Integrated detection of both 5-mC and 5-hmC by high-throughput tag sequencing technology highlights methylation reprogramming of bivalent genes during cellular differentiation

References

• Iyer LM, Tahiliani M, Rao A, Aravind L. Prediction of novel families of enzymes involved in oxidative and other complex modifications of bases in nucleic acids. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:1698 - 710; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.8.11.8580; PMID: 19411852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahiliani M, Koh KP, Shen Y, Pastor WA, Bandukwala H, Brudno Y, et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science 2009; 324:930 - 5; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1170116; PMID: 19372391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriaucionis S, Heintz N. The nuclear DNA base 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is present in Purkinje neurons and the brain. Science 2009; 324:929 - 30; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1169786; PMID: 19372393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song CX, Szulwach KE, Fu Y, Dai Q, Yi C, Li X, et al. Selective chemical labeling reveals the genome-wide distribution of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Nat Biotechnol 2011; 29:68 - 72; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1732; PMID: 21151123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, D’Alessio AC, Ito S, Wang Z, Cui K, Zhao K, et al. Genome-wide analysis of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine distribution reveals its dual function in transcriptional regulation in mouse embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev 2011; 25:679 - 84; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.2036011; PMID: 21460036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He YF, Li BZ, Li Z, Liu P, Wang Y, Tang Q, et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science 2011; 333:1303 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1210944; PMID: 21817016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito S, Shen L, Dai Q, Wu SC, Collins LB, Swenberg JA, et al. Tet proteins can convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Science 2011; 333:1300 - 3; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1210597; PMID: 21778364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficz G, Branco MR, Seisenberger S, Santos F, Krueger F, Hore TA, et al. Dynamic regulation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse ES cells and during differentiation. Nature 2011; 473:398 - 402; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10008; PMID: 21460836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastor WA, Pape UJ, Huang Y, Henderson HR, Lister R, Ko M, et al. Genome-wide mapping of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in embryonic stem cells. Nature 2011; 473:394 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10102; PMID: 21552279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wossidlo M, Nakamura T, Lepikhov K, Marques CJ, Zakhartchenko V, Boiani M, et al. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine in the mammalian zygote is linked with epigenetic reprogramming. Nat Commun 2011; 2:241; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1240; PMID: 21407207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth MJ, Branco MR, Ficz G, Oxley D, Krueger F, Reik W, et al. Quantitative sequencing of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine at single-base resolution. Science 2012; 336:934 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1220671; PMID: 22539555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu M, Hon GC, Szulwach KE, Song CX, Zhang L, Kim A, et al. Base-resolution analysis of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in the mammalian genome. Cell 2012; 149:1368 - 80; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.027; PMID: 22608086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Gao F, Li N, Li S, Yin G, Tian G, et al. An improved method for genome wide DNA methylation profiling correlated to transcription and genomic instability in two breast cancer cell lines. BMC Genomics 2009; 10:223; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-223; PMID: 19439076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinney SM, Chin HG, Vaisvila R, Bitinaite J, Zheng Y, Estève PO, et al. Tissue-specific distribution and dynamic changes of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian genomes. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:24685 - 93; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.217083; PMID: 21610077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichiyanagi K. Inhibition of MspI cleavage activity by hydroxymethylation of the CpG site: a concern for DNA modification studies using restriction endonucleases. Epigenetics 2012; 7:131 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/epi.7.2.18909; PMID: 22395461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelz CR, Kulesz-Martin M, Bagby G, Sears RC. Global rank-invariant set normalization (GRSN) to reduce systematic distortions in microarray data. BMC Bioinformatics 2008; 9:520; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-520; PMID: 19055840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunarso G, Chia NY, Jeyakani J, Hwang C, Lu X, Chan YS, et al. Transposable elements have rewired the core regulatory network of human embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 2010; 42:631 - 4; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.600; PMID: 20526341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valinluck V, Sowers LC. Endogenous cytosine damage products alter the site selectivity of human DNA maintenance methyltransferase DNMT1. Cancer Res 2007; 67:946 - 50; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3123; PMID: 17283125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valinluck V, Tsai HH, Rogstad DK, Burdzy A, Bird A, Sowers LC. Oxidative damage to methyl-CpG sequences inhibits the binding of the methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) of methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2). Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:4100 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh739; PMID: 15302911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhutani N, Burns DM, Blau HM. DNA demethylation dynamics. Cell 2011; 146:866 - 72; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.042; PMID: 21925312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, D’Alessio AC, Ito S, Xia K, Wang Z, Cui K, et al. Dual functions of Tet1 in transcriptional regulation in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature 2011; 473:389 - 93; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09934; PMID: 21451524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audic S, Claverie JM. The significance of digital gene expression profiles. Genome Res 1997; 7:986 - 95; PMID: 9331369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Yu C, Li Y, Lam TW, Yiu SM, Kristiansen K, et al. SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:1966 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp336; PMID: 19497933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou L, Chen J, Li Z, Li X, Hu X, Huang Y, et al. Integrated profiling of microRNAs and mRNAs: microRNAs located on Xq27.3 associate with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. PLoS One 2010; 5:e15224; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015224; PMID: 21253009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer LA, Lee TI, Cole MF, Johnstone SE, Levine SS, Zucker JP, et al. Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 2005; 122:947 - 56; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.020; PMID: 16153702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku M, Koche RP, Rheinbay E, Mendenhall EM, Endoh M, Mikkelsen TS, et al. Genomewide analysis of PRC1 and PRC2 occupancy identifies two classes of bivalent domains. PLoS Genet 2008; 4:e1000242; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000242; PMID: 18974828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Q, Smith AD. Identifying dispersed epigenomic domains from ChIP-Seq data. Bioinformatics 2011; 27:870 - 1; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr030; PMID: 21325299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar