References
- Hu Y , StumpfeD, BajorathJ. Lessons learned from molecular scaffold analysis. J. Chem. Inf. Model.51 (8), 1742–1753 (2011).
- Bemis GW , MurckoMA. The properties of known drugs. 1. Molecular frameworks. J. Med. Chem.39 (15), 2887–2893 (1996).
- Xu Y-J , JohnsonM. Algorithm for naming molecular equivalence classes represented by labeled pseudographs. J. Chem. Inf. Model.41 (1), 181–185 (2001).
- Evans BE , RittleKE, BockMGet al. Methods for drug discovery: development of potent, selective, orally effective cholecystokinin antagonists. J. Med. Chem.31 (12), 2235–2246 (1988).
- Müller G . Medicinal chemistry of target family-directed masterkeys. Drug Discov. Today8 (15), 681–691 (2003).
- Schneider G , NeidhartW, GillerTet al. “Scaffold‐hopping” by topological pharmacophore search: a contribution to virtual screening. Angew. Chem. Intl Ed.38 (19), 2894–2896 (1999).
- Walters WP , StahlMT, MurckoMA. Virtual screening - an overview. Drug Discov. Today3 (4), 160–178 (1998).
- Geppert H , VogtM, BajorathJ. Current trends in ligand-based virtual screening: molecular representations, data mining methods, new application areas, and performance evaluation. J. Chem. Inf. Model.50 (2), 205–216 (2010).
- Hongmao S , TawaG, WallqvistA. Classification of scaffold hopping approaches. Drug Discov. Today17 (7–8), 310–324 (2012).
- Wilkens SJ , JanesJ, SuAI. HierS: hierarchical scaffold clustering using topological chemical graphs. J. Med. Chem.48 (9), 182–193 (2005).
- Schuffenhauer A , ErtlP, RoggoSet al. The scaffold tree‐‐visualization of the scaffold universe by hierarchical scaffold classification. J. Chem. Inf. Model.47 (1), 47–58 (2007).
- Gupta-Ostermann D , HuY, BajorathJ. Introducing the LASSO graph for compound data set representation and structure–activity relationship analysis. J. Med. Chem.55 (11), 5546–5553 (2012).
- Wetzel S , KleinK, RennerSet al. Interactive exploration of chemical space with scaffold hunter. Nat. Chem. Biol.5 (8), 581–583 (2009).
- Lipkus AH , YuanQ, LucasKAet al. Structural diversity of organic chemistry. A scaffold analysis of the CAS registry. J. Org. Chem.73 (12), 4443–4451 (2008).
- Hu Y , BajorathJ. Global assessment of scaffold hopping potential for current pharmaceutical targets. Med. Chem. Comm.1 (5), 339–344 (2010).
- Wang J , HouT. Drug and drug candidate building block analysis. J. Chem. Inf. Model.50 (1), 55–67 (2008).
- Hu Y , BajorathJ. Many drugs contain unique scaffolds with varying structural relationships to scaffolds of currently available bioactive compounds. Eur. J. Med. Chem.76 (1), 427–434 (2014).
- Taylor RD , MacCossM, LawsonADG. Rings in drugs. J. Med. Chem.57 (14), 5845–5859 (2014).
- Shelat AA , GuyRK. Scaffold composition and biological relevance of screening libraries. Nat. Chem. Biol.3 (8), 442–446 (2007).
- Langdon SR , BrownN, BlaggJ. Scaffold diversity of exemplified medicinal chemistry space. J. Chem. Inf. Model.51 (9), 2174–2185 (2011).
- Gaulton A , BellisLJ, BentoAPet al. ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery. Nucleic Acids Res.40 (database issue), D1100–D1107 (2012).
- ChEMBL . www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl.
- Tiwari A , SekharAK . . Workflow based framework for life science informatics. Comput. Biol. Chem.31 (5), 305–319 (2007).
- KNIME . www.knime.org.
- Openeye . www.eyesopen.com.