5,616
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A Structure-Guided Molecular Chaperone Approach for Restoring the Transcriptional Activity of the p53 Cancer Mutant Y220C

, , , , , , , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 2491-2504 | Received 06 Jun 2019, Accepted 02 Aug 2019, Published online: 21 Oct 2019

References

  • Joerger AC , FershtAR. The p53 pathway: origins, inactivation in cancer, and emerging therapeutic approaches. Annu. Rev. Biochem.85, 375–404 (2016).
  • Vousden KH , PrivesC. Blinded by the light: the growing complexity of p53. Cell137, 413–431 (2009).
  • Bieging KT , MelloSS, AttardiLD. Unravelling mechanisms of p53-mediated tumour suppression. Nat. Rev. Cancer14, 359–370 (2014).
  • Khoo KH , VermaCS, LaneDP. Drugging the p53 pathway: understanding the route to clinical efficacy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.13, 217–236 (2014).
  • Bouaoun L , SonkinD, ArdinMet al. TP53 variations in human cancers: new lessons from the IARC TP53 database and genomics data. Hum. Mutat.37, 865–876 (2016).
  • Leroy B , FournierJL, IshiokaCet al. The TP53 website: an integrative resource centre for the TP53 mutation database and TP53 mutant analysis. Nucleic Acids Res.41, D962–D969 (2013).
  • Joerger AC , FershtAR. Structure-function-rescue: the diverse nature of common p53 cancer mutants. Oncogene26, 2226–2242 (2007).
  • Cho Y , GorinaS, JeffreyPD, PavletichNP. Crystal structure of a p53 tumor suppressor-DNA complex: understanding tumorigenic mutations. Science265, 346–355 (1994).
  • Eldar A , RozenbergH, Diskin-PosnerY, RohsR, ShakkedZ. Structural studies of p53 inactivation by DNA-contact mutations and its rescue by suppressor mutations via alternative protein-DNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res.41, 8748–8759 (2013).
  • Bullock AN , HenckelJ, FershtAR. Quantitative analysis of residual folding and DNA binding in mutant p53 core domain: definition of mutant states for rescue in cancer therapy. Oncogene19, 1245–1256 (2000).
  • Wang G , FershtAR. Multisite aggregation of p53 and implications for drug rescue. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA114, E2634–E2643 (2017).
  • Di Como CJ , PrivesC. Human tumor-derived p53 proteins exhibit binding site selectivity and temperature sensitivity for transactivation in a yeast-based assay. Oncogene16, 2527–2539 (1998).
  • Dearth LR , QianH, WangTet al. Inactive full-length p53 mutants lacking dominant wild-type p53 inhibition highlight loss of heterozygosity as an important aspect of p53 status in human cancers. Carcinogenesis28, 289–298 (2007).
  • Wassman CD , BaronioR, DemirOet al. Computational identification of a transiently open L1/S3 pocket for reactivation of mutant p53. Nat. Commun.4, 1407 (2013).
  • Joerger AC , AngHC, FershtAR. Structural basis for understanding oncogenic p53 mutations and designing rescue drugs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103, 15056–15061 (2006).
  • Joerger AC , BauerMR, WilckenRet al. Exploiting transient protein states for the design of small-molecule stabilizers of mutant p53. Structure23, 2246–2255 (2015).
  • Lambert JM , GorzovP, VeprintsevDBet al. PRIMA-1 reactivates mutant p53 by covalent binding to the core domain. Cancer Cell15, 376–388 (2009).
  • Bykov VJ , ZhangQ, ZhangM, CederS, AbrahmsenL, WimanKG. Targeting of mutant p53 and the cellular redox balance by APR-246 as a strategy for efficient cancer therapy. Front. Oncol.6, 21 (2016).
  • Bauer MR , JoergerAC, FershtAR. 2-Sulfonylpyrimidines: mild alkylating agents with anticancer activity toward p53-compromised cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA113, E5271–E5280 (2016).
  • Blanden AR , YuX, WolfeAJet al. Synthetic metallochaperone ZMC1 rescues mutant p53 conformation by transporting zinc into cells as an ionophore. Mol. Pharmacol.87, 825–831 (2015).
  • Miller JJ , OrvainC, JoziSet al. Multifunctional compounds for activation of the p53-Y220C mutant in cancer. Chemistry24, 17734–17742 (2018).
  • Boeckler FM , JoergerAC, JaggiG, RutherfordTJ, VeprintsevDB, FershtAR. Targeted rescue of a destabilized mutant of p53 by an in silico screened drug. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105, 10360–10365 (2008).
  • Basse N , KaarJL, SettanniG, JoergerAC, RutherfordTJ, FershtAR. Toward the rational design of p53-stabilizing drugs: probing the surface of the oncogenic Y220C mutant. Chem. Biol.17, 46–56 (2010).
  • Wilcken R , LiuX, ZimmermannMOet al. Halogen-enriched fragment libraries as leads for drug rescue of mutant p53. J. Am. Chem. Soc.134, 6810–6818 (2012).
  • Liu X , WilckenR, JoergerACet al. Small molecule induced reactivation of mutant p53 in cancer cells. Nucleic Acids Res.41, 6034–6044 (2013).
  • Wilcken R , ZimmermannMO, BauerMRet al. Experimental and theoretical evaluation of the ethynyl moiety as a halogen bioisostere. ACS Chem. Biol.10, 2725–2732 (2015).
  • Bauer MR , JonesRN, BaudMGet al. Harnessing fluorine-sulfur contacts and multipolar interactions for the design of p53 mutant Y220C rescue drugs. ACS Chem. Biol.11, 2265–2274 (2016).
  • Baud MGJ , BauerMR, VerduciLet al. Aminobenzothiazole derivatives stabilize the thermolabile p53 cancer mutant Y220C and show anticancer activity in p53-Y220C cell lines. Eur. J. Med. Chem.152, 101–114 (2018).
  • Rennison D , GueretSM, LaitaOet al. Substituted carbazoles – a new class of anthelmintic agent. Aust. J. Chem.69, 1268–1276 (2016).
  • Wilcken R , WangG, BoecklerFM, FershtAR. Kinetic mechanism of p53 oncogenic mutant aggregation and its inhibition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA109, 13584–13589 (2012).
  • Wang H , LaRussa M, QiLS. CRISPR/Cas9 in genome editing and beyond. Annu. Rev. Biochem.85, 227–264 (2016).
  • Kabsch W . XDS. Acta Crystallogr. D66, 125–132 (2010).
  • Evans P . Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Crystallogr. D62, 72–82 (2006).
  • Winn MD , BallardCC, CowtanKDet al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D67, 235–242 (2011).
  • Adams PD , AfoninePV, BunkocziGet al. PHENIX: a comprehensive python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D66, 213–221 (2010).
  • Emsley P , LohkampB, ScottWG, CowtanK. Features and development of coot. Acta Crystallogr. D66, 486–501 (2010).
  • Xu J , ReumersJ, CouceiroJRet al. Gain of function of mutant p53 by coaggregation with multiple tumor suppressors. Nat. Chem. Biol.7, 285–295 (2011).
  • Wang G , FershtAR. Propagation of aggregated p53: cross-reaction and coaggregation vs. seeding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA112, 2443–2448 (2015).
  • Aschauer L , MullerPA. Novel targets and interaction partners of mutant p53 gain-of-function. Biochem. Soc. Trans.44, 460–466 (2016).
  • Kehrloesser S , OsterburgC, TuppiM, SchaferB, VousdenKH, DotschV. Intrinsic aggregation propensity of the p63 and p73 TI domains correlates with p53R175H interaction and suggests further significance of aggregation events in the p53 family. Cell Death Differ.23, 1952–1960 (2016).
  • Wilcken R , ZimmermannMO, LangeA, JoergerAC, BoecklerFM. Principles and applications of halogen bonding in medicinal chemistry and chemical biology. J. Med. Chem.56, 1363–1388 (2013).
  • Zhang X , GongZ, LiJ, LuT. Intermolecular sulfur…oxygen interactions: theoretical and statistical investigations. J. Chem. Inf. Model.55, 2138–2153 (2015).
  • Fischer M . Census and evaluation of p53 target genes. Oncogene36, 3943–3956 (2017).
  • Harford TJ , KlimentG, ShuklaGC, WeymanCM. The muscle regulatory transcription factor MyoD participates with p53 to directly increase the expression of the pro-apoptotic Bcl2 family member PUMA. Apoptosis22, 1532–1542 (2017).