Populational survey of arthropods on transgenic common bean expressing the rep gene from Bean golden mosaic virus

References

• Marshall A. Existing agbiotech traits continue global march. Nat Biotechnol 2012; 30:207; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2154; PMID: 22398607
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• James C. Global status of commercialized Biotech/GM crops: 2010: ISAAA Brief 42-2010: executive summary. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/42/executivesummary/default.asp Accessed 2012 Jan. 2.
   Google Scholar
• DeFrancesco L. How safe does transgenic food need to be?. Nat Biotechnol 2013; 31:794 - 802; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2686; PMID: 24022153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heink U, Bartz R. I. Kowarik I. How useful are the concepts of familiarity, biological integrity, and ecosystem health for evaluating damages by GM crops?. J Agric Environ Ethics 2012; 25:3 - 17; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10806-010-9289-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferry N, Raemaekers RJM, Majerus MEN, Jouanin L, Port G, Gatehouse JA, Gatehouse AMR. Impact of oilseed rape expressing the insecticidal cysteine protease inhibitor oryzacystatin on the beneficial predator Harmonia axyridis (multicoloured Asian ladybeetle). Mol Ecol 2003; 12:493 - 504; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01736.x; PMID: 12535099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren JG, Wiedenmann RN. Coleopteran-specific Cry3Bb toxin from transgenic corn pollen does not affect the fitness of a nontarget species, Coleomegilla maculate DeGeer (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Environ Entomol 2002; 31:1213 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-31.6.1213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romeis J, Bartsch D, Bigler F, Candolfi MP, Gielkens MMC, Hartley SE, Hellmich RL, Huesing JE, Jepson PC, Layton R, et al. Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:203 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1381; PMID: 18259178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinge DB, Jørgensen HJL, Lund OS, Lyngkjaer MF. Engineering pathogen resistance in crop plants: current trends and future prospects. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2010; 48:269 - 91; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114430; PMID: 20687833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson JR, Tepfer M. Assessment of the benefits and risks for engineered virus resistance. Adv Virus Res 2010; 76:33 - 56; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3527(10)76002-4; PMID: 20965071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert J, Matousek J, Mattern D. Pathogen-derived resistance in potato to Potato virus Y-aspects of stability and biosafety under field conditions. Virus Res 2004; 100:41 - 50; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2003.12.013; PMID: 15036834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson SF, Maxwell DP. Trans-dominant inhibition of geminiviral DNA replication by bean golden mosaic geminivirus rep gene mutants. Phytopathology 1999; 89:480 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.6.480; PMID: 18944720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria JC, Albino MMC, Dias BBA, Cunha NB, Silva LM, Vianna GR, Aragão FJL. Partial resistance to Bean Golden Mosaic Virus in a transgenic common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) line expressing a mutated rep gene. Plant Sci 2006; 171:565 - 71; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2006.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Environmental Risk Assessment, ILSI Research Foundation. A review of the environmental safety of the PAT protein. Environ Biosafety Res 2011; 10:73 - 101; http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2012004; PMID: 22781085
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pilson D, Prendeville HR. Ecological effects of transgenic crops and the escape of transgenes into wild populations. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 2004; 35:149 - 74; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammann K. Effects of biotechnology on biodiversity: herbicide-tolerant and insect-resistant GM crops. Trends Biotechnol 2005; 23:388 - 94; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.06.008; PMID: 15979178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig W, Tepfer M, Degrassi G, Ripandelli D. An overview of general features of risk assessments of genetically modified crops. Euphytica 2008; 164:853 - 80; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9643-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims SR. Bacillus thuringiensis var kurstaki [CryIAC] protein expressed in transgenic cotton: effects on beneficial and other non-target insects. Southwest Entomologist 1995; 20:493 - 500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wold SJ, Burkness EC, Hutchinson WD, Venette RC. In-field monitoring of beneficial insect populations in transgenic corn expressing a Bacillus thuringiensis toxin. J Entomol Sci 2001; 36:177 - 87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatti MA, Duan J, Head GP, Jiang C, Mckee MJ, Nickson TE, Pilcher CL, Pilcher CD. Field evaluation of the impact of corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) -protected Bt corn on ground-dwelling invertebrates. Environ Entomol 2005; a 34:1325 - 35; http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X(2005)034[1325:FEOTIO]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatti MA, Duan J, Head GP, Jiang C, Mckee MJ, Nickson TE, Pilcher CL, Pilcher CD. Field evaluation of the impact of corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) -protected Bt corn on foliage-dwelling invertebrates. Environ Entomol 2005; b 34:1336 - 45; http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X(2005)034[1336:FEOTIO]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly T, Buntin GD. Effect of Bacillus thuringiensis transgenic corn for lepidopteran control on nontarget arthropods. Environ Entomol 2005; 34:1292 - 301; http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X(2005)034[1292:EOBTTC]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilcher CD, Rice ME, Obrycki JJ. Impact of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn and crop phenology on five nontarget arthropods. Environ Entomol 2005; 34:1302 - 16; http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X(2005)034[1302:IOTBTC]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arpaia S, Di Leo GM, Fiore MC, Schmidt JEU, Scardi M. Composition of arthropod species assemblages in Bt-expressing and near isogenic eggplants in experimental fields. Environ Entomol 2007; 36:213 - 27; http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X(2007)36[213:COASAI]2.0.CO;2; PMID: 17349136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbeck A, Eckel C, Kennedy GG. Impact of Bacillus thuringiensis – insecticides on population dynamics and egg predation of the Colorado potato beetle in North Carolina potato plantings. BioControl 1998; a 43:65 - 75; http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009966404802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbeck A, Baumgartner M, Fried PM, Bigler F. Effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn-fed prey on mortality and development time of immature Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environ Entomol 1998; b 27:480 - 7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbeck A, Moar WJ, Pusztai-Carey M, Filippini A, Bigler F. Prey-mediated effects of Cry1Ab toxin and protoxin and Cry2A protoxin on the predator Chrysoperla carnea.. Entomol Exp Appl 1999; 91:305 - 16; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.1999.00497.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romeis J, Dutton A, Bigler F. Bacillus thuringiensis toxin (Cry1Ab) has no direct effect on larvae of the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). J Insect Physiol 2004; 50:175 - 83; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2003.11.004; PMID: 15019519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendeville HR, Pilson D. Transgenic virus resistance in cultivated squash affects pollinator behaviour. J Appl Ecol 2009; 46:1088 - 96; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01698.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro PV, Faria JC, Nogueira EOPL, Aragão FJL. Transgenes inheritance and genetic similarities of near isogenic lines of genetically modified common beans. Pesquisa Agropecu Bras 2009; 44:1168 - 76; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2009000900015
   Google Scholar
• Priestley AL, Brownbridge M. Field trials to evaluate effects of Bt-transgenic silage corn expressing the Cry1Ab insecticidal toxin on non-target soil arthropods in northern New England, USA. Transgenic Res 2009; 18:425 - 43; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11248-008-9234-z; PMID: 19083116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Liu B, Cui J, Liu D, Ding S, Gilna B, Luo J, Fang Z, Cao W, Han Z. No evidence of persistent effects of continuously planted transgenic insect-resistant cotton on soil microorganisms. Plant Soil 2011; 339:247 - 57; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0572-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintela ED. Manejo integrado de pragas do feijoeiro. 2001. http://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/CNPAF/19418/1/circ_46.pdf Accessed 2013 Sept. 15.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute. Help and documentation – 9.1.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2002-2004.
   Google Scholar
• Badji CA, Guedes RNC, Silva AA, Araújo RA. Impact of deltamethrin on arthropods in maize under conventional and no-tillage cultivation. Crop Prot 2004; 23:1031 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2004.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar