal eyes: what behaviour tells us. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 100:4–10.
  • Edwards, S.A., Lightfoot A.L., 1986. The effect of flooring type in farrowing pens on pig injury. II. Leg and teat damage of sows. Br. Vet. J. 142:441–445.
  • EC-European Commission, 1991. Council Directive of 19 November 1991 laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs, 91/630/EEC In: Official Journal, L 340, 11/12/1991, pp 33–38.
  • EC-European Commission, 1998. Council Directive of 20 July 1998 concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes, 98/58/EC. In: Official Journal, L 221, 08/08/1998, pp 23–27.
  • EC-European Commission, 2001. Commission Directive of 9 November 2001 amending Directive 91/630/EEC laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs, 2001/93/EC. In: Official Journal, L 316, 01/12/2001, pp 36–38.
  • EC-European Commission, 2006. Screening Report – Croatia. Chapter 11. Agriculture and Rural Development, 17/07/2006. Home page address: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/croatia/screening_report_11_hr_internet_en.pdf
  • EC-European Commission, 2007. Chapter 11. Agriculture and Rural Development. In: Croatia 2007 Progress Report - Commission Staf Working Document, SEC(2007) 1431, Brussels, 6/11/2007, pp. 35. Home page address: http://www.mvpei.hr/ei/download/2007/11/14/Croatia_Progress_Reports__2007_en.pdf
  • EU-European Union, 2007. Overview of the European Union activities - Agriculture. Home page address: http://europa.eu/pol/agr/overview_en.htm
  • FAWC-Farm Animal Welfare Council, 2007. Five Freedoms.. Home page address: http://www.fawc.org.uk/freedoms.htm
  • Gallois, M., Cozler, Y.L., Prunier, A., 2005. Influence of tooth resection in piglets on welfare and performance. Prev. Vet. Med. 69:13–23.
  • Geers, R., 2007. Lying behaviour (Location, posture, duration). In: A. Verlade and R. Geers (ed.) On-farm monitoring of pig welfare. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp 19–24.
  • Hawkins, D., 2006. Biomeasurement. Understanding, analysing, and communicating data in the biosciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Hörning, B. 2007a. Space allowance. In: A. Verlade and R. Geers (ed.) On-farm monitoring of pig welfare. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp 121–126.
  • Hörning, B. 2007b. Quality, type and amount of bedding. In: A. Verlade and R. Geers (ed.) On-farm monitoring of pig welfare. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp 127–134.
  • Hörning, B. 2007c. Floor type. In: A. Verlade and R. Geers (ed.) On-farm monitoring of pig welfare. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp 135–140.
  • Jemersic, L., Cvetnic, Z., Tolak, I., Spicic, S., Grom, J., Barlic-Maganja, D., Terzic, S., Hostnik, P., Lojkic, M., Humski, A., Habrun, B., Krt, B., 2004. Detection and genetic characterization for porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) in pigs from Croatia. Res. Vet. Sci. 77:171–175.
  • Juric, I., Mikulic, D., Dikic, M., Curik, I., Kolega, A., Knjaz, V., 2000. Competitiveness of Livestock Production in Croatia in the Process of Joining the EU. Agricolturae Ceonsectus Scientificus,68:79–84.
  • Kirkden, R.D., Pajor, E.A., 2006. Using preference, motivation and aversion tests to ask scientific questions about animal’s feelings. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 100:29–47.
  • Mauch, C., Bilkei, G., 2004. Actinobacillus suis, a potential cause of abortion in gilts and low parity sows. Vet. J. 168:186–187.
  • McGlone, J.J., Hellman, J.M., 1988. Local and general anaesthetic effects on behaviour and performance of two- and seven-week old castrated and uncastrated piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 66:3049–3058.
  • MAFWM-Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management, 2005. Pig production development programme. Croatian Government. Home page address: www.mps.hr/pr/skini_dokument.asp?file=publikacije/Operativni_program_razvi-tka_svinjogojske_proizvodnje_u_RH.doc
  • MAFWM-Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management, 2006. SAPARD Programme - Agriculture and Rural Development Plan, 2005–2006. Croatian Government. Home page address: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/external/enlarge/countries/croatia/plan_en.pdf
  • Misir, A., 2003. Croatia livestock and products. Pork market, brief update. GAIN Report HR3018, USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, USA Embassy, Croatia. Home page address: http://www.fas.usda.gov/gainfiles/200310/145986292.pdf
  • SAS, 2008. User’s Guide: Statistics, Version 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
  • Smulders, D., Verbeke, G., Mormède, P., Geers, R., 2006. Validation of a behavioural observation tool to assess pig welfare. Physiol. Behav. 89:438–447.
  • Spoolder, H.A.M., 2007. Fear of humans. In: A. Verlade and R. Geers (ed.) On-farm monitoring of pig welfare. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp 79–84.
  • Taylor, A.A., Weary, D.M., Lessard, M., Braithwaite, L., 2001. Behavioural responses of piglets to castration: the effect of piglet age. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 73:35–43.
  • Tuytten, F.A.M., 2005. The importance of straw for pig and cattle welfare: A Review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 92:261–282.
  • Veissier, I., Butterworth, A., Bock, B., Roe, E., 2008. European approaches to ensure good animal welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 113(4):279–297.
  • Verlade, A., Geers, R., 2007. On-farm monitoring of pig welfare. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands.
  • Whay, H.R., Leeb, C., Main, D.C.J., Green, L.E., Webster A.J.F., 2007. Preliminary assessment of finishing pig welfare using animal-based measurements. Anim. Welfare 16:209–211.
  • Yeates, J.W., Main, D.C.M., 2008. Assessment of positive welfare: A review. Vet. J. 175:293–300.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.