Valuing solid biomass fuels for heat: thermodynamic and environmental considerations relative to liquid fuels

• Hsu DD, Inman D, Heath GA, Wolfrum EJ, Mann MK, Aden A. Life cycle environmental impacts of selected US ethanol production and use pathways in 2022. Environ. Sci. Technol.44(13),5289–5297 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominguez-Faus R, Powers SE, Burken J, Alvarez PJJ. The water footprint of biofuels: a drink or drive issue? Environ. Sci. Technol.43(9),3005–3010 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbens-Leenes W, Hoekstra AY. The water footprint of biofuel-based transport. Energy Environ. Sci.4(8),2658–2668 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Farrell AE, Plevin RJ, Turner BT et al. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science311(5760),506–508 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutzen PJ, Mosier AR, Smith KA, Winiwarter W. N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels. Atmos. Chem. Phys.8(2),389–395 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melillo JM, Reilly JM, Kicklighter DW et al. Indirect emissions from biofuels: how important? Science326(5958),1397–1399 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D et al. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science319(5867),1235–1238 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnoor JL. Cellulosic biofuels disappoint (commentary). Environ. Sci. Technol.45(17),7099–7099 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Biello D. The false promise of biofuels. Sci. Am.305(2),58–65 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Wiesenthal T, Leduc G, Christidis P et al. Biofuel support policies in Europe: lessons learnt for the long way ahead. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.13(4),789–800 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalt G, Kranzl L, Haas R. Long-term strategies for an efficient use of domestic biomass resources in Austria. Biomass Bioenergy34(4),449–466 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Kalt G, Kranzl L. Assessing the economic efficiency of bioenergy technologies in climate mitigation and fossil fuel replacement in Austria using a techno-economic approach. Appl. Energy88(11),3665–3684 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt J, Leduc S, Dotzauer E, Schmid E. Cost-effective policy instruments for greenhouse gas emission reduction and fossil fuel substitution through bioenergy production in Austria. Energy Policy39(6),3261–3280 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsson L, Holmberg J, Dornburg V et al. Using biomass for climate change mitigation and oil use reduction. Energy Policy35(11),5671–5691 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson MZ. Effects of ethanol (E85) versus gasoline vehicles on cancer and mortality in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol.41,4150–4157 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu M, Wu Y, Wang M. Energy and emissions benefits of alternative transportation liquid fuels derived from switchgrass: a fuel life cycle assessment. Biotechnol. Prog.22,1012–1024 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison R, Webb J. A review on the effect of N fertilizer type on gaseous emissions. Adv. Agronomy73,65–108 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu GZ, Chan AW, Minns DE. Life cycle assessment of bio-ethanol derived from cellulose. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.8(3),137–141 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel D, Patzek TW. Ethanol production using corn, switchgrass, and wood; biodiesel production using soybean and sunflower. Nat. Resour. Res.14(1),65–76 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Lavigne A, Powers SE. Valuing fuel ethanol feedstock options from multiple energy perspectives: corn and corn stover feedstocks. Energy Policy35,5918–5930 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Wu M, Huo H. Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts of different corn ethanol plant types. Environ. Res. Lett.2(1),1–13 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler PR, Del Grosso SJ, Parton WJ. Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems. Biomass Bioenergy17(3),675–691(2007).
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson E, Boman C, Westerholm R, Boström D, Nordin A. Stove performance and emission characteristics in residential wood log and pellet combustion, part 2: wood stove. Energy Fuels25(1),315–323 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. North America’s Wood Pellet Sector. Research Paper FPL-RP-656. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Johansson LS, Leckner B, Gustavsson L, Cooper D, Tullin C, Potter A. Emission characteristics of modern and old-type residential boilers fired with wood logs and wood pellets. Atmos. Environ.38,4183–4195 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boman C, Pettersson E, Westerholm R, Boström D, Nordin A. Stove performance and emission characteristics in residential wood log and pellet combustion, part 1: pellet stoves. Energy Fuels25,307–314 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Hukkanen A, Lamberg H, Kaivosoja T, Sippula O, Tissari J, Jokiniemi J. Comparison of emissions with pellet fuel and wood logs from a hybrid masonry heater. Presented at: The 2011 European Aerosol Conference. Manchester, UK, 4–9 September 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Fantozzi F, Barbanera M, Buratti C. Life cycle analysis of wood pellet from SRC through direct measuring of energy consumption. Presented at: 14th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, Biomass for Energy, Industry and Climate Protection. Paris, France, 17–21 October 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Giamcomo GD, Taglieri L. Renewable energy benefits with conversion of woody residues to pellets. Energy34,724–731 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Mani S, Sokhansanj S, Bi X, Kumar A. A streamlined life cycle analysis of biomass densification process. Presented at: 2005 AIChE Annual Conference. Cincinnati, OH, USA, 30 October–4 November 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Raymer AKP. A comparison of avoided greenhouse gas emissions when using different kinds of wood energy. Biomass Bioenergy30,605–617 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Risovic S, Dukic I, Vuckovic K. Energy analysis of pellets made of wood residues. Croat. J. For. Eng.1,95–108 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Mckenchnie J, Cormier D et al. Life cycle emissions and cost of producing electricity from coal, natural gas, and wood pellets in Ontario. Can. Environ. Sci. Technol.44(1),538–544 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magellia F, Boucherb K, Bib HT, Melinc S, Bonolia A. An environmental impact assessment of exported wood pellets from Canada to Europe. Biomass Bioenergy33,434–441 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Cook BM. Sustainable use of northern New York biomass: residential heating versus cellulosic ethanol. MS Thesis, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, USA (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaumer T. Biomass Combustion in Europe: Overview on Technologies and Regulations.NYSERDA Report 08–03. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Albany, NY, USA (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Sippula O, Hytonen K, Tissari J, Raunemaa T, Hokiniemi J. Effect of wood fuel on the emissions from a top-feed pellet stove. Energy Fuels21,1151–1160 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faaij APC. Bio-energy in Europe: changing technology choices. Energy Policy34(3),322–342 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran SR, Laing JR, Hopke PK, Holsen TM, Raja S. Emission characterization and efficiency measurements of high efficiency wood boilers. Energy Fuels25(11),5015–5021 (2011).
   Google Scholar

▪ Websites

• US DOE federal energy management programs. www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/regulations/eisa.html (Accessed October 2011)
   Google Scholar
• The Whitehouse. State of the Union address. www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/01/20070123–2.html (Accessed October 2011)
   Google Scholar
• Amber Waves. Next-generation biofuels near-term challenges and implications for agriculture. www.ers.usda.gov/AmberWaves/june10/Features/NGBiofuels.htm (Accessed October 2011)
   Google Scholar
• BioFuels Digest. EPA proposes 15.2 billion gallon biofuel mandate for 2012; 50 percent jump in advanced biofuels. http://biofuelsdigest.com/bdigest/2011/06/22/epa-proposes-15–2-billion-gallon-biofuel-madate-for-2012–50-percent-jump-in-advanced-biofuels (Accessed 28 October 2011)
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Communication from the Commission – biomass action plan. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52005DC0628:EN:NOT (Accessed 12 October 2011)
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2009/28/EC of The European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:140:0016:0062:en:PDF (Accessed January 2012)
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Renewable energy targets by 2020. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/renewables/targets_en.htm (Accessed January 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Sustainable Energy Ireland, Renewable Energy Information Office. Rakos C (Director of the Austrian Wood Pellet Association) Interview. www.seai.ie/Publications/Newsletters/Bioenergy_News/BioenergyNews05.pdf (Accessed 11 October 2011)
   Google Scholar
• US DOE, US EPA, Energy savers. www.energysavers.gov/your_home/space_heating_cooling/index.cfm/mytopic=12570 (Accessed 31 October 2011)
   Google Scholar
• US DOE, US EPA. Fuel economy: where the energy goes. www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/atv.shtml (Accessed 31 October 2011)
   Google Scholar
• Andritz Sprout. The pelleting process. www.andritzsproutbauer.com (Accessed July 2010)
   Google Scholar
• REAP-Canada. A process and energy analysis of pelletizing switchgrass. Resource efficient agricultural production. www.reap-canada.com (Accessed June 2010)
   Google Scholar
• University of British Columbia. Streamlined LCA of wood pellets: export and possible utilization in UBC. Final report. https://circle.ubc.ca (Accessed July 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Cornell University Cooperative Extension. Grass pelleting – the process. www.grassbioenergy.org/resources/bioinfo.asp (Accessed July 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Kansas Corporation Commission. Pelletized switchgrass for space and water heating, final report. www.engext.ksu.edu (Accessed June 2010)
   Google Scholar
• NYSERDA. Patterns and trends in New York State energy profiles: 1995–2009. www.nyserda.org/publications/1995_2009_patterns_trends_rpt.pdf (Accessed September 2011)
   Google Scholar
• NYSERDA. Renewable fuels roadmap and sustainable biomass feedstock supply for New York. www.nyserda.org/publications/renewablefuelsroadmap/Report_10_05_Renewable%20Fuels%20Roadmap.pdf (Accessed October 2011)
   Google Scholar
• Greenhouse gases, regulated emissions, and energy use in transportation. http://greet.es.anl.gov (Accessed January 2010)
   Google Scholar
• US EIA. Residential energy consumption survey. www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs (Accessed May 2010)
   Google Scholar
• ReCiPe. A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonizaed category indicators at the midpoint and endpoint level. www.lcia-recipe.net (Accessed August 2010)
   Google Scholar
• New York State. Renewable energy assessment New York State energy plan. www.nysenergyplan.com (Accessed 20 October 2011)
   Google Scholar
• US News MSNBC. $6 billion-a-year ethanol subsidy dies – but wait there’s more. http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/12/29/9804028–6-billion-a-year-ethanol-subsidy-dies-but-wait-theres-more (Accessed January 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Biomass Magazine. Market trend shows growing pellet markets. http://biomassmagazine.com/articles/6041/webinar-on-market-trends-shows-growing-pellet-markets (Accessed January 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Renewable Energy World. EU’s renewable goals driving wood pellet growth. www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2011/03/eus-renewable-goals-driving-wood-pellet-growth (Accessed January 2012)
   Google Scholar