Pre-Analytical and Analytical Variability in Absolute Quantitative Mrm-Based Plasma Proteomic Studies

• Hossain M , RobinsonEW, LiuTet al. Enhanced sensitivity for selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry-based targeted proteomics using a dual stage electrodynamic ion funnel interface. Mol. Cell. Proteomics10(2), do:10.1074/mcp.M000062-MCP201 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates JR , RuseCI, NakorchevskyA. Proteomics by mass spectrometry: approaches, advances, and applications. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 11, 49–79 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domon B , AebersoldR. Mass spectrometry and protein analysis. Science312(5771), 212–217 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han X , AslanianA, YatesJR. Mass spectrometry for proteomics. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 12(5), 483–490 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim Y , TangK, TolmachevAV, ShvartsburgAA, SmithR. Improving mass spectrometer sensitivity using a high-pressure electrodynamic ion funnel interface. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 17(9), 1299–1305 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Y , ParksBA, SohnS, KwastKE, KelleherNL. Top-down approaches for measuring expression ratios of intact yeast proteins using Fourier transform mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 78(3), 686–694 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng F , CargileBJ, PatrieSM, JohnsonJR, McLoughlinSM, KelleherNL. Processing complex mixtures of intact proteins for direct analysis by mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 74(13), 2923–2929 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelleher NL , LinHY, ValaskovicGA, AaserudDJ, FridrikssonEK, McLaffertyFW. Top down versus bottom up protein characterization by tandem high-resolution mass spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121(4), 806–812 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link AJ , EngJ, SchieltzDMet al. Direct analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry. Nat. Biotechnol. 17(7), 676–682 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabb DL , McDonaldWH, Yates Jr 3rd. DTASelect and contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 1(1), 21–26 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washburn MP , WoltersD, Yates Jr 3rd. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotech. 19(3), 242–247 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong S , MannM. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nat. Chem. Biol. 1(5), 252–262 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze WX , UsadelB. Quantitation in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61, 491–516 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bantscheff M , SchirleM, SweetmanG, RickJ, KusterB. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 389(4), 1017–1031 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott M , SmithD, KuzykM, ParkerCE, BorchersCH. Recent trends in quantitative proteomics. J. Mass Spectrom. 44(12), 1637–1660 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picotti P , AebersoldR. Selected reaction monitoring-based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions. Nat. Methods9(6), 555–566 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gygi SP , RistB, GerberSA, TurecekF, GelbMH, AebersoldR. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechol. 17(10), 994–999 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross PL , HuangYN, MarcheseJNet al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics3(12), 1154–1169 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayon L , SanchezJC. Relative protein quantification by MS/MS using the tandem mass tag technology. Methods Mol. Biol. 893, 115–127 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerber SA , RushJ, StemmanO, KirschnerMW, GygiSP. Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100(12), 6940–6945 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttenhain R , MalmstromJ, PicottiP, AebersoldR. Perspectives of targeted mass spectrometry for protein biomarker verification. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 13(5–6), 518–525 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brun V , MasselonC, GarinJ, DupuisA. Isotope dilution strategies for absolute quantitative proteomics. J. Proteomics72, 740–749 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson L , HunterCL. Quantitative mass spectrometric multiple reaction monitoring assays for major plasma proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics5(4), 573–588 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdi F , QuinnJF, JankovicJet al. Detection of biomarkers with a multiplex quantitative proteomic platform in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with neurodegenerative disorders. J. Alzheimers Dis. 9(3), 293–348 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elschenbroich S , IgnatchenkoV, ClarkeBet al. In-depth proteomics of ovarian cancer ascites: combining shotgun proteomics and selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 10(5), 2286–2299 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaglehole R , BonitaR, HortonRet al. Priority actions for the non-communicable disease crisis. Lancet377(9775), 1438–1447 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathers CD , LoncarD. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 3(11), e442 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma S , YehET. C-reactive protein and atherothrombosis – beyond a biomarker: an actual partaker of lesion formation. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 5(285), 5 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Zakynthinos E , PappaN. Inflammatory biomarkers in coronary artery disease. J. Cardiol. 53, 53(3), 317–333 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson NL , AndersonNG. The human plasma proteome: history, character, and diagnostic prospects. Mol. Cell. Proteomics1(11), 845–867 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brun V , DupuisA, AdraitAet al. Isotope-labeled protein standards: toward absolute quantitative proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics6(12), 2139–2149 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebert D , DupuisA, GarinJ, BruleyC, BrunV. Production and use of stable isotope-labeled proteins for absolute quantitative proteomics. Methods Mol. Biol. 753, 93–115 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirkpatrick DS , GerberSA, GygiSP. The absolute quantification strategy: a general procedure for the quantification of proteins and post-translational modifications. Methods35(3), 265–273 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettenbach AN , RushJ, GerberSA. Absolute quantification of protein and post-translational modification abundance with stable isotope-labeled synthetic peptides. Nat. Protoc. 6(2), 175–186 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy AJ , ChambersAG, YangJ, BorchersCH. Multiplexed MRM-based quantitation of candidate cancer biomarker proteins in undepleted and non-enriched human plasma. Proteomics13(14), 2202–2215 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy AJ , ChambersAG, YangJ, DomanskiD, BorchersCH. Comparison of standard-flow and nano-flow liquid chromatography systems for MRM-based quantitation of putative plasma biomarker proteins. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 404(4), 1089–1101 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers AG , PercyAJ, YangJ, CamenzindAG, BorchersCH. Multiplexed quantitation of endogenous proteins in dried blood spots by multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics12(3), 781–791 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domanski D , PercyAJ, YangJet al. MRM-based multiplexed quantitation of 67 putative cardiovascular disease biomarkers in human plasma. Proteomics12(8), 1222–1243 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzyk MA , SmithD, YangJet al. Multiple reaction monitoring-based, multiplexed, absolute quantitation of 45 proteins in human plasma. Mol. Cell. Proteomics8(8), 1860–1877 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshishian H , AddonaT, BurgessM, KuhnE, CarrSA. Quantitative, multiplexed assays for low abundance proteins in plasma by targeted mass spectrometry and stable isotope dilution. Mol. Cell. Proteomics6, 2212–2229 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshishian H , AddonaT, BurgessMet al. Quantification of cardiovascular biomarkers in patient plasma by targeted mass spectrometry and stable isotope dilution. Mol. Cell. Proteomics8, 2339–2349 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezeli M , VégváriA, OttervaldJ, OlssonT, LaurellT, Marko-VargaG. MRM assay for quantitation of complement components in human blood plasma – a feasibility study on multiple sclerosis. J. Proteomics75(1), 211–220 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T , HossainM, SchepmoesAAet al. Analysis of serum total and free PSA using immunoaffinity depletion coupled to MRM: correlation with clinical immunoassay tests. J. Proteomics75(15), 4747–4757 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüttenhain R , SosteM, SelevsekNet al. Reproducible quantification of cancer-associated proteins in body fluids using targeted proteomics. Sci. Transl. Med. 4(142), 1–13 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi M , FrickLE, LaMarrWAet al. High-throughput SISCAPA quantitation of peptides from human plasma digests by ultrafast, liquid chromatography-free mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 11(12), 5642–5649 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteaker JR , ZhaoL, AndersonL, PaulovichAG. An automated and multiplexed method for high throughput peptide immunoaffinity enrichment and multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry-based quantification of protein biomarkers. Mol. Cell. Proteomics9(1), 184–196 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn E , AddonaT, KeshishianHet al. Developing multiplexed assays for troponin I and interleukin-33 in plasma by peptide immunoaffinity enrichment and targeted mass spectrometry. Clin. Chem. 55(6), 1108–1117 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi T , FillmoreTL, SunXet al. Antibody-free, targeted mass-spectrometric approach for quantification of proteins at low picogram per milliliter levels in human plasma/serum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA109(38), 15395–15400 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundblad RL . Considerations for the use of blood plasma and serum for proteomic analysis. The Internet Journal of Genomics and Proteomics. 1(2) doi:10.5580 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Lippi G , FranchiniM, MontagnanaM, SalvagnoGL, PoliG, GuidiGC. Quality and reliability of routine coagulation testing: can we trust that sample? Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis17(7), 513–519 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelfand CA , OmennGS. Pre-analytical variables for plasma and serum proteome analyses. In:Sample Preparation in Biological Mass Spectrometry. Ivanov AR, Lazarev AV (Eds). Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 269–290 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Lista S , FaltracoF, HampelH. Biological and methodical challenges of blood-based proteomics in the field of neurological research. Prog. Neurobiol. 101–102, 18–34 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rai AJ , VitzthumF. Effects of pre-analytical variables on peptide and protein measurements in human serum and plasma: implications for clinical proteomics. Expert Rev. Proteomics3(4), 409–426 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi J , CraftD, GelfandCA. Minimizing pre-analytical variation of plasma samples by proper blood collection and handling. Methods Mol. Biol. 728, 137–149 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodriguez H , TežakZ, MesriMet al. Analytical validation of protein-based multiplex assays: a workshop report by the NCI-FDA Interagency Oncology Task Force on Molecular Diagnostics. Clin. Chem. 56(2), 237–243 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulovich AG , BillheimerDD, Ham A-JLet al. A CPTAC inter-laboratory study characterizing a yeast performance standard for benchmarking LC–MS platform performance. Mol. Cell. Proteomics9, 242–254 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez H , RiversR, KinsingerCet al. Reconstructing the pipeline by introducing multiplexed multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry for cancer biomarker verification: an NCI-CPTC initiative perspective. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 4(12), 904–914 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsinger CR , ApffelJ, BakerMet al. Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam Principles). J. Proteome Res. 11(2), 1412–1419 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Addona TA , AbbatielloSE, SchillingBet al. Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring-based measurements of proteins in plasma. Nat. Biotechnol. 27(7), 633–641 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proc JL , KuzykMA, HardieDBet al. A quantitative study of the effects of chaotropic agents, surfactants, and solvents on the digestion efficiency of human plasma proteins by trypsin. J. Proteome Res. 9(10), 5422–5437 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoy I , SalgadoR, ColpaertC, WeytjensR, VermeulenPB, DirixLY. Serum interleukin 6, plasma VEGF, serum VEGF, and VEGF platelet load in breast cancer patients. Clin. Breast Cancer2(4), 311–315 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caisey JD , KingDJ. Clinical chemical values for some common laboratory animals. Clin. Chem. 26(13), 1877–1879 (1980).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omenn GS , StatesDJ, AdamskiMet al. Overview of the HUPO plasma proteome project: results from the pilot phase with 35 collaborating laboratories and multiple analytical groups, generating a core dataset of 3020 proteins and a publicly-available database. Proteomics5(13), 3226–3245 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omenn GS . The HUPO human plasma proteome project. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 1(8), 769–779 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omenn GS . The Human Proteome Organization Plasma Proteome Project pilot phase: reference specimens, technology platform comparisons, and standardized data submissions and analyses. Proteomics4, 1235–1240 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlund LB , HardieDB, ElliottMHet al. Standard operating procedures and protocols for the preparation and analysis of plasma samples using the iTRAQ methodology. In:Sample Preparation in Biological Mass Spectrometry. Ivanov A, Lazarev A (Eds). Springer, NY, USA, 575–624 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• O’Mullan P , CraftD, YiJ, GelfandCA. Thrombin induces broad spectrum proteolysis in human serum samples. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 47(6), 685–693 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai AJ , GelfandCA, HaywoodBCet al. HUPO Plasma Proteome Project specimen collection and handling: towards the standardization of parameters for plasma proteome samples. Proteomics5, 3262–3277 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulmes JD , BetheaD, HoKet al. An investigation of plasma collection, stabilization, and storage procedures for proteomic analysis of clinical samples. Clin. Proteomics1(1), 17–31 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Yi J , KimC, GelfandCA. Inhibition of intrinsic proteolytic activities moderates pre-analytical variability and instability of human plasma. J. Proteome Res. 6(5), 1768–1781 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilar-Mahecha A , KuzykMA, DomanskiD, BorchersCH, BasikM. Comparison of blood collection tubes and processing protocols for plasma proteomics studies. PLoS ONE7(6), e38290 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zimmerman LJ , LiM, YarbroughWG, SlebosRJ, LieblerDC. Global stability of plasma proteomes for mass spectrometry-based analyses. Mol. Cell. Proteomics11(6), M111.014340 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall SA , McKayMJ, PascoviciDet al. Remarkable temporal stability of high-abundance human plasma proteins assessed by targeted mass spectrometry. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 6(11–12), 626–634 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostroff R , ForemanT, KeeneyTR, StratfordS, WalkerJJ, ZichiD. The stability of the circulating human proteome to variations in sample collection and handling procedures measured with an aptamer-based proteomics array. J. Proteomics73, 649–666 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz N , NishanianP, MitsuyasuR, DetelsR, FaheyJL. Variables that affect assays for plasma cytokines and soluble activation markers. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 6(1), 89–95 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martino TA , TataN, BjarnasonGA, StraumeM, SoleMJ. Diurnal protein expression in blood revealed by high throughput mass spectrometry proteomics and implications for translational medicine and body. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 293, R1430–R1437 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robles MS , MannM. Proteomic approaches in circadian biology. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 217, 389–407 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Ito Y , NakachiK, ImaiKet al. Stability of frozen serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-I, insulin-like growth factor-II, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3, transforming growth factor beta, soluble Fas, and superoxide dismutase activity for the JACC study. J. Epidemiol. 15(Suppl. 1), S67–S73 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Insenser M , Martínez-GarcíaM, NietoRM, San-MillánJL, Escobar-MorrealeHF. Impact of the storage temperature on human plasma proteomic analysis: implications for the use of human plasma collections in research. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 4(8–9), 739–744 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markiewski MM , NilssonB, EkdahlKN, MollnesTE, LambrisJD. Complement and coagulation: strangers or partners in crime? Trends Immunol. 28, 184–192 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy BM , SwartsS, MuellerBM, van der Geer P, Manning MC, Fitchmun MI. Protein instability following transport or storage on dry ice. Nat. Methods10(4), 278–279 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betsou F , Beaudeux J-L, Berthelaix Aet al. Procédure pour tester l’impact des variables préanalytiques sur des analyses peptidiques et protéiques et proposition de codage des procédures préanalytiques. Ann. Biol. Clin. (Paris)67(6), 641–649 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tuck MK , ChanDW, ChiaDet al. Standard operating procedures for serum and plasma collection: early detection research network consensus statement standard operating procedure integration working group. J. Proteome Res. 8, 113–117 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polaskova V , KapurA, KhanA, MolloyMP, BakerMS. High-abundance protein depletion: comparison of methods for human plasma biomarker discovery. Electrophoresis31(3), 471–482 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson NL , AndersonNG, HainesLR, HardieDB, OlafsonRW, PearsonTW. Mass spectrometric quantitation of peptides and proteins using stable isotope standards and capture by anti-peptide antibodies (SISCAPA). J. Proteome Res. 3(2), 235–244 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson NL , JacksonA, SmithD, HardieD, BorchersC, PearsonTW. SISCAPA peptide enrichment on magnetic beads using an in-line bead trap device. Mol. Cell. Proteomics8(5), 995–1005 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteaker JR , ZhaoL, AbbatielloSEet al. Evaluation of large scale quantitative proteomic assay development using peptide affinity-based mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics10(4), M110.005645 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenherr RM , ZhaoL, WhiteakerJRet al. Automated screening of monoclonal antibodies for SISCAPA assays using a magnetic bead processor and liquid chromatography-selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry. J Immunol. Methods353(1–2), 49–61 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang J , ParkerCE, FullerJR, KawulaTH, BorchersCH. An immunoaffinity tandem mass spectrometry (iMALDI) assay for detection of Francisella tularensis. Anal. Chim. Acta605, 70–79. (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang J , ParkerCE, HoadleyKA, PerouCM, BoysenG, BorchersCH. Development of an immuno tandem mass spectrometry (iMALDI) assay for EGFR diagnosis. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 1, 1651–1659 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid JD , HolmesDT, MasonDR, ShahB, BorchersCH. Towards the development of an immuno MALDI (iMALDI) mass spectrometry assay for the diagnosis of hypertension. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 21(10), 1680–1686 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason DR , ReidJD, CamenzindAG, HolmesDT, BorchersCH. Duplexed iMALDI for the detection of angiotensin I and angiotensin II. Methods56(2), 213–222 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polaskova V , KapurA, KhanA, MolloyMP, BakerMS. High-abundance protein depletion: comparison of methods for human plasma biomarker discovery. Electrophoresis31(3), 471–482 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K , YuJ, MinHet al. Online monitoring of immunoaffinity-based depletion of high-abundance blood proteins by UV spectrophotometry using enhanced green fluorescence protein and FITC-labeled human serum albumin. Proteome Sci. 8, 62 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen JV , OngSE, MannM. Trypsin cleaves exclusively C-terminal to arginine and lysine residues. Mol. Cell. Proteomics3(6), 608–614 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picotti P , AebersoldR, DomonB. The implications of proteolytic background for shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics6(9), 1589–1598 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S , YaoG, QiDet al. Fast and efficient proteolysis by microwave-assisted protein digestion using trypsin-immobilized magnetic silica microspheres. Anal. Chem. 80(10), 3655–3665 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang N , LiL. Reproducible microwave-assisted acid hydrolysis of proteins using a household microwave oven and its combination with LC–ESI-MS/MS for mapping protein sequences and modifications. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 21(9), 1573–1587 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye X , LiL. Microwave-assisted protein solubilization for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteome analysis. Anal. Chem. 84(14), 6181–6191 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Ferrer D , CapeloJL, VázquezJ. Ultra fast trypsin digestion of proteins by high intensity focused ultrasound. J. Proteome Res. 4, 1569–1574 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Ferrer D , PetritisK, HixsonKKet al. Application of pressurized solvents for ultrafast trypsin hydrolysis in proteomics: proteomics on the fly. J. Proteome Res. 7(8), 3276–3281 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Ferrer D , PetritisK, LouretteNMet al. On-line digestion system for protein characterization and proteome analysis. Anal. Chem. 23, 8930–8936 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Glatter T , LudwigC, AhrnéE, AebersoldR, HeckAJ, SchmidtA. Large-scale quantitative assessment of different in-solution protein digestion protocols reveals superior cleavage efficiency of tandem LysC/trypsin proteolysis over trypsin digestion. J. Proteome Res. 11(11), 5145–5156 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canas B , PineiroC, CalvoE, Lopez-FerrerD, GallardoJM. Trends in sample preparation for classical and second generation proteomics. J. Chromatog. A1153, 235–258 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J , ZhouTY, CaoRet al. Evaluation of the application of sodium deoxycholate to proteomic analysis of rat hippocampal plasma membrane.rat hippocampal plasma membrane. J. Proteome Res. 5, 2547–2553 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y , ZhouJ, BiD, ChenP, WangX, LiangS. Sodium-deoxycholate-assisted tryptic digestion and identification of proteolytically resistant proteins. Anal. Biochem. 377(2), 259–266 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhart JM , SchumbrutzkiC, WortelkampS, SickmannA, ZahediRP. Systematic and quantitative comparison of digest efficiency and specificity reveals the impact of trypsin quality on MS-based proteomics. J. Proteomics75(4), 1454–1462 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil B . Specificity of Proteolysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez J , GuptaN, SmithRD, PevznerPA. Does trypsin cut before proline? J. Proteome Res. 7(1), 300–305 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domanski D , Cohen Freue G, Sojo Let al. The use of multiplexed MRM for the discovery of biomarkers to differentiate iron-deficiency anemia from anemia of inflammation. J. Proteomics75(12), 3514–3528 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domanski D , SmithDS, MillerCAet al. High-flow multiplexed MRM-based analysis of proteins in human plasma without depletion or enrichment. Clin. Lab. Med. 31(3), 371–384 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillette MA , CarrSA. Quantitative analysis of peptides and proteins in biomedicine by targeted mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods10, 28–34 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn E , WhiteakerJR, ManiDRet al. Interlaboratory evaluation of automated, multiplexed peptide immunoaffinity enrichment coupled to multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry for quantifying proteins in plasma. Mol. Cell. Proteomics11(6), M111.013854 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuis A , HennekinneJA, GarinJ, BrunV. Protein standard absolute quantification (PSAQ) for improved investigation of staphylococcal food poisoning outbreaks. Proteomics8(22), 4633–4636 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaquinod M , TrauchessecM, HuilletCet al. Mass spectrometry-based absolute protein quantification: PSAQ™ strategy makes use of “noncanonical” proteotypic peptides. Proteomics12(8), 1217–1221 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huillet C , AdraitA, LebertDet al. Accurate quantification of cardiovascular biomarkers in serum using Protein Standard Absolute Quantification (PSAQ™) and selected reaction monitoring. Mol. Cell. Proteomics11(2), M111.008235 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agger SA , MarneyLC, HoofnagleAN. Simultaneous quantification of apolipoprotein a-I and apolipoprotein B by liquid chromatography–multiple reaction monitoring–mass spectrometry. Clin. Chem. 56(12), 1804–1813 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoofnagle AN , WenerMH. The fundamental flaws of immunoassays and potential solutions using tandem mass spectrometry. J. Immunol. Methods347(1–2), 3–11 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne TR . Stable isotopes in pharmacology studies: present and future. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 26(6), 485–489 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons HG . Stable isotopes in the management and diagnosis of inborn errors of metabolism. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 68(7), 950–954 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard G , LebertD, LouwagieMet al. PSAQ™ standards for accurate MS-based quantification of proteins: from the concept to biomedical applications. J. Mass Spectrom. 47(10), 1353–1363 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picotti P , BodenmillerB, MuellerLN, DomonB, AebersoldR. Full dynamic range proteome analysis of S. cerevisiae by targeted proteomics. Cell138(4), 795–806 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin T , SalvadorA, CharrierJPet al. Multiple reaction monitoring cubed for protein quantification at the low nanogram/milliliter level in nondepleted human serum. Anal. Chem. 81(22), 9343–9352 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter C . MRM3 quantitation for highest selectivity of proteins in complex matrices. J. Biomol. Tech. 21(3 Suppl.), S34–S35 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Shi T , SuD, LiuTet al. Advancing the sensitivity of selected reaction monitoring-based targeted quantitative proteomics. Proteomics12(8), 1074–1092 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy AJ , ChambersAG, ParkerCE, BorchersCH. Absolute quantitation of proteins in human blood by multiplexed multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. Methods Mol. Biol. 1000, 167–189 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abbatiello SE , ManiDR, KeshishianH, CarrSA. Automated detection of inaccurate and imprecise transitions in peptide quantification by multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. Clin. Chem. 56(2), 291–305 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiyonami R , SchoenA, PrakashAet al. Increased selectivity, analytical precision, and throughput in targeted proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics10(2), M110.002931 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röst H , MalmströmL, AebersoldR. A computational tool to detect and avoid redundancy in selected reaction monitoring. Mol. Cell. Proteomics11(8), 540–549 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillet LC , NavarroP, TateSet al. Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics11(6), O111.016717 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoofnagle AN . Quantitative clinical proteomics by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry: assessing the platform. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 56(2), 161–164 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann S , HoofnagleA, HochstrasserDet al. Quantitative clinical chemistry proteomics (qCCP) using mass spectrometry: general characteristics and application. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 51(5), 919–935 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallien S , DuriezE, DemeureK, DomonB. Selectivity of LC–MS/MS analysis: implication for proteomics experiments. J. Proteomics81, 148–158 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boja ES , JortaniSA, RitchieJet al. The journey to regulation of protein-based multiplex quantitative assays. Clin. Chem. 57(4), 560–567 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell AW , DeutschEW, AuCEet al. A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Methods6(6), 423–430 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermjakob H . The HUPO proteomics standards initiative – overcoming the fragmentation of proteomics data. Proteomics6(Suppl. 2), 34–38 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Legrain P , AebersoldR, ArchakovAet al. The human proteome project: current state and future direction. Mol. Cell. Proteomics10(7), M111.00993 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright GW , CazaresLH, LeungSMet al. Proteinchip(R) surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) mass spectrometry: a novel protein biochip technology for detection of prostate cancer biomarkers in complex protein mixtures. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2(5/6), 264–276 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petricoin EF , ArdekaniAM, HittBAet al. Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet359(9306), 572–577 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggerly KA , MorrisJS, CoombesKR. Reproducibility of SELDI-TOF protein patterns in serum: comparing datasets from different experiments. Bioinformatics20(5), 777–785 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash A , RezaiT, KrastinsBet al. Platform for establishing interlaboratory reproducibility of selected reaction monitoring-based mass spectrometry peptide assays. J. Proteome Res. 9(12), 6678–6688 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy AJ , ChambersAG, SmithDS, BorchersCH. Standardized protocols for quality control of MRM-based plasma proteomic workflow. J. Proteome Res. 12(1), 222–233 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Websites

• Schoenfeld DA. Statistical Considerations for Clinical Trials and Scientific Experiments. http://hedwig.mgh.harvard.edu/sample_size/size.html#ssize
   Google Scholar
• Anderson L, Pope M, Razavi M et al . High sensitivity SISCAPA-based peptide quantitation using UHPLC and the 6490 QQQ with iFunnel technology. www.chem.agilent.com/Library/applications/5990–8999en_lo.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Promise. PSAQ™: the ultimate in quantification. www.promise-proteomics.com/technology_promise_proteomics.php
   Google Scholar
• Fong T. New Technology Combining Bruker’s MALDI-TOF/TOF with Bio-Rad’s SELDI Set to Launch. www.genomeweb.com/proteomics/new-technology-combining-brukers-maldi-toftof-bio-rads-seldi-set-launch
   Google Scholar