Rho GTPase independent regulation of ATM activation and cell survival by the RhoGEF Net1A

References

• Harper JW, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: ten years after. Mol. Cell. 2007; 28:739-45; PMID:18082599; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhardt HC, Yaffe MB. Kinases that control the cell cycle in response to DNA damage: Chk1, Chk2, and MK2. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2009; 21:245-55; PMID:19230643; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2009.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson SP, Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 2009; 461:1071-8; PMID:19847258; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nat-ure08467
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ciccia A, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol Cell 2010; 40:179-204; PMID:20965415; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakkenist CJ, Kastan MB. DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation. Nature 2003; 421:499-506; PMID:12556884; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01368
   Google Scholar
• Uziel T, Lerenthal Y, Moyal L, Andegeko Y, Mittelman L, Shiloh Y. Requirement of the MRN complex for ATM activation by DNA damage. EMBO J 2003; 22:5612-21; PMID:14532133; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan DW, Chen BP, Prithivirajsingh S, Kurimasa A, Story MD, Qin J, Chen DJ. Autophosphorylation of the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit is required for rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks. Genes Dev 2002; 16:2333-8; PMID:12231622; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1015202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas P, Sapkota GP, Morrice N, Yu Y, Goodarzi AA, Merkle D, Meek K, Alessi DR, Lees-Miller SP. Identification of in vitro and in vivo phosphorylation sites in the catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase. Biochem J 2002; 368:243-51; PMID:12186630; http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20020973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soubeyrand S, Pope L, Pakuts B, Hache RJ. Threonines 2638/2647 in DNA-PK are essential for cellular resistance to ionizing radiation. Cancer Res 2003; 63:1198-201; PMID:12649176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavin MF, Kozlov S. ATM activation and DNA damage response. Cell Cycle 2007. 6:931-42; PMID:17457059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan AM, Takai S, Yamada K, Miki T. Isolation of a novel oncogene, NET1, from neuroepithelioma cells by expression cDNA cloning. Oncogene 1996; 12:1259-66; PMID:8649828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr HS, Morris CA, Menon S, Song EH, Frost JA. Rac1 controls the subcellular localization of the Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor Net1A to regulate focal adhesion formation and cell spreading. Mol Cell Biol 2013; 33:622-34; PMID:23184663; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00980-12
   Google Scholar
• Carr HS, Zuo Y, Oh W, Frost JA. Regulation of focal adhesion kinase activation, breast cancer cell motility, and amoeboid invasion by the RhoA guanine nucleotide exchange factor Net1. Mol Cell Biol 2013; 33:2773-86; PMID:23689132; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00175-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon S, Oh W, Carr HS, Frost JA. Rho GTPase-independent regulation of mitotic progression by the RhoGEF Net1. Mol Biol Cell 2013; 24:2655-67; PMID:23864709; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E13-01-0061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutertre M, Gratadou L, Dardenne E, Germann S, Samann S, Lidereau R, Driouch K, de la Grange P, Auboeuf D. 2010. Estrogen regulation and physiopathologic significance of alternative promoters in breast cancer. Cancer Res 70:3760-70; PMID:20406972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubash AD, Dubash AD, Guilluy C, Srougi MC, Boulter E, Burridge K, Garcia-Meta R. The small GTPase RhoA localizes to the nucleus and is activated by Net1 and DNA damage signals. PLoS One 2011; 6:e17380; PMID:21390328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra L, Carr HS, Richter-Dahlfors A, Masucci MG, Thelestam M, Frost JA, Frisan T. A bacterial cytotoxin identifies the RhoA exchange factor Net1 as a key effector in the response to DNA damage. PLoS One 2008; 3:e2254; PMID:18509476; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srougi MC, Burridge K. The nuclear guanine nucleotide exchange factors Ect2 and Net1 regulate RhoB-mediated cell death after DNA damage. PLos One 2011; 6:e17108; PMID:21373644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Peng G, Lin SY, Zhang P. DNA damage response is suppressed by the high cyclin-dependent kinase 1 activity in mitotic mammalian cells. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:35899-905; PMID:21878640; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.267690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orthwein A, Fradet-Turcotte A, Noordermeer SM, Canny MD, Canny MD, Brun CM, Strecker J, Escribano-Diaz C, Durocher D. Mitosis inhibits DNA double-strand break repair to guard against telomere fusions. Science 2014; 344:189-93; PMID:24652939; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1248024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberts AS and Treisman R. Activation of RhoA and SAPK/JNK signalling pathways by the RhoA-specific exchange factor mNET1. EMBO J 1998; 17:4075-85; PMID:9670022; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.14.4075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Z, Fang Z, Kozlov S, Mckay MJ, Woods R, Birrell G, Sprung CN, Murrell DF, Wangoo K, Teng L, et al. Low levels of ATM in breast cancer patients with clinical radiosensitivity. Genome Integr 2010; 1:9; PMID:20678261; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-9414-1-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Renwick A, Thompson D, Seal S, Kelly P, Chaqtai T, Ahmed M, North B, Jayatilake H, Barfoot R, Spanova K, et al. ATM mutations that cause ataxia-telangiectasia are breast cancer susceptibility alleles. Nat Genet 2006; 38:873-5; PMID:16832357; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tommiska J, Bartkova J, Heinonen M, Hautala L, Kilpivaara O, Eerola H, Aittomaki K, Hofstetter B, Lukas J, von Smitten K, et al. The DNA damage signalling kinase ATM is aberrantly reduced or lost in BRCA1/BRCA2-deficient and ER/PR/ERBB2-triple-negative breast cancer. Oncogene 2008;27:2501-6; PMID:17982490; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiff C, Schilling C, Cathcart MC, Mulligan N, Doran P, Muldoon C, Murray D, Pidgeon GP, Reynolds JV, Macmathuna P, et al. Prognostic significance of neuroepithelial transforming gene 1 in adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Br J Surg 2014; 101:55-62; PMID:24375299; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen SQ, Li K, Zhu N, Nakao A. Expression and clinical significance of NET-1 and PCNA in hepatocellular carcinoma. Med Oncol 2008; 25:341-5; PMID:18214716; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-008-9042-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu Y, Lu J, Fu J, Cao Y, Fu G, Kang R, Tian X, Wang B. Over-expression of neuroepithelial-transforming protein 1 confers poor prognosis of patients with gliomas. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2010; 40:388-94; PMID:20304779; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyp186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz G, Kaina B. Rac1 GTPase, a multifunctional player in the regulation of genotoxic stress response. Cell Cycle 2013; 12:2521-22; PMID:23907156; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.25807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin H, Carr HS, Wu X, Muallem D, Tran NH, Frost JA. Characterization of the biochemical and transforming properties of the neuroepithelial transforming protein 1. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:7603-13; PMID:15611121; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M412141200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost JA, Xu S, Hutchison MR, Marcus S, Cobb MH. Actions of Rho family small G proteins and p21-activated protein kinases on mitogen-activated protein kinase family members. Mol Cell Biol 1996; 16:3707-13; PMID:8668187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar