Transcriptional repression by the Msx1 homeoprotein is associated with global redistribution of the H3K27me3 repressive mark to the nuclear periphery

References

• Lallemand Y, Nicola MA, Ramos C, Bach A, Cloment CS, Robert B. Analysis of Msx1; Msx2 double mutants reveals multiple roles for Msx genes in limb development. Development 2005; 132:3003 - 14; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.01877; PMID: 15930102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu G, Lee H, Price SM, Shen MM, Abate-Shen C. Msx homeobox genes inhibit differentiation through upregulation of cyclin D1. Development 2001; 128:2373 - 84; PMID: 11493556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odelberg SJ, Kollhoff A, Keating MT. Dedifferentiation of mammalian myotubes induced by msx1. Cell 2000; 103:1099 - 109; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00212-9; PMID: 11163185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelison DD, Olwin BB, Rudnicki MA, Wold BJ. MyoD(-/-) satellite cells in single-fiber culture are differentiation defective and MRF4 deficient. Dev Biol 2000; 224:122 - 37; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2000.9682; PMID: 10926754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendall AJ, Abate-Shen C. Roles for Msx and Dlx homeoproteins in vertebrate development. Gene 2000; 247:17 - 31; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00081-0; PMID: 10773441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houzelstein D, Auda-Boucher G, Chéraud Y, Rouaud T, Blanc I, Tajbakhsh S, et al. The homeobox gene Msx1 is expressed in a subset of somites, and in muscle progenitor cells migrating into the forelimb. Development 1999; 126:2689 - 701; PMID: 10331980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendall AJ, Ding J, Hu G, Shen MM, Abate-Shen C. Msx1 antagonizes the myogenic activity of Pax3 in migrating limb muscle precursors. Development 1999; 126:4965 - 76; PMID: 10529415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catron KM, Wang H, Hu G, Shen MM, Abate-Shen C. Comparison of MSX-1 and MSX-2 suggests a molecular basis for functional redundancy. Mech Dev 1996; 55:185 - 99; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0925-4773(96)00503-5; PMID: 8861098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woloshin P, Song K, Degnin C, Killary AM, Goldhamer DJ, Sassoon D, et al. MSX1 inhibits myoD expression in fibroblast x 10T1/2 cell hybrids. Cell 1995; 82:611 - 20; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(95)90033-0; PMID: 7664340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson D. The function and evolution of Msx genes: pointers and paradoxes. Trends Genet 1995; 11:405 - 11; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(00)89124-6; PMID: 7482767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson DR, Crawley A, Hill RE, Tickle C. Position-dependent expression of two related homeobox genes in developing vertebrate limbs. Nature 1991; 352:429 - 31; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/352429a0; PMID: 1677742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Quinn JC, Prasanth KV, Swiss VA, Economides KD, Camacho MM, et al. PIAS1 confers DNA-binding specificity on the Msx1 homeoprotein. Genes Dev 2006; 20:784 - 94; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1392006; PMID: 16600910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Habas R, Abate-Shen C. MSX1 cooperates with histone H1b for inhibition of transcription and myogenesis. Science 2004; 304:1675 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1098096; PMID: 15192231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldhamer DJ, Brunk BP, Faerman A, King A, Shani M, Emerson CP Jr.. Embryonic activation of the myoD gene is regulated by a highly conserved distal control element. Development 1995; 121:637 - 49; PMID: 7720572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margueron R, Reinberg D. The Polycomb complex PRC2 and its mark in life. Nature 2011; 469:343 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09784; PMID: 21248841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawarkar R, Paro R. Interpretation of developmental signaling at chromatin: the Polycomb perspective. Dev Cell 2010; 19:651 - 61; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2010.10.012; PMID: 21074716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuettengruber B, Cavalli G. Recruitment of polycomb group complexes and their role in the dynamic regulation of cell fate choice. Development 2009; 136:3531 - 42; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.033902; PMID: 19820181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao R, Wang L, Wang H, Xia L, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, et al. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Polycomb-group silencing. Science 2002; 298:1039 - 43; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1076997; PMID: 12351676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzmichev A, Nishioka K, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Reinberg D. Histone methyltransferase activity associated with a human multiprotein complex containing the Enhancer of Zeste protein. Genes Dev 2002; 16:2893 - 905; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1035902; PMID: 12435631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz YB, Pirrotta V. Polycomb silencing mechanisms and the management of genomic programmes. Nat Rev Genet 2007; 8:9 - 22; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg1981; PMID: 17173055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezhkova E, Lien WH, Stokes N, Pasolli HA, Silva JM, Fuchs E. EZH1 and EZH2 cogovern histone H3K27 trimethylation and are essential for hair follicle homeostasis and wound repair. Genes Dev 2011; 25:485 - 98; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.2019811; PMID: 21317239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo CJ, Kharchenko PV, Daheron L, Park PJ, Kingston RE. A region of the human HOXD cluster that confers polycomb-group responsiveness. Cell 2010; 140:99 - 110; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.022; PMID: 20085705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendenhall EM, Koche RP, Truong T, Zhou VW, Issac B, Chi AS, et al. GC-rich sequence elements recruit PRC2 in mammalian ES cells. PLoS Genet 2010; 6:e1001244; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001244; PMID: 21170310
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sing A, Pannell D, Karaiskakis A, Sturgeon K, Djabali M, Ellis J, et al. A vertebrate Polycomb response element governs segmentation of the posterior hindbrain. Cell 2009; 138:885 - 97; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.020; PMID: 19737517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo L, Gassman KL, Petell LM, Wilson CL, Bewersdorf J, Shopland LS. The nuclear periphery of embryonic stem cells is a transcriptionally permissive and repressive compartment. J Cell Sci 2009; 122:3729 - 37; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.052555; PMID: 19773359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezhkova E, Pasolli HA, Parker JS, Stokes N, Su IH, Hannon G, et al. Ezh2 orchestrates gene expression for the stepwise differentiation of tissue-specific stem cells. Cell 2009; 136:1122 - 35; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.043; PMID: 19303854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracken AP, Dietrich N, Pasini D, Hansen KH, Helin K. Genome-wide mapping of Polycomb target genes unravels their roles in cell fate transitions. Genes Dev 2006; 20:1123 - 36; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.381706; PMID: 16618801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer LA, Plath K, Zeitlinger J, Brambrink T, Medeiros LA, Lee TI, et al. Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 2006; 441:349 - 53; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04733; PMID: 16625203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palacios D, Mozzetta C, Consalvi S, Caretti G, Saccone V, Proserpio V, et al. TNF/p38α/polycomb signaling to Pax7 locus in satellite cells links inflammation to the epigenetic control of muscle regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 2010; 7:455 - 69; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2010.08.013; PMID: 20887952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caretti G, Di Padova M, Micales B, Lyons GE, Sartorelli V. The Polycomb Ezh2 methyltransferase regulates muscle gene expression and skeletal muscle differentiation. Genes Dev 2004; 18:2627 - 38; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1241904; PMID: 15520282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajapakse I, Groudine M. On emerging nuclear order. J Cell Biol 2011; 192:711 - 21; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201010129; PMID: 21383074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meister P, Mango SE, Gasser SM. Locking the genome: nuclear organization and cell fate. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2011; 21:167 - 74; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2011.01.023; PMID: 21345665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peric-Hupkes D, Meuleman W, Pagie L, Bruggeman SW, Solovei I, Brugman W, et al. Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol Cell 2010; 38:603 - 13; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.03.016; PMID: 20513434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskiw CH, Cope NF, Clay I, Schoenfelder S, Nagano T, Fraser P. Transcription factories and nuclear organization of the genome. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2010; 75:501 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2010.75.046; PMID: 21467135
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao R, Bodnar MS, Spector DL. Nuclear neighborhoods and gene expression. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2009; 19:172 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2009.02.007; PMID: 19339170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towbin BD, Meister P, Gasser SM. The nuclear envelope--a scaffold for silencing?. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2009; 19:180 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2009.01.006; PMID: 19303765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misteli T. Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function. Cell 2007; 128:787 - 800; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.028; PMID: 17320514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanctôt C, Cheutin T, Cremer M, Cavalli G, Cremer T. Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions. Nat Rev Genet 2007; 8:104 - 15; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2041; PMID: 17230197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser P, Bickmore W. Nuclear organization of the genome and the potential for gene regulation. Nature 2007; 447:413 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05916; PMID: 17522674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Kumar RM, Biggs VJ, Lee H, Chen Y, Kagey MH, et al. The Msx1 Homeoprotein Recruits Polycomb to the Nuclear Periphery during Development. Dev Cell 2011; 21:575 - 88; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.003; PMID: 21852201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll JS, Meyer CA, Song J, Li W, Geistlinger TR, Eeckhoute J, et al. Genome-wide analysis of estrogen receptor binding sites. Nat Genet 2006; 38:1289 - 97; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1901; PMID: 17013392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchberger A, Freitag D, Arnold HH. A homeo-paired domain-binding motif directs Myf5 expression in progenitor cells of limb muscle. Development 2007; 134:1171 - 80; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.02798; PMID: 17301086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadchouel J, Carvajal JJ, Daubas P, Bajard L, Chang T, Rocancourt D, et al. Analysis of a key regulatory region upstream of the Myf5 gene reveals multiple phases of myogenesis, orchestrated at each site by a combination of elements dispersed throughout the locus. Development 2003; 130:3415 - 26; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.00552; PMID: 12810589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendall AJ, Rincón-Limas DE, Botas J, Abate-Shen C. Protein complex formation between Msx1 and Lhx2 homeoproteins is incompatible with DNA binding activity. Differentiation 1998; 63:151 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-0436.1998.6330151.x; PMID: 9697309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song YJ, Lee H. YB1/p32, a nuclear Y-box binding protein 1, is a novel regulator of myoblast differentiation that interacts with Msx1 homeoprotein. Exp Cell Res 2010; 316:517 - 29; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.12.003; PMID: 20004191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song YJ, Lee H. PIAS1 negatively regulates ubiquitination of Msx1 homeoprotein independent of its SUMO ligase activity. Mol Cells 2011; 32:221 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10059-011-1020-8; PMID: 21717107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Catron KM, Abate-Shen C. A role for the Msx-1 homeodomain in transcriptional regulation: residues in the N-terminal arm mediate TATA binding protein interaction and transcriptional repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93:1764 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.5.1764; PMID: 8700832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Hu G, Wang H, Sciavolino P, Iler N, Shen MM, et al. Heterodimerization of Msx and Dlx homeoproteins results in functional antagonism. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17:2920 - 32; PMID: 9111364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margueron R, Reinberg D. Chromatin structure and the inheritance of epigenetic information. Nat Rev Genet 2010; 11:285 - 96; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2752; PMID: 20300089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh K, Dilworth FJ. Redirecting traffic in the nucleus. Dev Cell 2011; 21:390 - 2; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.025; PMID: 21920308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guelen L, Pagie L, Brasset E, Meuleman W, Faza MB, Talhout W, et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 2008; 453:948 - 51; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06947; PMID: 18463634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao J, Fetter RD, Hu P, Betzig E, Tjian R. Subnuclear segregation of genes and core promoter factors in myogenesis. Genes Dev 2011; 25:569 - 80; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.2021411; PMID: 21357673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar