Stem Cell Culture and Differentiation in Microfluidic Devices Toward Organ-on-a-Chip

References

• Matsumura T, Tatsumi K, Noda Y et al. Single-cell cloning and expansion of human induced pluripotent stem cells by a microfluidic culture device. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 453(1), 131–137 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah YJ, Koh YT, Lim K, Menon NV, Wu Y, Kang Y. Simple surface engineering of polydimethylsiloxane with polydopamine for stabilized mesenchymal stem cell adhesion and multipotency. Sci. Rep. 5, 18162 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang JM, Tran SH, Na SC, Jeon NL. Engineering controllable architecture in matrigel for 3D cell alignment. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(4), 2183–2188 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titmarsh DM, Glass NR, Mills RJ et al. Induction of Human iPSC-derived cardiomyocyte proliferation revealed by combinatorial screening in high density microbioreactor arrays. Sci. Rep. 6, 24637 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alessandri K, Feyeux M, Gurchenkov B et al. A 3D printed microfluidic device for production of functionalized hydrogel microcapsules for culture and differentiation of human neuronal stem cells (hNSC). Lab Chip 16(9), 1593–1604 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavesi A, Adriani G, Rasponi M, Zervantonakis IK, Fiore GB, Kamm RD. Controlled electromechanical cell stimulation on-a-chip. Sci. Rep. 5, 11800 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno EL, Hachi S, Hemmer K et al. Differentiation of neuroepithelial stem cells into functional dopaminergic neurons in 3D microfluidic cell culture. Lab Chip 15(11), 2419–2428 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon JS, Bersini S, Whisler JA et al. Generation of 3D functional microvascular networks with human mesenchymal stem cells in microfluidic systems. Integr. Biol. (Camb.) 6(5), 555–563 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison SJ, Spradling AC. Stem cells and niches: mechanisms that promote stem cell maintenance throughout life. Cell 132(4), 598–611 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker AJ, McCulloch E, Till JE. Cytological demonstration of the clonal nature of spleen colonies derived from transplanted mouse marrow cells. Nature 197, 452–454 (1963).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murry CE, Keller G. Differentiation of embryonic stem cells to clinically relevant populations: lessons from embryonic development. Cell 132(4), 661–680 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu YC, Fuchs E. A family business: stem cell progeny join the niche to regulate homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13(2), 103–114 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King NM, Perrin J. Ethical issues in stem cell research and therapy. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 5(4), 85 (2014).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caulfield T, Kamenova K, Ogbogu U et al. Research ethics and stem cells: is it time to re-think current approaches to oversight? EMBO Rep. 16(1), 2–6 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertl P, Sticker D, Charwat V, Kasper C, Lepperdinger G. Lab-on-a-chip technologies for stem cell analysis. Trends Biotechnol. 32(5), 245–253 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park D, Lim J, Park JY, Lee SH. Concise review: stem cell microenvironment on a chip: current technologies for tissue engineering and stem cell biology. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 4(11), 1352–1368 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XJ, Zhou Y. Microfluidic Devices for Biomedical Applications. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Sanjay ST, Fu G, Dou M et al. Biomarker detection for disease diagnosis using cost-effective microfluidic platforms. Analyst 140(21), 7062–7081 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, He Z, Chen Q, Lin JM. Biochemical analysis on microfluidic chips. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 80, 213–231 (2016).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou M, Sanjay ST, Benhabib M, Xu F, Li X. Low-cost bioanalysis on paper-based and its hybrid microfluidic platforms. Talanta 145, 43–54 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou M, Garcia JM, Zhan S, Li X. Interfacial nano-biosensing in microfluidic droplets for high-sensitivity detection of low-solubility molecules. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 52(17), 3470–3473 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou M, Sanjay ST, Dominguez DC, Liu P, Xu F, Li X. Multiplexed instrument-free meningitis diagnosis on a polymer/paper hybrid microfluidic biochip. Biosens. Bioelectron. 87, 865–873 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XJ, Valadez AV, Zuo P, Nie Z. Microfluidic 3D cell culture: potential application for tissue-based bioassays. Bioanalysis 4(12), 1509–1525 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Duinen V, Trietsch SJ, Joore J, Vulto P, Hankemeier T. Microfluidic 3D cell culture: from tools to tissue models. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 35, 118–126 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncombe TA, Tentori AM, Herr AE. Microfluidics: reframing biological enquiry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16(9), 554–567 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allazetta S, Lutolf MP. Stem cell niche engineering through droplet microfluidics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 35, 86–93 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanjay ST, Dou M, Sun J, Li X. A paper/polymer hybrid microfluidic microplate for rapid quantitative detection of multiple disease biomarkers. Sci. Rep. 6, 30474 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou M, Dominguez DC, Li X, Sanchez J, Scott G. A versatile PDMS/paper hybrid microfluidic platform for sensitive infectious disease diagnosis. Anal. Chem. 86(15), 7978–7986 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JA, Xu Y, Xia Z, Fan ZH, Tan WH. Enrichment of cancer cells using aptamers immobilized on a microfluidic channel. Anal. Chem. 81(3), 1033–1039 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XJ, Ling V, Li PCH. Same-single-cell analysis for the study of drug efflux modulation of multidrug resistant cells using a microfluidic chip. Anal. Chem. 80(11), 4095–4102 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo P, Li X, Dominguez DC, Ye BC. A PDMS/paper/glass hybrid microfluidic biochip integrated with aptamer-functionalized graphene oxide nano-biosensors for one-step multiplexed pathogen detection. Lab Chip 13(19), 3921–3928 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian T, Shusta EV, Palecek SP. Advances in microfluidic platforms for analyzing and regulating human pluripotent stem cells. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 34, 54–60 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu HW, Lin CC, Lee GB. Stem cells in microfluidics. Biomicrofluidics 5(1), 13401 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titmarsh DM, Chen H, Glass NR, Cooper-White JJ. Concise review: microfluidic technology platforms: poised to accelerate development and translation of stem cell-derived therapies. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 3(1), 81–90 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia SN, Ingber DE. Microfluidic organs-on-chips. Nat. Biotechnol. 32(8), 760–772 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Austin RH. Applications of microfluidics in stem cell biology. BioNanoScience 2(4), 277–286 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoshimitsu R, Hattori K, Sugiura S et al. Microfluidic perfusion culture of human induced pluripotent stem cells under fully defined culture conditions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 111(5), 937–947 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Han S, Shin Y et al. A microfluidic array for quantitative analysis of human neural stem cell self-renewal and differentiation in three-dimensional hypoxic microenvironment. Biomaterials 34(28), 6607–6614 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Wu J, Zhuang Q, Lin X, Zhang J, Lin JM. Microfluidic isolation of highly pure embryonic stem cells using feeder-separated co-culture system. Sci. Rep. 3, 2433 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissoyi A, Bit A, Singh BK, Singh AK, Patra PK. Enhanced cryopreservation of MSCs in microfluidic bioreactor by regulated shear flow. Sci. Rep. 6, 35416 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon NV, Chuah YJ, Phey S et al. Microfluidic assay to study the combinatorial impact of substrate properties on mesenchymal stem cell migration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(31), 17095–17103 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahadik BP, Pedron Haba S, Skertich LJ, Harley BA. The use of covalently immobilized stem cell factor to selectively affect hematopoietic stem cell activity within a gelatin hydrogel. Biomaterials 67, 297–307 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah YJ, Kuddannaya S, Lee MH, Zhang Y, Kang Y. The effects of poly(dimethylsiloxane) surface silanization on the mesenchymal stem cell fate. Biomater. Sci. 3(2), 383–390 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song W, Wang X, Lu H, Kawazoe N, Chen G. Exploring adipogenic differentiation of a single stem cell on poly(acrylic acid) and polystyrene micropatterns. Soft Matter 8(32), 8429 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin DR, Weaver WM, Scumpia PO, Di Carlo D, Segura T. Accelerated wound healing by injectable microporous gel scaffolds assembled from annealed building blocks. Nat. Mater. 14(7), 737–744 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pati F, Jang J, Ha DH et al. Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink. Nat. Commun. 5, 3935 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lück S, Schubel R, Rub J et al. Tailored and biodegradable poly(2-oxazoline) microbeads as 3D matrices for stem cell culture in regenerative therapies. Biomaterials 79, 1–14 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal P, Zhao S, Bielecki P et al. One-step microfluidic generation of pre-hatching embryo-like core–shell microcapsules for miniaturized 3D culture of pluripotent stem cells. Lab Chip 13(23), 4525–4533 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Occhetta P, Centola M, Tonnarelli B, Redaelli A, Martin I, Rasponi M. High-throughput microfluidic platform for 3D cultures of mesenchymal stem cells, towards engineering developmental processes. Sci. Rep. 5, 10288 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuchter P, Saffrich R, Giselbrecht S et al. Microcavity arrays as an in vitro model system of the bone marrow niche for hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Tissue Res. 364(3), 573–584 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambier T, Honegger T, Vanneaux V et al. Design of a 2D no-flow chamber to monitor hematopoietic stem cells. Lab Chip 15(1), 77–85 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada R, Hattori K, Tachikawa S et al. Control of adhesion of human induced pluripotent stem cells to plasma-patterned polydimethylsiloxane coated with vitronectin and gamma-globulin. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 118(3), 315–322 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthier E, Young EW, Beebe D. Engineers are from PDMS-land, biologists are from polystyrenia. Lab Chip 12(7), 1224–1237 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattioli S, Martino S, D’angelo F, Emiliani C, Kenny JM, Armentano I. Nanostructured polystyrene films engineered by plasma processes: surface characterization and stem cell interaction. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 131(14), 40427 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiazzo M, Okawa Y, Ranga A, Piersigilli A, Tabata Y, Lutolf MP. Defined three-dimensional microenvironments boost induction of pluripotency. Nat. Mater. 15(3), 344–352 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Liu M, Li Y et al. Engineering cell microenvironment using novel functional hydrogels. Eur. Polym. J. 72, 590–601 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Lam AT, Toh JP, Reuveny S, Oh SK, Birch WR. Fabrication of uniform-sized poly-varepsilon-caprolactone microspheres and their applications in human embryonic stem cell culture. Biomed. Microdevices 17(6), 105 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Super A, Jaccard N, Cardoso Marques MP et al. Real-time monitoring of specific oxygen uptake rates of embryonic stem cells in a microfluidic cell culture device. Biotechnol. J. 11(9), 1179–1189 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XJ, Valadez AV, Zuo P, Nie Z. Microfluidic 3D cell culture: potential application for tissue-based bioassays. Bioanalysis 4(12), 1509–1525 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi H, Huang G, Han YL et al. In vitro spatially organizing the differentiation in individual multicellular stem cell aggregates. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 36(1), 20–31 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesari Z, Soleimani M, Atyabi F et al. A hybrid microfluidic system for regulation of neural differentiation in induced pluripotent stem cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 104(6), 1534–1543 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang B, Jedlicka S, Cheng X. Maintenance and neuronal cell differentiation of neural stem cells C17.2 correlated to medium availability sets design criteria in microfluidic systems. PLoS ONE 9(10), e109815 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siltanen C, Yaghoobi M, Haque A et al. Microfluidic fabrication of bioactive microgels for rapid formation and enhanced differentiation of stem cell spheroids. Acta Biomater. 34, 125–132 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzel SG, Amadi OC, Pearl TM, Lee RT, So PT, Kamm RD. Simultaneous or sequential orthogonal gradient formation in a 3D cell culture microfluidic platform. Small 12(5), 612–622 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Park HJ, Han S et al. Recapitulation of in vivo-like paracrine signals of human mesenchymal stem cells for functional neuronal differentiation of human neural stem cells in a 3D microfluidic system. Biomaterials 63, 177–188 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KM, Choi YJ, Hwang JH et al. Shear stress induced by an interstitial level of slow flow increases the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells through TAZ activation. PLoS ONE 9(3), e92427 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi X, Li L, Ostrovidov S, Shu Y, Khademhosseini A, Wu H. Stretchable and micropatterned membrane for osteogenic differentation of stem cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6(15), 11915–11923 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng YC, Tsao CW, Chiang MZ et al. Microfluidic platform for human placenta-derived multipotent stem cells culture and applied for enhanced neuronal differentiation. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 18(4), 587–598 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Mccain ML, Yang L et al. Modeling the mitochondrial cardiomyopathy of Barth syndrome with induced pluripotent stem cell and heart-on-chip technologies. Nat. Med. 20(6), 616–623 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tumarkin E, Tzadu L, Csaszar E et al. High-throughput combinatorial cell co-culture using microfluidics. Integr. Biol. (Camb.) 3(6), 653–662 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torisawa YS, Spina CS, Mammoto T et al. Bone marrow-on-a-chip replicates hematopoietic niche physiology in vitro. Nat. Methods 11(6), 663–669 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman SM, Barabino GA. Spatial engineering of osteochondral tissue constructs through microfluidically directed differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Biores. Open Access 5(1), 109–117 (2016).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jastrzebska E, Tomecka E, Jesion I. Heart-on-a-chip based on stem cell biology. Biosens. Bioelectron. 75, 67–81 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi M, Bahrami S, Mirshekari H et al. Microfluidic systems for stem cell-based neural tissue engineering. Lab Chip 16(14), 2551–2571 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosig AS. Organ-on-chip models: new opportunities for biomedical research. Future Sci. OA doi:10.4155/fsoa-2016-0038 (2016) ( Epub ahead of print).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar