Product carbon footprinting: a proposed framework to increase confidence, reduce costs and incorporate profit incentive

• IPCC. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (Eds). IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 104 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Pacala S, Socolow R. Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science305(5286),968–972 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright LA, Kemp S, Williams I. ‘Carbon footprinting’: towards a universally accepted definition. Carbon Management2(1),61–72 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micallef-Borg C. Product carbon footprinting: calculation and communication standards in the making. Climate Carbon Law Rev.2,178–189 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• World Resources Institute, World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Product Accounting and Reporting Standard. Draft. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, USA (2010).
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution. Specification for the Assessment of the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Goods and Services. PAS 2050. British Standards Institution, London, UK (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Vandenbergh MP, Dietz T, Stern P. Time to try carbon labeling. Nature Climate Change1,4–6 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon AC. Product-level carbon auditing of supply chains environmental imperative or wasteful distraction? Int. J. Phys. Distribution Logistics Manag.40(1/2),42–60 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinden G. The contribution of PAS 2050 to the evolution of international greenhouse gas emission standards. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.14,195–203 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SETAC Europe LCA Steering Committee. Standardisation efforts to measure greenhouse gases and ‘carbon footprinting’ for products. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.13(2),87–88 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plassmann K, Norton A, Attarzadeh N, Jensen MP, Brenton P, Edward-Jones G. Methodological complexities of product carbon footprinting: a sensitivity analysis of key variables in a developing country context. Environ. Sci. Policy13,393–404 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vankatesh A, Jaramillion P, Griffin WM, Matthews HS. Uncertainty analysis of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from petroleum-based fuels and impacts on low carbon fuel policies. Environ. Sci. Technol.45,125–131 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Environmental Management. Life Cycle Assessment. Principles and Framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Finkbeiner M. Carbon footprinting – opportunities and threats. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.14,91–94 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidema BP, Thrane M, Christensen P, Schmidt J, Lokke S. Carbon footprint a catalyst for life cycle assessment? J. Ind. Ecol.12(1),3–6 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Environmental Management. Life Cycle Assessment. Requirements and Guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2006).
   Google Scholar
• World Resources Institute, World Business Council for Sustainable Development. A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition). World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, USA (2004).
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution. How to Assess the Carbon Footprint of Goods and Services. Guide to PAS 2050. British Standards Institution, London, UK (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Basset-Mens C, Kelliher FM, Ledgard S, Cox N. Uncertainty of global warming potential for milk production on a New Zealand farm and implications for decision making. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.14,630–638 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong J, Shaked S, Rosenbaum RK, Jolliet O. Analytical uncertainty propagation in life cycle inventory and impact assessment: application to an automobile front panel. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.15,499–510 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• De Konigg A, Schowanek D, Dewaele J, Weisbrod A, Guinee J. Uncertainty in a carbon footprint model for detergents; quantifying the confidence in a comparative result. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.15,79–89 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Roos E, Sundberg C, Hansson PA. Uncertainties in the carbon footprint of food products: a case study on table potatoes. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.15,478–488 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker J, Ludley KE, Rowe R, Taylor G, Howard DC. Sources of variability in greenhouse gas and energy balances for biofuel production: a systematic review. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy2,99–112 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Basset-Mens C, van der Werf HMG, Durand P, Leterme P. Implications of uncertainty and variability in the life cycle assessment of pig production systems. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.11(5),298–304 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malca J, Freire F. Uncertainty analysis in biofuel systems: an application to the life cycle of rapeseed oil. J. Ind. Ecol.14(2),322–334 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T et al. Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J. Environ. Manag.91,1–21 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews HS, Hendrickson CT, Weber CL. The importance of carbon footprint estimation boundaries. Environ. Sci. Technol.42(16),5839–5842 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnansounou E, Dauriat A, Villegas J, Panichelli L. Life cycle assessment of biofuels: energy and greenhouse gas balances. Bioresour. Technol.100,4919–4930 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llyod M, Ries R. Characterizing, propagating, and analyzing uncertainty in life-cycle assessment a survey of quantitative approaches. J. Ind. Ecol.11(1),161–179 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B. A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment part 1: goal and scope and inventory analysis. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.13,290–300 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berners-Lee M, Howard DC, Moss J, Kaivanto K, Scott WA. Greenhouse gas footprinting for small businesses – the use of input-output data. Sci. Total Environ.409,883–891 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yellishetty M, Ranjith PG, Tharumarajah A, Bhosale S. Life cycle assessment in the minerals and metals sector: a critical review of selected issues and challenges. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.14,257–267 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Resources Institute, World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, USA (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Upham P, Dendler L, Bleda M. Carbon labelling of grocery products: public perceptions and potential emissions reductions. J. Cleaner Prod.19,348–355 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar

▪ Websites

• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Earth System Research Laboratory, trends in atmospheric CO2. www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends
   Google Scholar
• New Belgium Brewery and the Climate Conservancy. The carbon footprint of Fat Tire® amber ale. www.newbelgium.com/Files/the-carbon-footprint-of-fat-tire-amber-ale-2008-public-dist-rfs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sam Walton School of Business. White paper: open source lifecyle inventory. A collaborative approach to creating business, environmental and social values. http://asc.uark.edu/348.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Renewable Energy Laboratory. US life cycle inventory database. www.nrel.gov/lci
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie Mellon EIO LCA Tool. www.eiolca.net
   Google Scholar
• ELCD core database version II. http://lca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/lcainfohub/index.vm
   Google Scholar
• The International EPD System. www.enviondec.com
   Google Scholar
• Terrachoice. The seven sins of greenwashing 2009. http://sinsofgreenwashing.org/findings/greenwashing-report-2009
   Google Scholar
• Terrachoice. The sins of greenwashing 2010. http://sinsofgreenwashing.org/findings/greenwashing-report-2010
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register Notice for proposed revised green guides, 2010. www.ftc.gov/os/fedreg/2010/october/101006greenguidesfrn.pdf
   Google Scholar
• US Federal Trade Commission. FTC extends deadline for new lighting facts labels to January 1, 2012. www.ftc.gov/opa/2011/04/bulblabeling.shtm
   Google Scholar
• US DOE. New lighting standards begin in 2012. www.energysavers.gov/your_home/lighting_daylighting/index.cfm/mytopic=11977
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. Profile of an average US supermarket’s greenhouse gas impacts from refrigeration leaks compared to electricity consumption. www.epa.gov/greenchill/downloads/GC_AverageStoreProfile_FINAL_JUNE_2011_REVISED.pdf
   Google Scholar