References
- International Organization for S . ISO 15197:2013(E): In vitro diagnostic test systems – requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2013).
- Stockl D , DewitteK , ThienpontLM. Validity of linear regression in method comparison studies: is it limited by the statistical model or the quality of the analytical input data?Clin. Chem.44(11), 2340–2346 (1998).
- Bland JM , AltmanDG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet1(8476), 307–310 (1986).
- Clarke WL , CoxD , Gonder-FrederickLA , CarterW , PohlSL. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care10(5), 622–628 (1987).
- Parkes JL , SlatinSL , PardoS , GinsbergBH. A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. Diabetes Care23(8), 1143–1148 (2000).
- Klonoff DC , LiasC , VigerskyRet al. The surveillance error grid. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol.8(4), 658–672 (2014).
- Pleus S , FlackeF , SieberJ , HaugC , FreckmannG. Strengths and limitations of new approaches for graphical presentations of blood glucose monitoring system accuracy data. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol.11(6), 1226–1230 (2017).
- Simmons DA . How should blood glucose meter system analytical performance be assessed?J. Diabetes Sci. Technol.10(1), 178–184 (2015).
- Dunne N , ViggianiMT , PardoS , RobinsonC , ParkesJL. Accuracy evaluation of CONTOUR®PLUS compared with four blood glucose monitoring systems. Diabetes Ther.6(3), 377–388 (2015).
- Barnard K , BretonM. Diabetes Technological Revolution: winners and losers?J. Diabetes Sci. Technol.12(6), 1227–1230 (2018).
- Heinemann L , StuhrA. Self-measurement of blood glucose and continuous glucose monitoring- is there only one future?Eur. Endocrinol.14(2), 24–29 (2018).