Genetic Diversity in Four Populations of Nguni (Zulu) Sheep Assessed by Microsatellite Analysis

References

• Agaviezor B.O. Gunn H.H. Amusan S.A. Imumorin I.G., 2013. Gene flow between Nigerian sheep breeds as revealed by microsatellite DNA markers. J. Anim. Prod. Adv. 3: 35-39.
   Google Scholar
• AroraR. BhatiaS. Mishra B.P. Joshi B.K., 2011. Population structure in Indian sheep ascertained using microsatellite information. Anim. Genet. 42: 242-250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BelkhirK. BorsaP. ChikhiL. RaufasteN. BonhommeF., 1996-2004. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5171. Université de Montpellier II ed., France. Available from: http://www.genetix.univ-montp2.fr/genetix/genetix.htm
   Google Scholar
• ChakrabortyR. JinL., 1993. A unified approach to study hypervariable polymorphisms: statistical considerations of determining relatedness and population distances. In: Chakraborty J. Epplen T. Jeffreys A.J. (eds.) DNA fingerprinting: state of the science. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp 153-175.
   Google Scholar
• CinkulovM. PopovskiZ. PorcuK., 2008. Genetic diversity and structure of the West Balkan Pramenka sheep types as revealed by microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA analysis. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 125: 417-426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DOA, 2006. South African country report on farm animal genetic resources. Department of Agriculture ed., Pretoria, South Africa. Available from: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/a1250f/annexes/CountryReports/SouthAfrica.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DorjiT. JianlinH. WafulaP. YamamotoY. SasazakiS. OyamaK. HanotteO. Lin B.Z. MannenH., 2010. Sheep genetic diversity in Bhutan using microsatellite markers. Anim. Sci. J. 81: 145-151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EvannoG. RegnautS. GoudetJ., 2005. Detecting the number of cluster of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14: 2611-2620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ExcoffierL. LavalG. SchneiderS., 2005. Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinform. 1: 47-50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO, 2011. Molecular genetic characterization of animal genetic resources. Food and Agriculture Organization ed., Roma, Italy. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2413e/i2413e00.pdf
   Google Scholar
• FAO/ISAG, 1998. Secondary guidelines for development of national farm animal genetic resources management plans. Measurements of domestic animal diversity (MoDAD): original working group report. Food and Agriculture Organization/International Society for Animal Genetics ed., Roma, Italy/ Champaign, IL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• FAO/ISAG, 2004. Secondary guidelines for development of national farm animal genetic resources management plans. Measurements of domestic animal diversity (MoDAD): recommended microsatellite markers. Food and Agriculture Organization/International Society for Animal Genetics ed., Roma, Italy/ Champaign, IL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• FaridA. O’ReillyE. DollardC. KelseyC.R.Jr., 2000. Genetic analysis of ten sheep breeds using microsatellite markers. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 80: 9-17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FelsensteinJ., 2005. PHYLIP version 3.6. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Available from: http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html
   Google Scholar
• GoudetJ., 2002. FSTAT 2.9.3.2, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices. Available from: http://www.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm
   Google Scholar
• Guo S.W. Thompson E.A., 1992. A Monte Carlo method for combined segregation and linkage analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 51: 1111-1126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlophe S.R., 2011. Genetic variation between and within six selected South African sheep breeds using random amplified polymorphic DNA and protein markers. Degree Diss., University of Zululand, South Africa. Available from: uzspace. uzulu.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10530/611/Genetic%20variation%20between%20and%20within%20six%20selected.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• ILRI, 2007. Domestic animal genetic resource information. International Livestock Research Institute ed., Nairobi, Kenya. Available from: http://dagris.ilri.cgiar.org/display.asp?ID=152
   Google Scholar
• Köhler-RollefsonI. Rathore H.S. MathiusE., 2009. Local breeds, livelihoods and livestock keepers’ rights in South Asia. Trop. Anim. Health Pro. 41: 1061-1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KrugerI., 2011. The indigenous sheep of South Africa. Agricultural Research Council ed., Pretoria, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Kunene N.W. Bezuidenhout C.C. Nsahlai I.V., 2009. Genetic and phenotypic diversity in Zulu sheep populations: implications for exploitation and conservation. Small Ruminant Res. 84: 100-107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunene N.W. FosseyA., 2006. A survey on livestock production in some traditional areas of Northern KwaZulu Natal in South Africa. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 18 :113. Available from: http://lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd18/8/kune18113.htm
   Google Scholar
• LasagnaE. BianchiM. CeccobelliS. LandiV. Martínez A.M. Luis Vega Pla J. Bermelo J.V.D. Sarti F.M., 2011. Genetic relationships and population structure in three Italian Merino-derived sheep breeds. Small Ruminant Res. 96: 111-119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MavuleB., 2013. Phenotypic characterisation of Zulu sheep: implications for conservation and improvement. Degree Diss., University of Zululand, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• MavuleB. MuchenjeV. Kunene N.W., 2013. Characterization of Zulu sheep production system: implications for conservation and improvement. Sci. Res. Essays 8: 1226-1238.
   Google Scholar
• Muigai A.W.T. Okeyo A.M. Kwallah A.K. MburuD. HannotteO., 2009. Characterization of sheep populations of Kenya using microsatellite markers: implications for conservation and management of indigenous sheep populations. Afr S. Anim. J. Sci. 39(Suppl.1):93-96.
   Google Scholar
• Nyamukanza C.C. Scogings P.F. Mbatha K.R. Kunene N.W., 2010. Forage-sheep relationships in commonly managed moist thornveld in Zululand, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Afr. J. Range For. Sci. 27: 11-19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S.D.E., 2001. Trypanotolerance in West African cattle and the population genetic effects of selection. PhD Diss., Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• PeterC. BrufordM. PerezT. DalamitraS. HewittG. ErhardtG., 2007. Genetic diversity and subdivision of 57 European and Middle-Eastern sheep breeds. Anim. Genet. 38: 37-44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard J.K. StephensM. DonnellyP., 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 155: 945-959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RamsayK. HarrisL. KotzeA., 2000. Landrace breeds: South Africa’s indigenous and locally developed farm animals. Farm Animal Conservation Trust ed., Pretoria, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• RaymondM. RoussetF., 1995. An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49: 1280-1283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReynoldsJ. Weir B.S. Cockerham C.C., 1983. Estimation of the coancestry coefficient: basis for a short-term genetic distance. Genetics 105: 767-779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N.A., 2004. Distruct: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4: 137-138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N.A. Pritchard J.K. Weber J.L. Cann H.M. Kidd K.K. Zhivotovsky L.A. Feldman M.W., 2002. Genetic structure of human populations. Science 298: 2381-2385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SomaP. KotzeA. Grobler J.P. van Wyk J.B., 2012. South African sheep breeds: population genetic structure and conservation implications. Small Ruminant Res. 103: 112-119.
   Google Scholar
• South African Indigenous Breeds, 2012. Available from: http://www.indigenousbreeds.co.za/
   Google Scholar
• TamuraK. DudleyJ. NeiM. KumarS., 2007. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 1596-1599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir B.S. Cockerham C.C., 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh F.C. Yang R.C. BoyleT., 1999. Popgene version 1.31. Microsoft window-based freeware for population genetic analysis. Quick user guide. Department of Renewable Resources ed., University of Alberta, Canada.
   Google Scholar