Single cell correlation fractal dimension of chromatin

References

• Fraser P, Bickmore W. Nuclear organization of the genome and the potential for gene regulation. Nature 2007; 447:413 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05916; PMID: 17522674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markaki Y, Gunkel M, Schermelleh L, Beichmanis S, Neumann J, Heidemann M, Leonhardt H, Eick D, Cremer C, Cremer T. Functional nuclear organization of transcription and DNA replication: a topographical marriage between chromatin domains and the interchromatin compartment. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2010; 75:475 - 92; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2010.75.042; PMID: 21467142
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grosberg A, Rabin Y, Havlin S, Neer A. Crumpled Globule Model of the Three-Dimensional Structure of DNA. [EPL] Europhys Lett 1993; 23:373 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/23/5/012
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, Telling A, Amit I, Lajoie BR, Sabo PJ, Dorschner MO, et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 2009; 326:289 - 93; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1181369; PMID: 19815776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs RK, van den Engh G, Trask B, Yokota H, Hearst JE. A random-walk/giant-loop model for interphase chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995; 92:2710 - 4; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.7.2710; PMID: 7708711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa A, Everaers R. Structure and dynamics of interphase chromosomes. PLoS Comput Biol 2008; 4:e1000153; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000153; PMID: 18725929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirny LA. The fractal globule as a model of chromatin architecture in the cell. Chromosome Res 2011; 19:37 - 51; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-010-9177-0; PMID: 21274616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bancaud A, Lavelle C, Huet S, Ellenberg J. A fractal model for nuclear organization: current evidence and biological implications. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:8783 - 92; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks586; PMID: 22790985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metze K. Fractal dimension of chromatin: potential molecular diagnostic applications for cancer prognosis. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2013; 13:719 - 35; http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14737159.2013.828889; PMID: 24063399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebedev DV, Filatov MV, Kuklin AI, Islamov AKh, Kentzinger E, Pantina R, Toperverg BP, Isaev-Ivanov VV. Fractal nature of chromatin organization in interphase chicken erythrocyte nuclei: DNA structure exhibits biphasic fractal properties. FEBS Lett 2005; 579:1465 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2005.01.052; PMID: 15733858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam RL, Silva RC, Pereira FG, Leite NJ, Lorand-Metze I, Metze K. The fractal dimension of nuclear chromatin as a prognostic factor in acute precursor B lymphoblastic leukemia. Cell Oncol 2006; 28:55 - 9; PMID: 16675881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bancaud A, Huet S, Daigle N, Mozziconacci J, Beaudouin J, Ellenberg J. Molecular crowding affects diffusion and binding of nuclear proteins in heterochromatin and reveals the fractal organization of chromatin. EMBO J 2009; 28:3785 - 98; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.340; PMID: 19927119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconer K. Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications. 2nd ed. Wiley; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Lee C, Kramer TA. Prediction of three-dimensional fractal dimensions using the two-dimensional properties of fractal aggregates. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2004; 112:49 - 57; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2004.07.001; PMID: 15581554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betzig E, Patterson GH, Sougrat R, Lindwasser OW, Olenych S, Bonifacino JS, Davidson MW, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Hess HF. Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science 2006; 313:1642 - 5; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1127344; PMID: 16902090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang B, Wang W, Bates M, Zhuang X. Three-dimensional super-resolution imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy. Science 2008; 319:810 - 3; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1153529; PMID: 18174397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diggle PJ. Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns. 2nd ed. Hodder Education Publishers; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Ripley BD. Spatial Statistics. Wiley-Interscience; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Owen DM, Rentero C, Rossy J, Magenau A, Williamson D, Rodriguez M, Gaus K. PALM imaging and cluster analysis of protein heterogeneity at the cell surface. J Biophotonics 2010; 3:446 - 54; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbio.200900089; PMID: 20148419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson DJ, Owen DM, Rossy J, Magenau A, Wehrmann M, Gooding JJ, Gaus K. Pre-existing clusters of the adaptor Lat do not participate in early T cell signaling events. Nat Immunol 2011; 12:655 - 62; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ni.2049; PMID: 21642986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohn M, Diesinger P, Kaufmann R, Weiland Y, Müller P, Gunkel M, von Ketteler A, Lemmer P, Hausmann M, Heermann DW, et al. Localization microscopy reveals expression-dependent parameters of chromatin nanostructure. Biophys J 2010; 99:1358 - 67; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2010.05.043; PMID: 20816047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izeddin I, El Beheiry M, Andilla J, Ciepielewski D, Darzacq X, Dahan M. PSF shaping using adaptive optics for three-dimensional single-molecule super-resolution imaging and tracking. Opt Express 2012; 20:4957 - 67; http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.004957; PMID: 22418300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda A, Shao L, Boulanger J, Kervrann C, Carlton PM, Kner P, Agard D, Sedat JW. Condensed mitotic chromosome structure at nanometer resolution using PALM and EGFP- histones. PLoS One 2010; 5:e12768; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012768; PMID: 20856676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shav-Tal Y, Singer RH, Darzacq X. Imaging gene expression in single living cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004; 5:855 - 61; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm1494; PMID: 15459666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickfaden H, Zunhammer A, van Koningsbruggen S, Köhler D, Cremer T. 4D chromatin dynamics in cycling cells: Theodor Boveri’s hypotheses revisited. Nucleus 2010; 1:284 - 97; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/nucl.1.3.11969; PMID: 21327076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Q, Agterberg FP. Multifractal modeling and spatial point processes. Math Geol 1995; 27:831 - 45; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02087098
   Google Scholar
• Baker SM, Buckheit RW 3rd, Falk MM. Green-to-red photoconvertible fluorescent proteins: tracking cell and protein dynamics on standard wide-field mercury arc-based microscopes. BMC Cell Biol 2010; 11:15; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2121-11-15; PMID: 20175925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weil W. Spatial Point Processes and their Applications. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Weston DJ, Adams NM, Russell RA, Stephens DA, Freemont PS. Analysis of spatial point patterns in nuclear biology. PLoS One 2012; 7:e36841; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036841; PMID: 22615822
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Owen DM, Sauer M, Gaus K. Fluorescence localization microscopy: The transition from concept to biological research tool. Commun Integr Biol 2012; 5:345 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cib.20348; PMID: 23060958
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sengupta P, Lippincott-Schwartz J. Quantitative analysis of photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) datasets using pair-correlation analysis. Bioessays 2012; 34:396 - 405; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.201200022; PMID: 22447653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu C-J, Baumgart T. Spatial association of signaling proteins and F-actin effects on cluster assembly analyzed via photoactivation localization microscopy in T cells. PLoS One 2011; 6:e23586; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023586; PMID: 21887278
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prior IA, Muncke C, Parton RG, Hancock JF. Direct visualization of Ras proteins in spatially distinct cell surface microdomains. J Cell Biol 2003; 160:165 - 70; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200209091; PMID: 12527752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelbrot BB. Les objets fractals: forme, hasard et dimension. