Defining flexible vs. inherent promoter architectures

References

• Jiang C, Pugh BF. Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation: advances through genomics. Nat Rev Genet 2009; 10:161 - 72; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2522; PMID: 19204718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radman-Livaja M, Rando OJ. Nucleosome positioning: how is it established, and why does it matter?. Dev Biol 2010; 339:258 - 66; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.06.012; PMID: 19527704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan GJ, Lee CK, Lieb JD. Cell cycle-specified fluctuation of nucleosome occupancy at gene promoters. PLoS Genet 2006; 2:e158; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0020158; PMID: 17002501
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shivaswamy S, Bhinge A, Zhao Y, Jones S, Hirst M, Iyer VR. Dynamic remodeling of individual nucleosomes across a eukaryotic genome in response to transcriptional perturbation. PLoS Biol 2008; 6:e65; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060065; PMID: 18351804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawadzki KA, Morozov AV, Broach JR. Chromatin-dependent transcription factor accessibility rather than nucleosome remodeling predominates during global transcriptional restructuring in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 2009; 20:3503 - 13; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E09-02-0111; PMID: 19494041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Ma H, Pugh BF. Stable and dynamic nucleosome states during a meiotic developmental process. Genome Res 2011; 21:875 - 84; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.117465.110; PMID: 21515815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deal RB, Henikoff S. Capturing the dynamic epigenome. Genome Biol 2010; 11:218; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-218; PMID: 20959022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huebert DJ, Kuan PF, Keleş S, Gasch AP. Dynamic changes in nucleosome occupancy are not predictive of gene expression dynamics but are linked to transcription and chromatin regulators. Mol Cell Biol 2012; 32:1645 - 53; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.06170-11; PMID: 22354995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlmann T, Wrange O. Specific glucocorticoid receptor binding to DNA reconstituted in a nucleosome. EMBO J 1988; 7:3073 - 9; PMID: 2846275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer TK, Cordingley MG, Wolford RG, Hager GL. Transcription factor access is mediated by accurately positioned nucleosomes on the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Mol Cell Biol 1991; 11:688 - 98; PMID: 1846670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaich AK, Walker DA, Wolford R, Hager GL. Rapid periodic binding and displacement of the glucocorticoid receptor during chromatin remodeling. Mol Cell 2004; 14:163 - 74; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00178-9; PMID: 15099516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ransom M, Williams SK, Dechassa ML, Das C, Linger J, Adkins M, et al. FACT and the proteasome promote promoter chromatin disassembly and transcriptional initiation. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:23461 - 71; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.019562; PMID: 19574230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkina TY, Tschetter PA, Erkine AM. Different requirements of the SWI/SNF complex for robust nucleosome displacement at promoters of heat shock factor and Msn2- and Msn4-regulated heat shock genes. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28:1207 - 17; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01069-07; PMID: 18070923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirosh I, Barkai N. Two strategies for gene regulation by promoter nucleosomes. Genome Res 2008; 18:1084 - 91; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.076059.108; PMID: 18448704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field Y, Kaplan N, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Moore IK, Sharon E, Lubling Y, et al. Distinct modes of regulation by chromatin encoded through nucleosome positioning signals. PLoS Comput Biol 2008; 4:e1000216; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000216; PMID: 18989395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirosh I, Barkai N, Verstrepen KJ. Promoter architecture and the evolvability of gene expression. J Biol 2009; 8:95; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/jbiol204; PMID: 20017897
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cairns BR. The logic of chromatin architecture and remodelling at promoters. Nature 2009; 461:193 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08450; PMID: 19741699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basehoar AD, Zanton SJ, Pugh BF. Identification and distinct regulation of yeast TATA box-containing genes. Cell 2004; 116:699 - 709; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00205-3; PMID: 15006352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee W, Tillo D, Bray N, Morse RH, Davis RW, Hughes TR, et al. A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Nat Genet 2007; 39:1235 - 44; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng2117; PMID: 17873876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM, Carmel-Harel O, Eisen MB, Storz G, et al. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 2000; 11:4241 - 57; PMID: 11102521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman JR, Ghaemmaghami S, Ihmels J, Breslow DK, Noble M, DeRisi JL, et al. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 2006; 441:840 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04785; PMID: 16699522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad K, Henikoff S. Epigenetic consequences of nucleosome dynamics. Cell 2002; 111:281 - 4; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01081-4; PMID: 12419239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mito Y, Henikoff JG, Henikoff S. Histone replacement marks the boundaries of cis-regulatory domains. Science 2007; 315:1408 - 11; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1134004; PMID: 17347439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion MF, Kaplan T, Kim M, Buratowski S, Friedman N, Rando OJ. Dynamics of replication-independent histone turnover in budding yeast. Science 2007; 315:1405 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1134053; PMID: 17347438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JD, Thåström A, Widom J. Spontaneous access of proteins to buried nucleosomal DNA target sites occurs via a mechanism that is distinct from nucleosome translocation. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22:7147 - 57; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.20.7147-7157.2002; PMID: 12242292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poirier MG, Bussiek M, Langowski J, Widom J. Spontaneous access to DNA target sites in folded chromatin fibers. J Mol Biol 2008; 379:772 - 86; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2008.04.025; PMID: 18485363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker PB. The chromatin accessibility complex: chromatin dynamics through nucleosome sliding. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2004; 69:281 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2004.69.281; PMID: 16117660
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Widom J. Role of DNA sequence in nucleosome stability and dynamics. Q Rev Biophys 2001; 34:269 - 324; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033583501003699; PMID: 11838235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal E, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Chen L, Thåström A, Field Y, Moore IK, et al. A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature 2006; 442:772 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04979; PMID: 16862119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan N, Moore IK, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Gossett AJ, Tillo D, Field Y, et al. The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 2009; 458:362 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07667; PMID: 19092803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denver DR, Morris K, Streelman JT, Kim SK, Lynch M, Thomas WK. The transcriptional consequences of mutation and natural selection in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Genet 2005; 37:544 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1554; PMID: 15852004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry CR, Lemos B, Rifkin SA, Dickinson WJ, Hartl DL. Genetic properties influencing the evolvability of gene expression. Science 2007; 317:118 - 21; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1140247; PMID: 17525304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eng KH, Kvitek DJ, Keles S, Gasch AP. Transient genotype-by-environment interactions following environmental shock provide a source of expression variation for essential genes. Genetics 2010; 184:587 - 93; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.109.107268; PMID: 19966067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MV, Topper SE, Hubler SL, Hose J, Wenger CD, Coon JJ, et al. A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast. Mol Syst Biol 2011; 7:514; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2011.48; PMID: 21772262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar