Risk, regulation and biotechnology: The case of GM crops

References

• Kinsella K. Changes in life expectancy 1900–1990. Am J Clin Nutr 1992; 55:1196-1202; PMID: 1590256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth SJ, Endres AB, Redick T, Kershen DL. Innovation and Liability in Biotechnology: Transnational and Comparative Perspectives. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips PWB, Smyth SJ. Grounding the management of liabilities in the risk analysis framework. Bull Sci Technol Soc 2007; 27:4:274-86; PMID: 22973420; http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0270467607-300639
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization. FAO/WHO Codex Training Package: Section Four – Scientific Basis for Codex Work, 4.1 Risk analysis in the framework of Codex (26 Nov 2012) available from ftp://ftp.fao.org/es/esn/food/capacity_building/4_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Powell D. Risk based regulatory responses in global food trade: A case study of Guatemalan raspberry imports into the United States and Canada, 1996–98; 131-155. In: Doern, GB, Reed, T (Eds.), Risky Business: Canada's Changing Science-based Policy and Regulatory Regime. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Lammerding A, Paoli G. Quantitative risk assessment: An emerging tool for emerging foodborne pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis 1997; 3:483-87; PMID: 9366601; http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0304.970411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Tengs T, Adams M, Pliskin J, Safran D, Siegel J, Weinstein M, Graham J. Five hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness. Risk Anal 1995; 15:369-90; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00330.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandman P. Mass media and environmental risk: Seven principles. Risk 1994; 5:251-60.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips PWB, Smyth SJ, Kerr WA. (eds.). Governing Risk in the 21st Century: Lessons from the World of Biotechnology. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac G, Kerr WA. The Biosafety Protocol and the WTO: Concert or conflict. In: R Falkner (ed.), The International Politics of Genetically Modified Food. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Viju C, Yeung M, Kerr WA. The trade implications of the post-moratorium European Union approval system for genetically modified organisms. J World Trade 2012; 46:1207-37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth SJ, Khachatourians G, Phillips PWB. Liabilities and economics of transgenic crops. Nat Biotechnol 2002; 20:537-41; PMID: 12042844; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt0602-537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fürst I. Swiss soiled seed prompts tolerance question. Nat Biotechnol 1999; 17:629; PMID: 10409344; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/10837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijman J. Advanta: Worldwide challenges. Ag Bio Forum 2001; 4:34-9.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. Unauthorised material in GM crop trials (27 Nov 2012) available from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/News/Releases/2002/08/2066
   Google Scholar
• Western Producer. GM canola found in mustard load (27 Nov 2012) available from http://www.producer.com/2003/03/gm-canola-found-in-mustard-load/
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Wailes E, McKenzie A, Thomsen M. LL601 contamination and its impact on US rice prices. J Agr Appl Econ 2010; 42:31-8.
   Google Scholar
• Kershen D. Legal liability and agricultural biotechnology: Ten questions (27 Nov 2012) available from http://agribiotech.info/details/KershenFinal%2003%20layout.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Redick T, Endres AB. Jury verdict against Bayer for Liberty Link rice breaks new ground in biotech liability. Agr Law Update 2009; 26:2-6.
   Google Scholar
• Endres AB, Johnson N. $750 million settlement in GM rice contamination (27 Nov 2012) available from http://www.farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2011/07/750_million_settlement_in_gm_r.html
   Google Scholar
• EuropaBio. Herculex I (1507) maize: Safety and general characteristics (27 Nov 2012) available from http://www.europabio.org/sites/default/files/pages/1507_factsheet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ryan C, Smyth SJ. Economic implications of low-level presence in a zero-tolerance European import market: The case of Canadian triffid flax. Ag Bio Forum 2012; 15:21-30.
   Google Scholar
• Dayananda B. The European Union Policy of Zero Tolerance: Insights from the discovery of CDC Triffid. 2011. M.Sc. thesis, University of Saskatchewan.
   Google Scholar
• Nature Biotechnology. Agnostic about agriculture. Nat Biotechnol 2012; 30:197; PMID: 22398593; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Parliament. Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC (27 Nov 2012) available from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2001:106:0001:0038:EN:PDF>
   Google Scholar
• Low Level Presence of GMOs not Authorized in Europe: The Linseed CDC Triffid case. COCERAL, Brussels, Belgium. 2010. file on copy with authors.
   Google Scholar
• Falck-Zepeda J. Socio-economic considerations, Article 26.1 of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: What are the issues and what is at stake?. Ag Bio Forum 2009; 12:90-107.
   Google Scholar
• Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montréal, Québec. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe G. Implementing the Biosafety Protocol through national biosafety regulatory systems: An analysis of key unresolved issues. J Publ Aff 2005, 5:299-311; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pa.30
   Google Scholar
• Falck-Zepeda JJ, Wesseler, Smyth SJ. The current status of the debate on socio-economic regulatory assessments: Positions and policies in Canada, the USA, the EU and Developing Countries. World Rev Sci, Technol Sust Dev 2013; 10:203-27; http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/WRSTSD.2013.057690
   Google Scholar
• Donoghue v. Stevenson. 1932. SC (HL) 31, [1931] UKHL 3, [1932] UKHL 100, [1932] AC 562. Available from: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1932/100.html
   Google Scholar
• Missmer S, Suarez L, Felkner M, Wang E, Merrill A Jr., Rothman K, Hendricks K. Exposure to fumonisims and the occurance of neural tube defects along the Texas-Mexico border. Environ Health Perspect 2006; 114:237-41; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Outbreaks of E.coli O104: H4 infection: Update 30 (27 Nov 2012) available from http://www.euro.who.int/en/what-we-do/health-topics/emergencies/international-health-regulations/news/news/2011/07/outbreaks-of-e.-coli-o104h4-infection-update-30
   Google Scholar