Physically Facilitating drug-delivery Systems

• Wang C , HeC, TongZ, LiuX, RenB, ZengF. Combination of adsorption by porous CaCO3 microparticles and encapsulation by polyelectrolyte multilayer films for sustained drug delivery. Int. J. Pharm.308(1–2), 160–167 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santini J , RichardsA, ScheidtR, CimaM, LangerR. Microchips as controlled drug-delivery devices. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.39(14), 2397–2407 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassan DG , LynchAM, StillerMJ. Physical enhancement of dermatologic drug delivery: iontophoresis and phonophoresis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.34(4), 657–666 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellinger K , SchmidJ. Klinik und therapie des chronischen gelenkrheumatismus. JAMA155(3), 322 (1954).
   Google Scholar
• Newman MK , KillM, FramptonG. Effects of ultrasound alone and combined with hydrocortisone injections by needle or hypo-spray. Am. J. Phys. Med.37(4), 206–209 (1958).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitragotri S , BlankschteinD, LangerR. Ultrasound-mediated transdermal protein delivery. Science269(5225), 850–853 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitragotri S , EdwardsDA, BlankschteinD, LangerR. A mechanistic study of ultrasonically-enhanced transdermal drug delivery. J. Pharm. Sci.84(6), 697–706 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glushchenko L . Phonophoresis of thiamin and ascorbic acid. Zdravookhr Beloruss11, 80–81 (1977).
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee DS . A double-blind clinical study with benzydamine 3% cream on soft tissue injuries in an occupational health centre. J. Int. Med. Res.5(6), 450–458 (1977).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bommannan D , MenonGK, OkuyamaH, EliasPM, GuyRH. Sonophoresis. II. Examination of the mechanism(s) of ultrasound-enhanced transdermal drug delivery. Pharm. Res.9(8), 1043–1047 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat BE , HartD, LangerR, BlankschteinD. Ultrasound-mediated transdermal drug delivery: Mechanisms, scope, and emerging trends. J. Control. Release152(3), 330–348 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennen CE . Cavitation and Bubble Dynamics. Oxford University Press, NY, USA (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Tang H , WangCC, BlankschteinD, LangerR. An investigation of the role of cavitation in low-frequency ultrasound-mediated transdermal drug transport. Pharm. Res.19(8), 1160–1169 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezel A , SensA, MitragotriS. Investigations of the role of cavitation in low-frequency sonophoresis using acoustic spectroscopy. J. Pharm. Sci.91(2), 444–453 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner-Kerr T , FranklinM, KerrJ, SmithS, FranklinR. Phonophoretic delivery of dexamethasone to human transdermal tissues: a controlled pilot study. Eur. J. Phys. Rehab. Med.8(1), 19–23. (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Gatev S , VatsovE. Attempt to treat essential pruritus vulvae and some inflammatory gynecologic diseases with hydrocortisone phonophoresis. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia)5(2), 123–128 (1966).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hikima T , HiraiY, TojoK. Effect of ultrasound application on skin metabolism of prednisolone 21-acetate. Pharmaceut. Res.15(11), 1680–1683 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quillin W . Ultrasonic phonophoresis. Phys. Sportsmed.10, 211 (1982).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamashita A , HiraiY, TojoK. Effect of ultrasound on rate of drug absorption through skin. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn29(5), 812–816 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjarnason I , HayllarJ, MacphersonAJ, RussellAS. Side effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the small and large intestine in humans. Gastroenterology104(6), 1832–1847 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainsford KD . Profile and mechanisms of gastrointestinal and other side effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Am. J. Med.107(6A), 27S–36S (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meshali MM , Abdel-AleemHM, SakrFM, NazzalS, El-MalahY. In vitro phonophoresis: effect of ultrasound intensity and mode at high frequency on NSAIDs transport across cellulose and rabbit skin membranes. Pharmazie63(1), 49–53 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma D , HaneshM, YahyaA, MohamedM. Phonophoresis with diclofenac versus ketoprofen for knee joint injuries. Middle East J. Int. Med.2, 9–12 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Kaya K , DelialougluS, BabadagMet al. Combined physiotherapy in patients with arthrogenous pain of temporomandibular joint. J. Phys. Med. Rehab. Sci. 13, 6–14, (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Yang JH , KimTY, LeeJH, YoonSW, YangKH, ShinSC. Anti-hyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of ketorolac tromethamine gel using pulsed ultrasound in inflamed rats. Arch. Pharm. Res.31(4), 511–517 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barja PR , VelosoDJDV. Photoacoustic study of the penetration kinetics of nimesulid into human skin. Proceedings of : 15th International Conference on Photoacoustic and Photothermal Phenomena (Icppp15), 214 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Shiran M , MotevalianM, RavanfarR, BohlouliS. The effect of bubble surface charge on phonophoresis: implications in transderaml piroxicam delivery. Iran J. Pharm. Ther.7(1), 15–19 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Silveira F , BarjaP, Acosta-AvalosD. Photoacoustic evaluation of the penetration of piroxicam gel applied with phonophoresis into human skin. J. Phys. Conf. Ser.214(1), 012022 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Heyneman CA , Lawless-LidayC, WallGC. Oral versus topical NSAIDs in rheumatic diseases: a comparison. Drugs60(3), 555–574 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat BE , FigueroaPL, BlankschteinD, LangerR. Transport pathways and enhancement mechanisms within localized and non-localized transport regions in skin treated with low-frequency sonophoresis and sodium lauryl sulfate. J. Pharm. Sci.100(2), 512–529 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden GM , MckieJE, PottsRO. Role of stratum corneum lipid fluidity in transdermal drug flux. J. Pharm. Sci.76(1), 25–28 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu B , DongCY, SoPT, BlankschteinD, LangerR. In vitro visualization and quantification of oleic acid induced changes in transdermal transport using two-photon fluorescence microscopy. J. Invest. Dermatol.117(1), 16–25 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu B , KimKH, SoPT, BlankschteinD, LangerR. Visualization of oleic acid-induced transdermal diffusion pathways using two-photon fluorescence microscopy. J. Invest. Dermatol.120(3), 448–455 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankschtein D , LopezRFV, SetoJE, LangerR. Enhancing the transdermal delivery of rigid nanoparticles using the simultaneous application of ultrasound and sodium lauryl sulfate. Biomaterials32(3), 933–941 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat BE , LinS, MendenhallJD, VanvellerB, LangerR, BlankschteinD. Experimental and molecular dynamics investigation into the amphiphilic nature of sulforhodamine B. J. Phys. Chem. B115(6), 1394–1402 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dakowicz A , LatosiewiczR. The value of iontophoresis combined with ultrasound in patients with the carpal tunnel syndrome. Rocz. Akad. Med. Bialymst.50(Suppl. 1), 196–198 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dudelzak J , HussainM, PhelpsRG, GottliebGJ, GoldbergDJ. Evaluation of histologic and electron microscopic changes after novel treatment using combined microdermabrasion and ultrasound-induced phonophoresis of human skin. J. Cosmet. Laser Ther.10(4), 187–192 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlan A , AlparHO, StickingsP, SesardicD, MurdanS. Transcutaneous immunisation assisted by low-frequency ultrasound. Int. J. Pharm.368(1–2), 123–128 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezel A , PaliwalS, ShenZ, MitragotriS. Low-frequency ultrasound as a transcutaneous immunization adjuvant. Vaccine23(29), 3800–3807 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prausnitz MR , LangerR. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat. Biotechnol.26(11), 1261–1268 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prausnitz MR , MitragotriS, LangerR. Current status and future potential of transdermal drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.3(2), 115–124 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman CM , BettingerT. Gene therapy progress and prospects: ultrasound for gene transfer. Gene Ther.14(6), 465–475 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenkel V . Ultrasound mediated delivery of drugs and genes to solid tumors. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.60(10), 1193–1208 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DL , SongJ. Tumor growth reduction and DNA transfer by cavitation-enhanced high-intensity focused ultrasound in vivo. Ultrasound Med. Biol.29(6), 887–893 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashiya N , AokiM, TachibanaKet al. Local delivery of E2F decoy oligodeoxynucleotides using ultrasound with microbubble agent (Optison) inhibits intimal hyperplasia after balloon injury in rat carotid artery model. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 317(2), 508–514 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger EC , HershE, VannanM, MccreeryT. Gene delivery using ultrasound contrast agents. Echocardiogr. J. Card.18(4), 355–361 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husseini GA , Diaz De La Rosa MA, Gabuji T, Zeng Y, Christensen DA, Pitt WG. Release of doxorubicin from unstabilized and stabilized micelles under the action of ultrasound. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol.7(3), 1028–1033 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder A , AvnirY, WeismanSet al. Controlling liposomal drug release with low frequency ultrasound: mechanism and feasibility. Langmuir 23(7), 4019–4025 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernot S , KlibanovAL. Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.60(10), 1153–1166 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodama T , TanPH, OffiahIet al. Delivery of oligodeoxynucleotides into human saphenous veins and the adjunct effect of ultrasound and microbubbles. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 31(12), 1683–1691 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki R , NamaiE, OdaYet al. Cancer gene therapy by IL-12 gene delivery using liposomal bubbles and tumoral ultrasound exposure. J. Control. Release 142(2), 245–250 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann E , Schaefer-RidderM, WangY, HofschneiderPH. Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. EMBO J.1(7), 841–845 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang DC , ChassyBM, SaundersJA, SowersAEE. Guide to Electroporation and Electrofusion. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Dev SB , HofmannGA. Electrochemotherapy – a novel method of cancer treatment. Cancer Treat. Rev.20(1), 105–115 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehl J . Electroporation: theory and methods, perspectives for drug delivery, gene therapy and research. Acta Physiol. Scand.177(4), 437–447 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heller R . Overview of electroporation. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat.1(5), 317–318 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller R , GilbertR, JaroszeskiMJ. Clinical applications of electrochemotherapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.35(1), 119–129 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miklavcic D , PucM. Electroporation. In: Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1–10 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Mir LM , MorsliN, GarbayJR, BillardV, RobertC, MartyM. Electrochemotherapy: a new treatment of solid tumors. J. Exp Clin. Cancer Res.22(Suppl. 4), 145–148 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann E , BoldtE. Membrane electroporation: the dye method to determine the cell membrane conductivity. Prog Clin. Biol. Res.343, 69–83 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramos C , TeissieJ. Electrofusion: a biophysical modification of cell membrane and a mechanism in exocytosis. Biochimie82(5), 511–518 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teissie J , GolzioM, RolsMP. Mechanisms of cell membrane electropermeabilization: a minireview of our present (lack of ?) knowledge. Biochim. Biophys. Acta.1724(3), 270–280 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver JC , ChizmadzhevYA. Theory of electroporation: a review. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerget. (41), 135–160 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann U , PilwatG, BeckersF, RiemannF. Effects of external electrical fields on cell membranes. Bioelectroch. Bioener.3(1), 58–83 (1976).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edd JF , HorowitzL, DavalosRV, MirLM, RubinskyB. In vivo results of a new focal tissue ablation technique: irreversible electroporation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.53(7), 1409–1415 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinsky B , OnikG, MikusP. Irreversible electroporation: a new ablation modality – clinical implications. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat.6(1), 37–48 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golzio M , RolsMP, TeissieJ. In vitro and in vivo electric field-mediated permeabilization, gene transfer, and expression. Methods33(2), 126–135 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall WG Jr, Boone BA, Burgos JD et al. Electroporation-mediated delivery of a naked DNA plasmid expressing VEGF to the porcine heart enhances protein expression. Gene Ther.17(3), 419–423 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best SR , PengS, JuangCMet al. Administration of HPV DNA vaccine via electroporation elicits the strongest CD8+ T cell immune responses compared to intramuscular injection and intradermal gene gun delivery. Vaccine 27(40), 5450–5459 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daud AI , DecontiRC, AndrewsSet al. Phase I trial of interleukin-12 plasmid electroporation in patients with metastatic melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 26(36), 5896–5903 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos AK , KingA, PisaP. DNA vaccination for prostate cancer. Methods Mol. Biol.423, 463–472 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roos AK , MorenoS, LederC, PavlenkoM, KingA, PisaP. Enhancement of cellular immune response to a prostate cancer DNA vaccine by intradermal electroporation. Mol. Ther.13(2), 320–327 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodles-Brakhop AM , HellerR, Draghia-AkliR. Electroporation for the delivery of DNA-based vaccines and immunotherapeutics: current clinical developments. Mol. Ther.17(4), 585–592 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sura HS , MagnayJ, AttridgeK, ZghoulN, DobsonJ, El Haj A. Gene expression changes in stem cells following targeted localisation in a flow system using magnetic particle technology. Eur. Cells Mater.16(Suppl. 3), 18 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Kyrtatos PG , LehtolainenP, Junemann-RamirezMet al. Magnetic tagging increases delivery of circulating progenitors in vascular injury. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2(8), 794–802 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veiseh O , GunnJW, ZhangM. Design and fabrication of magnetic nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery and imaging. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.62(3), 284–304 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu SH , TsaiCH, LiaoCF, LiuDM, ChenSY. Controlled rupture of magnetic polyelectrolyte microcapsules for drug delivery. Langmuir24(20), 11811–11818 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liong M , LuJ, KovochichMet al. Multifunctional inorganic nanoparticles for imaging, targeting, and drug delivery. ACS Nano 2(5), 889–896 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler N , SunC, FichtenholtzA, GunnJ, FangC, ZhangM. Methotrexate-immobilized poly(ethylene glycol) magnetic nanoparticles for MR imaging and drug delivery. Small2(6), 785–792 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain TK , RicheyJ, StrandM, Leslie-PeleckyDL, FlaskCA, LabhasetwarV. Magnetic nanoparticles with dual functional properties: drug delivery and magnetic resonance imaging. Biomaterials29(29), 4012–4021 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhutia SK , MaitiTK. Targeting tumors with peptides from natural sources. Trends Biotechnol.26(4), 210–217 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CA , De La Fuente J, Pelaz B, Furlani EP, Mullin M, Berry CC. The effect of static magnetic fields and tat peptides on cellular and nuclear uptake of magnetic nanoparticles. Biomaterials31(15), 4392–4400 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veiseh O , GunnJW, KievitFMet al. Inhibition of tumor-cell invasion with chlorotoxin-bound superparamagnetic nanoparticles. Small 5(2), 256–264 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH , HuhYM, JunYWet al. Artificially engineered magnetic nanoparticles for ultra-sensitive molecular imaging. Nat. Med. 13(1), 95–99 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakamoto JH , SmithBR, XieB, RokhlinSI, LeeSC, FerrariM. The molecular analysis of breast cancer utilizing targeted nanoparticle based ultrasound contrast agents. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat.4(6), 627–636 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medarova Z , PhamW, FarrarC, PetkovaV, MooreA. In vivo imaging of siRNA delivery and silencing in tumors. Nat. Med.13(3), 372–377 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccarthy JR , WeisslederR. Multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles for targeted imaging and therapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.60(11), 1241–1251 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouly C , PouliquenD, LucetI, JeuneJJ, JalletP. Development of superparamagnetic nanoparticles for MRI: effect of particle size, charge and surface nature on biodistribution. J. Microencapsul.13(3), 245–255 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobrovolskaia MA , AggarwalP, HallJB, McneilSE. Preclinical studies to understand nanoparticle interaction with the immune system and its potential effects on nanoparticle biodistribution. Mol. Pharm.5(4), 487–495 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuertges F , AbuchowskiA. The clinical efficacy of poly(ethylene glycol)-modified proteins. J. Control. Release11(1–3), 139–148 (1990).