The effect of neurospecific knockdown of candidate genes for locomotor behavior and sound production in Drosophila melanogaster

References

• Briggman KL, Kristan WB. Multifunctional pattern-generating circuits. Annu Rev Neurosci 2008; 31:271-94;PMID:18558856; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marder E, Bucher D. Understanding circuit dynamics using the stomatogastric nervous system of lobsters and crabs. Annu Rev Physiol 2007; 69:291-316; PMID:17009928; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.69.031905.161516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiehn O. Development and functional organization of spinal locomotor circuits. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2011; 21:100-9; PMID:20889331; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2010.09.004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu TZ, Feng Z-P. NALCN: A regulator of pacemaker activity. Mol Neurobiol 2012; 45:415-23; PMID:22476981; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12035-012-8260-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash HA, Scott RL, Lear BC, Allada R. An unusual cation channel mediates photic control of locomotion in Drosophila. Curr Biol 2002; 12:2152-8; PMID:12498692; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01358-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Lee J, Venkatesh K., Wu C-F, Hasan G. Loss of flight and associated neuronal rhythmicity in inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor mutants of Drosophila. J Neurosci 2004; 24:7869-78; PMID:15356199; http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0656-04.2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnet B, Burnet L, Connolly K, Williamson N. A genetic analysis of locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 1988; 61:111-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1988.96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan KS, Nash HA. A genetic study of the anesthetic response: Mutants of Drosophila melanogaster altered in sensitivity to halothane. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:8632-6; PMID:2122464; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.21.8632
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mendes C, Bartos I, Akay T, Marka S, Mann RS. Quantification of gait parameters in freely walking wild type and sensory deprived Drosophila melanogaster. eLife 2013; 2:e00231; PMID:23326642
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ewing AW, Bennet-Clark HC. The courtship songs of Drosophila. Behaviour 1968; 31:288-301; http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853968X00298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Philipsborn AC, Liu T, Yu JY, Masser C, Bidaye SS, Dickson BJ. Neuronal control of Drosophila courtship song. Neuron 2011; 69:509-22; PMID:21315261; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing AW. Attempts to select for spontaneous activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim Behav 1963; 11:369-78; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(63)80128-1
   Google Scholar
• Ewing AW. Genetics and activity in D. melanogaster. Experientia 1967; 23:330-2; PMID:6065753; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02144495
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Connolly K. Locomotor activity in Drosophila. II. Selection for active and inactive strains. Anim Behav 1966; 14:444-9; PMID:5972802; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(66)80043-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly K. Locomotor activity in Drosophila III. A distinction between activity and reactivity. Anim Behav 1967; 15:149-52; PMID:6031102; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(67)80026-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luchnikova EM. The nature of genetic determination of general locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica (Russ.) 1966; 6: 36-46; [in Russian]
   Google Scholar
• van Dijken FR, Scharloo W. Divergent selection on locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Selection response. Behav Genet 1979a; 9:543-53; PMID:122270; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01067350
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luchnikova EM, Borisov GV. Identification of the linkage group responsible for interstrain differences in the level of locomotor activity in Drosophila. Bulletin of Leningrad State University 1971; 4:67-75
   Google Scholar
• van Dijken FR, van Sambeek MP, Scharloo W. Divergent selection on locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster. III. Genetic analysis. Behav Genet 1979b; 9:563-70; PMID:122272; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01067352
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costa R, Zonta LA, Osti M, Jayakar SD. Genetic analysis of adult locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 1989; 63:107-17; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1989.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan KW, Morgan TJ, Mackay TF. Quantitative trait loci for locomotor behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2006; 174:271-84; PMID:16783013; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.058099
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jordan KW, Carbone MA, Yamamoto A, Morgan TJ, Mackay TF. Quantitative genomics of locomotor behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Biol 2007; 8:R172; PMID:17708775; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2007-8-8-r172
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strauss R. A screen for EMS-induced X-linked locomotor mutants in Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurogenet 1995; 10:53-4
   Google Scholar
• Tauber E, Eberl DF. Acoustic communication in Drosophila. Behavioural Processes 2003; 64:197-210; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(03)00135-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran CN, Kyriacou CP. Functional neurogenomics of the courtship song of male Drosophila melanogaster. Cortex 2009; 45:18-34; PMID:19054505; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2008.05.010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chintapalli VR, Wang J, Dow JA. Using FlyAtlas to identify better Drosophila melanogaster models of human disease. Nat Genet 2007; 39:715-20; PMID:17534367; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng2049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FlyAtlas. The Drosophila gene expression atlas ; [http://flyatlas.org]
   Google Scholar
• Luo LQ, Martin-Morris LE, White K. Identification, secretion, and neural expression of APPL, a Drosophila protein similar to human amyloid protein precursor. J Neurosci 1990; 10:3849-61; PMID:2125311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasano L, Röder L, Coré N, Alexandre E, Vola C, Jacq B, Kerridge S. The gene teashirt is required for the development of Drosophila embryonic trunk segments and encodes a protein with widely spaced zinc finger motifs. Cell 1991; 64:63-79; PMID:1846092; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(91)90209-H
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luo L, Liao YJ, Jan LY, Jan YN. Distinct morphogenetic functions of similar small GTPases: Drosophila Drac1 is involved in axonal outgrowth and myoblast fusion. Genes Dev 1994; 8:1787-802; PMID:7958857; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.8.15.1787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun B, Xu P, Salvaterra PM. Dynamic visualization of nervous system in live Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96:10438-43; PMID:10468627; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.18.10438
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun B, Xu P, Wang W, Salvaterra PM. In vivo modification of Na(+),K(+)-ATPase activity in Drosophila. Comp Biochem Physiol B, Biochem Mol Biol 2001; 130:521-36; PMID:11691629; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-4959(01)00470-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger C, Renner S, Lüer K, Technau GM. The commonly used marker ELAV is transiently expressed in neuroblasts and glial cells in the Drosophila embryonic CNS. Dev Dyn 2007; 236:3562-8; PMID:17994541; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.21372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Soares L, Bonini NM. Design and implementation of in vivo imaging of neural injury responses in the adult Drosophila wing. Nat Protoc 2013; 8:810-9; PMID:23589940; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.042
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reifegerste R, Schreiber J, Gülland S, Lüdemann A, Wegner M. mGCMa is a murine transcription factor that overrides cell fate decisions in Drosophila. Mech Dev 1999; 82:141-50; PMID:10354478; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4773(99)00027-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han DD, Stein D, Stevens LM. Investigating the function of follicular subpopulations during Drosophila oogenesis through hormone-dependent enhancer-targeted cell ablation. Development 2000; 127:573-83; PMID:10631178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green EW, Fedele G, Giorgini F, Kyriacou CP. A Drosophila RNAi collection is subject to dominant phenotypic effects. Nature methods 2014; 11: 222-3; PMID:24577271; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2856
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamamoto A, Zwarts L, Callaerts P, Norga K, Mackay TF, Anholt RR. Neurogenetic networks for startle-induced locomotion in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:12393-8; PMID:18713854; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804889105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau-Fauvarque C, Taillebourg E, Boissoneau E, Mesnard J, Dura JM. The receptor tyrosine kinase gene linotte is required for neuronal pathway selection in the Drosophila mushroom bodies. Mech Dev 1998; 78:47-61; PMID:9858681; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4773(98)00147-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yao Y, Wu Y, Yin C, Ozawa R, Aigaki T, Wouda RR, Noordermeer JN, Fradkin LG, Hing H. Antagonistic roles of Wnt5 and the Drl receptor in patterning the Drosophila antennal lobe. Nat Neurosci 2007; 10:1423-32; PMID:17934456; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn1993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsen A, Cumming RC, Brech A, Isakson P, Schubert DR, Finley KD. Promoting basal levels of autophagy in the nervous system enhances longevity and oxidant resistance in adult Drosophila. Autophagy 2008; 4:176-84; PMID:18059160; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/auto.5269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumstrei K, Wang F, Hartenstein V. Role of DE-cadherin in neuroblast proliferation, neural morphogenesis, and axon tract formation in Drosophila larval brain development. J Neurosci 2003; 23:3325-35; PMID:12716940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss R, Heisenberg M. A higher control center of locomotor behavior in the Drosophila brain. J Neurosci 1993; 13:1852-61; PMID:8478679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss R, Hanesch U, Kinkelin M, Wolf R, Heisenberg M. No-bridge of Drosophila melanogaster: portrait of a structural brain mutant of the central complex. J Neurogenet 1992; 8:125-55; PMID:1460532; http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01677069209083444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roder L, Vola C, Kerridge S. The role of the teashirt gene in trunk segmental identity in Drosophila. Development 1992; 115:1017-33; PMID:1360402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büschges A, Akay T, Gabriel JP, Schmidt J. Organizing network action for locomotion: insights from studying insect walking. Brain Res Rev 2008; 57:162-71; PMID:17888515; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.06.028
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yellman C, Tao H, He B, Hirsh J. Conserved and sexually dimorphic behavioral responses to biogenic amines in decapitated Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 4131-6; PMID:9108117; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.8.4131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clyne JD, Miesenböck G. Sex-specific control and tuning of the pattern generator for courtship song in Drosophila. Cell 2008; 133:354-63; PMID:18423205; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• InterPro. Protein sequence analysis & classification ; [http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/]
   Google Scholar
• Graveley BR, Brooks AN, Carlson JW, Duff MO, Landolin JM, Yang L, Artieri CG, van Baren MJ, Boley N, Booth BW, Brown JB, et al. The developmental transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 2010; 471:473-9; PMID:21179090; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09715
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FlyBase. A Database of Drosophila Genes & Genomes ; [http://flybase.org/]
   Google Scholar
• Duffy JB. GAL4 system in Drosophila: A fly geneticist's Swiss army knife. Genesis 2002; 34:1-15; PMID:12324939; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gene.10150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groth AC, Fish M, Nusse R, Calos MP. Construction of transgenic Drosophila by using the site-specific integrase from phage ϕC31. Genetics 2004; 166:1775-82; PMID:15126397; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.166.4.1775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgington ES. Randomization tests. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1995
   Google Scholar
• Perneger TV. What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ 1998; 316: 1236-8; PMID:9553006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Lee S, Hwang M, Ko S, Min C, Kim-Ha J. Bunched specifically regulates α/β mushroom body neuronal cell proliferation during metamorphosis. Neuroscience 2009; 161:46-52; PMID:19328837; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.03.054
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. The single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate–phenol–chloroform extraction: twenty-something years on. Nat Protoc 2006; 1:581-5; PMID:17406285; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfaffl MW, Horgan GW, Dempfle L. Relative expression software tool (REST©) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucl Acids Res 2002; 30:e36-e36; PMID:11972351; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.9.e36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar