Chemical Composition, in Vitro Digestibility and Gas Production of Brachiaria Managed Under Different Forage Allowances

References

• Allen V.G. BatelloC. Berretta E.J. HodgsonJ. KothmannM. LiX. MclvorJ. MilneJ. MorrisC. PeetersA. SandersonM.,2011. An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. Grass Forage Sci. 66: 2-28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOAC, 2005. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Buxton D.R. Redfearn D.D.,1997. Plant limitations to fiber digestion and utilization. J. Nutr. 127: 814-818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro G.H.F. Graça D.S. Gonçalves L.C. Mauricio R.M. Rodriguez N.M. BorgesI. Tomich T.R.,2007. Cinética de degradação e fermentação ruminal da Brachiaria brizantha cv. marandu colhida em diferentes idades ao corte. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zoo. 59: 1538-1544.
   Google Scholar
• De Souza-Kaneshima A.M. SimioniC. Felismino M.F. Mendes-Bonato A.B. Risso-PascottoC. PessimC. Pagliarini M.S. Do Valle C.B.,2010. Meiotic behaviour in the first interspecific hybrids between Brachiaria brizantha and Brachiaria decumbens. Plant Breeding 129: 186-191.
   Google Scholar
• FranceJ. Dhanoa M.S. Theodorou M.K. Lister S.J. Davies D.R. IsacD.,1993. Model to interpret gas accumulation profiles associated with in vitro degradation of ruminant feeds. J. Theor. Biol. 163: 99-111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GetachewG. BlummelM. Makkar H.P.S. BeckerK.,1998. In vitro gas measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feeds: a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 72: 261-281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GetachewG. Robinson P.H. De Peters E.J. Taylor S.J.,2004. Relationships between chemical composition, dry matter degradation and in vitro gas production of several ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 111: 57-71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare D.M. TatsapongP. PhengphatS.,2009. Herbage yield and quality of Brachiaria cultivars, Paspalum atrotum and Panicum maximum in north-east Thailand. Trop. Grasslands 43: 65-72.
   Google Scholar
• Jung H.G. Allen M.S.,1995. Characteristics of plant cell walls affecting intake and digestibility of forages by ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 73: 2774-2790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães M.A.,2010. Características morfogênicas, estruturais e composição química de cultivares de Brachiaria sub-metidas a níveis de oferta de forragem sob pastejo rotativo. Degree Diss., Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Mauricio R.M. Mould F.L. Dhanoa M.S. OwenE. Channa K.S. Theodorou M.K.,1999. A semi-automated in vitro gas production technique for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 79: 321-330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mc Dougal E.I.,1949. Studies on ruminal saliva. The composition and output of sheep’s saliva. Biochem. J. 43: 99-109.
   Google Scholar
• Menke K.H. SteingassH.,1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Dev. 28: 7-55.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens D.R.,1987. Predicting intake and digestibility using mathematical models of ruminal function. J. Anim. Sci. 64: 1548-1558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nave R.L.G. Pedreira C.G.S. Lima C.G.D.,2009. Canonical correlations amonschemical, physical and morphological characteristics of xaraes palisadegrass under rotational grazing. Sci. Agric. 66: 270-275.
   Google Scholar
• Nave R.L.G. Pedreira C.G.S. Pedreira B.C.,2010. Nutritive value and physical characteristics of Xaraes Palisadegrass as affected by grazing strategy. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 40: 285-293.
   Google Scholar
• Pell A.N. SchofieldP.,1993. Computerized monitoring of gas production to measure forage digestion in vitro. J. Dairy Sci. 76: 1063-1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russel B.J. O’Connor J.D. Fox D.J. Van Soest P.J. Sniffen C.J.,1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluation cattle diets: ruminal fermentation. J. Dairy Sci. 70: 3551-3581.
   Google Scholar
• SAS,2002. SAS user’s guide: statistics. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary NC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Sniffen C.J., O’ Connor D.J. Van Soest P.J.,1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: carbohydrate and protein availability. J. Anim. Sci. 70: 3562-3577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodorou M.K. Williams B.A. Dhanoa M.S.,1994. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetic of ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 48: 185-197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilley J.M.A. Terry R.A.,1963. A two stage technique for in vitro digestion of forages crops. Grass Forage Sci. 18: 104-111.
   Google Scholar
• USDA, 1999. Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd ed. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service ed., Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• VanSoest P.J.,1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2nd ed. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• VanSoest P.J. Robertson J.B. Lewis B.A.,1985. Analysis of forage and fibrous foods. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Velásquez P.A.T. Berchielli T.T. Reis R.A. Rivera A.R. Dian P.H.M. Teixeira I.A.M.A.,2010. Composição química, fracionamento de carboidratos e proteínas e digestibilidade in vitro de forrageiras tropicais em diferentes idades de corte. Rev. Bras. Zootecn. 39: 1206-1213.
   Google Scholar
• Vigna B.B.Z. JungmannL. Francisco P.M. Zucchi M.I. Valle C.B. Souza A.P.,2011. Genetic diversity and population structure of the Brachiaria brizantha germplasm. Trop. Plant Biol. 4: 157-169.
   Google Scholar
• Wattiaux M.A. Mertens D.R. Satter L.D.,1991. Effect of source and amount of fiber on kinetics of digestion and specific gravity of forage particles in the rumen. J. Dairy Sci. 74: 3872-3883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss W.P.,1994. Estimation of digestibility of forages by laboratory methods. In:Fahey G.C.Jr. Collins M. Mertens D.R. (eds.) Forage quality evaluation and utilization. American Society of Agronomy Publ., Madison, WI, USA, pp 644-651.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson J.R. Brown R.H. Windham W.R.,1983. Influence of leaf anatomy on dry matter digestibility of C3, C4, and C3/C4 intermediate types of Panicum species. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 23: 141-146.
   Google Scholar