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veiseh O , KievitFM, GunnJW, RatnerBD, ZhangM. A ligand-mediated nanovector for targeted gene delivery and transfection in cancer cells. Biomaterials30(4), 649–657 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun C , FangC, StephenZet al. Tumor-targeted drug delivery and MRI contrast enhancement by chlorotoxin-conjugated iron oxide nanoparticles. Nanomedicine 3(4), 495–505 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J , LeeCH, KoHJet al. Multifunctional magneto-polymeric nanohybrids for targeted detection and synergistic therapeutic effects on breast cancer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 46(46), 8836–8839 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yallapu MM , OthmanSF, CurtisET, GuptaBK, JaggiM, ChauhanSC. Multi-functional magnetic nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging and cancer therapy. Biomaterials32(7), 1890–1905 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier-Hauff K , RotheR, ScholzRet al. Intracranial thermotherapy using magnetic nanoparticles combined with external beam radiotherapy: results of a feasibility study on patients with glioblastoma multiforme. J. Neurooncol. 81(1), 53–60 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannsen M , GneveckowU, ThiesenBet al. Thermotherapy of prostate cancer using magnetic nanoparticles: feasibility, imaging, and three-dimensional temperature distribution. Eur. Urol. 52(6), 1653–1661 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannsen M , GneveckowU, EckeltLet al. Clinical hyperthermia of prostate cancer using magnetic nanoparticles: presentation of a new interstitial technique. Int. J. Hyperthermia 21(7), 637–647 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniell MD , HillJS. A history of photodynamic therapy. Aust. Nz. J. Surg61(5), 340–348 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ackroyd R , KeltyC, BrownN, ReedM. The history of photodetection and photodynamic therapy. Photochem. Photobiol.74(5), 656–669 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz JS , BurdickJA. Light-responsive biomaterials: development and applications. Macromol. Biosci.10(4), 339–348 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juarranz A , JaenP, Sanz-RodriguezF, CuevasJ, GonzalezS. Photodynamic therapy of cancer. Basic principles and applications. Clin. Transl. Oncol.10(3), 148–154 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O‘Connor AE , GallagherWM, ByrneAT. Porphyrin and nonporphyrin photosensitizers in oncology: preclinical and clinical advances in photodynamic therapy. Photochem. Photobiol.85(5), 1053–1074 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato H . Photodynamic therapy for lung cancer – a review of 19 years‘ experience. J. Photoch. Photobio. B42(2), 96–99 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skyrme RJ , FrenchAJ, DattaSN, AllmanR, MasonMD, MatthewsPN. A Phase-1 study of sequential mitomycin C and 5-aminolaevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy in recurrent superficial bladder carcinoma. BJU Int.95(9), 1206–1210 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuller DE , MccaughanJS, RockRP. Photodynamic therapy in head and neck-cancer. Arch. Otolaryngol.111(6), 351–355 (1985).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rhodes LE , De Rie M, Enstrom Y et al. Photodynamic therapy using topical methyl aminolevulinate vs surgery for nodular basal cell carcinoma – results of a multicenter randomized prospective trial. Arch. Dermatol.140(1), 17–23 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dolmans DE , FukumuraD, JainRK. Photodynamic therapy for cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer3(5), 380–387 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty TJ . An update on photodynamic therapy applications. J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg.20(1), 3–7 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baptista MS , WainwrightM. Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT) for the treatment of malaria, leishmaniasis and trypanosomiasis. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res.44(1), 1–10 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly RF , CassidyCM, TunneyMM, MccarronPA. Drug delivery strategies for photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy: from benchtop to clinical practice. J. Photoch. Photobio. B95(2), 71–80 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakamatsu T , SaitoT, HayashiJ, TakeichiT, KitamotoK, AizawaK. Long-term inhibition of intimal hyperplasia using vascular photodynamic therapy in balloon-injured carotid arteries. Med. Mol. Morphol.38(4), 225–232 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ortu P , LamuragliaGM, RobertsWG, FlotteTJ, HasanT. Photodynamic therapy of arteries. A novel approach for treatment of experimental intimal hyperplasia. Circulation85(3), 1189–1196 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenkranz MS , WoodburnKW, QingF, VerdoonerS, KesselD, MillerR. Lutetium texaphyrin (Lu-Tex): a potential new agent for ocular fundus angiography and photodynamic therapy. Am. J. Ophthalmol.129(3), 353–362 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittra RA , SingermanLJ. Recent advances in the management of age-related macular degeneration. Optom. Vis. Sci.79(4), 218–224 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leman JA , MortonCA. Photodynamic therapy: applications in dermatology. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther.2(1), 45–53 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva JN , FilipeP, MorlierePet al. Photodynamic therapy: dermatology and ophthalmology as main fields of current applications in clinic. Biomed. Mater. Eng. 18(4–5), 319–327 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trauner KB , Gandour-EdwardsR, BambergM, ShortkroffS, SledgeC, HasanT. Photodynamic synovectomy using benzoporphyrin derivative in an antigen-induced arthritis model for rheumatoid arthritis. Photochem. Photobiol.67(1), 133–139 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee D , FongL, ZhangY. Nanoparticles in photodynamic therapy: an emerging paradigm. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.60(15), 1627–1637 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy JC , PottierRH. Endogenous protoporphyrin IX, a clinically useful photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B14(4), 275–292 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulina ME , ChudakovDM, BritanovaOVet al. A genetically encoded photosensitizer. Nat. Biotechnol. 24(1), 95–99 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison R , DownieG, CuencaR, HuX, ChildsC, SibataC. Photosensitizers in clinical PDT. Photodiagn. Photodyn.1(1), 27–42 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy CM , TunneyMM, MageeNDet al. Drug and light delivery strategies for photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT) of pulmonary pathogens: a pilot study. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 8(1), 1–6 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen CB , JohnsenM, ArnbjergJet al. Synthesis and characterization of water-soluble phenylene-vinylene-based singlet oxygen sensitizers for two-photon excitation. J. Org. Chem. 70(18), 7065–7079 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechet D , CouleaudP, FrochotC, ViriotML, GuilleminF, Barberi-HeyobM. Nanoparticles as vehicles for delivery of photodynamic therapy agents. Trends Biotechnol.26(11), 612–621 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toda M . Intraoperative navigation and fluorescence imagings in malignant glioma surgery. Keio. J. Med.57(3), 155–161 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mou CY , TsaiCP, ChenCY, HungY, ChangFH. Monoclonal antibody-functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) for selective targeting breast cancer cells. J. Mater. Chem.19(32), 5737–5743 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrabalak SE , AuL, LiX, XiaY. Facile synthesis of Ag nanocubes and Au nanocages. Nat. Protoc.2, 2182–2190 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavuz MS , ChengY, ChenJet al. Gold nanocages covered by smart polymers for controlled release with near-infrared light. Nat. Mater. 8(12), 935–939 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ZL . Transmission electron microscopy of shape-controlled nanocrystals and their assemblies. J. Phys. Chem. B104(6), 1153–1175 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su ZM , WangTT, ChaiFet al. Uniform hollow mesoporous silica nanocages for drug delivery in vitro and in vivo for liver cancer therapy. J. Mater. Chem. 21(14), 5299–5306 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambure S , TerrerosD, XuT. Release of biomolecues from a photovoltaic device for targeted drug delivery. Presented at: AVS 57th International Symposium & Exhibition, Proceedings. Albuquerque, NM, USA, 17–22 October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz J . Microscopic solar cells could change cancer therapy. Biophotonics18(1), 13–14 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Yao Y , ZhangB, GreenMA, ConibeerG, ShresthaSK. Photovoltaic effect in Ge nanocrystals/C-silicon heterojunctions devices. IEEE Phot. Spec. Conf. (2010).
   Google Scholar

Websites

• ClinicalTrials.gov http://clinicaltrials.gov
   Google Scholar
• ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT00859729 www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00859729
   Google Scholar