Progress in the Canadian biorefining sector

• Mabee WE, Gregg DJ, Saddler JN. Assessing the emerging biorefinery sector in Canada. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.121,765–778 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Sorda G, Banse M, Kemfert C. An overview of biofuel policies across the world. Energy Policy38(11),6977–6988 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans B, Dessureault D. Canada Biofuels Annual 2012. In: USDA Foreign Agricultural Service Global Agricultural Information Network (CA12024)38 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• St Denis G, Parker P. Community energy planning in Canada: the role of renewable energy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.13(8),2088–2095 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabee WE, Saddler JN. Bioethanol from lignocellulosics: status and perspectives in Canada. Biores. Technol.101(13),4806–4813 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley D, Bradburn K. Economic Impact of Bioenergy in Canada – 2011. Canadian Bioenergy Association, OT, Canada, 26 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Aguilar F, Hartkamp R, Mabee WE, Skog KE: Wood energy markets, 2011–2012. In: Forest Products Annual Market Review 2011–2012. Fonseca M, Posio J (Eds). United Nations, NY (USA) and Geneva (Switzerland),95–106 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• De Gorter H, Just DR. Ethanol and corn prices: the role of US tax credits, mandates, and imports. Economic Impact of Public Support to Agriculture: An International Perspective7,155–169 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Doyletech Corporation. Total Economic Impact Assessment of Biofuels Plants in Canada. Canadian Renewable Fuels Association, OT, Canada, 58 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Natural Resources Canada. Pulp and Paper Green Transformation Program – Report on Results. Canadian Forest Service, OT, Canada, 15 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Mabee WE, Mannion J, Carpenter T. Comparing the feed-in tariff incentives for renewable electricity in Ontario and Germany. Energy Policy40,480–489 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towers M, Browne T, Kerekes R, Paris J, Tran H. Biorefinery opportunities for the Canadian pulp and paper industry. Pulp Pap. Canada108(6),26–29 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold S, Seuring S. Supply chain and logistics issues of bio-energy production. J. Cleaner Prod.19(1),32–42 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccormick K, Kaberger T. Key barriers for bioenergy in Europe: economic conditions, know-how and institutional capacity, and supply chain co-ordination. Biomass Bioenerg.31(7),443–452 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart P. The forest biorefinery: survival strategy for Canada‘s pulp and paper sector? Pulp Pap. Canada107(6),13–16 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne TC. An economic analysis of energy, fuels and chemicals from forest biomass. Cell. Chem. Technol.45(7–8),455–460 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Evergreen Canada. The Green Jobs Map: Supplementary Ontario Report – Labour Market Research Study.76 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Pulp & Paper Canada. 2012 Annual Mill Directory (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Panshin AJ, De Zeeuw C. Textbook of Wood Technology (4th Edition). McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, TO, Canada (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Krigstin S, Hayashi K, Tchorzewski J, Wetzel S. Current inventory and modelling of sawmill residues in eastern Canada. For. Chron.88(5),626–635 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Dymond CC, Titus BD, Stinson G, Kurz WA. Future quantities and spatial distribution of harvesting residue and dead wood from natural disturbances in Canada. For. Ecol. Manage.260(2),181–192 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumarappan S, Joshi S, Maclean HL. Biomass supply for biofuel production: estimates for the United States and Canada. Bioresources4(3),1070–1087 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naik S, Goud VV, Rout PK, Jacobson K, Dalai AK. Characterization of Canadian biomass for alternative renewable biofuel. Renew. Energ.35(8),1624–1631 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Mupondwa E, Panigrahi S, Tabil L, Sokhansanj S, Stumborg M. A review of agricultural crop residue supply in Canada for cellulosic ethanol production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.16(5),2954–2965 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Wood SM, Layzell DB. A Canadian Biomass Inventory: Feedstocks For A Bio-Based Economy. BIOCAP Canada, Kingston, Canada, 42 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Stephen JD, Sokhansanj S, Bi X et al. The impact of agricultural residue yield range on the delivered cost to a biorefinery in the Peace River region of Alberta, Canada. Biosyst. Eng.105(3),298–305 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Huggins DR, Karow RS, Collins HP, Ransom JK. Introduction: evaluating long-term impacts of harvesting crop residues on soil quality. Agronomy J.103(1),230–233 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Lemke RL, Vandenbygaart AJ, Campbell CA, Lafond GP, Grant B. Crop residue removal and fertilizer N: effects on soil organic carbon in a long-term crop rotation experiment on a Udic Boroll. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.135(1–2),42–51 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith WN, Grant BB, Campbell CA et al. Crop residue removal effects on soil carbon: measured and inter-model comparisons. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.161,27–38 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlack RD, Wright LL, Turhollow AF, Graham RL. Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. US Department of Energy, 78 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Shinners KJ, Digman MF, Runge TM. Biomass logistics – harvest and storage. Acs. Sym. Ser.1067,65–86 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. Waste Management Industry Survey: Businesss and Government Sectors 2008. Catalogue No. 16F0023X, OT, Canada, 42 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Cameron JB, Flynn PC. Biomass power cost and optimum plant size in western Canada. Biomass Bioenerg.24(6),445–464 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen JD, Mabee WE, Saddler JN. Biomass logistics as a determinant of second-generation biofuel facility scale, location and technology selection. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining-Biofpr.4(5),503–518 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mupondwa E, Li X, Tabil L et al. Technoeconomic analysis of wheat straw densification in the Canadian Prairie Province of Manitoba. Biores. Technol.110,355–363 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Ebadian M, Sowlati T, Sokhansanj S, Stumborg M, Townley-Smith L. A new simulation model for multi-agricultural biomass logistics system in bioenergy production. Biosyst. Eng.110(3),280–290 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam MB, Pulkki R, Shahi C, Upadhyay T. Modeling woody biomass procurement for bioenergy production at the Atikokan generating station in northwestern Ontario, Canada. Energies5(12),5065–5085 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Kumar L, Tooyserkani Z, Sokhansanj S, Saddler JN. Does densification influence the steam pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of softwoods to sugars? Biores. Technol.121,190–198 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyay TP, Shahi C, Leitch M, Pulkki R. Economic feasibility of biomass gasification for power generation in three selected communities of northwestern Ontario, Canada. Energy Policy44,235–244 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Cameron JB, Flynn PC. Pipeline transport of biomass. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.113–16, 27–39 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Yemshanov D, Mckenney D. Fast-growing poplar plantations as a bioenergy supply source for Canada. Biomass Bioenerg.32(3),185–197 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro C, Betters DR. Single rotation vs coppice systems for short-rotation intensive culture plantations – optimality conditions for volume production. Biomass Bioenerg.8(6),395–400 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Truax B, Gagnon D, Fortier J, Lambert F. Yield in 8 year-old hybrid poplar plantations on abandoned farmland along climatic and soil fertility gradients. Forest. Ecol. Manage.267,228–239 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortier J, Gagnon D, Truax B, Lambert F. Biomass and volume yield after 6 years in multiclonal hybrid poplar riparian buffer strips. Biomass Bioenerg.34(7),1028–1040 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Amichev BY, Johnston M, Van Rees KCJ. Hybrid poplar growth in bioenergy production systems: biomass prediction with a simple process-based model (3PG). Biomass Bioenerg.34(5),687–702 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Mckenney DW, Yemshanov D, Fox G, Ramlal E. Using bioeconomic models to assess research priorities: a case study on afforestation as a carbon sequestration tool. Canadian J. Forest Res. – Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere36(4),886–900 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Clinch RL, Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM, Volk TA, Sidders D. Biophysical interactions in a short rotation willow intercropping system in southern Ontario, Canada. Agric. Ecosystems Environ.131(1–2),61–69 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Sevel L, Nord-Larsen T, Raulund-Rasmussen K. Biomass production of four willow clones grown as short rotation coppice on two soil types in Denmark. Biomass Bioenerg.46,664–672 