1,742
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article Addendum

Bowerbirds, art and aesthetics

Are bowerbirds artists and do they have an aesthetic sense?

Pages 281-283 | Published online: 01 May 2012

References

  • Frith CB, Frith DW. The Bowerbirds. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2004.
  • Endler JA, Westcott DA, Madden JR. Robson, T. (2005) Animal visual systems and the evolution of color patterns; sensory processing illuminates signal evolution. Evolution 2005; 50:1795 - 818
  • Endler JA, Endler LC, Doerr NR. Great bowerbirds create theaters with forced perspective when seen by their audience. Curr Biol 2010; 20:1679 - 84; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.033; PMID: 20832314
  • Kelley LA, Endler JA. Illusions promote mating success in great bowerbirds. Science 2012; 335:335 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1212443; PMID: 22267812
  • Concise Oxford Dictionary, 7th edition Oxford: Oxford University Press 1982.
  • Merriam-Webster dictionary online. http://www.merriam-webster.com/netdict/art%5B2%5D
  • Macquarie Dictionary, 3rd edition 2001, Macquarie Library Pty, Limited, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW: Macquarie Library.
  • “Art.” Wikipedia. online: Wikipedia; [accessed May 18 2010] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art
  • Encyclopædia Britannica Online, s. v. “the arts,” accessed May 18 2010, http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/36405/the-arts
  • “Art.” The Free Dictionary: Houghton Mifflin Company, updated 2009. [May 18 2010] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/art
  • “The definition of art.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Oct 23, 2007; [accessed May 18 2010] http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/art-definition
  • Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL. Principles of Animal Communication. Sunderland MA: Sinauer Associates 2011.
  • Ruxton GD, Schaefer HM. Resolving current disagreements and ambiguities in the terminology of animal communication. J Evol Biol 2011; 24:2574 - 85; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02386.x; PMID: 21902751
  • Darwin C. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation To Sex (2 volumes). London: John Murray 1871.
  • Diamond JM. Evolution of bowerbirds' bowers: animal origins of the aesthetic sense. Nature 1982; 297:99 - 102; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/297099a0
  • Diamond JM. Animal art: Variation in bower decorating style among male bowerbirds Amblyornis inornatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1986; 83:3042 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.9.3042; PMID: 16593691
  • Grammer K, Fink B, Møller AP, Thornhill R. Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2003; 78:385 - 407; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1464793102006085; PMID: 14558590
  • Anderson JR, Kuwahata H, Kuroshima H, Leighty KA, Fujita K. Are monkeys aesthetists? Rensch (1957) revisited. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2005; 31:71 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.31.1.71; PMID: 15656728
  • Kawabata H, Zeki S. Neural correlates of beauty. J Neurophysiol 2004; 91:1699 - 705; http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00696.2003; PMID: 15010496
  • Watanabe S. Van Gogh, Chagall and pigeons: picture discrimination in pigeons and humans. Anim Cogn 2001; 4:147 - 51; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s100710100112
  • Ikkatai Y, Watanabe S. Discriminative and reinforcing properties of paintings in Java sparrows (Padda oryzivora). Anim Cogn 2011; 14:227 - 34; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0356-3; PMID: 21132449
  • Welsch W. Animal Aesthetics. Contemporary Aesthetics, volume 2, Forum: Science in Aesthetics? (Online 2004) ISSN 1932-8478: http://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=243
  • Snaevarr S. Talk To The Animals: A short comment on Wolfgang Welsch's “Animal Aesthetics”. Contemporary Aesthetics, volume 2, Forum: Science in Aesthetics?(online 2004), ISSN 1932-8478 http://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=251
  • Brooks RL, Endler JA. Female guppies agree to differ: phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection. Evolution 2001; 55:1644 - 55; PMID: 11580024
  • Östlund-Nilsson S, Holmlund M. The artistic three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2003; 53:214 - 20; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-002-0574-z
  • Rushbrook BJ, Head ML, Katsiadaki I, Barber I. Flow regime affects building behaviour and nest structure in sticklebacks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2010; 64:1927 - 35; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1003-3
  • Schaedelin FC, Taborsky M. Female choice of a non-bodily ornament: an experimental study of cichlid sand craters in Cyathopharynx furcifer. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2010; 64:1437 - 47; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-0959-3
  • Wisenden BD, Unruh A, Morantes A, Bury S, Curry B, Driscoll R, et al. Functional constraints on nest characteristics of pebble mounds of breeding male hornyhead chub Nocomis biguttatus. J Fish Biol 2009; 75:1577 - 85; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02384.x; PMID: 20738634
  • Lehtonen TK. Wong BBM. Should females prefer males with elaborate nests?. Behav Ecol 2009; 20:1014 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp091
  • Sergio F, Blas J, Blanco G, Tanferna A, López L, Lemus JA, et al. Raptor nest decorations are a reliable threat against conspecifics. Science 2011; 331:327 - 30; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1199422; PMID: 21252345
  • Penteriani V, del Mar Delgado M. Owls may use faeces and prey feathers to signal current reproduction. PLoS One 2008; 3:e3014; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003014