GHG emissions from jatropha-based bioderived synthetic paraffinic kerosene

• Chiesa T, Densborn R. Policies and Collaborative Partnership for Sustainable Aviation. World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Maniatis K, Weitz M, Zschocke A. 2 Million Tons Per Year: A Performing Biofuels Supply Chain for EU Aviation. EC, Brussels, Belgium (2011).
   Google Scholar
• ASTM Standard D7566. Standard Specification for Aviation Turbine Fuel Containing Synthesized Hydrocarbons. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA (2011).
   Google Scholar
• International Air Transport Association. Report on Alternative Fuels. International Air Transport Association, Montreal, Canada (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel D, Marklein A, Toth M et al. Food versus biofuels: environmental and economic costs. Hum. Ecol.37,1–12 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye-Blake W. Biofuel and food: it’s complicated. Biofuels1(4),511–514 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Thofern H. Bioenergy and food security. The BEFS Analytical Framework. In: Environment and Natural Resources Management (Volume 16). FAO, Rome, Italy (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Koh LP, Wilcove DS. Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity? Conserv. Lett.1(2),60–64(2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU. Renewable Energy Directive (RED). 2009/28/EC. EC, Brussels, Belgium (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Grass M. Jatropha curcas L.: visions and realities. J. Agric. Rural Dev. Trop.110(1),29–38 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achten WMJ, Nielsen LR, Aerts R et al. Towards domestication of Jatropha curcas. Biofuels1(1),91–107 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. DIN ISO EN 14040. Umweltmanagament – Ökobilanz – Grundsätze und Rahmenbedingungen. Beuth Verlag GmbH, Berlin, Germany (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. DIN ISO EN 14044. Umweltmanagement – Ökobilanz – Anforderungen und Anleitungen. Beuth Verlag GmbH, Berlin, Germany (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Heinz A, Kaltschmitt M, Hofbauer H. Anwendung energetischer und nicht-energetischer ressourcen in energiesystemen. Vergleichende bewertung. Z. Umweltchem Ökotox17(3–4),147–150; 218–222 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Bauen A, Howes J, Franzosi M, Tipper R, Woods J. A Methodology and Tool for Calculating the Carbon Intensity of Biofuels. E4tech, ECCM, Themba Technology, London, UK (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Institut für Umweltinformatik, Institut für Energie und Umweltforschung. Umberto. Software für das betriebliche Stoffstrommanagement. Benutzerhandbuch Version Umberto 5. Institut für Umweltinformatik, Hamburg, Germany (2005).
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. Climate Change 2007. The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge Press, NY, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Paz A, Vissers P. Greenhouse Gas Calculations Jatropha Value Chain. Sun Biofuels, Mozambique (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Krall S. Jatropha Reality Check. A Field Assessment of the Agronomic and Economic Viability of Jatropha and Other Oilseed Crops in Kenya. GTZ, Eschborn, Germany (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Jongschaap R, Corré W, Bindraban P, Brandenburg W. Claims and Facts on Jatropha curcas L. Global Jatropha curcas Evaluation, Breeding And Propagation Programme. Plant Research International, Wageningen, The Netherlands (2007).
   Google Scholar
• van Eijck J, Smeets E, Romijn H, Balkema A, Jongshaap R. Jatropha Assessment. Agronomy, Socio-Economic Issues, and Ecology. Utrecht University, Technical University Eindhoven, Plant Research International, Wageningen, The Netherlands (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Bailis R, Baka J. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Land Use Change from Jatropha curcas-Based Jet Fuel in Brazil. Supplemental Information. Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New Haven, CT, USA (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Pandey KK. Life cycle assessment of small-scale high-input jatropha biodiesel production. Appl. Energy88(12),4831–4839 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• EU. Leitlinien für die Berechnung des Kohlenstoffbestands im Boden für die Zwecke des Anhangs V der Richtlinie 2009/28/EG. 2010/335/EU. EC, Brussels, Belgium (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Reinhardt G, Gärtner S, Rettenmaier N, Münch J, von Falkenstein E. Screening Life Cycle Assessment of Jatropha Biodiesel. Final Report. Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, Heidelberg, Germany (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Üllenberg A. Jatropha in Madagaskar. Sachstandsbericht. Gesellschaft für technische Zusammenarbeit, Madagascar (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Reinhardt G, Gärtner S, Rettenmaier N, Köppen S. Screening Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrotreated Jatropha Oil. Final Report. Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, Heidelberg, Germany (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Warshay B, Pan J, Sgouridis S. Aviation industry’s quest for a sustainable fuel: considerations of scale and modal opportunity carbon. Biofuels2(1),33–58 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Ali N, Kurchania A, Babel S. Bio-methanisation of Jatropha curcas defatted waste. J. Eng. Tech. Res.2(3),38–43 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Gupta N, Dhanya M, Joshi H, Lata. Biogas potentiality of agro-wastes jatropha fruit coat. Int. J. Civ. Environ. Eng.1(3), (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Nikander S. Greenhouse Gas and Energy Intensity Assessment of Product Chain: Case Transport Biofuel. Helsinki University of Technology, Neste Oil Corporation, Helsinki, Finland (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Makkar H, Maes J, de Greyt W, Becker K. Removal and degradation of phorbol esters during pre-treatment and transesterification of Jatropha curcas oil. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.86,173–181 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weindorf W. Vergleichende Betrachtung der Herstellung von Biodiesel und im Co-Processing hydrierten Pflanzenölen. Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik GmbH, Ottobrunn, Germany (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Donnis B, Egeberg R, Blom P, Knudsen KG. Hydroprocessing of bio-oil and oxygenates to hydrocarbons. Understanding the reaction routes. Top. Catal.52,229–240 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bautsch J. Raffineriekonzepte – Integration von HVO-Anlagen. BP, Berlin, Germany (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Kaltschmitt M. Energie aus Biomasse. Grundlagen, Techniken und Verfahren (2nd Edition). Springer, Berlin, Germany (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Muradov N. Production of hydrogen from hydrocarbons. In: Hydrogen Fuel: Production, Transport, Storage. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 33–102 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Hiller H. Formaldehyde to glyoxylic acid. Gas production. In: Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (Volume 15) (6th Edition). Wiley-VHC Verlag, Weinheim, Germany (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Bechrakis DA, Varkaraki E. Hydrogen production from wind energy. In: Hydrogen Fuel: Production, Transport, Storage. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 161–184 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Wulf C, Kaltschmitt M. Life cycle assessment of hydrogen supply chain with special attention on hydrogen refueling stations. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy37,16711–16721 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratton R, Wong HM, Hileman J. Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Alternative Jet Fuels. PARTNER Project 28 Report, Version 1.2. The Partnership for Air Transportation Noise and Emissions Reduction, Cambridge, MA, USA (2010).
   Google Scholar

▪ Patent

• Bönsch R, Seidel E, Saft H: EP2311929 A1 (2011).
   Google Scholar

▪ Websites

• Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories (EcoInvent). www.ecoinvent.org
   Google Scholar
• Neste Oil Corporation. Rotterdam renewable diesel refinery. www.nesteoil.com/default.asp?path=1,41,537,2397,14089
   Google Scholar
• Google Maps. http://maps.google.de
   Google Scholar
• World Shipping Register. Sea distance calculator. http://sea-distances.com/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency. Statistics and balances. www.iea.org/stats/index.asp
   Google Scholar