Ask the Experts: The food versus fuel debate

• McLaughlin SB, Kszos LA. Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States. Biomass Bioenergy28(6),515–535 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart LB, Cameron KD. Genetic improvement of willow (Salix spp.) as a dedicated bioenergy crop. In: Genetic Improvement of Bioenergy Crops. Vermerris WE (Ed.). Springer Science, NY, USA, 347–376 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Licker R, Johnston M, Foley JA, Barford CL, Monfreda C, Ramankutty N. Mind the gap: how do climate and agricultural management explain the ‘yield gap’ of croplands around the world? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.19(6),769–782 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston M, Licker R, Barford CL, Foley JA, Holloway T, Kucharik CJ. Closing the gap: global potential for increasing biofuels production through intensification. Environ. Res. Lett.6,034028 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Sommerville C, Youngs H, Taylor C, Davis SC, Long SP. Feedstocks for lignocellulosic biofuels. Science329,790–792 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searchinger TR. Heimlich RA, Houghton F et al. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science319(5867),1238–1240 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science319(5867),1235–1238 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smil V. Feeding the World. A Challenge for the 21st Century. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Hall KD, Guo J, Dore M, Chow CC. The progressive increase of food waste in America and its environmental impact. PLoS ONE4(11),e7940.
   Google Scholar
• Chisti Y, Yan J. Algal biofuels – a status report. Appl. Energy88,3277–3279 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisti Y. Fuels from microalgae. Biofuels1,233–235 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Chisti Y. Biodiesel from microalgae beats bioethanol. Trends Biotechnol.26,126–131 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisti Y. Energy crops are essential for producing biofuels. Biotechnol. Adv.28,935 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Courchesne NMD, Parisien A, Wang B, Lan CQ. Enhancement of lipid production using biochemical, genetic and transcription factor engineering approaches. J. Biotechnol.141,31–41 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lü J, Sheahan C, Fu PC. Metabolic engineering of algae for fourth generation biofuels production. Energy Environ. Sci.4,2451–2466 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radakovits R, Jinkerson RE, Darzins A, Posewitz MC. Genetic engineering of algae for enhanced biofuel production. Eukaryot. Cell9,486–501 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Work VH, D’Adamo S, Radakovits R et al. Improving photosynthesis and metabolic networks for the competitive production of phototroph-derived biofuels. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.23,290–297 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu W-L, Ansari W, Schoepp NG et al. Modifications of the metabolic pathways of lipid and triacylglycerol production in microalgae. Microb. Cell Fact.10, article 91 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Chen M, Blankenship RE. Expanding the solar spectrum used by photosynthesis. Trends Plant Sci.16,427–431 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson PG, Moore CM, Terry MJ et al. Improving photosynthesis for algal biofuels: toward a green revolution. Trends Biotechnol.29,615–623 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pate R, Klise G, Wu B. Resource demand implications for US algae biofuels production scale-up. Appl. Energy88,3377–3388 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano M, Beardall J, Raven JA. CO2 concentrating mechanisms in algae: mechanisms, environmental modulation, and evolution. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol.56,99–131 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zehr JP. Nitrogen fixation by marine cyanobacteria. Trends Microbiol.19,162–173 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisti Y. Response to Reijnders: Do biofuels from microalgae beat biofuels from terrestrial plants? Trends Biotechnol.26,351–352 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisti Y. A bioeconomy vision of sustainability. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref.4,359–361 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Fedoroff NV, Battisti DS, Beachy RN et al. Radically rethinking agriculture for the 21st century. Science327,833–834 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavrilescu M, Chisti Y. Biotechnology – a sustainable alternative for chemical industry. Biotechnol. Adv.23,471–499 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Khanna M. Food vs fuel: the effects of biofuels policies. Am. J. Agric. Econ. doi:10.1093/ajae/aas039 (2012) (Epub).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baffes J, Haniotis T. Placing the 2006/08 Commodity Price Boom into Perspective. World Bank Working Paper 5371. World Bank, Washington, DC, USA (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Oladosu G, Kline, K. The role of modeling assumptions and policy instruments in evaluating the global implications of US biofuel policies. Presented at: 33rd IAEE International Conference ‘The Future of Energy: Global Challenges, Diverse Solutions’. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, June 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuschammer-Klein D, Oleskowicz-Popiel P, Simmons B, Blanch HW. The challenge of enzyme costs in the production of lignocellulosic biofuels. Biotechnol. Bioeng.109(4),1083–1087 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nguyen TLT, Gheewala SH, Garivait S. Fossil energy savings and GHG mitigation potentials of ethanol as a gasoline substitute in Thailand. Energy Policy35(10),5195–5205 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen TLT, Gheewala SH, Garivait S. Energy balance and GHG-abatement cost of cassava utilization for fuel ethanol in Thailand. Energy Policy35(9),4585–4596 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Pleanjai S, Gheewala SH, Garivait S. Greenhouse gas emissions from production and use of palm methyl ester in Thailand. Int. J. Glob. Warming1(4),418–431 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Pleanjai S, Gheewala SH, Garivait S. Greenhouse gas emissions from production and use of used cooking oil methyl ester as transport fuel in Thailand. J. Cleaner Prod.17(9),873–876 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silalertruksa T, Gheewala SH. Security of feedstocks supply for future bio-ethanol production in Thailand. Energy Policy34,7475–7486 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Silalertruksa T, Gheewala SH, Hünecke K, Fritsche UR. Biofuels and employment effects: implications for socio-economic development in Thailand. Biomass Bioenergy (2012) (In press).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kochaphum C, Gheewala SH, Vinitnantarat S. Commodity price rise caused by biofuel in Thailand. Presented at: 4th International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Environment (SEE 2011): A Paradigm Shift to Low Carbon Society. Bangkok, Thailand, 27–29 February 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Silalertruksa T, Gheewala SH, Sagisaka M. Impacts of Thai bio-ethanol policy target on land use and greenhouse gas emissions. Appl. Energy86(Suppl. 1),S170–S177 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Siangjaeo S, Gheewala SH, Unnanon K, Chidthaisong A. Implications of land use change on the life cycle greenhouse gas emission from palm biodiesel production in Thailand. Energy Sustain. Devel.15,1–7 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silalertruksa T, Gheewala SH. Food, fuel and climate change: is palm-based biodiesel a sustainable option for Thailand? J. Ind. Ecol.16,541–551 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Asian Development Bank. Global and Regional Development and Impact of Biofuels: A Focus on the Greater Mekong Subregion. Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong City, Philippines (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Edwards R, Mulligan D, Marelli L. Indirect Land Use Change from Increased Biofuels Demand – Comparison of Models and Results for Marginal Biofuels Production from Different Feedstocks. Publications Office of the EU, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg (2011)
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers J, Kunen E, Ford S, Harris N, Kadyzewski J. Biofuels and Indirect Land Use Change, White Paper: Challenges and Opportunities for Improved Assessment and Monitoring. Winrock International, Arlington, VA, USA (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Bauen A, Chudziak C, Vad K, Watson P. A Causal Descriptive Approach to Modelling the GHG Emissions Associated with the Indirect Land Use Change Impacts of Biofuels. UK Department for Transport, London, UK (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Fritsche UR, Sims REH, Monti A. Direct and indirect land-use competition issues for energy crops and their sustainable production – an overview. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref.4,692–704 (2010).
   Google Scholar

▪ Website

• People’s Daily Online. South Africa to develop biofuel. http://english.people.com.cn/200612/08/eng20061208_329831.html
   Google Scholar