Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic biomass

• Wyman CE. Twenty years of trials, tribulations, and research progress in bioethanol technology selected key events along the way. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.91–93,5–21 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reese ET, Mandels M. Degradation of cellulose and its derivatives. Enzymic degradation. High Polymers5(5),1079–1094 (1971).
   Google Scholar
• Wright JD. Ethanol from biomass by enzymatic-hydrolysis. Chem. Eng. Prog.84(8),62–74 (1988).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright JD. Ethanol from lignocellulose: an overview. Energ. Prog.8(2),71–78 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Montencourt BS, Kelleher TJ, Eveleigh DE. Biochemical nature of cellulases from mutants of Trichoderma reesei. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp.10,15–26 (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Spindler DD, Wyman CE, Grohmann K, Mohagheghi A. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of pretreated wheat straw to ethanol with selected yeast strains and β-glucosidase supplementation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.21,529–540 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• American Chemical Society. Novozymes, DOE claim cost cut. Chemical and Engineering News, 10 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• American Institute of Chemical Engineering. Genencor makes strides in the conversion of biomass to ethanol. Chem. Eng. Prog.15 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Wooley R, Ruth M, Glassner D, Sheehan J. Process design and costing of bioethanol technology: a tool for determining the status and direction of research and development. Biotechnol. Prog.15,794–803 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooley R, Ruth M, Sheehan J, Ibsen K, Majdeski H, Galvez A. Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis: Current and Futuristic Scenarios. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Aden A, Ruth M, Ibsen K et al. Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover. In: National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report # NREL/TP-510–32438. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA (2002)
   Google Scholar
• Wyman CE. What is (and is not) vital to advancing cellulosic ethanol. Trends Biotechnol.25(4),153–157 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingren A, Galbe M, Roslander C, Rudolf A, Zacchi G. Effect of reduction in yeast and enzyme concentrations in a simultaneous-saccharification-and-fermentation-based bioethanol process. Technical and economic evaluation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.,121–124,485–499 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Himmel ME, Ruth MF, Wyman CE. Cellulase for commodity products from cellulosic biomass. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol,10(4),358–364 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Himmel ME. biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science316(5827),982 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Yang B, Wyman CE. BSA treatment to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose in lignin containing substrates. Biotechnol. Bioeng.94(4),611–617 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan X, Kadla JF, Ehara K, Gilkes N, Saddler JN. Organosolv ethanol lignin from hybrid poplar as a radical scavenger: relationship between lignin structure, extraction conditions, and antioxidant activity. J. Agric. Food Chem.54(16),5806–5813 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen F, Dixon RA. Lignin modification improves fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. Nat. Biotechnol.25(7),759–761 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen F, Reddy MSS, Temple S, Jackson L, Shadle G, Dixon RA. Multi-site genetic modulation of monolignol biosynthesis suggests new routes for formation of syringyl lignin and wall-bound ferulic acid in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant J.48(1),113–124 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyropoulos DS, Liu Y. The role and fate of lignin’s condensed structures during oxygen delignification. J. Pulp Paper Sci.26(3),107–113 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, Holtzapple M, Ladisch MR, Lee YY. Coordinated development of leading biomass pretreatment technologies. Bioresource Technol.96(18),1959–1966 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris VJ, Kirby AR, Gunning AP. Atomic Force Microscopy for Biologists. Imperial College Press, London, UK (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Kirby AR, Gunning AP, Waldron KW, Morris VJ, Ng A. Visualization of plant cell walls by atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J.70(3),1138–1143 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thimm JC, Burritt DJ, Ducker WA, Melton LD. Celery (Apium graveolens L.) parenchyma cell walls examined by atomic force microscopy: effect of dehydration on cellulose microfibrils. Planta212(1),25–32 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ding S-Y, Himmel ME. The maize primary cell wall microfibril: a new model derived from direct visualization. J. Agric. Food Chem.54(3),597–606 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmel ME, Ding S-Y, Johnson DK et al. biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science315(5813),804–807 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris D, Bulone V, Ding S-Y, De Bolt S. Tools for cellulose analysis in plant cell walls. Plant Physiol.153(2),420–426 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ding S-Y, Himmel ME. Anatomy and ultrastructure of maize cell walls: an example of energy plants. In: Biomass Recalcitrance, Deconstructing the Plant Cell Wall for Bioenergy. Himmel ME (Ed.). Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, UK 38–60 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Fan LT, Lee Y-H, Beardmore DH. Major chemical and physical features of cellulosic materials as substrates for enzymic hydrolysis. Adv. Biochem. Eng.14,101–117 (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Lee Y-H, Fan LT. Kinetic studies of enzymatic hydrolysis of insoluble cellulose: (II). Analysis of extended hydrolysis times. Biotechnol. Bioeng.25,939–966 (1983).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghose TK, Bisaria VS. Studies on the mechanism of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic substances. Biotechnol. Bioeng.21,131–146 (1979).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood TM, McCrae SI, Bhat KM. The mechanism of fungal cellulase action. Synergism between enzyme components of Penicillium pinophilum cellulase in solubilizing hydrogen-bond ordered cellulose. Biochem. J.260,37–43 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan LT, Gharpuray MM, Lee Y. Evaluation of pretreatments for enzymatic conversion of agricultural residues. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symposium11,29–45 (1981).
   Google Scholar
• Sasaki T, Tanaka T, Nanbu N, Sato Y, Kainuma K. Correlation between x-ray diffraction measurements of cellulose crystalline structure and the susceptibility of microbial cellulase. Biotechnol. Bioeng.21,1031–1042 (1979).
   Google Scholar
• Sinitsyn AP, Gusakov AV, Vlasenko EY. Effect of structural and physico-chemical features of cellulosic substrates on the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.30,43–59 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grethlein HE. The effect of pore size distribution on the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic substrates. Nat. Biotechnol.3,155–160 (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Puri VP. Effect of crystallinity and degree of polymerization of cellulose on enzymatic saccharification. Biotechnol. Bioeng.26,1219–1222 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannigrahi P, Miller SJ, Ragauskas AJ. Effects of organosolv pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis on cellulose structure and crystallinity in Loblolly pine. Carbohydr. Res.345(7),965–970 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ooshima H, Sakata M, Harano Y. Adsorption of cellulase from Trichoderma viride on cellulose. Biotechnol. Bioeng.25(12),3103–3114 (1983).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paralikar KM, Betrabet SM. Electron-diffraction technique for determination of cellulose crystallinity. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.21(4),899–903 (1977).
   Google Scholar
• Puls J, Wood TM. The degradation pattern of cellulose by extracellular cellulases of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms. Bioresource Technol.36(1),15–19 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Hall M, Bansal P, Lee JH, Realff MJ, Bommarius AS. Cellulose crystallinity – a key predictor of the enzymatic hydrolysis rate. FEBS J.277(6),1571–1582 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield SD, Mooney C, Saddler JN. Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Bio. Prog.15(5),804–816 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Converse AO. Substrate factors limiting enzymatic hydrolysis. In: Bioconversion of Forest and Agricultural Plant Residue. Saddler JN (Ed.). CAB International, Wallingford, UK 93–106 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Kim S, Holtzapple MT. Effect of structural features on enzyme digestibility of corn stover. Bioresour. Technol.97(4),583–591 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivers DB, Emert GH. Factors affecting the enzymatic hydrolysis of municipal-solid-waste components. Biotechnol. Bioeng.31(3),278–281 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivers DB, Emert GH. Factors affecting the enzymatic hydrolysis of bagasse and rice straw. Biol. Wastes26,85–95 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Puri VP, Pearce GR. Alkali-explosion pretreatment of straw and bagasse for enzymic hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng.28(4),480–485 (1986).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gharpuray MM, Lee YH, Fan LT. Pretreatment of wheat straw for cellulose hydrolysis. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Biochemical Engineering Symposium. 1–10 (1981).
   Google Scholar
• Lynd LR. Overview and evaluation of fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass : technology, economics, the environment, and policy. Ann. Rev. Energ. Environ.21,403–465 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y-HP, Lynd LR. Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnol. Bioeng.88(7),797–824 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YH, Lynd LR. Determination of the number-average degree of polymerization of cellodextrins and cellulose with application to enzymatic hydrolysis. Biomacromolecules6(3),1510–1515 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto R, Carvalho J, Mota M, Gama M. Large-scale production of cellulose-binding domains. Adsorption studies using CBD-FITC conjugates. Cellulose13(5),557–569 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Ryu DDY, Lee SB. Enzymic hydrolysis of cellulose: determination of kinetic parameters. Chem. Eng. Comm.45(1–6),119–134 (1986).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeoh T, Ishizawa CI, Davis MF, Himmel ME, Adney WS, Johnson DK. Cellulase digestibility of pretreated biomass is limited by cellulose accessibility. Biotechnol. Bioeng.98(1),112–122 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding H, Xu F. Productive cellulase adsorption on cellulose. ACS Symp. Ser.889,154–169 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Banka RR, Mishra S. Adsorption properties of the fibril forming protein from Trichoderma reesei. Enzyme Microb. Technol.31(6),784–793 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Nidetzky B, Hayn M, Macarron R, Steiner W. Synergism of Trichoderma reesei cellulases while degrading different celluloses. Biotechnol. Lett.15(1),71–76 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Hoshino E, Shiroishi M, Amano Y, Nomura M, Kanda T. Synergistic actions of exo-type cellulases in the hydrolysis of cellulose with different crystallinities. J. Ferment. Bioeng.84(4),300–306 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Henrissat B, Driguez H, Viet C, Schuelein M. Synergism of cellulases from Trichoderma reesei in the degradation of cellulose. Nat. Biotechnol.3(8),722–726 (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Valjamae PS, Nutt V, Pettersson A, Johansson G. Acid hydrolysis of bacterial cellulose reveals different modes of synergistic action between cellobiohydrolase I and endoglucanase I. Eur. J. Biochem.266(2),327–334 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valjamae P. The kinetics of cellulose enzymatic hydrolysis: implications of the synergism between enzymes. PhD thesis. Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Hoshino E, Kanda T. Scope and mechanism of cellulase action on different cellulosic substrates. Oyo Toshitsu Kagaku44(1),87–104 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Tarantili PA, Koullas DP, Christakopoulos P, Kekos D, Koukios EG, Macris BJ. Cross-synergism in enzymic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics: mathematical correlations according to a hyperbolic model. Biomass Bioenerg.10(4),213–219 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrissat B. Cellulases and their interaction with cellulose. Cellulose1,169–196 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Kanda T, Wakabayashi K, Nisizawa K. Modes of action of exo- and endo-cellulases in the degradation of celluloses I and II. J. Biochem.87(6),1635–1639 (1980).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Igarashi K, Wada M, Hori R, Samejima M. Surface density of cellobiohydrolase on crystalline celluloses. A critical parameter to evaluate enzymatic kinetics at a solid-liquid interface. FEBS J.273(13),2869–2878 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Igarashi K, Wada M, Samejima M. Enzymatic kinetics at a solid-liquid interface: hydrolysis of crystalline celluloses by cellobiohydrolase. Cellulose Comm.13(4),173–177 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Igarashi K, Wada M, Samejima M. Activation of crystalline cellulose to cellulose III(I) results in efficient hydrolysis by cellobiohydrolase. FEBS J.274(7),1785–1792 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizutani C, Sethumadhavan K, Howley P, Bertoniere N. Effect of a nonionic surfactant on Trichoderma cellulase treatments of regenerated cellulose and cotton yarns. Cellulose9(1),83–89 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Gama FM, Mota M. Enzymic hydrolysis of cellulose. (II): x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies on cellulase adsorption. Effect of the surfactant Tween 85. Biocatal. Biotransform.15(3),237–250 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Ossowski I, Stahlberg J, Koivula A et al. Engineering the exo-loop of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase, Cel7A. A comparison with Phanerochaete chrysosporium Cel7D. J. Mol. Biol.333(4),817–829 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipper K, Valjamae P, Johansson G. Processive action of cellobiohydrolase Cel7A from Trichoderma reesei is revealed as ‘burst’ kinetics on fluorescent polymeric model substrates. Biochem. J.385(2),527–535 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kanda T, Wakabayashi K, Nisizawa K. Synergistic action of two different types of endo-cellulase components from Irpex lacteus (Polyporus tulipiferae) in the hydrolysis of some insoluble celluloses. J. Biochem.79(5),997–1005 (1976).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mansfield SD, Meder R. Cellulose hydrolysis – the role of monocomponent cellulases in crystalline cellulose degradation. Cellulose10(2),159–169 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleman-Leyer KM, Siika-Aho M, Teeri TT, Kirk TK. The cellulases endoglucanase I and cellobiohydrolase II of Trichoderma reesei act synergistically to solubilize native cotton cellulose but not to decrease its molecular size. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.62(8),2883–2887 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eremeeva T, Bikova T, Eisimonte M, Viesturs U, Treimanis A. Fractionation and molecular characteristics of cellulose during enzymatic hydrolysis. Cellulose8(1),69–79 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Pala H, Mota M, Gama FM. Enzymatic depolymerisation of cellulose. Carbohyd. Polymers68(1),101–108 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilden L, Valjamae P, Johansson G. Surface character of pulp fibres studied using endoglucanases. J. Biotechnol.118(4),386–397 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hallac BB, Ragauskas AJ. Analyzing cellulose degree of polymerization and its relevancy to cellulosic ethanol. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin.5(2),215–225 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang YH, Lynd LR. A functionally based model for hydrolysis of cellulose by fungal cellulase. Biotechnol. Bioeng.94(5),888–898 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nidetzky B, Zachariae W, Gercken G, Hayn M, Steiner W. Hydrolysis of cellooligosaccharides by Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolases: experimental data and kinetic modeling. Enzyme Microb. Technol.16(1),43–52 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Lee YH, Fan LT. Properties and mode of action of cellulase. Adv. Biochem. Eng.17,101–129 (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson CA, McCrae SI, Wood TM. Characterisation of a β-glucosidase from the anaerobic rumen fungus Neocallimastix frontalis with particular reference to attack on cello-oligosaccharides. J. Biotechnol.37(3),217–227 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Okazaki M, Moo-Young M. Kinetics of enzymic hydrolysis of cellulose: analytical description of a mechanistic model. Biotechnol. Bioeng.20(5),637–663 (1978).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okazaki M, Miura Y, Moo-Young M. Synergistic effect of enzymic hydrolysis of cellulose. Adv. Biotechnol.2,3–8 (1981).
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan AM, Mandels M, Pillion E, Greenberger M. Resistance of weathered cotton cellulose to cellulase action. Appl. Microbiol.20(1),85–93 (1970).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teeri TT, Koivula A, Linder M et al. Modes of action of two Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolases. Prog. Biotechnol.10,211–224 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Divne C, Ståhlberg J, Teeri TT, Alwyn Jones T. High-resolution crystal structures reveal how a cellulose chain is bound in the 50 Å long tunnel of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. J. Mol. Biol.275,309–325 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teeri TT. Crystalline cellulose degradation: new insight into the function of cellobiohydrolases. Trends Biotech.15,160–167 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beldman G, Searle-Van Leeuwen MF, Rombouts FM, Voragen FG. The cellulase of Trichoderma viride. Purification, characterization and comparison of all detectable endoglucanases, exoglucanases and β-glucosidases. Eur. J. Biochem.146(2),301–308. (1985).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Houghton J, Weatherwax S, Ferrell J. Breaking the Biological Barriers to Cellulosic Ethanol: a Joint Research Agenda, DOE/SC-0095. US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, USA (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Ding S-Y, Xu Q, Ali MK et al. Versatile derivatives of carbohydrate-binding modules for imaging of complex carbohydrates approaching the molecular level of resolution. Biotechniques41(4),435–436,438,440,441–443 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y-S, Zeng Y, Luo Y et al. Does the cellulose-binding module move on the cellulose surface? Cellulose16(4),587–597 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Q, Tucker MP, Arenkiel P et al. Labeling the planar face of crystalline cellulose using quantum dots directed by type-I carbohydrate-binding modules. Cellulose16(1),19–26 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Cowling EB. Physical and chemical constraints in hydrolysis of cellulose and lignocellulosic materials. Biotechnol. Bioeng. (5), 163–181 (1975).
   Google Scholar
• Cowling EB, Kirk TK. Properties of cellulose and lignocellulosic materials as substrates for enzymatic conversion processes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. (6), 95–123 (1976).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King KW. Enzymic degradation of crystalline hydrocellulose. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm.24(3),295 (1966).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mandels M, Kostick J, Parizek R. Use of adsorbed cellulase in the continuous conversion of cellulose to glucose. J. Polymer Sci.36,445–459 (1971).
   Google Scholar
• Peitersen N, Medeiros J, Mandels M. Adsorption of Trichoderma cellulase on cellulose. Biotechnol. Bioeng.19(7),1091–1094 (1977).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stone J, Scallan A, Donefer E, Ahlgren E. Digestibility as a simple function of a molecule of a similar size to a cellulase enzyme. Adv. Chem. Series95,219–241 (1969).
   Google Scholar
• Grethlein HE. Pretreatment for enhanced hydrolysis of cellulosic biomass. Biotechnol. Adv.2(1),43–62 (1984).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong KKY, Deverell KF, Mackie KL, Clark TA, Donaldson LA. The relationship between fiber-porosity and cellulose digestibility in steam-exploded Pinus radiata. Biotechnol. Bioeng.31(5),447–456 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suurnakki A, Li TQ, Buchert J et al. Effects of enzymic removal of xylan and glucomannan on the pore size distribution of kraft fibers. Holzforschung51(1),27–33 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Zeng M, Mosier NS, Huang CP, Sherman DM, Ladisch MR. Microscopic examination of changes of plant cell structure in corn stover due to hot water pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng.97(2),265–278 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangseethong K, Meunier-Goddik L, Tantasucharit U, Liaw ET, Penner MH. Rationale for particle size effect on rates of enzymatic sacchariification of microcrystalline cellulose. J. Food Biochem.22(4),321–330 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Dasari R, Eric Berson R. The effect of particle size on hydrolysis reaction rates and rheological properties in cellulosic slurries. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.137–140(1),289–299 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Wen Z, Liao W, Chen S. Hydrolysis of animal manure lignocellulosics for reducing sugar production. Bioresour. Technol.91(1),31–39 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin KW, Ladisch MR, Voloch M, Patterson JA, Noller CH. Effect of pretreatments and fermentation on pore size in cellulosic materials. Biotechnol. Bioeng.27(10),1427–1433 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gama FM, Teixeira JA, Mota M. Cellulose morphology and enzymic reactivity: a modified solute exclusion technique. Biotechnol. Bioeng.43(5),381–387 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizawa CI, Davis MF, Schell DF, Johnson DK. Porosity and its effect on the digestibility of dilute sulfuric acid pretreated corn stover. J. Agric. Food Chem.55(7),2575–2581 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel SC, Ramachandran KB. Studies on the adsorption of cellulase on lignocellulosics. J. Ferment. Technol.61(3),281–286 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• Peters LE, Walker LP, Wilson DB, Irwin DC. The impact of initial particle size on the fragmentation of cellulose by the cellulase of Thermomonospora fusca. Bioresour. Technol.35(3),313–319 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Goel SC, Ramachandran KB. Comparison of the rates of enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated rice straw and bagasse with celluloses. Enzyme Microb. Technol.5(4),281–284 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• Chang VS, Burr B, Holtzapple MT. Lime pretreatment of switchgrass. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.63–65,3–19 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney CA, Mansfield SD, Touhy MG, Saddler JN. The effect of initial pore volume and lignin content on the enzymic hydrolysis of softwoods. Bioresour. Technol.64(2),113–119 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos LP, Nazhad MM, Saddler JN. Effect of enzymatic hydrolysis on the morphology and fine structure of pretreated cellulosic residues. Enz. Microb. Technol.15,821–831 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Nutor JRK, Converse AO. The effect of enzyme and substrate levels on the specific hydrolysis rate of pretreated poplar wood. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.28–29,757–772 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Wang SS, Converse AO. On the use of enzyme adsorption and specific hydrolysis rate to characterize thermal-chemical pretreatment. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.34–35,61–74 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson T, Karlsson J, Tjerneld F. A model explaining declining rate in hydrolysis of lignocellulose substrates with cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A) and endoglucanase I (Cel7B) of Trichoderma reesei. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.101,41–60 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caminal G, Lopez-Santin J, Sola C. Kinetic modeling of the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated cellulose. Biotechnol. Bioeng.27,1282–1290 (1985).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Converse AO, Ooshima H, Burns DS. Kinetics of enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials based on surface area of cellulose accessible to enzyme and enzyme adsorption on lignin and cellulose. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.24–25,67–73 (1990).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez G, Caminal G, De Mas C, Lopez-Santin J. A kinetic model for pretreated wheat straw saccharification by cellulase. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.44,275–288 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Holtzapple M, Cognata M, Shu Y, Hendrickson C. Inhibition of Trichoderma reesei cellulase by sugars and solvents. Biotechnol. Bioeng.36,275–287 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusakov AV, Sinitsyn AP. A theoretical analysis of cellulase product inhibition: effect of cellulase binding constant, enzyme/substrate ratio, and β-glucosidase activity on the inhibition pattern. Biotechnol. Bioeng.40(6),663–671 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan Q, Allen SJ, Taylor G. Kinetic dynamics in heterogeneous enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: an overview, an experimental study and mathematical modelling. Process. Biochem.38(7),1003–1018 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorovic R, Grujic S, Matavulj M. Effect of reaction end-products on the activity of cellulolytic enzymes and xylanase of Trichoderma harzianum. Microbiol. Lett.36(143–144),113–119 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Kadam KL, Rydholm EC, McMillan JD. Development and validation of a kinetic model for enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnol. Prog.20(3),698–705 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Converse AO, Matsuno R, Tanaka M, Taniguchi M. A model of enzyme adsorption and hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose with slow deactivation of the adsorbed enzyme. Biotechnol. Bioeng.32,38–45 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusakov AV, Sinitsyn AP, Klesov AA. Factors affecting the enzymic hydrolysis of cellulose in batch and continuous reactors: computer simulation and experiment. Biotechnol. Bioeng.29,906–910 (1987).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sinitsyn A, Mitkevich O, Klesov A. Inactivation of cellulolytic enzymes by stirring and their stabilization by cellulose. Prikladnaya Biokhimiya i Mikrobiologiya22(6),759–765 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Mukataka S, Tada M, Takahashi J. Effects of agitation on enzymic hydrolysis of cellulose in a stirred-tank reactor. J. Ferm. Technol.61(6),615–621 (1983).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese E. Protection of Trichoderma reesei cellulase from inactivation due to shaking. International Symposium on Solution Behavior of Surfactants: Theoretical Application Aspects. 1487–1504 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Ooshima H, Burns DS, Converse AO. Adsorption of cellulase from Trichoderma reesei on cellulose and lignaceous residue in wood pretreated by dilute sulfuric acid with explosive decompression. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp.36,446–452 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe R, Saddler JN. The role of lignin in the adsorption of cellulases during enzymatic treatment of lignocellulosic material. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp.17,749–762 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Desai SG, Converse AO. Substrate reactivity as a function of the extent of reaction in the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Biotechnol. Bioeng.56(6),650–655 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Wolfgang DE, Wilson DB. Substrate heterogeneity causes the nonlinear kinetics of insoluble cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng.66,35–41 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nidetzky B, Steiner W. A new approach for modeling cellulase cellulose adsorption and the kinetics of the enzymatic-hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose. Biotechnol. Bioeng.42(4),469–479 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusakov AV, Sinitsyn AP, Klesov AA. Kinetic model of the enzymic hydrolysis of cellulose in a column type reactor. Biotekhnologiya3,112–122 (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Ooshima H, Kurakake M, Kato J, Harano Y. Enzymatic activity of cellulase adsorbed on cellulose and its change during hydrolysis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.31(3),253–266 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valjamae P, Sild V, Pettersson G, Johansson G. The initial kinetics of hydrolysis by cellobiohydrolases I and II is consistent with a cellulose surface erosion model. Eur. J. Biochem.253(2),469–475 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang B, Willies DM, Wyman CE. Changes in the enzymatic hydrolysis rate of avicel cellulose with conversion. Biotech. Bioeng. (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Bommarius AS, Katona A, Cheben SE et al. Cellulase kinetics as a function of cellulose pretreatment. Metab. Eng.10(6),370–381 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grohmann K, Torget R, Himmel M. Optimization of dilute acid pretreatment of biomass. Biotech. Bioeng. Symp.15,59–80 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Oehgren K, Bura R, Saddler J, Zacchi G. Effect of hemicellulose and lignin removal on enzymatic hydrolysis of steam pretreated corn stover. Bioresour. Technol.98(13),2503–2510 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang B, Wyman CE. Effect of xylan and lignin removal by batch and flowthrough pretreatment on the enzymatic digestibility of corn stover cellulose. Biotechnol. Bioeng.86(1),88–95 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Lee YY, Elander RT. Optimization of dilute-acid pretreatment of corn stover using a high-solids percolation reactor. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.121–124,1045–1054 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kabel MA, Bos G, Zeevalking J, Voragen AG, Schols HA. Effect of pretreatment severity on xylan solubility and enzymatic breakdown of the remaining cellulose from wheat straw. Bioresour. Technol.98(10),2034–2042 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palonen H, Thomsen AB, Tenkanen M, Schmidt AS, Viikari L. Evaluation of wet oxidation pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.117(1),1–17 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen SG, Schulman D, Lichwa J, Antal MJ, Jennings E, Elander R. A comparison of aqueous and dilute-acid single-temperature pretreatment of yellow poplar sawdust. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.40(10),2352–2361 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Millett MA, Baker AJ, Satter LD. Physical and chemical pretreatments for enhancing cellulose saccharification. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp.6,125–153 (1976).
   Google Scholar
• Tsao GT, Ladisch M, Ladisch C, Hsu TA, Dale B, Chou T. Fermentation substrates from cellulosic materials: production of fermentable sugars from cellulosic materials. Ann. Rep. Ferm. Process.2,1–21 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Fan LT, Lee Y, Gharpuray MM. The nature of lignocellulosics and their pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis. Adv. Biochem. Eng.23,157–187 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Dale BE, Weaver J, Byers FM. Extrusion processing for ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX). Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.77–79,35–45 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Grethlein HE. Pretreatment of cellulosic biomass for enzymic hydrolysis. Energ. Biomass Wastes9,939–960 (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Grohmann K, Mitchell DJ, Himmel ME, Dale BE, Schroeder HA. The role of ester groups in resistance of plant cell wall polysaccharides to enzymic hydrolysis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.20–21,45–61 (1989).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chum HL, Johnson DK, Black SK et al. Organosolv pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of poplar. I. Enzyme hydrolysis of cellulosic residues. Biotechnol. Bioeng.31,643–649 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang B, Wyman CE. Characterization of the degree of polymerization of xylooligomers produced by flowthrough hydrolysis of pure xylan and corn stover with water. Bioresource Technol.99(13),5756–5762 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee YY, Iyer P, Torget RW. Dilute-acid hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol.65,93–115 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Dale BE, Leong CK, Pham TK, Esquivel VM, Rios I, Latimer VM. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosics at low enzyme levels: application of the AFEX process. Bioresour. Technol.56,111–116 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teymouri F, Laureano-Perez L, Alizadeh H, Dale BE. Optimization of the ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX) treatment parameters for enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Bioresour. Technol.96(18),2014–2018 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlasenko EY, Ding H, Labavitch JM, Shoemaker SP. Enzymic hydrolysis of pretreated rice straw. Bioresour. Technol.59(2 & 3),109–119 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira LC, Linden JC, Schroeder HA. Simultaneous saccharification and cofermentation of peracetic acid-pretreated biomass. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.84–6,111–127 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Kim S, Holtzapple MT. Lime pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Bioresour. Technol.96(18),1994–2006 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong F, Engler CR, Soltes EJ. Effects of cell-wall acetate, xylan backbone, and lignin on enzymic hydrolysis of aspen wood. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.34–35,23–35 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Chang VS, Holtzapple MT. Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.84–86,5–37 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimer PJ, Hackney JM, Jung HJ, Hatfield RD. Fermentation of a bacterial cellulose/xylan composite by mixed ruminal microflora: implications for the role of polysaccharide matrix interactions in plant cell wall biodegradability. J. Agric. Food Chem.48(5),1727–1733 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan X, Gilkes N, Saddler JN. Effect of acetyl groups on enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic substrates. Holzforschung60,398–401 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson J, Momcilovic D, Wittgren B, Schulein M, Tjerneld F, Brinkmalm G. Enzymatic degradation of carboxymethyl cellulose hydrolyzed by the endoglucanases Cel5A, Cel7B, and Cel45A from Humicola insolens and Cel7B, Cel12A and Cel45Acore from Trichoderma reesei. Biopolymers63(1),32–40 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samios E, Dart RK, Dawkins JV. Preparation, characterization and biodegradation studies on cellulose acetates with varying degrees of substitution. Polymer38(12),3045–3054 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeoh T, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Himmel ME. Measuring cellulase accessibility of dilute-acid pretreated corn stover. Preprints of Symposia – American Chemical Society, Division of Fuel Chemistry50(2),673–674 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Qing Q, Yang B, Wyman CE. Xylooligomers are strong inhibitors of cellulose hydrolysis by enzymes. Bioresour. Technol.101(24),9624–9630 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Wyman CE. Effect of enzyme supplementation at moderate cellulase loadings on initial glucose and xylose release from corn stover solids pretreated by leading technologies. Biotechnol. Bioeng.102(2),457–467 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes AC, Fontes CMGA, Gilbert HJ, Hazlewood GP, Fernandes TH, Ferreira LMA. Homologous xylanases from Clostridium thermocellum: evidence for bi-functional activity, synergism between xylanase catalytic modules and the presence of xylan-binding domains in enzyme complexes. Biochem. J.342(1),105–110 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenkanen M, Siika-aho M, Hausalo T, Puls J, Viikari L. Synergism of xylanolytic enzymes of Trichoderma reesei in the degradation of acetyl-4-O-methylglucuronoxylan. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Biotechnology in the Pulp and Paper Industry. Vienna, Austria, 11–15 June 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Kormelink FJM, Voragen AGJ. Combined action of xylan-degrading and accessory enzymes on different glucurono-arabino xylans. Prog. Biotechnol.7,415–418 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Wood TM, McCrae SI. The effect of acetyl groups on the hydrolysis of ryegrass cell walls by xylanase and cellulase from Trichoderma koningii. Phytochemistry25(5),1053–1055 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell DJ, Grohmann K, Himmel ME, Dale BE, Schroeder HA. Effect of the degree of acetylation on the enzymic digestion of acetylated xylans. J. Wood Chem. Technol.10(1),111–121 (1990).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu P, McKinnon JJ, Maenz DD, Olkowski AA, Racz VJ, Christensen DA. Enzymic release of reducing sugars from oat hulls by cellulase, as influenced by Aspergillus ferulic acid esterase and Trichoderma xylanase. J. Agric. Food Chem.51(1),218–223 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabka MG, Herpoel-Gimbert I, Monod F, Asther M, Sigoillot JC. Enzymatic saccharification of wheat straw for bioethanol production by a combined cellulase xylanase and feruloyl esterase treatment. Enzyme Microb. Technol.39(4),897–902 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Aparicio M, Ballesteros M, Manzanares P, Ballesteros I, González A, José Negro M. Xylanase contribution to the efficiency of cellulose enzymatic hydrolysis of barley straw. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.137–140(1),353–365 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murashima K, Kosugi A, Doi RH. Synergistic effects of cellulosomal xylanase and cellulases from Clostridium cellulovorans on plant cell wall degradation. J. Bacteriol.185(5),1518–1524 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merino ST, Cherry J. Progress and challenges in enzyme development for biomass utilization. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol.108,95–120 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hespell RB, O’Bryan PJ, Moniruzzaman M, Bothast RJ. Hydrolysis by commercial enzyme mixtures of AFEX-treated corn fiber and isolated xylans. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.62(1),87–97 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knauf M, Moniruzzaman M. Lignocellulosic biomass processing: a perspective. Int. Sugar J.106(1263),147–150 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang B, Boussaid A, Mansfield SD, Gregg DJ, Saddler JN. Fast and efficient alkaline peroxide treatment to enhance the enzymatic digestibility of steam-exploded softwood substrates. Biotechnol. Bioeng.77(6),678–684 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto K, Fujii T, Sudo K, Shimizu K. Changes in cell wall structure and enzymic hydrolysis of steam exploded bamboo and bamboo grass. Baiomasu Henkan Keikaku Kenkyu Hokoku22,20–34 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield SD, Dickson AR, Saddler JN. Improving paper properties by a selective enzymic treatment of coarse pulp fibers. Presented at: 7th International Conference on Biotechnology in the Pulp and Paper Industry. Vancouver, BC, Canada, 16–19 June 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson R, Oliver DW. Study of cellulose structure and its relation to reactivity. J. Polymer Sci.36,305–320 (1971).
   Google Scholar
• Schwald W, Chan M, Brownell HH, Saddler JN. Influence of hemicellulose and lignin on the enzymic hydrolysis of wood. FEMS Symp.43,303–314 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Shevchenko SM. The nature of lignin from steam explosion/enzymatic hydrolysis of softwoods. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.77–79 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torget R, Walter P, Himmel M, Grohmann K. Dilute-acid pretreatment of corn residues and short-rotation woody crops. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.28–9,75–86 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Kawamoto H, Nakatsubo F, Murakami K. Protein-adsorbing capacities of lignin samples. Mokuzai Gakkaishi38(1),81–84 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Lu YP, Yang B, Gregg D, Saddler JN, Mansfield SD. Cellulase adsorption and an evaluation of enzyme recycle during hydrolysis of steam-exploded softwood residues. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.98,641–654 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B et al. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technol.96(6),673–686 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang B, Gray MC, Liu C et al. Unconventional relationships for hemicellulose hydrolysis and subsequent cellulose digestion. ACS Symp. Series889,100–125 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson T, Borjesson J, Tjerneld F. Mechanism of surfactant effect in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb. Technol.31(3),353–364 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berson R, Dasari R, Hanley T. Modeling of a continuous pretreatment reactor using computational fluid dynamics. Presented at: 27th Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals. Denver, CO, USA, 1–4 May 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Fan Z, South C, Lyford K, Munsie J, van Walsum P, Lynd L. Conversion of paper sludge to ethanol in a semicontinuous solids-fed reactor. Bioprocess Biosys. Eng.26(2),93–101 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabber JH, Ralph J, Hatfield RD, Quideau S. P-hydroxyphenyl, guaiacyl, and syringyl lignins have similar inhibitory effects on wall degradability. J. Agric. Food Chem.45(7),2530–2532 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabber JH, Ralph J, Hatfield RD. Ferulate cross-links limit the enzymatic degradation of synthetically lignified primary walls of maize. J. Agric. Food Chem.46(7),2609–2614 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabber JH. How do lignin composition, structure, and cross-linking affect degradability? A review of cell wall model studies. Crop Sci.45(3),820–831 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewalt VJH, Ni W, Jung HG, Dixon RA. Lignin impact on fiber degradation: increased enzymic digestibility of genetically engineered tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) stems reduced in lignin content. J. Agric. Food Chem.45(5),1977–1983 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Michalowicz G, Toussaint B, Vignon MR. Ultrastructural changes in poplar cell wall during steam explosion treatment. Holzforschung45(3),175–179 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selig MJ, Viamajala S, Decker SR, Tucker MP, Himmel ME, Vinzant TB. Deposition of lignin droplets produced during dilute acid pretreatment of maize stems retards enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Bio. Prog.23(6),1333–1339 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selig MJ, Vinzant TB, Himmel ME, Decker SR. The effect of lignin removal by alkaline peroxide pretreatment on the susceptibility of corn stover to purified cellulolytic and xylanolytic enzymes. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.155(1–3),397–406 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuldashev BT, Rabinovich ML, Rakhimov MM. Comparative study of cellulase behavior on the cellulose and lignocellulose surface during enzymic hydrolysis. Prikl. Biokhim. Mikrobiol.29(2),233–243 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Ishihara M, Uemura S, Hayashi N, Jellison J, Shimizu K. Adsorption and desorption of cellulase components during enzymatic hydrolysis of steamed shirakamba (Betula platyphylla Skatchev) wood. J. Ferment. Bioeng.72(2),96–100 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Estrada P, Acebal C, Castillon MP, Mata I, Romero D. Adsorption of cellulase from Trichoderma reesei on wheat straw. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem.10(1),49–58 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Mooney CA, Mansfield SD, Tuohy MG, Saddler JN. The effect of lignin content on cellulose accessibility and enzymic hydrolysis of softwood pulps. Presented at: Biological Sciences Symposium. San Francisco, CA, USA, 19–23 October 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell HH, Saddler JN. Steam pretreatment of lignocellulosic material for enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng.26,228–235 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Berson RE, Young JS, Hanley TR. Reintroduced solids increase inhibitor levels in a pretreated corn stover hydrolysate. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.129–132,612–620 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alvira P, Negro MJ, Saez F, Ballesteros M. Application of a microassay method to study enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated wheat straw. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.85(9),1291–1297 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Dutta A, Dowe N, Ibsen KN, Schell DJ, Aden A. An economic comparison of different fermentation configurations to convert corn stover to ethanol using Z. mobilis and Saccharomyces. Biotechnol. Prog.26(1),64–72 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linde M, Jakobsson E-L, Galbe M, Zacchi G. Steam pretreatment of dilute H2SO4-impregnated wheat straw and SSF with low yeast and enzyme loadings for bioethanol production. Biomass Bioenerg.32(4),326–332 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oehgren K, Bura R, Lesnicki G, Saddler J, Zacchi G. A comparison between simultaneous saccharification and fermentation and separate hydrolysis and fermentation using steam-pretreated corn stover. Process. Biochem.42(5),834–839 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Sipos B, Reczey J, Somorai Z, Kadar Z, Dienes D, Reczey K. Sweet sorghum as feedstock for ethanol production: enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated bagasse. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.153(1–3),151–162 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TH, Lee YY. Pretreatment of corn stover by soaking in aqueous ammonia at moderate temperatures. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.137–140,81–92 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhu Y, Kim TH, Lee YY, Chen R, Elander RT. Enzymatic production of xylooligosaccharides from corn stover and corn cobs treated with aqueous ammonia. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.129–132,586–598 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hagerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: inhibition and detoxification. Bioresource Technol.74(1),17–24 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantarella M, Cantarella L, Gallifuoco A, Spera A, Alfani F. Effect of inhibitors released during steam-explosion treatment of poplar wood on subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis and SSF. Biotechnol. Prog.20(1),200–206 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TH, Lee YY, Sunwoo C, Kim JS. Pretreatment of corn stover by low-liquid ammonia recycle percolation process. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.133(1),41–57 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ximenes E, Kim Y, Mosier N, Dien B, Ladisch M. Deactivation of cellulases by phenols. Enzyme Microb. Technol.48(1),54–60 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Z, Zhang X, Gregg David J, Saddler John N. Effects of sugar inhibition on cellulases and β-glucosidase during enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood substrates. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.113–116, 1115–1126 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge DB, Karim MN, Schell DJ, McMillan JD. Soluble and insoluble solids contributions to high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Bioresour. Technol.99(18),8940–8948 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin A, Balakshin M, Gilkes N et al. Inhibition of cellulase, xylanase and β-glucosidase activities by softwood lignin preparations. J. Biotechnol.125(2),198–209 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Excoffier G, Toussaint B, Vignon MR. Saccharification of steam-exploded poplar wood. Biotechnol. Bioeng.38(11),1308–1317 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewalt VJH, Ni WT, Jung HG, Dixon RA. Lignin impact on fiber degradation: increased enzymatic digestibility of genetically engineered tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) stems reduced in lignin content. J. Agric. Food Chem.45(5),1977–1983 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Sineiro J, Dominguez H, Nunez MJ, Lema JM. Hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose by cellulolytic complex of Trichoderma reesei in low-moisture media. Enzyme Microb. Technol.17(9),809–815 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Akin DE. Plant cell wall aromatics: influence on degradation of biomass. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin.2(4),288–303 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ximenes EA, Dien BS, Ladisch MR, Mosier N, Cotta MA, Li X-L. Enzyme production by industrially relevant fungi cultured on coproduct from corn dry grind ethanol plants. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.137–140, 171–183 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaya F, Heitmann JA, Jr., Joyce TW. Effect of dissolved lignin and related compounds on the enzymic hydrolysis of cellulose model compound. Cellulose Chem. Technol.33(3–4),203–213 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Mandels M, Reese ET. Inhibition of cellulases. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol.3,85–102 (1965).
   Google Scholar
• Panagiotou G, Olsson L. Effect of compounds released during pretreatment of wheat straw on microbial growth and enzymatic hydrolysis rates. Biotechnol. Bioeng.96(2),250–258 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vohra RM, Shirkot CK, Dhawan S, Gupta KG. Effect of lignin and some of its components on the production and activity of cellulase(s) by Trichoderma reesei. Biotechnol. Bioeng.22(7),1497–1500 (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Paul SS, Kamra DN, Sastry VRB, Sahu NP, Kumar A. Effect of phenolic monomers on biomass and hydrolytic enzyme activities of an anaerobic fungus isolated from wild nil gai (Boselaphus tragocamelus). Lett. Appl. Microbiol.36(6),377–381 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkar HPS, Dawra RK, Singh B. Protein precipitation assay for quantitation of tannins: determination of protein in tannin-protein complex. Anal. Biochem.166(2),435–439 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chundawat SP, Venkatesh B, Dale BE. Effect of particle size based separation of milled corn stover on AFEX pretreatment and enzymatic digestibility. Biotechnol. Bioeng. (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Panagiotou G, Olsson L. Effect of compounds released during pretreatment of wheat straw on microbial growth and enzymatic hydrolysis rates. Biotechnol. Bioeng.96(2),250–258 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Himmel ME, Xu Q, Luo Y, Ding S-Y, Lamed R, Bayer EA. Microbial enzyme systems for biomass conversion: emerging paradigms. Biofuels1(2),323–341 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.66(3),506–577, (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, Wolfaardt G, Zhang Y-HP. Cellulose hydrolysis by Clostridium thermocellum: a microbial perspective. Cellulosome95–117 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Elkins JG, Raman B, Keller M. Engineered microbial systems for enhanced conversion of lignocellulosic biomass. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.21(5),657–662 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmel ME, Karplus PA, Sakon J, Adney WS, Baker JO, Thomas SR. Polysaccharide hydrolase folds diversity of structure and convergence of function. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.63–65, 315–325 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wei H, Xu Q, Taylor LE, Baker JO, Tucker MP, Ding S-Y. Natural paradigms of plant cell wall degradation. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.20(3),330–338 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer E, Kenig R, Lamed R. Adherence of Clostridium thermocellum to cellulose. J. Bacteriol.156(2),818 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamed R, Setter E, Bayer E. Characterization of a cellulose-binding, cellulase-containing complex in Clostridium thermocellum. J. Bacteriol.156(2),828 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer E, Belaich J, Shoham Y, Lamed R. The cellulosomes: multienzyme machines for degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides. Microbiology58(1),521 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Bégum P, Lemaire M. The cellulosome: an exocellular, multiprotein complex specialized in cellulose degradation. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.31(3),201–236 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doi R, Kosugi A. Cellulosomes: plant-cell-wall-degrading enzyme complexes. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.2(7),541–551 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felix C, Ljungdahl L. The cellulosome: the exocellular organelle of Clostridium. Ann. Rev. Microbiol.47(1),791–819 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontes C, Gilbert H. Cellulosomes: highly efficient nanomachines designed to deconstruct plant cell wall complex carbohydrates. Ann. Rev. Biochem.79,655–681 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljungdahl L. The cellulase/hemicellulase system of the anaerobic fungus Orpinomyces PC-2 and aspects of its applied use. Ann. New York Acad. Sci.1125(1),308–321 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinzant TB, Adney WS, Decker SR et al. Fingerprinting Trichoderma reesei hydrolases in a commercial cellulase preparation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.91–93, 99–107 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Banerjee G, Car S, Scott-Craig JS, Borrusch MS, Walton JD. Rapid optimization of enzyme mixtures for deconstruction of diverse pretreatment/biomass feedstock combinations. Biotechnol. Biofuels3,22 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gritzali M, Brown RD, Jr. The cellulase system of Trichoderma. Relationships between purified extracellular enzymes from induced or cellulose-grown cells. Adv. Chem. Series181,237–260 (1979).
   Google Scholar
• Ryu DY, Kim C, Mandels M. Competitive adsoprtion of cellulase components and its significance in a synergistic mechanism. Biotechnol. Bioeng.26(5),488–496 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nidetzky B, Claeyssens M, Steiner W. Cellulose degradation by the major cellulases from Trichoderma reesei: synergistic interaction and competition for binding sites on cellulose. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Biotechnology in the Pulp and Paper Industry. Vienna, Austria, 11–15 June 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Jeoh T, Wilson DB, Walker LP. Cooperative and competitive binding in synergistic mixtures of Thermobifida fusca cellulases Cel5A, Cel6B, and Cel9A. Biotechnol. Prog.18(4),760–769 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeoh T, Wilson DB, Walker LP. Effect of cellulase mole fraction and cellulose recalcitrance on synergism in cellulose hydrolysis and binding. Biotechnol. Prog.22(1),270–277 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boraston AB, McLean BW, Kormos JM et al. Carbohydrate-binding modules: diversity of structure and function. Royal Soc. Chem.246,202–211 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Lehtio J, Sugiyama J, Gustavsson M, Fransson L, Linder M, Teeri TT. The binding specificity and affinity determinants of family 1 and family 3 cellulose binding modules. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100(2),484–489 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divne C, Stahlberg J, Reinikainen T et al. The 3-dimensional crystal-structure of the catalytic core of cellobiohydrolase-I from Trichoderma reesei. Science265(5171),524–528 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson DB. Evidence for a novel mechanism of microbial cellulose degradation. Cellulose16(4),723–727 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Irwin DC, Wilson DB. Processivity, substrate binding, and mechanism of cellulose hydrolysis by Thermobifida fusca Cel9A. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.73(10),3165–3172 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield S, Saddler J, Gübitz G. Characterization of endoglucanases from the brown rot fungi Gloeophyllum sepiarium and Gloeophyllum trabeum. Enzyme Microb. Technol.23(1–2),133–140 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamed R, Morag E, Mor-Yosef O, Bayer E. Cellulosome-like entities inbacteroides cellulosolvens. Curr. Microbiol.22(1),27–33 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward J. Synergism in cellulase systems. Bioresource Technol.36(1),67–75 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Din N, Coutinho JB, Gilkes NR et al. Interactions of cellulases from Cellulomonas fimi with cellulose. Prog. Biotechnol.10,261–270 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Zverlov VV, Volkov IY, Lunina NA, Velikodvorskaya GA. Enzymes of thermophilic anaerobic bacteria hydrolyzing cellulose, xylan, and other β-glucans. Mol. Biol.33(1),89–95 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz WH. The cellulosome and cellulose degradation by anaerobic bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.56(5–6),634–649 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nidetzky B, Claeyssens M. Specific quantification of Trichoderma reesei cellulases in reconstituted mixtures and its application to cellulase–cellulose binding studies. Biotechnol. Bioeng.44(8),961–966 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stalbrand H, Mansfield SD, Saddler JN. Analysis of molecular size distributions of cellulose molecules during hydrolysis of cellulose by recombinant Cellulomonas fimi β-1,4-glucanases. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.64,7, 1–6 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walker L, Wilson D. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: an overview. Bioresource Technol.36(1),3–14 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprey B, Lambert C. Titration curves of cellulases from Trichoderma reesei: demonstration of a cellulase xylanase glucosidase containing complex. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.18(3),217–222 (1983).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita Y, Ito J, Ueda M, Fukuda H, Kondo A. Synergistic saccharification, and direct fermentation to ethanol, of amorphous cellulose by use of an engineered yeast strain co-displaying three types of cellulolytic enzyme. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.70(2),1207 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murai T, Ueda M, Kawaguchi T, Arai M, Tanaka A. Assimilation of cellooligosaccharides by a cell surface-engineered yeast expressing β-glucosidase and carboxymethylcellulase from Aspergillus aculeatus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.64(12),4857 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tilbeurgh H, Claeyssens M, De Bruyne C. The use of 4-methylumbelliferyl and other chromophoric glycosides in the study of cellulolytic enzymes. FEBS Lett.149(1),152–156 (1982).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alahuhta M, Xu Q, Bomble Y et al. The unique binding mode of the cellulosomal CBM4 from Clostridium thermocellum cellobiohydrolase A. J. Mol. Biol. (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matthews J, Skopec C, Mason P et al. Computer simulation studies of microcrystalline cellulose I β. Carbohydrate Res.341(1),138–152 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nimlos M, Matthews J, Crowley M et al. Molecular modeling suggests induced fit of Family I carbohydrate-binding modules with a broken-chain cellulose surface. Prot. Eng. Des. Sel.20(4),179 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saharay M, Guo H, Smith J, Rodrigues-Lima F. Catalytic mechanism of cellulose degradation by a cellobiohydrolase, CelS. PLoS One5(10),433–443 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Zhong L, Matthews J, Crowley M et al. Interactions of the complete cellobiohydrolase I from Trichodera reesei with microcrystalline cellulose I. Cellulose15(2),261–273 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Zhong L, Matthews J, Hansen P et al. Computational simulations of the Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I acting on microcrystalline cellulose Iβ: the enzyme–substrate complex. Carbohydrate Res.344(15),1984–1992 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baker J, Adney W, Nleves R, Thomas S, Wilson D, Himmel M. A new thermostable endoglucanase, Acidothermus cellulolyticus E1. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.45(1),245–256 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Baker JO, Adney WS, Thomas SR et al. Synergism between purified bacterial and fungal cellulases. ACS Symp. Ser.618,113–141 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Coughlan M, Moloney A, McCrae S, Wood T. Cross-synergistic interactions between components of the cellulase systems of Talaromyces emersonii, Fusarium solani, Penicillium funiculosum, and Trichoderma koningii. Biochem. Soc. Trans.15,263–264 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Wood T, Wilson C, McCrae S. Synergism between components of the cellulase system of the anaerobic rumen fungus Neocallimastix frontalis and those of the aerobic fungi Penicillium pinophilum and Trichoderma koningii in degrading crystalline cellulose. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.41(2),257–261 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Breznak J, Brune A. Role of microorganisms in the digestion of lignocellulose by termites. Ann. Rev. Entomol.39(1),453–487 (1994).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison M, Pope P, Denman S, McSweeney C. Plant biomass degradation by gut microbiomes: more of the same or something new? Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.20(3),358–363 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe H, Tokuda G. Cellulolytic systems in insects. Ann. Rev. Entomol.55,609–632 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamra D. Rumen microbial ecosystem. Curr. Sci.89(1),124–135 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnecke F, Luginbühl P, Ivanova N et al. Metagenomic and functional analysis of hindgut microbiota of a wood-feeding higher termite. Nature450(7169),560–565 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brulc J, Antonopoulos D, Berg Miller M et al. Gene-centric metagenomics of the fiber-adherent bovine rumen microbiome reveals forage specific glycoside hydrolases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.106(6),1948 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izquierdo J, Sizova M, Lynd L. Diversity of bacteria and glycosyl hydrolase family 48 genes in cellulolytic consortia enriched from thermophilic biocompost. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.76(11),3545 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronnenmeier K, Adelsberger H, Lottspeich F, Staudenbauer WL. Affinity purification of cellulose-binding enzymes of Clostridium stercorarium. Bioseparation6(1),41–45 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bronnenmeier K, Kundt K, Riedel K, Schwarz WH, Staudenbauer WL. Structure of the Clostridium stercorarium gene celY encoding the exo-1,4-β-glucanase Avicelase II. Microbiology143(3),891–898 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berger E, Zhang D, Zverlov V, Schwarz W. Two noncellulosomal cellulases of Clostridium thermocellum, Cel9I and Cel48Y, hydrolyse crystalline cellulose synergistically. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.268(2),194–201 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo X, Chen C, Pang H, Feng Y, Feng J. Identification and characterization of a novel xylanase derived from a rice straw degrading enrichment culture. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.87(6),2137–2146 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlüter A, Bekel T, Diaz N et al. The metagenome of a biogas-producing microbial community of a production-scale biogas plant fermenter analysed by the 454-pyrosequencing technology. J. Biotechnol.136(1–2),77–90 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson A, Bowers J, Bruggmann R et al. The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature457(7229),551–556 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin E. Genomics of cellulosic biofuels. Nature454(7206),841–845 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnable P, Ware D, Fulton R et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science326(5956),1112 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuskan G, Difazio S, Jansson S et al. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science313(5793),1596 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel J, Garvin D, Mockler T et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. Nature463(7282),763–768 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez D, Berka R, Henrissat B et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of the biomass-degrading fungus Trichoderma reesei (syn. Hypocrea jecorina). Nat. Biotechnol.26(5),553–560 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez D, Larrondo L, Putnam N et al. Genome sequence of the lignocellulose degrading fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium strain RP78. Nat. Biotechnol.22(6),695–700 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pel H, de Winde J, Archer D et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of the versatile cell factory Aspergillus niger CBS 513.88. Nat. Biotechnol.25(2),221–231 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nierman W, Pain A, Anderson M et al. Genomic sequence of the pathogenic and allergenic filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. Nature438(7071),1151–1156 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James E, Sarah E, Christina Cuomo L, Jennifer R, Serafim Batzoglou S. Sequencing of Aspergillus nidulans and comparative analysis with A. fumigatus and A. oryzae. Nature438(7071),1105–1115 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Machida M, Asai K, Sano M et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of Aspergillus oryzae. Nature438(7071),1157–1161 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuomo C, Guldener U, Xu J et al. The Fusarium graminearum genome reveals a link between localized polymorphism and pathogen specialization. Science317(5843),1400 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean R, Talbot N, Ebbole D et al. The genome sequence of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Nature434(7036),980–986 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galagan J, Calvo S, Borkovich K et al. The genome sequence of the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Nature422(6934),859–868 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg M, Albang R, Albermann K et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of the filamentous fungus Penicillium chrysogenum. Nat. Biotechnol.26(10),1161–1168 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kämper J, Kahmann R, Bölker M et al. Insights from the genome of the biotrophic fungal plant pathogen Ustilago maydis. Nature444(7115),97–101 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allgaier M, Reddy A, Park J et al. Targeted discovery of glycoside hydrolases from a switchgrass-adapted compost community. PLoS One5(1),372–380 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Tringe S, Von Mering C, Kobayashi A et al. Comparative metagenomics of microbial communities. Science308(5721),554 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan D, Meyer Q, Stafford W, Muyanga S, Cameron R, Wittwer P. Metagenomic gene discovery: past, present and future. Trends Biotechnol.23(6),321–329 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan C, Feng J. Mining metagenomes for novel cellulase genes. Biotechnol. Lett.32(12),1765–1775 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer M, Golyshina O, Beloqui A, Golyshin P. Mining enzymes from extreme environments. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.10(3),207–214 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riesenfeld C, Schloss P, Handelsman J. Metagenomics: genomic analysis of microbial communities. Genetics38(1),525 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Schmeisser C, Steele H, Streit W. Metagenomics, biotechnology with non-culturable microbes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.75(5),955–962 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cravatt B, Simon G, Yates Iii J. The biological impact of mass-spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature450(7172),991–1000 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann M, Kelleher N. Precision proteomics: the case for high resolution and high mass accuracy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.105(47),18132 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider T, Gerrits B, Gassmann R et al. Proteome analysis of fungal and bacterial involvement in leaf litter decomposition. Proteomics10(9),1819–1830 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahajan S, Master E. Proteomic characterization of lignocellulose-degrading enzymes secreted by Phanerochaete carnosa grown on spruce and microcrystalline cellulose. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.86(6),1903–1914 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raman B, Pan C, Hurst G et al. Impact of pretreated switchgrass and biomass carbohydrates on Clostridium thermocellum ATCC 27405 cellulosome composition: a quantitative proteomic analysis. PLoS One4(4), (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muddiman D, Andrews G, Lewis D, Notey J, Kelly R. Part I: characterization of the extracellular proteome of the extreme thermophile Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus by GeLC-MS2. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.398(1),377–389 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martinez D, Challacombe J, Morgenstern I et al. Genome, transcriptome, and secretome analysis of wood decay fungus Postia placenta supports unique mechanisms of lignocellulose conversion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.106(6),1954 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang A, Butler G, Powlowski J, Panisko E, Baker S. Analytical and computational approaches to define the Aspergillus niger secretome. Fungal Genetics Biol.46(1),S153–S160 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vanden Wymelenberg A, Gaskell J, Mozuch M et al. Comparative transcriptome and secretome analysis of wood decay fungi Postia placenta and Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.76(11),3599 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Budnik B, Lee R, Steen J. Global methods for protein glycosylation analysis by mass spectrometry. Biochim. Biophys. Acta14,25 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Hitchen P, Dell A. Bacterial glycoproteomics. Microbiology152(6),1575 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morelle W, Canis K, Chirat F, Faid V, Michalski J. The use of mass spectrometry for the proteomic analysis of glycosylation. Proteomics6(14),3993–4015 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun B, Ranish J, Utleg A et al. Shotgun glycopeptide capture approach coupled with mass spectrometry for comprehensive glycoproteomics. Mol. Cellular Proteomics6(1),141 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollscheid B, Bausch-Fluck D, Henderson C et al. Mass-spectrometric identification and relative quantification of N-linked cell surface glycoproteins. Nat. Biotechnol.27(4),378–386 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaia J. Mass spectrometry and the emerging field of glycomics. Chem. Biol.15(9),881–892 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eriksson T, Stals I, Collén A et al. Heterogeneity of homologously expressed Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei) Cel7B catalytic module. Eur. J. Biochem.271(7),1266–1276 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hui J, White T, Thibault P. Identification of glycan structure and glycosylation sites in cellobiohydrolase II and endoglucanases I and II from Trichoderma reesei. Glycobiology12(12),837 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandra K, Van Beeumen J, Stals I, Sandra P, Claeyssens M, Devreese B. Characterization of cellobiohydrolase I N-glycans and differentiation of their phosphorylated isomers by capillary electrophoresis- Q-trap mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.76(19),5878–5886 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stals I, Sandra K, Geysens S, Contreras R, Van Beeumen J, Claeyssens M. Factors influencing glycosylation of Trichoderma reesei cellulases. I: postsecretorial changes of the O-and N-glycosylation pattern of Cel7A. Glycobiology14(8),713 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerwig G, Kamerling J, Vliegenthart J, Morag E, Lamed R, Bayer E. Primary structure of O-linked carbohydrate chains in the cellulosome of different Clostridium thermocellum strains. Eur. J. Biochem.196(1),115–122 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rincon M, Ding S, McCrae S et al. Novel organization and divergent dockerin specificities in the cellulosome system of Ruminococcus flavefaciens. J. Bacteriol.185(3),703 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adney W, Jeoh T, Beckham G et al. Probing the role of N-linked glycans in the stability and activity of fungal cellobiohydrolases by mutational analysis. Cellulose16(4),699–709 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeoh T, Michener W, Himmel M, Decker S, Adney W. Implications of cellobiohydrolase glycosylation for use in biomass conversion. Biotechnol. Biofuels1(1),10 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao X, Rignall T, McCabe C, Adney W, Himmel M. Molecular simulation evidence for processive motion of Trichoderma reesei Cel7A during cellulose depolymerization. Chem. Phys. Lett.460(1–3),284–288 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Otten L, Greye H, Hernalsteens J et al. Mendelian transcmission of genes introduced into plants by the Ti plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. MGG183(2),209–213 (1981).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Birch R. Plant transformation: problems and strategies for practical application. Ann. Rev.Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.48(1),297 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Jeon J, Lee S, Jung K et al. T DNA insertional mutagenesis for functional genomics in rice. Plant J.22(6),561–570 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinke D, Cherry J, Dean C, Rounsley S, Koornneef M. Arabidopsis thaliana: a model plant for genome analysis. Science282(5389),662(1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parinov S, Sundaresan V. Functional genomics in Arabidopsis: large-scale insertional mutagenesis complements the genome sequencing project. Curr. Opin. Biotech.11(2),157–161 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somers D, Samac D, Olhoft P. Recent advances in legume transformation. Plant Physiol.131(3),892 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vain P, Worland B, Thole V et al. Agrobacterium mediated transformation of the temperate grass Brachypodium distachyon (genotype Bd21) for T DNA insertional mutagenesis. Plant Biotechnol. J.6(3),236–245 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michielse C, Hooykaas P, van den Hondel C, Ram A. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation as a tool for functional genomics in fungi. Curr. Genetics48(1),1–17 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piers K, Heath J, Liang X, Stephens K, Nester E. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA93(4),1613 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballance DJ, Buxton FP, Turner G. Transformation of Aspergillus nidulans by the orotidine 5’-phosphate decarboxylase gene of Neurospora crassa. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm.112(1),284–289 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dan Y, Baxter A, Zhang S, Pantazis CJ, Veilleux RE. Development of efficient plant regeneration and transformation system for Impatiens using Agrobacterium tumefaciens and multiple bud cultures as explants. BMC Plant Biol.10,165 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nugent GD, Coyne S, Nguyen TT, Kavanagh TA, Dix PJ. Nuclear and plastid transformation of Brassica oleracea var. botrytis (cauliflower) using PEG-mediated uptake of DNA into protoplasts. Plant Sci.170(1),135–142 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey M, Nevalainen K. Induction, isolation and testing of stable Trichoderma reesei mutants with improved production of solubilizing cellulase. Enzyme Microbial Technol.3(2),153–157 (1981).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown J, Falconer D, Wood T. Isolation and properties of mutants of the fungus Penicillium pinophilum with enhanced cellulase and β-glucosidase production. Enzyme Microbial Technol.9(3),169–175 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Durand H, Clanet Gérard M. Genetic improvement of Trichoderma reesei for large scale cellulase production. Enzyme Microbial Technol.10(6),341–346 (1988).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkaš V, Labudova I, Bauer Š, Ferenczy L. Preparation of mutants of Trichoderma viride with increased production of cellulase. Folia Microbiologica26(2),129–132 (1981).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ilmén M, Thrane C, Penttilä M. The glucose repressor genecre1 of Trichoderma: isolation and expression of a full-length and a truncated mutant form. MGG,251(4),451–460 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kubicek C, Mikus M, Schuster A, Schmoll M, Seiboth B. Metabolic engineering strategies for the improvement of cellulase production by Hypocrea jecorina. Biotechnol. Biofuels,2,19 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aro N, Ilmen M, Saloheimo A, Penttila M. ACEI of Trichoderma reesei is a repressor of cellulase and xylanase expression. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.69(1),56–65 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brestic-Goachet N, Gunasekaran P, Cami B, Baratti J. Transfer and expression of an Erwinia chrysanthemi cellulase gene in Zymomonas mobilis. Microbiology135(4),893 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Den Haan R, Rose S, Lynd L, Van Zyl W. Hydrolysis and fermentation of amorphous cellulose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metabolic Eng.9(1),87–94 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saloheimo M, Niku-Paavola M. Heterologous production of a ligninolytic enzyme: expression of the Phlebia radiata laccase gene in Trichoderma reesei. Nat. Biotechnol.9(10),987–990 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Dai Z, Hooker B, Anderson D, Thomas S. Expression of Acidothermus cellulolyticus endoglucanase E1 in transgenic tobacco: biochemical characteristics and physiological effects. Transgenic Res.9(1),43–54 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood E, Love R, Lane J et al. Subcellular targeting is a key condition for high level accumulation of cellulase protein in transgenic maize seed. Plant Biotechnol. J.5(6),709–719 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ziegelhoffer T, Raasch J, Austin-Phillips S. Dramatic effects of truncation and sub-cellular targeting on the accumulation of recombinant microbial cellulase in tobacco. Mol. Breeding8(2),147–158 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Sticklen M. Plant genetic engineering for biofuel production: towards affordable cellulosic ethanol. Nat. Rev. Genetics9(6),433–443 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor I, Larry E, Dai Z et al. Heterologous expression of glycosyl hydrolases in planta: a new departure for biofuels. Trends Biotechnol.26(8),413–424 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mohagheghi A, Grohmann K, Himmel M, Leighton L, Updegraff DM. Isolation and characterization of Acidothermus cellulolyticus, a new genus of thermophilic, acidophilic, cellulolytic bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.36(3),435–443 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Fukumori F, Kudo T, Narahashi Y, Horikoshi K. Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence of the alkaline cellulase gene from the alkalophilic Bacillus sp. strain 1139. J. General Microbiol.132(8),2329–2335 (1986).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharma D, Satyanarayana T. A marked enhancement in the production of a highly alkaline and thermostable pectinase by Bacillus pumilus dcsr1 in submerged fermentation by using statistical methods. Bioresource Technol.97(5),727–733 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panbangred W, Kondo T, Negoro S, Shinmyo A, Okada H. Molecular cloning of the genes for xylan degradation of Bacillus pumilus and their expression in Escherichia coli. MGG192(3),335–341 (1983).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murphy N, McConnell D, Cantwell B. The DNA sequence of the gene and genetic control sites for the excreted B. subtilis enzyme glucanase. Nucleic Acids Res.12(13),5355 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirasawa K, Uchimura K, Kashiwa M et al. Salt-activated endoglucanase of a strain of alkaliphilic Bacillus agaradhaerens. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek89(2),211–219 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liang Y, Yesuf J, Schmitt S, Bender K, Bozzola J. Study of cellulases from a newly isolated thermophilic and cellulolytic Brevibacillus sp. strain JXL. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.36(7),961–970 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Avalos O, Sánchez-Herrera L, Salgado L, Ponce-Noyola T. A bifunctional endoglucanase/endoxylanase from Cellulomonas flavigena with potential use in industrial processes at different pH. Curr. Microbiol.57(1),39–44 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langsford ML, Gilkes NR, Wakarchuk WW, Kilburn DG, Miller RC Jr, Warren RAJ. The cellulase system of Cellulomonas fimi. J. General Microbiol.130(6),1367–1376 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Tai S, Lin H, Kuo J, Liu J. Isolation and characterization of a cellulolytic Geobacillus thermoleovorans T4 strain from sugar refinery wastewater. Extremophiles8(5),345–349 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko C, Chen W, Tsai C, Jane W, Liu C, Tu J. Paenibacillus campinasensis BL11: a wood material-utilizing bacterial strain isolated from black liquor. Bioresource Technol.98(14),2727–2733 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Shyu C, Ho S, Chiou S. Characterization of a novel thermophilic, cellulose-degrading bacterium Paenibacillus sp. strain B39. Lett. Appl. Microbiol.47(1),46–53 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hankin L, Anagnostakis S. Solid media containing carboxymethylcellulose to detect Cx cellulase activity of micro-organisms. Microbiology98(1),109 (1977).
   Google Scholar
• Su T-M, Paulavicius I. Enzymatic saccharification of cellulose by thermophilic actinomyces. Appl. Polym. Symp.28,16 (1975).
   Google Scholar
• Stutzenberger F. Degradation of cellulosic substances by Thermomonospora curvata. Biotechnol. Bioeng.21(5),909–913 (1979).
   Google Scholar
• Crawford D, McCoy E. Cellulases of Thermomonospora fusca and Streptomyces thermodiastaticus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.24(1),150 (1972).
   Google Scholar
• Ding S, Bayer E, Steiner D, Shoham Y, Lamed R. A novel cellulosomal scaffoldin from Acetivibrio cellulolyticus that contains a family 9 glycosyl hydrolase. J. Bacteriol.181(21),6720 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabathé F. Characterization of the cellulolytic complex (cellulosome) of Clostridium acetobutylicum. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.217(1),15–22 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagnara-Tardif C, Gaudin C, Belaich A, Hoest P, Citard T, Belaich J. Sequence analysis of a gene cluster encoding cellulases from Clostridium cellulolyticum. Gene119(1),17–28 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoseyov O, Takagi M, Goldstein M, Doi R. Primary sequence analysis of Clostridium cellulovorans cellulose binding protein A. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA89(8),3483 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakiuchi M, Isui A, Suzuki K et al. Cloning and DNA sequencing of the genes encoding Clostridium josui scaffolding protein CipA and cellulase CelD and identification of their gene products as major components of the cellulosome. J. Bacteriol.180(16),4303 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia V, Madarro A, Peña J, Piñaga F, Vallès S, Flors A. Purification and characterization of cellulases from Clostridium papyrosolvens. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.46(1),49–60 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Ohara H, Karita S, Kimura T, Sakka K, Ohmiya K. Characterization of the cellulolytic complex (cellulosome) from Ruminococcus albus. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.64(2),254–260 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby J, Martin J, Daniel A, Flint H. Dockerin like sequences in cellulases and xylanases from the rumen cellulolytic bacterium Ruminococcus flavefaciens. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.149(2),213–219 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kansarn S, Nihira T, Hashimoto E, Suzuki M, Kono T, Okada G. Purification and properties of two endo-cellulases from Acremonium cellulolyticus. J. Appl. Glycoscience47(3/4),293–302 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Ximenes F, de Sousa M, Puls J, da Silva Jr F, Filho E. Purification and characterization of a low-molecular-weight xylanase produced by Acrophialophora nainiana. Curr. Microbiol.38(1),18–21 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adisa V, Fajola A. Cellulolytic enzymes associated with the fruit rots of Citrus sinensis caused by Aspergillus aculeatus and Botryodiplodia theobromae. Mycopathologia82(1),23–27 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• Reese E, Siu R, Levinson H. The biological degradation of soluble cellulose derivatives and its relationship to the mechanism of cellulose hydrolysis. J. Bacteriol.59(4),485 (1950).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandamme E, Logghe J, Geeraerts H. Cellulase activity of a thermophilic Aspergillus fumigatus (fresenius) strain. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.32(7–12),968–974 (1982).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, King K. Fractionation of β-glucosidases and related extracellular enzymes from Aspergillus niger. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.11(4),320 (1963).
   Google Scholar
• Jermyn M. Fungal cellulases. I. General properties of unpurified enzyme preparations from Aspergillus oryzae. Aus. J. Sci.5,409–432 (1952).
   Google Scholar
• Wood T, Phillips D. Another source of cellulase. Nature222,986–987 (1969).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fergus C. The cellulolytic activity of thermophilic fungi and actinomycetes. Mycologia61(1),120–129 (1969).
   Google Scholar
• Nisizawa K. Cellulose-splitting enzymes: v. purification of irpex cellulase and its action upon p-nitrophenyl r β-cellobioside. J. Biochem.42(6),825 (1955).
   Google Scholar
• Wood T, McCrae S. Purification and some properties of a (1--> 4)-β-glucan glucohydrolase associated with the cellulase from the fungus Penicillium funiculosum. Carbohydrate Res.110(2),291–303 (1982).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domsch K, Gams W. Variability and potential of a soil fungus population to decompose pectin, xylan and carboxymethyl-cellulose. Soil Biol. Biochem.1(1),29–36 (1969).
   Google Scholar
• Olutiola P. A cellulase complex in culture filtrates of Penicillium citrinum. Can. J. Microbiol.22(8),1153 (1976).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saddler J. Screening of highly cellulolytic fungi and the action of their cellulase enzyme systems. Enzyme Microbial Technol.4(6),414–418 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Jurásek L, Colvin J, Whitaker D. Microbiological aspects of the formation and degradation of cellulosic fibers. Adv. Appl. Microbiol.9,131–170 (1968).
   Google Scholar
• Bateman D. Some characteristics of the cellulase system produced by Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. Phytopathology59(1),37–42 (1969).
   Google Scholar
• Bateman D. The polygalacturonase complex produced by Sclerotium rolfsii. Physiologial Plant Pathol.2(2),175–184 (1972).
   Google Scholar
• Folan M, Coughlan M. The cellulase complex in the culture filtrate of the thermophyllic fungus, Talaromyces emersonii. Int. J. Biochem.9(10),717–722 (1978).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gong C, Ladisch M, Tsao G. Biosynthesis, purification, and mode of action of cellulases of Trichoderma reesei. Adv. Chem. Ser.181,261–288 (1979).
   Google Scholar
• Reese E, Levinson H. A comparative study of the breakdown of cellulose by microorganisms. Physiologia Plantarum5(3),345–366 (1952).
   Google Scholar
• Ho Y, Bauchop T, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S. Ruminomyces elegans gen. et sp. nov., a polycentric anaerobic rumen fungus from cattle. Mycotaxon (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Fliegerova K, Paioutova S, Mrazek J, Kopean J. Special properties of polycentric anaerobic fungus Anaeromyces mucronatus. Acta Vet. Brno.71,441–444 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Matsui H, Ban-Tokuda T. Studies on carboxymethyl cellulase and xylanase activities of anaerobic fungal isolate CR4 from the bovine rumen. Curr. Microbiol.57(6),615–619 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson C, Wood T. The anaerobic fungus Neocallimastix frontalis: isolation and properties of a cellulosome-type enzyme fraction with the capacity to solubilize hydrogen-bond-ordered cellulose. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.37(1),125–129 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Webb J, Theodorou MK (1991) Neocallimastix hurleyensis sp.nov., an anaerobic fungus from the ovine rumen. Can. J. Bot.69(10),1220–1224.
   Google Scholar
• Pai C, Wu Z, Chen M et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of a bifunctional xylanolytic enzyme from Neocallimastix patriciarum. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.85(5),1451–1462 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qiu X, Selinger B, Yanke L, Cheng K. Isolation and analysis of two cellulase cDNAs from Orpinomyces joyonii. Gene245(1),119–126 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steenbakkers P, Li X, Ximenes E et al. Noncatalytic docking domains of cellulosomes of anaerobic fungi. J. Bacteriol.183(18),5325 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Chen H, Ljungdahl L. Two cellulases, CelA and CelC, from the polycentric anaerobic fungus Orpinomyces strain PC-2 contain N-terminal docking domains for a cellulase-hemicellulase complex. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.63(12),4721 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood TM, Wilson CA. Studies on the capacity of the cellulase of the anaerobic rumen fungus Piromonas communis P to degrade hydrogen bond-ordered cellulose. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.43,572–578 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghothama S, Eberhardt R, Simpson P et al. Characterization of a cellulosome dockerin domain from the anaerobic fungus Piromyces equi. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.8(9),775–778 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Dijkerman R, den Camp H, Van der Drift C. Cultivation of anaerobic fungi in a 10-l fermenter system for the production of (hemi-) cellulolytic enzymes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.46(1),85–91 (1996).
   Google Scholar

▪ Patents

• Spindler DD, Grohmann K, Wyman CE: US5100791 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Komura I, Awao T, Yamada K: US4106989 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Skinner W, Tokuyama F: US4081328 (1978).
   Google Scholar

▪ Website

• Carbohydrate-active Enzymes Database. www.cazy.org
   Google Scholar