In Vitro and Ex Vivo Evaluation of Biomaterials' Distinctive Properties as a Result of Thiolation

References

• Mero A , CampisiM. Hyaluronic acid bioconjugates for the delivery of bioactive molecules. Polymers6 (2), 346–369 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campisi M , GalessoD, MeroA, PasutG. Development of a new hyaluronic acid-calcitonin conjugate for the local treatment of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartilage22, S475–S476 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Necas J , BartosikovaL, BraunerP, KolarJ. Hyaluronic acid (hyaluronan): a review. Vet. Med-Czech53 (8), 397–411 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernkop-Schnurch A . Mucoadhesive polymers: strategies, achievements and future challenges. Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev.57 (11), 1553–1555 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernkop-Schnurch A . The use of multifunctional polymers for non-invasive peptide and protein application. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat.10 (9), 1357–1366 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernkop-Schnurch A , KraulandAH, LeitnerVM, PalmbergerT. Thiomers: potential excipients for non-invasive peptide delivery systems. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.58 (2), 253–263 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudhakar Y , KuotsuK, BandyopadhyayAK. Buccal bioadhesive drug delivery – a promising option for orally less efficient drugs. J. Control. Release114 (1), 15–40 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffleur F , Bernkop-SchnurchA. Thiomers: promising platform for macromolecular drug delivery. Future Med. Chem.4 (17), 2205–2216 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafedjiiski K , JettiRK, FogerFet al. Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of thiolated hyaluronic acid for mucoadhesive drug delivery. Int. J. Pharm.343 (1–2), 48–58 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habeeb AF . A sensitive method for localization of disulfide containing peptides in column effluents. Anal. Biochem.56 (1), 60–65 (1973).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings P , KoppelstaetterC, PfallerW, MorinJP, HartungT, RyanMP. Assessment of a new cell culture perfusion apparatus for in vitro chronic toxicity testing – Part 2: toxicological evaluation. Altex-Altern. Tierexp.21 (2), 61–66 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmitz T , HombachJ, Bernkop-SchnurchA. Chitosan-N-acetyl cysteine conjugates: in vitro evaluation of permeation enhancing and P-glycoprotein inhibiting properties. Drug. Deliv.15 (4), 245–252 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornof MD , KastCE, Bernkop-SchnurchA. In vitro evaluation of the viscoelastic properties of chitosan-thioglycolic acid conjugates. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.55 (2), 185–190 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peh KK , WongCF. Polymeric films as vehicle for buccal delivery: swelling, mechanical, and bioadhesive properties. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci.2 (2), 53–61 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha Roy D , RoheraBD. Comparative evaluation of rate of hydration and matrix erosion of HEC and HPC and study of drug release from their matrices. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.16 (3), 193–199 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernkop-Schnurch A , WeithalerA, AlbrechtK, GreimelA. Thiomers: preparation and in vitro evaluation of a mucoadhesive nanoparticulate drug delivery system. Int. J. Pharm.317 (1), 76–81 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffleur F , RogglaJ, IdreesMA, GriessingerJ. Chemical modification of hyaluronic acid for intraoral application. J. Pharm. Sci.103 (8), 2414–2423 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffleur F . Mucoadhesive polymers for buccal drug delivery. Drug. Dev. Ind. Pharm.40 (5), 591–598 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurler J , Skalko-BasnetN. Potentials of chitosan-based delivery systems in wound therapy: bioadhesion study. J. Funct. Biomater.3 (1), 37–48 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shahnaz G , VetterA, BarthelmesJet al. Thiolated chitosan nanoparticles for the nasal administration of leuprolide: bioavailability and pharmacokinetic characterization. Int. J. Pharm.428 (1–2), 164–170 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart JD . Recent developments in the use of bioadhesive systems for delivery of drugs to the oral cavity. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst.21 (4), 319–344 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortazavi SA , SmartJD. An investigation into the role of water-movement and mucus gel dehydration in mucoadhesion. J. Control. Release25 (3), 197–203 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peppas NA . Mucoadhesive polymers. Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. S.199, 343-POLY (1990).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart JD . Buccal drug delivery. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv.2 (3), 507–517 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barrett WC , DeGnoreJP, KonigSet al. Regulation of PTP1B via glutathionylation of the active site cysteine 215. Biochemistry38 (20), 6699–6705 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar