Laser microbeam-induced DNA damage inhibits cell division in fertilized eggs and early embryos

References

• Ummat A, Rechkoblit O, Jain R, Roy Choudhury J, Johnson RE, Silverstein TD, Buku A, Lone S, Prakash L, Prakash S, et al. Structural basis for cisplatin DNA damage tolerance by human polymerase η during cancer chemotherapy. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2012; 19:628 - 32; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2295; PMID: 22562137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valko M, Rhodes CJ, Moncol J, Izakovic M, Mazur M. Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative stress-induced cancer. Chem Biol Interact 2006; 160:1 - 40; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2005.12.009; PMID: 16430879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer JN, Bess AS. Involvement of autophagy and mitochondrial dynamics in determining the fate and effects of irreparable mitochondrial DNA damage. Autophagy 2012; 8:1822 - 3; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/auto.21741; PMID: 22929123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward JF. DNA damage produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: identities, mechanisms of formation, and reparability. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 1988; 35:95 - 125; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6603(08)60611-X; PMID: 3065826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marangos P, Carroll J. Oocytes progress beyond prophase in the presence of DNA damage. Curr Biol 2012; 22:989 - 94; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.063; PMID: 22578416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll J, Marangos P. The DNA damage response in mammalian oocytes. Front Genet 2013; 4:117; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00117; PMID: 23805152
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ma JY, Ou Yang YC, Wang ZW, Wang ZB, Jiang ZZ, Luo SM, Hou Y, Liu ZH, Schatten H, Sun QY. The effects of DNA double-strand breaks on mouse oocyte meiotic maturation. Cell Cycle 2013; 12:1233 - 41; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.24311; PMID: 23518501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen WS, Merriman JA, O’Bryan MK, Jones KT. DNA double strand breaks but not interstrand crosslinks prevent progress through meiosis in fully grown mouse oocytes. PLoS One 2012; 7:e43875; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043875; PMID: 22928046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dar S, Grover SA, Moskovtsev SI, Swanson S, Baratz A, Librach CL. In vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in patients with a markedly high DNA fragmentation index (>50%). Fertil Steril 2013; 100:75 - 80; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.03.011; PMID: 23562046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukawa M, Oda S, Mitani H, Nagata M, Aoki F. Deficiency in the response to DNA double-strand breaks in mouse early preimplantation embryos. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2007; 358:578 - 84; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.04.162; PMID: 17498656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu XF, Jin XL, Farnham MM, Li Y, O’Neill C. DNA damage-sensing kinases mediate the mouse 2-cell embryo’s response to genotoxic stress. Biol Reprod 2011; 85:524 - 35; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.110.089334; PMID: 21593482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukas C, Falck J, Bartkova J, Bartek J, Lukas J. Distinct spatiotemporal dynamics of mammalian checkpoint regulators induced by DNA damage. Nat Cell Biol 2003; 5:255 - 60; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb945; PMID: 12598907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jazayeri A, Falck J, Lukas C, Bartek J, Smith GC, Lukas J, Jackson SP. ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:37 - 45; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1337; PMID: 16327781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekker-Jensen S, Lukas C, Kitagawa R, Melander F, Kastan MB, Bartek J, Lukas J. Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance machinery in response to DNA strand breaks. J Cell Biol 2006; 173:195 - 206; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200510130; PMID: 16618811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogakou EP, Boon C, Redon C, Bonner WM. Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. J Cell Biol 1999; 146:905 - 16; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.146.5.905; PMID: 10477747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paull TT, Rogakou EP, Yamazaki V, Kirchgessner CU, Gellert M, Bonner WM. A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curr Biol 2000; 10:886 - 95; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00610-2; PMID: 10959836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong X, Mohanty SK, Stephens J, Heale JT, Gomez-Godinez V, Shi LZ, Kim JS, Yokomori K, Berns MW. Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:e68; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp221; PMID: 19357094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka S, Rotman G, Ogawa A, Shiloh Y, Tamai K, Elledge SJ. Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated phosphorylates Chk2 in vivo and in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97:10389 - 94; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.190030497; PMID: 10973490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falck J, Mailand N, Syljuåsen RG, Bartek J, Lukas J. The ATM-Chk2-Cdc25A checkpoint pathway guards against radioresistant DNA synthesis. Nature 2001; 410:842 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35071124; PMID: 11298456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawecka JE, Marh J, Ortega M, Yamauchi Y, Ward MA, Ward WS. Mouse zygotes respond to severe sperm DNA damage by delaying paternal DNA replication and embryonic development. PLoS One 2013; 8:e56385; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056385; PMID: 23431372
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barton TS, Robaire B, Hales BF. DNA damage recognition in the rat zygote following chronic paternal cyclophosphamide exposure. Toxicol Sci 2007; 100:495 - 503; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfm242; PMID: 17872895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derijck AA, van der Heijden GW, Giele M, Philippens ME, van Bavel CC, de Boer P. gammaH2AX signalling during sperm chromatin remodelling in the mouse zygote. DNA Repair (Amst) 2006; 5:959 - 71; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.05.043; PMID: 16837249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao J, Liu Y, Li Z, Zhou Y, Lin H, Wu X, Chen M, Xiao W. Effects of the insemination of hydrogen peroxide-treated epididymal mouse spermatozoa on γH2AX repair and embryo development. PLoS One 2012; 7:e38742; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038742; PMID: 22745678
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fatehi AN, Bevers MM, Schoevers E, Roelen BA, Colenbrander B, Gadella BM. DNA damage in bovine sperm does not block fertilization and early embryonic development but induces apoptosis after the first cleavages. J Androl 2006; 27:176 - 88; http://dx.doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.04152; PMID: 16304212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beli P, Lukashchuk N, Wagner SA, Weinert BT, Olsen JV, Baskcomb L, Mann M, Jackson SP, Choudhary C. Proteomic investigations reveal a role for RNA processing factor THRAP3 in the DNA damage response. Mol Cell 2012; 46:212 - 25; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.026; PMID: 22424773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquet P. Sensitivity of germ cells and embryos to ionizing radiation. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2004; 18:106 - 14; PMID: 15471212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang QL, Sun SC, Han J, Kwak YC, Kim NH, Cui XS. Doxorubicin induces early embryo apoptosis by inhibiting poly(ADP ribose) polymerase. In Vivo 2012; 26:827 - 34; PMID: 22949597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamauchi H, Katayama K, Ueno M, Kanemitsu H, Nam C, Mikami T, Saito A, Ishida Y, Uetsuka K, Doi K, et al. Etoposide induces TRP53-dependent apoptosis and TRP53-independent cell cycle arrest in trophoblasts of the developing mouse placenta. Biol Reprod 2009; 80:813 - 22; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.108.069419; PMID: 19109225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuzuka T, Ozawa M, Nakamura A, Ushitani A, Hirabayashi M, Kanai Y. Effects of heat stress on the redox status in the oviduct and early embryonic development in mice. J Reprod Dev 2005; 51:281 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1262/jrd.16089; PMID: 15699582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borhani N, Rajaei F, Salehi Z, Javadi A. Analysis of DNA fragmentation in mouse embryos exposed to an extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field. Electromagn Biol Med 2011; 30:246 - 52; http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2011.589556; PMID: 22047462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Q, Yang J, Zeng QL, Zhu XM, Qian YL, Huang HF. 50-Hertz electromagnetic fields induce gammaH2AX foci formation in mouse preimplantation embryos in vitro. Biol Reprod 2006; 75:673 - 80; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.106.052241; PMID: 16855210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streffer C. Chromosomal damage in preimplantation mouse embryos and its development through the cell cycle. Mutat Res 1993; 299:313 - 5; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-1218(93)90108-P; PMID: 7683099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarkowski AK. Experiments on the development of isolated blastomers of mouse eggs. Nature 1959; 184:1286 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/1841286a0; PMID: 13836947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Velde H, Cauffman G, Tournaye H, Devroey P, Liebaers I. The four blastomeres of a 4-cell stage human embryo are able to develop individually into blastocysts with inner cell mass and trophectoderm. Hum Reprod 2008; 23:1742 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den190; PMID: 18503052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore NW, Adams CE, Rowson LE. Developmental potential of single blastomeres of the rabbit egg. J Reprod Fertil 1968; 17:527 - 31; http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0170527; PMID: 5715682
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willadsen SM. The development capacity of blastomeres from 4- and 8-cell sheep embryos. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1981; 65:165 - 72; PMID: 6895911
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chi HJ, Koo JJ, Choi SY, Jeong HJ, Roh SI. Fragmentation of embryos is associated with both necrosis and apoptosis. Fertil Steril 2011; 96:187 - 92; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.020; PMID: 21550043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyoshima M. Analysis of p53 dependent damage response in sperm-irradiated mouse embryos. J Radiat Res 2009; 50:11 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1269/jrr.08099; PMID: 19218778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cryns V, Yuan J. Proteases to die for. Genes Dev 1998; 12:1551 - 70; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.11.1551; PMID: 9620844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamjoo M, Brison DR, Kimber SJ. Apoptosis in the preimplantation mouse embryo: effect of strain difference and in vitro culture. Mol Reprod Dev 2002; 61:67 - 77; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1132; PMID: 11774377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao Y, Lai L, Mao J, Im GS, Bonk A, Prather RS. Apoptosis and in vitro development of preimplantation porcine embryos derived in vitro or by nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod 2003; 69:501 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.016170; PMID: 12700186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weil M, Jacobson MD, Coles HS, Davies TJ, Gardner RL, Raff KD, Raff MC. Constitutive expression of the machinery for programmed cell death. J Cell Biol 1996; 133:1053 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.133.5.1053; PMID: 8655578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar