Ethanol or gasoline? Consumer choice in the face of different fuel pricing systems in Brazil and Sweden

• Macedo I, Seabra JEA, Joao EAR. Green house gases emissions in the production and use of ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil: the 2005/2006 averages and a prediction for 2020. Biomass Bioenergy32(7),582–595 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekman SK. Biofuels in the U.S. – challenges and opportunities. Renewable Energy34(1),14–22 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldemberg J. Ethanol for a sustainable energy future. Science315,808–810 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. Directive on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. J. Eur. Union140,16–62 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• United States Congress. US Energy Independence and Security Act. Pub.L. 110–140, DC, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Wiesenthal T, Leduc G, Christidis P et al. Biofuel support policies in Europe: lessons learnt for the long way ahead. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.13,794–796 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Costa HSP, Silveira S. Evidence from markets of gasoline and ethanol in Brazil and Sweden: the consumer choice justifying the need for multiple biofuel producers. Presented at: Simon Fraser University Biofuels Workshop. Vancouver, Canada, 16 September 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sterner T. Fuel taxes: an important instrument for climate policy. Energy Policy35(6),7 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Vedenov D, Wetzstein M. Toward an optimal U.S. ethanol fuel subsidy. Energy Economics30(5),2073–2090 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Clausen TH. Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovation activities at the firm level?. Structural Change Economic Dynamics20(4),239–253 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Looty M, Pinto H Jr, Ebelling F. Automotive fuel consumption in Brazil: applying static and dynamic systems of demand s. Energy Policy37(12),8 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira AL, Prado FPA, Silveira JJ. Flex cars and the alcohol price. Energy Economics31,13 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Pop M, Van de Velde L, Vickery G et al. Determinants of consumer interest in fuel economy: lessons for strengthening the conservation argument. Biomass Bioenergy33(5),768–778 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Jeong G, Ahn J et al. Consumer preferences for alternative fuel vehicles in South Korea. Int. J. Automot. Technol. Manag.7(4),327–342 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• The Royal Society. Sustainable biofuels: prospects and challenges. Policy 41, document 01/08 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Goettemoeller A. Sustainable Ethanol: Biofuels, Biorefineries, Cellulosic Biomass, Flex-Fuel Vehicles, and Sustainable Farming for Energy Independence. Praire Oak Publishing, MO, USA, 42 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Brazilian Ministry of Mines and Energy. Monthly Bulletins of Renewable Fuels. MME, Washington, DC, USA (2010).
   Google Scholar
• West BH, López AJ, Theiss T et al.Fuel Economy and Emissions of the Ethanol-Optimized Saab 9–5 Biopower. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Roberts M. E85 and fuel efficiency: an empirical analysis of 2007 EPA test data. Energy Policy36,2 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Pindick R, Rubinfeld D. Microeconomics (6th Edition). Macmillan Publications, NY, USA (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Wagner A, Ebert S. Energy Security and Transport. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit – GTZ Energy and Transport Eschborn, Eschborn, Germany (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Petroleum Institute. Statistics Section. Swedish Petroleum Institute, Stokholm, Sweden (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Agencia Nacional do Petróleo, Gas Natural e Biocombustíveis. Annual Statistical Information. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2010a).
   Google Scholar
• Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit – GTZ. International Fuel Prices Data. Eschborn, Germany 4–5 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Agencia Nacional do Petróleo, Gas Natural e Biocombustíveis. Annual Statistical Information 2009 Section 2: National Industry of Oil and Natural Gas. Table 2.24: Refinery Capacities. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2010b).
   Google Scholar
• Radschenko S. Lags in the response of gasoline prices to changes in crude oil prices: the role of short-term and long-term shocks. Energy Economics27(4),573–602 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Honavar A. Asymmetry in retail gasoline and crude oil price movements in the United States: an application of hidden cointegration technique. Energy Economics31(3),395–402 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Ajanovic A, Haas R. Economic challenges for the future relevance of biofuels in transport in EU countries. Energy35(8),4 (2010).
   Google Scholar

▪ Websites

• JET. Time series of fuel prices. www.jet.se/prices/
   Google Scholar
• Statoil. Time series of fuel prices. www.statoil.se/FrontServlet?s=sdh&state=sdh_dynamic&viewid=1882197&showMenu=0_2
   Google Scholar
• OKQ8. Time series of fuel prices. www.okq8.se/privat/pastationen/drivmedel
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Petroleum Institute. www.spi.se
   Google Scholar
• ANP. Brazilian Agency for Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels. www.anp.gov.br/?id=502
   Google Scholar
• Petrobras. Components of gasoline price. www.br.com.br
   Google Scholar
• IBGE. Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics. Consumer price index. www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/indicadores/precos/inpc_ipca/defaultinpc.shtm
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Statistical Agency. Consumer price index. http://www.scb.se/Pages/Product____33769.aspx
   Google Scholar
• European Central Bank Statistical Data Warehouse. http://sdw.ecb.europa.eu/
   Google Scholar
• Swedish government publications. www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/10165/a/96322
   Google Scholar
• Preem. Time series of fuel prices. www.preem.se/templates/page____781.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Economagic commodity time-series. www.economagic.com/em-cgi/data.exe/var/west-texas-crude-long
   Google Scholar