Environmental analysis of biogas production systems

• Steinfeld H. Livestock’s Long Shadow Environmental Issues and Options. FAO, Rome, Italy (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K. IPPC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (Volume 4). IPPC, Hayama, Japan, (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Thornton PK. Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B365,2853–2867 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohseni F, Magnusson M, Görling PA. Biogas from renewable electricity – increasing a climate neutral fuel supply. Appl. Energy90,11–16 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poeschl M, Ward S, Owende P. Prospects for expanded utilization of biogas in Germany. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev.14,1082–1797 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Curry N, Pillay P. Biogas prediction and design of a food waste to energy system for the urban environment. Renew. Energy41,200–209 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelli S. Biomasse ed Energia. Produzione, Gestione e Processi di Trasformazione, Ambiente e Territorio. Maggioli Editori Spa. Santarcangelo di Romagna, Italy, (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Weiland P. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.85,849–860 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nallathambi Gunaseelan V. Anaerobic digestion of biomass for methane production: a review. Biomass Bioenergy13(1–2),83–114 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward AJ, Hobbs PJ, Holliman PJ, Jones DL. Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour. Technol.99(17),7928–7940 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vismara R, Canziani R, Malpei F, Piccinini S. Biogas da Agrozootecnia e Agroindustria. Dario Flaccovio, Palermo, Italy, (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Tricase C, Lombardi M. State of the art and prospects of Italian biogas production from animal sewage: technical–economic considerations. Renew. Energy34(3),477–485 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro E, Mantha V, Rouboa A. Prospective application of farm cattle manure for bioenergy production in Portugal. Renew. Energy36,627–631 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Information and Advisory Service on Appropriate Technology/Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit. Biogas Digest (Volume I). Biogas Basic. Information and Advisory Service on Appropriate Technology, Eschbarn, Germany, 1–45 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Centro Ricerche Produzioni Animali. Biogas e Cogenerazione Nell’allevamento Suino – Manuale Pratico. Enel S.p.A, Rome, Italy (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Cherubini F, Strømman AH. Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. Bioresour. Technol.102,437–451 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund M, Börjesson P. Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle of biogas production. Biomass Bioenergy30,254–266 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börjesson P, Berglund M. Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems – part I: fuel – cycle emissions. Biomass Bioenergy30,469–485 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börjesson P, Berglund M. Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems – part II: the environmental impact of replacing various reference systems. Biomass Bioenergy31,326–344 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöschl M, Ward S, Owende P. Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization. Appl. Energy87,3305–3321 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poeschl M, Ward S, Owende P. Environmental impacts of biogas deployment – part I: life cycle inventory for evaluation of production process emissions to air. J. Clean. Prod.24,168–183 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poeschl M, Ward S, Owende P. Environmental impacts of biogas deployment – part II: life cycle assessment of multiple production and utilization pathways. J. Clean. Prod.24,184–201 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thyø KA, Wenzel H. Life Cycle Assessment of Biogas from Maize Silage and from Manure – for Transport and for Heat and Power Production under Displacement of Natural Gas Based Heat Works and Margin Electricity in Northern Germany. Institute for Product Development, Cologne, Germany (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Hishinuma T, Kurishima H, Yang C, Genchi Y. Using a life cycle assessment method to determine the environmental impacts of manure utilisation: biogas plant and composting systems. Aust. J. Exp. Agric.48(2),89–92 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Astrup T, Tonini D, Hamelin L, Wenzel H. Environmental Assessment of Renewable Energy Scenarios Towards 2050. Coherent Energy and Environmental System Analysis. Background Report Part 5. Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, Denmark (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Wulf S, Jäger P, Döhler H. Balancing of greenhouse gas emissions and economic efficiency for biogas-production through anaerobic co-fermentation of slurry with organic waste. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.112,178–185 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuomisto HL, Hodge ID, Riordan P, Macdonald DW. Comparing energy balances, greenhouse gas balances and biodiversity impacts of contrasting farming systems with alternative land uses. Agric. Syst.108,42–49 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gac A, Béline F, Bioteau T, Maguet K. A French inventory of gaseous emissions (CH4, N2O, NH3) from livestock manure management using a mass-flow approach. Livestock Sci.112,252–260 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciotola RJ, Lansing S, Martin JF. Emergy analysis of biogas production and electricity generation from small-scale agricultural digesters. Ecol. Eng.37,1681–1691 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway JN. Nitrogen cycles: past, present, and future. Biogeochemistry70,153–226 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway JN. The nitrogen cascade. BioScience53(4),341–356 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenestein CM, Smits MCJ, Huijsmans JFM, Oenema O. Measures to Reduce Ammonia Emissions from Livestock Manures; Now, Soon and Later. Report 488. Livestock Research Wageningen UR, Lelystad, The Netherlands (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Petersen SO, Sommer SG. Ammonia and nitrous oxide interactions: roles of manure organic matter management. Animal Feed Sci. Technol.166–167,503–513 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Davidson EA. The contribution of manure and fertilizer nitrogen to atmospheric nitrous oxide since 1860. Nat. Geosci.2,659–662 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbie KE, McTaggart IP, Smith KA. Nitrous oxide from intensive agricultural systems: variations between crops and seasons, key during variables, and mean emission factors. J. Geophys. Res.104(21),26891–26899 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosier A. Closing the global N2O budget: nitrous oxide emissions through the agricultural nitrogen cycle. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.52,225–248 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oenema O, Tamminga S. Nitrogen in global animal production and management options for improving nitrogen use efficiency. Sci. China Ser. C Life Sci.48,871–887 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Steinfeld H, Wassenaar T. The role of livestock production in carbon and nitrogen cycles. Annu. Rev. Environ. Res.32(1),271–294 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oenema O, Oudendag D, Velthof GL. Nutrient losses from manure management in the European Union. Livestock Sci.112,261–272 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Möller K, Schulz R, Müller T. Substrate inputs, nutrient flows and nitrogen loss of two centralized biogas plants in southern Germany. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.87,307–325 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick D. Manure management: implications for greenhouse gas emissions. Animal Feed Sci. Technol.166–167,514–531 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massé DI, Talbot G, Gilbert Y. On farm biogas production: a method to reduce GHG emissions and develop more sustainable livestock operations. Animal Feed Sci. Technol.166–167,436–445 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-Aurich A. Impact of uncertainties on greenhouse gas mitigation potential of biogas production from agricultural resources. Renew. Energy37,277–284 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton CH, Turner C. Manure management – Treatment Strategies for Sustainable Agriculture (2nd Edition). Silsoe Research Institute, Bedford, UK (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Vercoe P, Boettcher P, Makkar H. Guidelines for Sustainable Manure Management in Asian Livestock Systems. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Burton CH. The potential contribution of separation technologies to the management of livestock manure. Livestock Sci.112,208–216 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Holm-Nielsen JB, Al Seadi T, Oleskowicz-Popiel P. The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresour. Technol.100(22),5478–5484 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mata-Alvarez J, Macé S, Llabres P. Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives. Bioresour. Technol.74(1),3–16 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarnink AJA, Ellen HE, Huijsmans JFM, Smits MCJ, Starmans DAJ. Emission abatement in practical situations. In: Ammonia, the Case of The Netherlands. Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands, (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Brandjes PJ, de Wit J, van der Meer HG, Van Keulen H. Livestock and the Environment Finding a Balance. Environmental Impact of Animal Manure Management. International Agriculture Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands. (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Hooda PS, Edwards AC, Anderson HA, Miller A. A review of water quality concerns in livestock farming areas. Sci. Total Environ.250(1–3),143–167 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J. A review of microbiology in swine manure odor control. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.78,93–106 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeli H, Eidelmann W, Fuchs J, Rottermann K. Survival of plant pathogens and weed seed during anaerobic digestion. Water Sci. Technol.27(2),69–76 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerman PR, Heiermann M, Pottberg U, Rodemann B, Gerowitt B. Weed seed survival during mesophilic anaerobic digestion in biogas plants. Weed Res.52(4),307–316 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Coté C, Massé DI, Quessy S. Reduction of indicator and pathogenic microorganisms by psychrophilic anaerobic digestion in swine slurries. Bioresour. Technol.97,686–691 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan TY, Holley RA. Pathogen survival in swine manure environments and transmission of human enteric illness: a review. J. Environ. Qual.32(2),383–392 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velthof GL, Mosquera J. The impact of slurry application technique on nitrous oxide emission from agricultural soils. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.140(1–2),298–308 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• van der Meer HG. Optimising manure management for GHG outcomes. Aust. J. Exp. Agric.48(2),38–45 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Gendbien A. Environmental, Economic and Social Impacts of the use of Sewage Sludge on Land. Final Report Part III: Project Interim Reports. EC, Brussels, Belgium (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi M, Tricase C. Environmental aspects of biogas production system. In: Proceedings of the 20th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition. Setting the Course of a Biobased Economy. Renewable Energies, Florence, Italy, (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Ryckebosch E, Drouillon M, Vervaeren H. Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane. Biomass Bioenergy35,1633–1645 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson M, Jönsson O, Wellinger A. Biogas Upgrading to Vehicle Fuel Standards and Grid Injection.IEA Task 37. IEA Bioenergy, Vienna, Austria (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Petersson A, Wellinger A. Biogas Upgrading Technologies – Development and Innovations. IEA Task 37. IEA Bioenergy, Vienna, Austria (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Abatzoglou N, Boivin S. A review of biogas purification processes. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref.3(1),42–71 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pertl A, Mostbauer P, Obersteiner G. Climate balance of biogas upgrading systems. Waste Manag.30,92–99 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiridoe EK, Gordon R, Brown BB. Nonmarket cobenefits and economic feasibility of on-farm biogas. Energy Policy37,1170–1179 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinuccio E, Berg W, Balsari P. Effects of mechanical separation on GHG and ammonia emissions from cattle slurry under winter conditions. Animal Feed Sci. Technol.166–167,523–538 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Rehl T, Müller J. Life cycle assessment of biogas digestate processing technologies. Resour. Conserv. Recy.56,92–104 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capponi S, Fazio S, Barbanti L. CO2 savings affect the break-even distance of feedstock supply and digestate placement in biogas production. Renew. Energy37,45–52 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Chen B, Song D. Life-cycle energy production and emissions mitigation by comprehensive biogas-digestate utilization. Bioresour. Technol.114,357–364 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries JW, Corré WJ, van Dooren HJC. Environmental Assessment of Untreated Manure Use, Manure Digestion and Co-Digestion with Silage Maize. Report 372. Livestock Research, Wageningen UR, The Netherlands, (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Lukehurst CT, Frost P, Al Seadi T. Utilisation of Digestate from Biogas Plants as Biofertiliser. IEA Bioenergy Task 37. IEA Bioenergy, Vienna, Austria (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Makádi M, Tomócsik A, Orosz V. Digestate: a new nutrient source – review. In: Biogas. Kumar S (Ed.). InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 295–310 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Matuana, L. Gould MC. Promoting the Use of Digestate from Anaerobic Digesters in Composite Materials: Final Report. Michigan Biomass Energy Program, Lansing, MI, USA (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Kratzeisen M, Starcevic N, Martinov M, Maurer C, Müller J. Applicability of biogas digestate as solid fuel. Fuel89(9),2544–2548 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budzianowski WM. Sustainable biogas energy in Poland: prospects and challenges. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev.16,342–349 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• de Boer IJM, Cederberg C, Eady S et al. Greenhouse gas mitigation in animal production: towards an integrated life cycle sustainability assessment. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.3(5),423–431 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar

▪ Websites

• EU-Agro-Biogas. Deliverables. www.eu-agrobiogas.net/deliverables.html
   Google Scholar
• Waste and Resources Action Programme. Driving Innovation in AD. www.wrap.org.uk/content/driving-innovation-ad
   Google Scholar
• EU-Agro-Biogas. Deliverable 22: Report on the economic value and the calculated energy and material fluxes. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/renewables/bioenergy/doc/anaerobic/d22.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Environmental Agency. Annual European Union greenhouse gas inventory 1990–2010 and inventory report 2012. www.eea.europa.eu/publications/european-union-greenhouse-gas-inventory-2012
   Google Scholar