Global economic effects of US biofuel policy and the potential contribution from advanced biofuels

• US Government. The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (H.R.6). US Government, Washington, DC, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Verick S, Islam I. The Great Recession of 2008–2009: Causes, Consequences and Policy Responses. Discussion Paper Series, IZA DP No. 4934. Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Wicke B, Verweij P, van Meijl H, van Vuuren DP, Faaij APC. Indirect land use change: review of existing models and strategies for mitigation. Biofuels3(1),87–100 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Gehlhar M, Winston A, Somwaru A. Effects of Increased Biofuels on the US Economy in 2022. Economic Research Report 102. Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Taheripour F, Hertel TW, Tyner WE, Beckman JF, Birur DK. Biofuels and their by-products: global economic and environmental implications. Biomass Bioenergy34,278–289 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Yu E, Rozelle S, Yang J, Msangi S. The Impact of Biofuel Growth on Agriculture: Why is the Range of Estimates So Wide? Working Paper. Biofuels and the Poor, Washington, DC, USA (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Chen X, Khanna M. Food vs fuel: the effect of biofuel policies. Am. J. Agric. Econ. (2012) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Timilsina GR, Mevel S, Shrestha A. Oil price, biofuels and food supply. Energy Policy39,8089–8105 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Kretschmer B, Narita D, Peterson S. The economic effects of the EU biofuel target. Energy Economics31,S285–S294 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banse M, van Meijl H, Tabeau A, Woltjer G, Hellmann F, Verbug PH. Impact of EU biofuel policies on world agriculture and land use. Biomass Bioenergy35,2385–2390 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Riffai P, Dimaranan B, Laborde D. Global Trade and Environmental Impact Study of the EU Biofuels Mandate. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Yang J, Huang J, Qiu H, Rozelle S, Sombilla MA. Biofuels and the greater Mekong subregion: assessing the impact on prices, production and trade. Appl. Econ.86,S37–S46 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Arndt C, Msangi S, Thurlow J. Are biofuels good for African development? An analytical framework with evidence from Mozambique and Tanzania. Biofuels2(2),221–234 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Lashitew AA. Competition between food and biofuel production in Ethiopia: a partial equilibrium analysis. Biofuels2(6),611–627 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Oladosu G. Estimates of the global indirect energy-use emission impacts of USA biofuel policy. Appl. Energy99,85–96 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Gorter H, Just DR. The social costs and benefits of biofuels: the intersection of environmental, energy and agricultural policy. Appl. Econ. Perspect.32(1),4–32, (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertel TW. Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1997).
   Google Scholar
• McDougall R, Golub A. GTAP-E: A Revised Energy-Environmental Version of the GTAP Model. GTAP Research Memorandum No. 15. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Surry Y, Dimaranan B, Hertel T. CDE calibration. In: Global Trade Assistance and Protection: GTAP 4 Data Base Documentation. McDougall RA, Elbehri A, Truong TP (Eds). Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Ianchovichina E, McDougall R. Theoretical Structure of Dynamic GTAP. Technical paper No. 17. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Perlack RD, Stokes BJ. US Billion-Ton Update: Biomass Supply for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry. ORNL/TM-2011/224. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Rose A, Oladosu G. Greenhouse gas reduction policy in the United States: identifying winners and losers in an expanded permit trading system, Energy J.23(1),1–18 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizer W, Burtraw D, Harrington W, Newell R, Sanchirico J. Modeling economy-wide vs sectoral climate policies using combined aggregate-sectoral models. Energy J.27(3),135–168 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao L, Aden A. The economics of current and future biofuels In Vitro. Cell. Dev. Bio. Plant45,199–217 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip S, Aden A, Jechura J, Dayton D. Thermochemical Ethanol Via Indirect Gasification and Mixed Alcohol Synthesis of Lignocellulosic Biomass, NREL Report No: TP-510–41168. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Aden A, Ruth M, Ibsen K et al.Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover. NREL Report TP-510–32438. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Taheripour F, Birur DK, Hertel TW, Tyner WE. Introducing Liquid Biofuels into the GTAP Database. GTAP Research Memorandum No. 11. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Lee H, Hertel T, Sohngen B, Ramankutty N. Towards An Integrated Land Use Database for Assessing the Potential for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, GTAP Resource #1900. Global Trade Analysis Project, West Lafayette, IN, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• McDougall RA, Walmsley T, Golub A, Ianchoiachina E, Itakura K. An overview of the dynamic GTAP database: the database construction and aggregation programs. In: Global Economic Analysis: Dynamic Modeling and Application. Ianchovichina E, Wamsley T (Eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2011)
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley TL. A baseline scenario for the dynamic GTAP model. In: Global Economic Analysis: Dynamic Modeling and Application. Ianchovichina E, Wamsley T (Eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Bouët A, Dimaranan BV, Valin H. Modeling the Global Trade and Environmental Impacts of Biofuel Policies. IFPRI Discussion Paper 01018. International Food and Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Golub A, McDougall R. Behavioral and entropy parameters of the dynamic GTAP model. In: Global Economic Analysis: Dynamic Modeling and Application. Ianchovichina E, Wamsley T (Eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Tannura M, Irwin S, Good D. Are Corn Trend Yields Increasing at a Faster Rate? MOBR 08–02, Marketing and Outlook Briefs. University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Huang H, Khanna M. An econometric analysis of US crop yield and cropland acreage: implications for the impact of climate change. Presented at: The Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, CAES, and WAEA Joint Annual Meeting. Denver, CO, 25–27 July 2010.
   Google Scholar

▪ Websites

• Ascencion Publishing. Advanced biofuel tracking database. www.ascension-publishing.com/BIZ/ABTDv17.xls
   Google Scholar
• National Advanced Biofuels Consortium. Advanced biofuels processing and integration. www.nabcprojects.org/biofuels.html
   Google Scholar
• SAGE – Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment. Maps, data, models. www.sage.wisc.edu/mapsdatamodels.html
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. World development indicators database. http://databank.worldbank.org/databank/download/WDIandGDF_excel.zip
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund. World economic outlook database. www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2010/02/weodata/index.aspx
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture. Production, supply, and distribution online. www.fas.usda.gov/psdonline
   Google Scholar
• National Advanced Biofuels Consortium. The NABC Completes its Stage II Plans. www.nabcprojects.org/pdfs/nabc_completes_stage_ii_plans.pdf
   Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency. E15 (a blend of gasoline and ethanol). www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/fuels/additive/e15
   Google Scholar