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie JM, Capek-Menard E, Chornet E. Evaluation of the co-product pulp from Salix viminalis energy crops. Biomass Bioenerg.34(9),1342–1347 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Mckenney DW, Yemshanou D, Fraleigh S, Allen D, Preto F. An economic assessment of the use of short-rotation coppice woody biomass to heat greenhouses in southern Canada. Biomass Bioenerg.35(1),374–384 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madakadze IC, Stewart K, Peterson PR, Coulman BE, Smith DL. Switchgrass biomass and chemical composition for biofuel in eastern Canada. Agron. J.91(4),696–701 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson PG, Mccaughey WP, May K, Woosaree J, Mcfarlane L. Potential utilization of native prairie grasses from western Canada as ethanol feedstock. Can. J. Plant Sci.84(4),1067–1075 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Masse D, Gilbert Y, Savoie P, Belanger G, Parent G, Babineau D. Methane yield from switchgrass harvested at different stages of development in eastern Canada. Biores. Technol.101(24),9536–9541 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu TT, Ma ZY, Kulshreshtha S et al. Bioenergy production potential on marginal land in Canada. Presented at: 2012 First International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics (Agro-Geoinformatics). 650–655, Shanghai, China, 2–4 August 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Shay PE, Kubien DS. Field analysis of photoprotection in co-occurring cool climate C3 and C4 grasses. Physiol. Plantarum147(3),316–328 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Goyal A, Beres BL, Randhawa HS, Navabi A, Salmon DF, Eudes F. Yield stability analysis of broadly adaptive triticale germplasm in southern and central Alberta, Canada, for industrial end-use suitability. Can. J. Plant Sci.91(1),125–135 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Fowler DB. Sunrise soft red winter wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci.92(1),195–198 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Fowler DB. Accipiter hard red winter wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci.91(2),363–365 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Fowler DB. Peregrine hard red winter wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci.90(6),853–856 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Fowler DB. CDC Ptarmigan soft white winter wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci.90(6),857–861 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Schillinger WF, Wysocki DJ, Chastain TG, Guy SO, Karow RS. Camelina: planting date and method effects on stand establishment and seed yield. Field Crops Res.130,138–144 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzmueller EJ, Jose S. Biomass production for biofuels using agroforestry: potential for the north central region of the United States. Agroforestry Sys.85(2),305–314 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudette C, Bradley RL, Whalen JK, Mcvetty PBE, Vessey K, Smith DL. Tree-based intercropping does not compromise canola (Brassica napus L.) seed oil yield and reduces soil nitrous oxide emissions. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.139(1–2),33–39 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, He Y, Qian BD et al. Short communication: climate change and biofuel wheat: a case study of southern Saskatchewan. Can. J. Plant Sci.92(3),421–425 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Toor IA, Smith EG, Whalen JK, Naseem A. Tree-based intercropping in southern Ontario, Canada. Can. J. Agric. Econ. – Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie60(2),141–154 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Nelson AS, Saunders MR, Wagner RG, Weiskittel AR. Early stand production of hybrid poplar and white spruce in mixed and monospecific plantations in eastern Maine. New Forests43(4),519–534 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Fortier J, Truax B, Gagnon D, Lambert F. Hybrid poplar yields in Québec: implications for a sustainable forest zoning management system. For. Chron.88(4),391–407 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• El Kasmioui O, Ceulemans R. Financial analysis of the cultivation of poplar and willow for bioenergy. Biomass Bioenerg.43,52–64 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royle DJ, Ostry ME. Disease and pest control in the bioenergy crops poplar and willow. Biomass Bioenerg.9(1–5),69–79 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labrecque M, Teodorescu TI. Field performance and biomass production of 12 willow and poplar clones in short-rotation coppice in southern Québec (Canada). Biomass Bioenerg.29(1),1–9 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokhansanj S, Hess JR. Biomass supply logistics and infrastructure. Methods Mol. Biol.581,1–25 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park KC, Whitney C, Mcnichol JC et al. Mixotrophic and