The potential of fish and fish oil waste for bioenergy generation: Norway and beyond

• Taufiqurrahmi N, Bhatia S. Catalytic cracking of edible and non-edible oils for the production of biofuels. Energy Environ. Sci.4,1087–1112 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigam PS, Singh A. Production of liquid biofuels from renewable resources. Prog. Energ. Comb. Sci.37,52–68 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvanitoyannis IS, Kassaveti A. Fish industry waste: treatments, environmental impacts, current and potential uses. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech.43,726–745 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvanitoyannis IS, Ladas D. Meat waste treatment methods and potential uses. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech.43,543–559 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvanitoyannis IS. Waste Management for the Food Industries. Academic Press, USA (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Atadashi IM, Aroua MK, Abdul Aziz A. Biodiesel separation and purification: a review. Renew. Energ.36,437–443 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CY, Li RJ. Fuel properties of biodiesel produced from the crude fish oil from the soapstock of marine fish. Fuel Process. Tech.90,130–136 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuomisto HL, Helenius J. Comparison of energy and greenhouse gas balances of biogas with other transport biofuel options based on domestic agricultural biomass in Finland. Agricultur. Food Sci.17,240–251 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åhman M. Biomethane in the transport sector – an appraisal of the forgotten option. Energ. Policy38,208–217 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Ryan F., Caulfield B. Examining the benefits of using bio-CNG in urban bus operations. Transp. Res. Part D15,362–365 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury P, Viraraghavan T, Srinivasan A. Biological treatment processes for fish processing wastewater – a review. Bioresour. Technol.101,439–449 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen AC. New renewable energy developments and the climate change issue: a case study of Norwegian politics. Energ. Policy30,235–243 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabbe M, Lalander E, Lundin S, Laijon M. A review of the tidal current energy resource in Norway. Ren. Sust. Energ. Rev.13,1898–1909 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Løvseth J. The renewable energy potential of Norway and strategies for its development. Renew. Energ.6,207–214 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Preto F, Zhang F, Wang J. A study on using fish oil as an alternative fuel for conventional combustors. Fuel87,2258–2268 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenden V, Sandquist J, Horrigmo W. Forbrenningforsøk med kategori 2 fiskebiprodukter (Combustion trials with Category 2 fish residues) RUBIN Rapport Nr.183 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Niemi S, Vauhkonen V, Hiltunen et al. Results of an off-road diesel engine driven with different animal fat based biofuels. ASME 2009 Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference. Lucerne, Switzerland, 27–30 September 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Godiganur S, Murphy CS, Reddy RP. Performance and emission characteristics of a Kirloskar HA394 diesel engine operated on fish oil methyl esters. Ren. Energ.35,355–359 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou BS, El-Mashad HM, Avena-Bustillos RJ et al. Biodiesel from waste salmon. Transactions of the ASABE51,797–802 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser BR. Biodiesel production, properties and feedstocks. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant45,229–266 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas MJ. Improving the economics of biodiesel production through the use of low value lipids as feedstocks: vegetable oil soapstock. Fuel Processing Tech.86,1087–1096 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggers VR, Wisniewski Jr A, Madureira LAS, Barros AAC, Meier HF. Biofuels from waste fish oil pyrolysis: continuous production in a pilot plant. Fuel88,2135–2141 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adebanjo AO, Dalai AK, Bakshi NN. Production of diesel-like fuel and other value-added chemicals from pyrolysis of animal fat. Energ. Fuels19,1735–1741 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano-Ruiz JC, West RM, Dumesic JA. Catalytic conversion of renewable biomass resources to fuels and chemicals. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng.1,79–100 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisniewski Jr. A, Wiggers VR, Simionatto EL, Meier HF, Barros AAC, Madureira LAS. Biofuels from waste fish oil pyrolysis: chemical composition. Fuel89,563–568 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maoyun H, Xiao B, Liu S et al. Syngas production from pyrolysis of municipal solid waste (MSW) with dolomite as downstream catalysts. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis87,181–187 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Ho M, Aleklett K. A review on coal-to-liquid fuels and its coal consumption. Int. J. Energ. Res.34,848–864 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• De Klerk A. Fischer–Tropsch refining: technology selection to match molecules. Green Chem.10,1249–1279 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Weiland P. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. App. Microbiol. Biotechnol.85,849–860 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard SJT, Sollars CJ, Perry R. The reuse of spent bleaching earth: a feasibility study in waste minimisation for the edible oil industry. Bioresour. Technol.45,53–58 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Løes AK. Eksempler på Biogassanlegg. Rapport fra Studietur Til Biogassanlegg i Norge, Sverige og Danmark Oktober 2009. Bioforsk Rapport6(60), (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Poeschl M, Ward S, Owende P. Prospects for expanded utilization of biogas in Germany. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.14,1782–1797 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantz M, Svensson M, Bjornsson L, Borjesson P. The prospects for an expansion of biogas systems in Sweden – incentives, barriers and potentials. Energ. Policy35,1830–1843 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abatzoglou N, Boivin S. A review of biogas purification processes. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref.3,42–71 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan XH, Burton R, Austic G. Preparation and characterization of biodiesel produced from fish oil. Chem. Technol. Fuels Oils46,287–293 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Abe Y, Toba M, Mochizuki T, Yoshimura Y. Oxidative degradation behaviour of fatty acid methyl ester in fish oil biodiesel and improvement of oxidation stability by partial hydrogenation. J. Jpn Petrol. Inst.52,307–315 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Lin CY, Li RJ. Engine performance and emission characteristics of marine biodiesel produced from the discarded parts of marine fish. Fuel Process. Technol.90,883–888 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos ALF, Martins DU, Iha OK, Ribeiro RAM, Quirino RL, Suarez PAZ. Agro-industrial residues as low-price feedstock for diesel-like fuel production by thermal cracking. Bioresour. Technol.101,6157–6162 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lara PV, Park EY. Potential application of waste activated bleaching earth on the production of fatty acid alkyl esters using Candida cylindracea lipase in organic solvent system. Enzyme Microbial Technol.34,270–277 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Zuhair S. Production of biodiesel: possibilities and challenges. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref.1,57–66 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Garcia AJ, Esteban MB, Marquez MC, Ramos P. Biodegradable municipal solid waste: characterization and potential use as animal feedstuffs. Waste Manage.25,780–787 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelidaki I, Ahring BK. Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of livestock waste: effect of ammonia. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.38,560–564 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion processes: a review. Bioresour. Technol.99,4044–4064 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez JA, Otero L, Lema JM. A methodology for optimising feed composition for anaerobic co-digestion of agro-industrial wastes. Bioresour. Technol.101,1153–1158 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mshandete A, Kivaisi A, Rubindamayugi M, Mattiasson B. Anaerobic batch co-digestion of sisal pulp and fish wastes. Bioresour. Technol.95,19–24 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelidaki I, Petersen SP, Ahring BK. Effects of lipids on thermophilic anaerobic digestion and reduction of lipid inhibition upon addition of bentonite. App. Microbiol. Biotechnol.33,469–472 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvanitoyannis IS, Varzakas TH. Vegetable waste treatment: comparison and critical presentation of methodologies. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nut.48,205–247 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward AJ. Biogas Potential of Fish Wax (Stearin) with Cattle Manure. Animal Science Number 23. Aarhus University Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Herning, Denmark (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Kim HW, Shin HS, Oh SE. Response surface optimization of substrates for thermophilic anaerobic codigestion of sewage sludge and food waste. J. Air Waste Manage. Ass.57,309–318 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DavidssonÅ, Lovstedt C, la Cour Jansen J, Gruvberger C, Aspergen H. Co-digestion of grease trap sludge and sewage sludge. Waste Manage.28,986–992 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Ward AJ, Hobbs PJ, Holliman PJ, Jones DL. Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour. Technol.99,7928–7940 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller HB, Sommer SG, Ahring B. Methane productivity of manure, straw and solid fractions of manure. Biomass Bioenerg.26,485–495 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nges IA, Liu J. Effects of solid retention time on anaerobic digestion of dewatered-sewage sludge in mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Renew. Energ.35,2200–2206 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteban MB, Garcia AJ, Ramos P, Marquez MC. Evaluation of fruit-vegetable and fish wastes as alternative feedstuffs in pig diets. Waste Manage.27,193–200 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brezonik PK, King SO, and Mach CE. The infuence of water chemistry on trace metal bioavailability and toxicity in aquatic organisms. In: Metal Ecotoxicology. Newman MD, McIntosh AW (Eds). Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, USA (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Schattauer A, Abdoun E, Weiland P, Plöchl M, Heiermann M. Abundance of trace elements in demonstration biogas plants. Biosyst. Eng.108,57–65 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson LM, Christensson K, Björnsson L. Biogas production from crop residues on a farm-scale level in Sweden: scale, choice of substrate and utilization rate most important parameters for financial feasibility. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng.29,137–142 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven RPJM, Gregersen KH. Biogas plants in Denmark: successes and setbacks. Ren. Sust. Energ. Rev.11,116–132 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poeschl M, Ward S, Owende P. Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways. Appl. Energ.87,3305–3321 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Raghareutai T, Chavalparit O, Ongwandee M. Development and environmental sustainability for the biodiesel industry in Thailand. Int. J. Sust. Dev. World17,363–369 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountoulakis MS, Petousi I, Manios T. Co-digestion of sewage sludge to boost biogas production. Waste Manage.31,1849–1853 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Andersen O, Weinbach JE. Residual animal fat and fish for biodiesel production. Potentials in Norway. Biomass Bioenerg.34,1183–1188 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buswell AM. Anaerobic Fermentations. Bulletin Number 32. Div. State Water Survey, University of Illinois, IL, USA (1936).
   Google Scholar
• Gungor-Demirci G, Demirer GN. Effect of initial COD concentration, nutrient addition, temperature and microbial acclimation on anaerobic treatability of broiler and cattle manure. Bioresour. Biotechnol.93,109–117 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alptekin E, Canakci M. Determination of the density and the vicosities of biodiesel – diesel fuel blends. Renew. Energ.33,2623–2630 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zervas E, Bikas G. CO2 changes from the increasing percentage of diesel passenger cars in Norway. Energ. Fuels19,1919–1926 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Riley H. Energi og tidsforbruk ved forskjellige jordarbeidingssystem. NJF Seminar Nr. 130 ”Reduceret Jordarbejdning”, Horsens. In: Rapporter från Jordbearbetningsavd Nr. 77, SLU, 196–206 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Walla C, Schneeberger W. The optimal size of biogas plants. Biomass Bioener.32,551–557 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar

▪ Websites

• Statistics Norway 2010. www.ssb.no/en/yearbook/
   Google Scholar
• FAO world fish production, trade and utilization. www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1890t/i1890t.pdf
   Google Scholar
• RUBIN homepage (in Norwegian). www.rubin.no/index.php?current_page=hovedsiden
   Google Scholar
• FAO Fish and fishery products, world apparent consumption statistics based on food balance sheets. ftp://ftp.fao.org/FI/CDrom/CD_yearbook_2008/root/food_balance/introduction.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate. www.nve.no/en/Energy/
   Google Scholar
• Tobiasen L, Knudsen J. Alternative additives. Dong Energy Report PSO FU 6532. http://130.226.56.153/rispubl/NEI/NEI-DK-5024.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Potensialstudie for biogass i Norge. Enova report OR 21.08 (in Norwegian). http://naring.enova.no/file.axd?fileDataID=19b5e6d9-e51f-4eb8-b1f3–4555ef2808f7
   Google Scholar
• IEA. The contribution of natural gas vehicles to sustainable transport. www.iea.org/papers/2010/natural_gas_vehicles.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nyteknik Bilgas av kospill årets uppfinning 2010 (in Swedish). www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/bioenergi/article2492699.ece
   Google Scholar
• RUBIN Varestrømanalyse for 2009 (in Norwegian). www.rubin.no/index.php?current_page=nyheter&lang=no&id=183
   Google Scholar
• European Commission health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption 2002. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2002:273:0001:0095:EN:PDF
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Energy Agency. Förslag till en sektorsövergripande biogasstrategi (in Swedish). www.energimyndigheten.se/sv/Press/Pressmeddelanden/Pressmeddelanden-2010/Nationell-strategi-for-biogas
   Google Scholar
• Kronikk. Lag biogass av gjødselen (in Norwegian). www.nationen.no/meninger/Kronikk/article5067631.ece
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. Enige om prinsippene for et felles elsertifikatmarked. Pressemelding, 07.09.2009. Nr: 102/09 (in Norwegian). www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/oed/pressesenter/pressemeldinger/2009/enige-om-prinsippene-for-felles-elsertif.html?id=575821
   Google Scholar
• Kraftnytt. Mer kraft med elsertifikater. Kraftnytt 61430, 10/01/2011 (in Norwegian). www.kraftnytt.no/default.asp?page=1&article=61430
   Google Scholar
• Toll Customs Norway. Avgifter på mineralske produkter MV. Rundskriv Nr. 11/2011 S (in Norwegian). www.toll.no/upload/aarsrundskriv/Mineralske%20produkter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Forskning i bioenergi. Enkel og billig opgradering af biogas (in Danish). www.biopress.dk/PDF/Nyhedsbrev_15–2011_07.pdf/view
   Google Scholar
• ASTM International Standards (2011). www.astm.org/Standards/D6751.htm
   Google Scholar
• GC Rieber AS Norway. www.gcrieber.no/?page=70&show=128&news=142
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/agrista/2009/table_en/en354.htm
   Google Scholar