Opinion: The water footprint of biofuel production in the USA

• National Research Council. Water Implications of Biofuels Production in the United States. National Academies Press, Washington DC, USA, 1–88 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Dominguez-Faus R, Powers SE, Burken JG, Alvarez PJJ. The water footprint of biofuels. A drink or drive issue. Environ. Sci. Technol.43(9),3005–3010 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donner SD, Kucharik CJ. Corn-based ethanol production compromises goal of reducing nitrogen export by the Mississippi River. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105(11),4513–4518 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu YW, Walseth B, Suh S. Water embodied in bioethanol in the US. Environ. Sci. Technol.43(8),2688–2692 (2009)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrish DJ, Fike JH. The biology and agronomy of switchgrass for biofuels. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.24(5),423–458 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DK, Boe A. Biomass production of switchgrass in central South Dakota. Crop Sci.45,2583–2590 (2005)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Energy. Energy Demands on Water Resources: Report to Congress on the Interdependency of Energy and Water. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, USA, 1–54 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Hayes T, Haston K, Tsui M, Hoang A, Haeffele C, Vonk A. Atrazine-induced hermaphroditism at 0.1 ppb in American leopard frogs (Rana pipiens): laboratory and field evidence. Environ. Health Pers.111(4),568–575 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon KR, Carr JA, Du Preez LH, Kendall RJ, Smith EE, Van Der Kraak GJ. Effects of atrazine on fish, amphibians, and aquatic reptiles: a critical review. Crit. Rev. Toxicol.38,721–772 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz RJ, Rosenberg R. Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine Ecosystems Sci.321,926–929 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Goolsby DA, Battaglin WA, Aulenbach BT, Hooper RP. Nitrogen flux and sources in the Mississippi River Basin. Sci. Total Environ.248(2–3),75–86 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smil V. Nitrogen in crop production. An account of global flows. Global Biogeochem. Cycles13(2),647–662 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller SA, Landis AE, Theis TL. Use of Monte Carlo analysis to characterize nitrogen fluxes in agroecosystems. Environ. Sci. Technol.40(7),2324–2332 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers SE. Nutrient loads to surface water from row crop production. Int. J. Lifecycle Assess.12(6),399–407 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth RW, Boyer EW, Pabich WJ, Galloway JN. Nitrogen use in the United States from 1961 to 2000 and potential future trends. Ambio31,88–96 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers SE, Ascough LA, Nelson RG. Soil and water quality implications associated with corn stover removal and herbaceous energy crop production in Iowa. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Annual International Meeting of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. RI, USA. Paper Number 083916 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Randall GW, Mulla DJ. Nitrate nitrogen in surface waters as influenced by climatic conditions and agricultural practices. JEQ30,337–344 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justic D, Bierman VJ Jr, Scavia D, Hetland RD. Forecasting Gulf’s hypoxia: the next 50 years? Estuaries Coasts30(5),791–801 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello C, Griffin W, Landis A, Matthews H. Impact of biofuel crop production on the formation of hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. Environ. Sci. Technol.43(20),7985–7991 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. Nutrient Control Actions for Improving Water Quality in the Mississippi River Basin and Northern Gulf of Mexico Committee on the Mississippi River and the Clean Water Act: Scientific, Modeling and Technical Aspects of Nutrient Pollutant Load Allocation and Implementation. National Research Council, Washington DC, USA (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Doering OC, Diaz-Hermelo F, Howard C et al.Evaluation of Economic Costs and Benefits of Methods for Reducing Nutrient Loads to the Gulf of Mexico (Report of Task Group 6 to White House Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, Hypoxia Work Group). US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Coastal Ocean Program, Silver Spring, MD, USA (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Secchi S, Babcock B. Impact of High Crop Prices on Environmental Quality: A Case of Iowa and the Conservation Reserve Program. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University Ames, IA, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Petrolia DR, Gowda PH. Missing the boat: midwest farm drainage and Gulf of Mexico hypoxia. Rev. Agricul. Economics28(2),240–253 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribaudo MO, Heimlich R, Peters M. Nitrogen sources and Gulf hypoxia: potential for environmental credit trading. Ecological Economics52,159–168 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regalbuto JR. Cellulosic biofuels – got gasoline? Science325(5942),822–824 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

▪ Websites

• Biomass Research and Development Initiative, Increasing Feedstock Production for Biofuels Economic Drivers, Environmental Implications, and the Role of Research www.usbiomassboard.gov/pdfs/8_Increasing_Biofuels_Feedstock_Production.pdf (Accessed October 2009)
   Google Scholar
• Chesapeake Bay Commission, Biofuels And the Bay: Getting It Right to Benefit Farms, Forests and the Chesapeake (2007) www.chesbay.state.va.us/Publications/BiofuelsAndTheBay1.pdf (Accessed September 2008)
   Google Scholar
• National Agriculture Statistics Service Agricultural Chemical Usage, 2005 Field Crops Summary And 2003 Field Crops Summary http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewDocumentInfo.do?documentID=1001 (Accessed July 2008)
   Google Scholar
• ‘Roundup Ready’® Corn 2 Projected on 50 Million Acres in 2007.” Corn and Soybean Digesthttp://cornandsoybeandigest.com/cornoncorn/ (Accessed October 2008)
   Google Scholar
• EPA, Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force www.epa.gov/owow/msbasin/index.htm (Accessed September 2009).
   Google Scholar
• NOAA, Smaller Than Expected, But Severe, Dead Zone in Gulf of Mexico, July 27, 2009 www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2009/20090727_deadzone.html (Accessed October 2009)
   Google Scholar
• Aulenbach BT, Buxton HT, Battaglin WT, Coupe RH. Streamflow and nutrient fluxes of the Mississippi–Atchafalaya River Basin and subbasins for the period of record through 2005: US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007–1080 http://toxics.usgs.gov/hypoxia/mississippi/flux_ests/delivery/index.html (Accessed September 2009)
   Google Scholar
• Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force, Gulf Hypoxia Action Plan 2008 www.epa.gov/msbasin/pdf/ghap2008_update082608.pdf (Accessed October 2009)
   Google Scholar