photoautotrophic cultivation of 14 microalgae isolates from Saskatchewan, Canada: potential applications for wastewater remediation for biofuel production. J. Appl. Phycol.24(3),339–348 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Power IM, Wilson SA, Small DP, Dipple GM, Wan WK, Southam G. Microbially mediated mineral carbonation: roles of phototrophy and heterotrophy. Environ. Sci. Technol.45(20),9061–9068 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Sierra Legal Defense Fund. The National Sewage Report Card (Number 3): Grading the Sewage Treatment of 22 Canadian Cities.Vancouver, Canada (Sierra Legal Defense Fund),68 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Frigon JC, Guiot SR. Biomethane production from starch and lignocellulosic crops: a comparative review. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining-Biofpr.4(4),447–458 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey-Stamler S, Samson R, Ho Lem C. Biomass Resource Options: Creating A BIOHEAT Supply For The Canadian Greenhouse Industry. Phase 1 Research Report. Resource Efficient Agricultural Production [REAP], Canada, Sainte Anne de Bellevue, Canada, 68 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Mobini M, Sowlati T, Sokhansanj S. Forest biomass supply logistics for a power plant using the discrete-event simulation approach. Appl. Energy88(4),1241–1250 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabee WE, Mirck J. A regional evaluation of potential bioenergy production pathways in eastern Ontario, Canada. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geographers101(4),897–906 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakkilainen EK, Kankkonen S, Suutela J. Advanced efficiency options: increasing electricity generating potential from pulp mills. Pulp Pap. Canada109(4),14–18 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Fornell R, Berntsson T. Process integration study of a Kraft pulp mill converted to an ethanol production plant – part A: potential for heat integration of thermal separation units. Appl. Therm. Eng.35,81–90 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Saeed A, Liu ZH, Fatehi P, Jahan MS, Li HM, Ni YH. Process concept of forest biorefinery for the prehydrolysis Kraft-based dissolving pulp production process. In: Research Progress in Paper Industry and Biorefinery (4th Edition) 1–3, 1348–1352 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Saeed A, Jahan MS, Li HM, Liu ZH, Ni YH, Van Heiningen A. Mass balances of components dissolved in the pre-hydrolysis liquor of Kraft-based dissolving pulp production process from Canadian hardwoods. Biomass Bioenerg.39,14–19 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong E, Higson A, Walsh P, Wellisch M. Product developments in the bio-based chemicals arena. Biofuels Bioproducts Biorefining-Biofpr.6(6),606–624 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Mateos-Espejel E, Marinova M, Schneider S, Paris J. Simulation of a Kraft pulp mill for the integration of biorefinery technologies and energy analysis. Pulp Pap.Canada111(3),19–23 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Mateos-Espejel E, Alva-Argaez A, Savulescu L, Paris J. From Kraft mills to forest biorefinery: an energy and water perspective. I. Methodology. Cell. Chem. Technol.44(1–3),15–19 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Marinova M, Mateos-Espejel E, Paris J. From Kraft mill to forest biorefinery: an energy and water perspective. Ii. Case study. Cell. Chem. Technol.44(1–3),21–26 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Ghezzaz H, Pelletier L, Stuart PR. Biorefinery implementation for recovery debottlenecking at existing pulp mills – Part I: potential for debottlenecking. Tappi J.11(7),17–25 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghezzaz H, Pelletier L, Stuart PR. Biorefinery implementation for recovery debottlenecking at existing pulp mills – part II: techno-economic evaluation. Tappi J.11(8),17–24 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wising U, Stuart P. Identifying the forest biorefinery. Pulp Pap. Canada107(6),25–30 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Magdzinski L. Tembee Temiscaming integrated biorefinery. Pulp Pap-Canada107(6),44–46 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyman CE. Potential synergies and challenges in refining cellulosic biomass to fuels, chemicals, and power. Biotechnol. Prog.19(2),254–262 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey A, Soccol CR, Nigam P, Soccol VT. Biotechnological potential of agro-industrial residues. I: sugarcane bagasse. Biores. Technol.74(1),69–80 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöström E. Wood Chemistry: Fundamentals and Applications (2nd Edition). Academic Press, Inc., Canada (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Edye LA, Doherty WOS, Blinco JA, Bullock GE. The sugarcane biorefinery: energy crops and processes for the production of liquid fuels and renewable commodity chemicals. Int. Sugar J.108(1285),19 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen JD, Mabee WE, Saddler JN. Will second-generation ethanol be able to compete with first-generation ethanol? Opportunities for cost reduction. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining – Biofpr.6(2),159–176 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay K, Thomassin PJ: Macroeconomic effects of the ethanol biofuel sector in Canada. Biomass Bioenerg.35(7),2822–2838 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra RP, Bura R, Mabee WE, Berlin A, Pan X, Saddler JN. Substrate pretreatment: the key to effective enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics? Biofuels108,67–93 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Pan XJ, Arato C, Gilkes N et al. Biorefining of softwoods using ethanol organosolv pulping: preliminary evaluation of process streams for manufacture of fuel-grade ethanol and co-products. Biotechnol. Bioengin.90(4),473–481 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Rio LF, Chandra RP, Saddler JN. Fibre size does not appear to influence the ease of enzymatic hydrolysis of organosolv-pretreated softwoods. Biores. Technol.107,235–242 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Sims REH, Mabee W, Saddler JN, Taylor M. An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. Biores. Technol.101(6),1570–1580 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabee WE, Mcfarlane PN, Saddler JN. Biomass availability for lignocellulosic ethanol production. Biomass Bioenerg.35(11),4519–4529 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan XJ, Kadla JF, Ehara K, Gilkes N, Saddler JN. Organosolv ethanol lignin from hybrid poplar as a radical scavenger: relationship between lignin structure, extraction conditions, and antioxidant activity. J. Agricul. Food Chem.54(16),5806–5813 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cote P, Noel G, Moore S. The Chatham demonstration: from design to operation of a 20 m(3)/d membrane-based ethanol dewatering system. Desalination250(3),1060–1066 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane J. Iogen makes a comeback in landmark sugarcane cellulosic ethanol deal with Brazil‘s Raizen. Biofuels Digest. 16 October 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Obj Staff. Iogen Energy slashes 150 jobs. Ottawa Bus. J. 30 April 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong CL, Wei XM. A comparative experimental study on the liquefaction of wood. Energy29(11),1731–1741 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbas A. Fuels recovery from municipal solid and liquid wastes (MSLW). Energ. Source.25(7),713–720 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaman S. Pyrolysis of biomass to produce fuels and chemical feedstocks. Energ. Convers. Manage.45(5),651–671 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faaij APC. Bio-energy in Europe: changing technology choices. Energy Policy34(3),322–342 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spath P, Dayton D. Preliminary screening – technical and economic assessment of synthesis gas to fuels and chemicals with emphasis on the potential for biomass-derived syngas. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, CO, USA, 160 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Pilon G, Lavoie JM. Biomass char production at low severity conditions under CO2 and N-2 environments. Energ. Sustainabil. Iii143,109–121 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar S, Kumar A. Large-scale biohydrogen production from bio-oil. Biores. Technol.101(19),7350–7361 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez C, Abad B, Hubner S, Alfonso D, Segura I. Wind park reliable energy production based on a hydrogen compensation system. Part I: technical viability. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy36(24),15548–15560 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Sarma SJ, Brar SK, Sydney EB, Le Bihan Y, Buelna G, Soccol CR. Microbial hydrogen production by bioconversion of crude glycerol: a review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy37(8),6473–6490 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le THN, Tran QV, Nguyen TTL, Van DST, Yang XY, Su BL. Preparation of bio-fuels by catalytic cracking reaction of vegetable oil sludge. Fuel90(3),1069–1075 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Werpy T, Petersen G, Aden A et al. Top value added chemicals from biomass volume 1: results of screening for potential candidates from sugars and synthesis gas. US Department of Energy76,1–67 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Smith W, Grant B, Desjardins R. Some perspectives on agricultural GHG mitigation and adaptation strategies with respect to the impact of climate change/variability in vulnerable areas. Idojaras113(1–2),103–115 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science319(5867),1235–1238 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh S, Jordaan SM, Brandt AR, Turetsky MR, Spatari S, Keith DW. Land use GHG emissions from conventional oil production and oil sands. Environ. Sci. Technol.44(22),8766–8772 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Mckechnie J, Zhang YM, Ogino A et al. Impacts of co-location, co-production, and process energy source on life cycle energy use and GHG emissions of lignocellulosic ethanol. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining – Biofpr.5(3),279–292 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer JA, Verge XPC, Desjardins RL, Worth DE, McConkey BG. The impact of increased biodiesel production on the GHG emissions from field crops in Canada. Energy for Sustainable Develop.14(2),73–82 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amichev BY, Kurz WA, Smyth C, Van Rees KCJ. The carbon implications of large-scale afforestation of agriculturally marginal land with short-rotation willow in Saskatchewan. Global Change Biology Bioenergy4(1),70–87 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer JA, Verge XPC, Kulshreshtha SN, Desjardins RL, McConkey BG. Areas and GHG emissions from feed crops not used in Canadian livestock production in 2001. J. Sustain. Agr.35(7),780–803 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar

▪ Websites

• Natural Resources Canada: ecoENERGY for Biofuels Program. http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/transportation/alternative-fuels/programs/10163 (Accessed 7 March 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Natural Resources Canada: Investments in forest industry transformation. http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/pages/232 (Accessed 7 March 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield Ethanol: Ethanol plant locations. www.greenfieldethanol.com/locations (Accessed 1 February 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Food Agriculture and Rural Affairs. Corn production in Ontario. www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/crops/field/corn.html (Accessed 1 March 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Food Agriculture and Rural Affairs. Grain corn – area and production by county (2011). www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/stats/crops/ctygrcorn11.htm (Accessed 1 March 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Faostat. FAOStat Forestry Database. http://faostat.fao.org (Accessed 7 March 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Sawmill Database. The Sawmill database. www.sawmilldatabase.com (Accessed 2 March 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. Focus on Geography Series, 2011 Census. www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/fogs-spg/select-Geo-Choix.cfm?Lang=Eng&GK=CMA&PR=10 (Accessed 7 March 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. Gasoline and fuel oil, average retail prices by urban centre (household heating fuel). www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/econ154c-eng.htm (Accessed 21 April 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Energy Information Agency. Henry Hub Gulf COast Natural Gas Spot Price. www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/rngwhhdm.htm (Accessed 21 April 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. Census of agriculture. www.statcan.gc.ca/ca-ra2011/index-eng.htm (Accessed 20 Ferbruary 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Prairie shelterbelt program. www4.agr.gc.ca/AAFC-AAC/display-afficher.do?id=1286907236630&lang=eng (Accessed 22 April 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. Biogas production (2013). www.mass.gov/dep/water/priorities/ene_bio.htm (Accessed 22 April 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Valbio Canada Inc. About Valbio Canada. www.valbio.ca/en/about-valbio/who-we-are.html (Accessed 22 April 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Growing Power Hairy Hill LP. Integrated biorefinery. www.growingpower.com/index.php?page_id=1002 (Accessed 22 April 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Nexterra Systems Inc. Ownership. www.nexterra.ca/files/ownership.php (Accessed 1 February 2013)
   Google Scholar
• University of British Columbia. UBC first Canadian university to produce clean heat and electricity from biofuel (2012). www.publicaffairs.ubc.ca/2012/09/13/ubc-first-canadian-university-to-produce-clean-heat-and-electricity-from-biofuel (Accessed 10 February 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Lignol Energy Corp. Cellulosic ethanol – the renewable fuel for the future. www.lignol.ca (Accessed 1 March 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Mah B. Enerkem hires 30 workers for Edmonton biofuels plant. www.edmontonjournal.com/business/Enerkem+hires+workers+Edmonton+biofuels+plant/7828977/story.html (Accessed 1 March 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Hill B. $20 million injection for Ottawa biofuel firm. www.ensyn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/20M-injection-for-Ottawa-biofuel-firm.pdf (Accessed 1 March 2013)
   Google Scholar