Assessing the Most Suitable Floor System for Growing-Finishing Piggery Under Tropical Conditions Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

References

• AnandaJ. HerathG. 2003. The use of Analytic Hierarchy Process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning. Forest Policy Econ. 5:13-26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AverósX. BrossardL. DourmadJ-Y. de GreefK.H. EdgeH.L. EdwardsS.A. Meunier-SalaünM.C. 2010. A meta-analysis of the combined effect of housing and environmental enrichment characteristics on the behaviour and performance of pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 127:73-85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BollojuN. 2001. Aggregation of analytic hierarchy process models based on similarities in decision makers’ preferences. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 128:499-508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BuffingtonD.E. Collazo-ArochoA. CantonG.H. PittD. ThatcherW.W. CollierR.J. 1981. Black Globe Humidity-Index (BGHI) as comfort equation for dairy cows. T. ASAE 24:711-714.
   Google Scholar
• CaldaraF.R. RosaP.S.G. FerreiraR.A. NayanaM. De ReisN.M.O. NääsI.A. Almeida PazI.C.L. GarciaR.G FerreiraV.M.O.S. 2012. Behaviour, performance and physiological parameters of pigs reared in deep bedding. Eng. Agric. 32:38-46.
   Google Scholar
• CordeiroM.B. TinôcoI.F.F. OliveiraP.A.V. MenegaliI. GuimarãesM.C.C. BaêtaF.C. SilvaJ.N. 2007. Effect of different raising systems on the thermal environment comfort and swine productive performance under spring conditions. Rev. Bras. Zootecn. 36:1597-1602.
   Google Scholar
• CorrêaE.K. PerdomoC.C. JacondinoI.F. BarioniW. 2000. Environmental condition and performance in growing and finishing swine raised under different types of litter. Rev. Bras. Zootecn. 29:2072-2079.
   Google Scholar
• Dalla CostaO.A. AmaralA.L. LudkeJ.V. ColdebellaA. FigueiredoE.A.P. 2008. Desempenho, características de carcaça, qualidade da carne e condição sanitária de suínos criados nas fases de crescimento e terminação nos sistemas confinado convencional e de cama sobreposta. Cienc. Rural 38:2307-2313.
   Google Scholar
• DayJ.E.L. van de WeerdH.A. EdwardsS.A. 2008. The effect of varying lengths of straw bedding on the behaviour of growing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 109:249-260.
   Google Scholar
• GentryJ.G. Mc GloneJ.J. BlantonJ.R. MillerM.F. 2002. Alternative housing systems for pigs: influences on growth, composition and pork quality. J. Anim. Sci. 80:1781-1790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GilhespyS.L. WebbJ. ChadwickD.R. MisselbrookT.H. KayR. CampV. RetterA. BasonA.L. 2009. Will additional straw bedding in buildings housing cattle and pigs reduce ammonia emissions? Biosyst. Eng. 102:180-189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HötzelM.J. LopesE.J.C. de OliveiraP.A.V. GuidoniA.L. 2009. Behaviour and performance of pigs finished on deep bedding with wood shavings or rice husks in summer. Anim. Welfare 18:65-71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KarlenG.A.M. HemsworthP.H. GonyouH.W. FabregaE. StromD.A. SmitsR.J. 2007. The welfare of gestating sows in conventional stalls and large groups on deep litter. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 105:87-101.
   Google Scholar
• KunzA. HigarashiM.M. OliveiraP.A. 2005. Tecnologias de manejo e tratamento de dejetos de suínos estudadas no Brasil. Cadernos de Ciência & Tecnologia 22:651-665.
   Google Scholar
• MakeitRational, 2010. Available from: http://makeitrational.com
   Google Scholar
• MorrisonR.S. HemsworthP.H. CroninG.M. CampbellR.G. 2003. The social and feeding behaviour of growing pigs in deep-litter, large group housing systems. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 82:173-188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorrisonR.S. JohnstonL.J. HilbrandsA.M. 2007. The behaviour, welfare, growth performance and meat quality of pigs housed in a deep-litter, large group housing system compared to a conventional confinement system. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 103:12-24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OliveiraP.A.V. 2000. Produção de suínos em sistema “deep bedding”: experiência brasileira. pp 101-107 in Proc. 5th Int. Seminar on Pork, São Paulo, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• PauloR.M. TinôcoI.F.F. OliveiraP.A.V. SouzaC.F. BaetaF.C. CeconP.R. 2009. Evaluation of the emitted ammonia from deep beddings and concrete floor used in the swine production. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agric. Amb. 13:210-213.
   Google Scholar
• Rosado JúniorA.G. LobatoJ.F.P. MüllerC. 2011. Building consolidated performance indicators for an agribusiness company: a case study. Rev. Bras. Zootecn. 40:454-461.
   Google Scholar
• RostagnoH.S. AlbinoL.F.T. DonzeleJ.L. 2005. Tabelas brasileiras para aves e suínos: composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais. University of Viçosa Press, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• SaatyT.L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process, planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw Hill Publ., New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• SaatyT.L. 2008. Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int. J. Services Sci. 1:83-98.
   Google Scholar
• SaatyT.L. VargasL.G. 1998. Diagnosis with dependent symptoms: Bayes theorem and the analytic hierarchy process. Oper. Res. 46:491-502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TuyttensF.A.M. 2005. The importance of straw for pig and cattle welfare: a review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 92:261-282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangK. WeiB. ZhuS. YeZ. 2011. Ammonia and odour emitted from deep litter and fully slatted floor systems for growing-finishing pigs. Biosyst. Eng. 109:203-210.
   Google Scholar
• ZangY.T. TanY.P. HuY.N. LuC.H. 2012. Construction of index system for external risk factors of disease on large-scale farm based on the analytic hierarchy process. Procedia Eng. 37:274-280.
   Google Scholar