288
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspective

Biofuels: from a win–win solution to a wicked problem?

&
Pages 737-748 | Published online: 09 Apr 2014

References

  • Govinda R, Shrestha A. How much hope should we have for biofuels? Energy36(4),2055–2069 (2011).
  • Rohracher H. Biofuels and their publics: the need for differentiated analysis and strategies. Biofuels1(1),3–5 (2010).
  • World Bioenergy Association. WBA Position Paper on Global Potential for Bioenergy Sufficient to meet Global Energy Demand. World Bioenergy Association, Stockholm, Sweden, 4 (2009).
  • Greenpeace. Press release: Europe’s biofuels plans driving social and environmental destruction. New research warns of massive increase in carbon emissions and land conversion. Greenpeace, 8 November 2010.
  • Landerweerd L, Osseweijer P, Kinderlerer J. Distributing responsibility in the debate on sustainable biofuels. Sci. Eng. Ethics15,531–543 (2009).
  • Senger F, Raven R, Venrooij A. From riches to rags: biofuels, media discourses, and resistance to sustainable energy technologies. Energy Policy38(9),5013–5027 (2010).
  • Upham P, Tomei J, Dendler L. Governance and legitimacy aspects of the UK biofuel carbon and sustainability reporting system. Energy Policy39,2669–2678 (2011).
  • Rittel H, Webber M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci.4,155–169 (1973).
  • Batie S. Wicked problems and applied economics. Am. J. Agric. Econ.90(5),1176–1191 (2008).
  • Kreuter M, de Rosa C, Howze E, Baldwin G. Understanding wicked problems: a key to advancing environmental health promotion. Health Educ. Behav.31(4),441–454 (2004).
  • Ludwig D. The age of management is over. Ecosystems4,758–764 (2001).
  • Frame B. ‘Wicked’, ‘messy’, and ‘clumsy’: long-term frameworks for sustainability. Environ. Planning C26,1113–1128 (2008).
  • Funtowicz S, Ravetz J. Science for the post-normal age. Futures739–755 (1993).
  • Ravetz J. Post-normal science and the complexity of transitions towards sustainability. Ecol. Complex.3,275–284 (2006).
  • Lachapelle P, Mccool S, Patterson M. Barriers to effective natural resource planning in a ‘messy’ world. Soc. Nat. Resour.16,473–490 (2003).
  • McCormick K. Communicating bioenergy: a growing challenge. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref.4,494–502 (2010).
  • Canada Gazette. Notice of intent to develop a federal regulation requiring renewable fuels. Canada Gazette140(52) (2006).
  • US EPA. Federal Register. Notice of Proposed Rule-Making: Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Changes to Renewable Fuel Standard Program; Proposed Rule. US EPA, Washington, DC, USA, 24904–25143 (2009).
  • EC. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources and Amending and Subsequently Repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. EC, Brussels, Belgium, 47 (2009).
  • FAO. A Review of the Current State of BioEnergy Development in G8 plus 5 countries. FAO, Rome, Italy, 292 (2007).
  • Earley J, Mckeown A. Smart Choices for Biofuels. Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC, USA, 16 (2009).
  • WWF. The Energy Report. WWF, Godalming, UK, 256 (2012).
  • Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science319,1235–1238 (2008).
  • Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, Polasky S, Tiffany D. Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103(30),11210–11216 (2006).
  • Searchinger T, Hemlich R, Houghton RA et al. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land use change. Science319,1238–1240 (2008).
  • Tilman D, Socolow R, Foley J et al. Beneficial biofuels – the food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science325(5938),270–271 (2009).
  • Renewable Fuels Agency. The Gallagher Review of the Indirect Effects of Biofuels Production. Renewable Fuels Agency, London, UK, 92 (2008).
  • Bailis R, Baka J. Constructing sustainable biofuels: governance of the emerging biofuel economy. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr.101(4),827–838 (2011).
  • Florin MV, Bunting C. Risk governance guidelines for bioenergy policies. J. Cleaner Prod. (2009).
  • Howarth R, Bringezu S, Bekunda M et al. Rapid assessment on biofuels and the environment: overview and key findings. In: Biofuels Environmental Consequences and Interactions with Changing Land Use. Scope, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA, 1–13 (2009).
  • Levidow L, Papaioannou T, Birch K. Neoliberalising technoscience and environment: EU policy for competitive, sustainable biofuels. In: Neoliberalism and Technoscience: Critical Assessments. Pellizzoni L, Ylonen M (Eds). Ashgate, Farnham, UK (2012).
  • Schouten J, Glasbergen P. Creating legitimacy in global private governance: the case of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. Ecol. Econ.79,1891–1898 (2011).
  • US EPA. EPA Lifecycle Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Renewable Fuels. Report no. EPA-420-F-10–006. US EPA, Washington, DC, USA (2010).
  • Palmer J. Risk governance in an age of wicked problems: lessons from the European approach to indirect land-use change. J. Risk Res.15(5),515 (2011) (2011).
  • EC. Report from the Commission on Indirect Land-Use Change Related to Biofuels and Bioliquids. EC, Brussels, Belgium (2010).
  • EC. Estimate of GHG Emissions from Global Land Use Change Scenarios. EC, Brussels, Belgium (2011).
  • Laborde D. Assessing the land use change consequences of European biofuel policies – final report. Int. Food Policy Res. Inst.111 (2011).
  • Debucquet D. Land Use Change and European Biofuel Policies. EC, Brussels, Belgium, 52 (2011).
  • Liska A, Perrin R. Indirect land use emissions in the life cycle of biofuels: regulations vs science. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref.3(3),318–329 (2009).
  • Mata T, Martins A, Caetano N. Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.14,217–232 (2010).
  • US Department of Energy. National Algal Biofuels Technology Roadmap. US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, USA, 140 (2010).
  • Di Lucia L, Nilsson L. Transport biofuels in the European Union: the state of play. Transport Policy14(6),533–543 (2007).
  • Jacobson M. Effects of ethanol (E85) versus gasoline on cancer and mortality in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol.41,4150–4157 (2007).
  • Koh L, Wilcove D. Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity? Conserv. Lett.1(2),60–64 (2008).
  • EC. Commission Sets Up System for Certifying Sustainable Biofuels. MEMO/10/247. EC, Brussels, Belgium (2010).
  • Pacini H, Assuncao L. Sustainable biofuels in the EU: the costs of certification and impacts on new producers. Biofuels2(6),595–598 (2011).
  • Friends of the Earth Europe. Press release: European Commission expected to approve seven certification schemes for biofuels without public scrutiny. Friends of the Earth Europe, 18 July (2011).
  • The Royal Society. Sustainable Biofuels: Prospects and Challenges. Royal Society Policy Documents. The Royal Society, London, UK, 90 (2008).
  • Agarwal A. Biofuels (alcohols and biodiesel) applications as fuels for internal combustion engines. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.33,233–271 (2007).
  • EC. Memo: Certification Schemes for Biofuels. EC, Brussels, Belgium (2012).
  • Fast S. The biofuels debate: searching for the role of environmental justice in environmental discourse. Environments37(1),83–110 (2009).
  • Goodell J. Ethanol scam: ethanol hurts the environment and is one of America’s biggest political boondoggles. Rolling Stone1032 (2007).
  • Oppel R. In Iowa, ethanol can still trip up a candidate. New York Times 8 October (2011).
  • Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Biofuels: Ethical Issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London, UK, 226 (2011).
  • Forester J. Planning in the Face of Power. University of California Press, Los Angeles, CA, USA (1989).
  • Roundtable for Sustainable Biofuels. RSB Principles and Criteria for Sustainable Biofuel Production. Roundtable for Sustainable Biofuels, Lausanne, Switzerland, 29 (2010).
  • Ginnebaugh D, Liang J, Jacobson M. Examining the temperature dependence of ethanol (E85) versus gasoline emissions on air pollution with a largely-explict chemical mechanism. Atmos. Environ.44(9),1192–1199 (2010).
  • Christensen K. Coping with uncertainity in planning. J. Am. Plan. Assoc.51(1),63–73 (1985).
  • Fast S, Brklachich M, Saner M. A geography-based critique of new US biofuels regulations. GCB Bioenergy4(3),243–252 (2011).
  • Wang M, Wu Y, Elgowainy A. Operating Manual for GREET Version 1.7. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, USA (2007).
  • Turpenny J, Jones M, Lorenzi I. Where now for post-normal science? A critical review of its development, definitions and uses. Sci. Technol. Human Values36(3),287–306 (2011).
  • Frame B, Brown J. Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability. Ecol. Econ.65,225–241 (2008).
  • Flyjberg B. Power and Rationality: Democracy in Practice. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA (1998).
  • Forester J. The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA (1999).
  • Healey P. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. UBC Press, Vancouver, Canada (1997).
  • Fischer F. Citizen Participation and the democratization of policy expertise: from theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy Sci.26(3),165–187 (1993).
  • Sherman J, Peterson G. Finding the win in wicked problems: lessons from evaluating public policy. Foundation Rev.1(3),87–99 (2009).
  • Luskin R, Crow D, Fishkin J, Guild W, Thomas D. Report on the Deliberative Poll® on ‘Vermont’s Energy Future’. University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA, 158 (2007).
  • Luskin R, Fishkin J, Hahn K. Consensus and polarization in small group deliberations. Presented at: The Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Chicago, IL, USA, 30 August–2 September 2007.
  • Habermas J. The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume 1 Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Beacon Press, Boston, MA, USA, 1 (1984).
  • Habermas J. Some further clarifications of the concept of communicative rationality. In: On the Pragmatics of Communication. Cooke M (Ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 307–343 (1998).
  • Kean B. Self-fulfilling prophecies of the European knowledge-based bio-economy: the shaping of institutional and policy frameworks in the bio-pharmaceuticals sector. J. Knowledge Econ. (2012) (Epub).
  • McCormick K, Bomb C, Deurwaarder E. Governance of biofuels for transport: lessons from Sweden and the UK. Biofuels3(3),293–305 (2012).
  • Cashore B, Auld G, Newsom D. Governing through markets: forest certification and the emergence of non-state authority. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA (2004).
  • Nass L, Peraira P, Ellis A. Biofuels in Brazil: an overview. Crop Sci.47(6),2228–2237 (2007).
  • Valdes C. Brazil’s Ethanol Industry: Looking Forward. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA, 47 (2011).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.