Effects of Hybrid and Maturity Stage on in Vitro Rumen Digestibility of Immature Corn Grain

References

• AhmedS. MinutiA. BaniP., 2013. In vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of some naturally occurring and synthetic sugars. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 12:e57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AllenM., 2012. Adjusting concentration and ruminal digestibility of starch through lactation. Available from: http://www.live-stocktrail.illinois.edu/uploads/dairynet/pap ers/Adjusting%20Concentration%20Allen %2Epdf
   Google Scholar
• AllenM.S., 1997. Relationship between fermentation acid production in the rumen and the requirement for physically effective fiber. J. Dairy Sci. 80:1447-1462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AndraeJ.G. HuntC.W. PritchardG.T. KenningtonL.R. HarrisonJ.H. KezarW. MahannaW., 2001. Effect of hybrid, maturity, and mechanical processing of corn silage on intake and digestibility by beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 79:2268-2275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOAC, 1995. Official methods of analysis. 16th ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• BalM.A. CoorsJ.G. ShaverR.D., 1997. Impact of the maturity of corn for use as silage in the diets of dairy cows on intake, digestion, and milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 80:2497-2503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BerardN.C. HolleyR.A. McAllisterT.A. OminskiK.H. WittenbergK.M. BouchardK.S. BouchardJ.J. KrauseD.O., 2009. Potential to reduce Escherichia coli shedding in cattle feces by using sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) forage, tested in vitro and in vivo. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:1074-1079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChaiW.Z. VanGelderA.H. ConeJ.W., 2004. Relationship between gas production and starch degradation in feed samples. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 114: 195-204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CorreaC.E.S. ShaverR.D. PereiraM.N. LauerJ.G. KohnK., 2002. Relationship between corn vitreousness and ruminal in situ starch degradability. J. Dairy Sci. 85:3008-3012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DrochioiuG. DrutaI. PetrovanuM. StrajeruS., 2002. A rapid method used at the Suceava Genebank to evaluate protein quality of some cereal grains. Plant Genet. Resour. Newsl. 129: 47-51.
   Google Scholar
• DuBoisM. GillesK.A. HamiltonJ.K. RebersP.A. SmithF., 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 28: 350-356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GanoeK.H. RothG.W., 1992. Kernel milkline as a harvest indicator for corn silage in Pensylvania. J. Prod. Agric. 5: 519-523.
   Google Scholar
• GiubertiG. GalloA. MasoeroF., 2011. A comparison of methods to quantify prolamin contents in cereals. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 10:e2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoeringH.K. VanSoestP.J., 1970. Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). United States Department of Agriculture-Agicultural Research Service Publ., Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• HarrisonJ.H. JohnsonL. RileyR. XuS. LoneyK. HuntC.W. SapienzaD., 1996. Effect of harvest maturity of whole plant corn silage on milk production and component yield, and passage of corn grain and starch into feces. J. Dairy Sci. 79(Suppl.1):149 (abstr.).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuhtanenP. SveinbjörnssonJ., 2006. Evaluation of methods for estimating starch digestibility and digestion kinetics in ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 130: 95-113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JensenC. WeisbjergM.R. NørgaardP. HvelplundT., 2005. Effect of maize silage maturity on site of starch and NDF digestion in lactating dairy cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 118: 279-294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JohnsonJ.C. GatesR.N. NewtonG.L. WilsonJ.P. ChandlerL.D. UtleyP.R., 1997. Yield, composition, and in vitro digestibility of temperate and tropical corn hybrids grown as silage crops planted in summer. J. Dairy Sci. 80: 550-557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JohnsonL.M. HarrisonJ.H. DavidsonD. HuntC. MahannaW.C. ShinnersK., 2003. Corn silage management: effects of hybrid, maturity, chop length, and mechanical processing on rate and extent of digestion. J. Dairy Sci. 86:3271-3299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JohnsonL.M. HarrisonJ.H. DavidsonD. RobuttiJ.L. SwiftM. MahannaW.C. ShinnersK., 2002a. Corn silage management I: effects of hybrid, maturity, and mechanical processing on chemical and physical characteristics. J. Dairy Sci. 85: 833-853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JohnsonL.M. HarrisonJ.H. DavidsonD. SwiftM. MahannaW.C. ShinnersK., 2002b. Corn silage management II: effects of hybrid, maturity, and mechanical processing on digestion and energy content. J. Dairy Sci. 85:2913-2927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KuehnC.S. LinnJ.G. JohnsonD.G. JungH.G. EndresM.I., 1999. Effect of feeding silages from corn hybrids selected for leafiness or grain to lactating dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 82:2746-2755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LanzasC. FoxD.G. PellA.N., 2007. Digestion kinetics of dried cereal grains. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 136: 265-280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LarsonJ. HoffmanP.C., 2008. Technical note: a method to quantify prolamin proteins in corn that are negatively related to starch digestibility in ruminants. J. Dairy Sci. 91: 4834-4839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MahannaB., 2005. Managing corn silage from seed to feed. pp 83-96 in Proc. 7th Western Dairy Management Conf., Reno, NV, USA.
   Google Scholar
• MasoeroF. GalloA. ZanfiC. GiubertiG. SpangheroM., 2011. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on chemical composition and rumen fermentation of different parts of plants of three corn hybrids. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 164: 207-216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MasoeroF. RossiF. PulimenoA.M., 2006. Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of stalks, leaves and cobs of four corn hybrids at different phenological stages. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 5: 215-227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MauricioR.M. MouldF.L. DhanoaM.S. OwenE. ChannaK.S. HeodorouM.K., 1999. A semiautomated in vitro gas production technique for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 79: 321-330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MuellerJ.P. GreenJ.T., 2001. Corn silage harvest techniques. Available from: http://www.extension.purdue.edu/ext-media/nch/nch-49.html
   Google Scholar
• MurphyJ.J. DalbyA., 1971. Changes in the protein fractions of developing normal and opaque-2 maize endosperm. Cereal Chem. 48: 336-349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngonyamo-MajeeD. ShaverR.D. CoorsJ.G. SapienzaD. LauerJ.G., 2008. Relationships between kernel vitreousness and dry matter degradability for diverse corn germplasm II. Ruminal and post-ruminal degradabilities. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 142: 259-274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NocekJ.E. TammingaS., 1991. Site of digestion of starch in the gastrointestinal tract of dairy cows and its effect on milk yield and composition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3598-3629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OffnerA. BachA. SauvantD., 2003. Quantitative review if in situ starch degradation in the rumen. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 106: 81-93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ØrskovE.R. ReidG.W. McDonaldI., 1981. The effects of protein degradability and food intake on milk yield and composition in cows in early lactation. Brit. Nutr. J. 45: 547-555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PeelM.C. FinlaysonB.L. McMahonT.A., 2007. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc. 4: 439-473.
   Google Scholar
• PetzenJ.S. BertoldoJ., 2011. Managing the 2011 corn crop. Available from: http://nydairyadmin.cce.cornell.edu/pdf/ne wsletter/pdf23_pdf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• PhilippeauC. LandryJ. Michalet-DoreauB., 2000. Influence of the protein distribution of maize endosperm on ruminal starch degradability. J. Sci. Food Agr. 80: 404-408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PhilippeauC. Michalet-DoreauB., 1997. Influence of genotype and stage of maturity of maize on rate of ruminal starch degradation. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 68: 25-35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RymerC. GivensD.I., 1999. Predicting the apparent disappearance of starch in the rumen of cows from the in vitro gas production profile of their diet. Page 157 in Proc. British Soc. Anim. Sci., Drayton, Stratford-on-Avon, UK.
   Google Scholar
• SAS, 2008. User’s guide, version 9.2. Inst. SAS. Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• SniffenC.J. deOndarzaM.B. WardR., 2009. Interpreting and implementing starch digestibility information in the field. pp. 148-158 in Proc. Cornell Nutrition Conf. Feed Manufacturers, East Syracuse, New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• SniffenC.J. WardR., 2011. Using starch digestibility information in ration balancing. Adv. Dairy Technol. 23: 121-133.
   Google Scholar
• SuttonJ.D. CammellS.B. PhippsR.H. HumphriesD.E. BeeverD.J., 2000. The effect of crop maturity on the nutritional value of maize silage for lactating dairy cows 2. Ruminal and post-ruminal digestion. Anim. Sci. 71: 391-400.
   Google Scholar
• TaylorC.C. AllenM.S., 2005. Corn grain endosperm type and brown midrib 3 corn silage: ruminal fermentation and N partitioning in lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 88:1434-1442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThorntonJ.H. GoodrichR.D. MeiskeJ.C., 1969. Corn maturity. II. Digestibility of nutrients and energy value of corn grain of various maturities and test weights. J. Anim. Sci. 29: 983-986.
   Google Scholar
• USDA-NRCS, 1999. Soil taxonomy. 2nd rev ed. United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service Publ., Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• VattikondaM.R. HunterR.B., 1983. Comparison of grain yield and whole-plant silage production of recommended corn hybrids. Can. J. Plant Sci. 63: 601-609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VerbičJ. StekarJ.M.A. Resnik-ČeponM., 1995. Rumen degradation characteristics and fibre composition of various morphological parts of different maize hybrids and possible consequences for breeding. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 54: 133-148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WatsonS.A., 1998. Corn marketing, processing, and utilization. In: SpragueG.F. DudleyJ.W. (ed.) Corn and corn improvement. American Society of Agronomy Publ., Madison, WI, USA, pp 881-940.
   Google Scholar
• WatsonS.A., 2003. Description, development, structure and composition of the corn kernel. In: WhiteP.J. JohnsonL.A. (ed.) Corn: chemistry and technology. International, AACC, St. Paul, MN, USA, pp 69-101.
   Google Scholar
• XuJ. HuQ. WangX. LuoJ. LiuY. TianC., 2010. Changes in the main nutrients, phytochemicals, and antioxidant activity in yellow corn grain during maturation. J. Agr. Food Chem. 58: 5751-5756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZeoulaL.M. BelezeJ.R.F. CecatoU. JobimC.C. GeronL.J.V. MaedaE.M. da Silva FalcãoA.J., 2003. Avaliação de cinco híbridos de milho (Zea mays, L.) em diferentes estádios de maturação: 3. Composição químico-bromatológica. Rev. Bras. Zootecn. 32: 556-566.
   Google Scholar