A new approach to comparing problem solving, flexibility and innovation

References

• Kamil AC. A synthetic approach to the study of animal intelligence. In: Leger DW, ed. Comparative Perspectives in Modern Psychology: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Lincoln, NE: U. of Nebraska Press, 1998; 35, 230-257.
   Google Scholar
• Shettleworth SJ. The evolution of comparative cognition: is the snark still a boojum?. Behav Processes 2009; 80:210 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2008.09.001; PMID: 18824222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shettleworth S. Cognition Evolution and Behaviour. Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Maclean EL, Matthews LJ, Hare BA, Nunn CL, Anderson RC, Aureli F, et al. How does cognition evolve? Phylogenetic comparative psychology. Anim Cogn 2011; In press http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0448-8; PMID: 21927850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tebbich S, Sterelny K, Teschke I. The tale of the finch: adaptive radiation and behavioural flexibility. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2010; 365:1099 - 109; http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0291; PMID: 20194172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balda RP, Kamil AC. A comparative study of cache recovery by three corvid species. Anim Behav 1989; 38:486 - 95; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80041-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balda RP, Kamil AC, Bednekoff PA. Predicting cognitive capacity from natural history: examples from four species of corvids. In Nolan V, Ketterson ED, eds. Current Ornithology. New York: Plenum Press, 1996:13, 33-66.
   Google Scholar
• Balda RP, Kamil AC, Bednekoff PA, Hile AG. Species differences in spatial memory performance on a three-dimensional task. Ethology 1997; 103:47 - 55; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1997.tb00006.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednekoff PA, Balda RP, Kamil AC, Hile AG. Long-term spatial memory in four seed-caching corvid species. Anim Behav 1997; 53:335 - 41; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton NS, Krebs JR. Memory for spatial and object-specific cues in food-storing and non-storing birds. J Comp Psychol A 1994; 174:371 - 9
   Google Scholar
• Clayton NS, Dally JM, Emery NJ. Social cognition by food caching corvids: The western scrub-jay as a natural psychologist. Phil Trans Royal Soc B 2007; 326:506
   Google Scholar
• Olson DJ, Kamil AC, Balda RP, Nims PJ. Performance of four seed-caching corvid species in operant tests of nonspatial and spatial memory. J Comp Psychol 1995; 109:173 - 81; http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.109.2.173; PMID: 7758292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auersperg AMI, von Bayern AMP, Gajdon GK, Huber L, Kacelnik A. Flexibility in problem solving and tool use of kea and New Caledonian crows in a multi access box paradigm. PLoS One 2011; 6:e20231; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020231; PMID: 21687666
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caldwell CA, Whiten A. Evolutionary perspectives on imitation: is a comparative psychology of social learning possible?. Anim Cogn 2002; 5:193 - 208; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-002-0151-x; PMID: 12461597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell CB, Hodos W. The Scala naturae revisited: evolutionary scales and anagenesis in comparative psychology. J Comp Psychol 1991; 105:211 - 21; http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.105.3.211; PMID: 1935002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macphail EM, Bolhuis JJ. The evolution of intelligence: adaptive specializations versus general process. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2001; 76:341 - 64; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S146479310100570X; PMID: 11569788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premack D. On the origins of domain-specific primitives. In: Pick HL Jr, eds. Cognition: Conceptual and methodological issues. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association, 1992: xiv, 359.
   Google Scholar
• Rozin P. The evolution of intelligence and access to the cognitive unconscious. In Sprague JM, Epstein AN, eds. Progress in Psychobiology and Physiological Psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1976: 245-280.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson B. The g factor in non-human animals. In: Bock GR, Goode JA, Webb K, eds. The Nature of Intelligence. New York: Wiley, 2000:79-95.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee K, Chabris CF, Johnson VE, Lee JJ, Tsao F, Hauser MD. General intelligence in another primate: individual differences across cognitive task performance in a New World monkey (Saguinus oedipus). PLoS One 2009; 4:e5883; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005883; PMID: 19536274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deaner RO, van Schaik CP, Johnson VE. Do some taxa have better domain-general cognition than others? A meta-analysis of nonhuman primate studies. Evol Psychol 2006; 4:149 - 96
   Google Scholar
• Jensen AR. The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre L, Whittle P, Lascaris E, Finkelstein A. Feeding innovations and forebrain size in birds. Anim Behav 1997; 53:549 - 60; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth G, Dicke U. Evolution of the brain and intelligence. Trends Cogn Sci 2005; 9:250 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.005; PMID: 15866152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones CB. Behavioral flexibility in primates: Causes and consequences. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kummer H, Goodall J. Conditions of innovative behaviour in primates. Phill Trans Royal Soc B 1985; 308:203 - 14; http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1985.0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overington SE, Boogert NJ, Morand-Ferron J, Lefebvre L. Technical innovations drive the relationship between innovativeness and residual brain sizein birds. Anim Behav 2009; 78:1001 - 10; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.06.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reader SM, Laland KN. Social intelligence, innovation, and enhanced brain size in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99:4436 - 41; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.062041299; PMID: 11891325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sol D, Timmermans S, Lefebvre L. Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds. Anim Behav 2002; 63:495 - 502; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey G, Bastian ML, van Schaik CP. Animal innovation defined and operationalized. Behav Brain Sci 2007; 30:393 - 407, discussion 407-32; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07002373; PMID: 18081967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond J, Bond AB. Kea, Bird of Paradox: The Evolution and Behavior of a New Zealand Parrot. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Huber L, Gajdon GK. Technical intelligence in animals: the kea model. Anim Cogn 2006; 9:295 - 305; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-006-0033-8; PMID: 16909237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajdon GK, Lichtnegger M, Huber L. . Toddler like object exploration helps captive mountain parrots to innovate tool use behaviour. Submitted.
   Google Scholar
• Bird CD, Emery NJ. Insightful problem solving and creative tool modification by captive nontool-using rooks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:10370 - 5; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901008106; PMID: 19478068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkart A, Strasser MF. Trade-offs between social learning and individual innovativeness in common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus. Anim Behav 2009; 77:1291 - 301; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reader SM, Macdonald K. Environmental variability and primate behavioural flexibility. In: Reader SM, Laland KN, eds. Animal Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003: 83-116.
   Google Scholar
• Povinelli DJ. Folk physics for apes: a chimpanzee’s theory of how the world works. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hare B, Call J, Agnetta B, Tomasello M. Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see. Anim Behav 2000; 59:771 - 85; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1377; PMID: 10792932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare B. Can competitive paradigms increase the validity of social cognitive experiments on primates?. Anim Cogn 2001; 4:269 - 80; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s100710100084
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emery NJ, Clayton NS. Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jays. Nature 2001; 414:443 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35106560; PMID: 11719804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raby CR, Alexis DM, Dickinson A, Clayton NS. Planning for the future by western scrub-jays. Nature 2007; 445:919 - 21; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05575; PMID: 17314979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimpenny JH, Weir AAS, Clayton L, Rutz C, Kacelnik A. Cognitive processes associated with sequential tool use in New Caledonian crows. PLoS One 2009; 4:e6471; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006471; PMID: 19654861
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuczai SA, Walker RT. How do dolphins solve problems? In Wassermann EA, Zentall TR, eds. Comparative Cogniton. Oxford University Press, 2006:580-602.
   Google Scholar
• Visalberghi E, Limongelli L. Lack of comprehension of cause-effect relations in tool-using capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J Comp Psychol 1994; 108:15 - 22; http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.108.1.15; PMID: 8174341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich B. An experimental investigation of insight in common ravens (Corvus corax). Auk 1995; 112:994 - 1003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann E, Call J, Hernàndez-Lloreda MV, Hare B, Tomasello M. Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: the cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science 2007; 317:1360 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1146282; PMID: 17823346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liedtke J, Werdenich D, Gajdon GK, Huber L, Wanker R. Big brains are not enough: performance of three parrot species in the trap-tube paradigm. Anim Cogn 2011; 14:143 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0347-4; PMID: 20814805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schloegl C, Dierks A, Gajdon GK, Huber L, Kotrschal K, Bugnyar T. What you see is what you get? Exclusion performances in ravens and keas. PLoS One 2009; 4:e6368; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006368; PMID: 19654864
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herrmann E, Herńndez-Lloreda MV, Call J, Hare B, Tomasello M. The structure of individual differences in the cognitive abilities of children and chimpanzees. Psychol Sci 2010; 21:102 - 10; http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797609356511; PMID: 20424030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaner RO, Isler K, Burkart JM, van Schaik CP. Overall brain size, and not encephalization quotient, best predicts cognitive ability across non-human primates. Brain Behav Evol 2007; 70:115 - 24; http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000102973; PMID: 17510549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Range F, Horn L, Bugnyar T, Gajdon GK, Huber L. Social attention in keas, dogs, and human children. Anim Cogn 2009; 12:181 - 92; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0181-0; PMID: 18716802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber L, Rechberger S, Taborski M. Social learning affects object exploration andmanipulation in keas, Nestor notabilis. Anim Behav 2001; 62:945 - 54; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gossette RL, Gossette MF, Riddell W. Comparison of successive discrimination reversal performances among closely and remotely related avian species. Anim Behav 1996; 14:560 - 4; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(66)80060-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gossette RL, Gossette MF. Examination of the reversal index (RI) across fifteen different mammalian and avian species. Percept Mot Skills 1967; 24:987 - 90; http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1967.24.3.987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamil AC, Jones TB, Pietrewicz A, Mauldin JE. Positive transfer from successive reversal training to learning set in blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata). J Comp Physiol Psychol 1977; 91:79 - 86; http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0077295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutz C, Bluff LA, Reed N, Troscianko J, Newton J, Inger R, et al. The ecological significance of tool use in New Caledonian crows. Science 2010; 329:1523 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1192053; PMID: 20847272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar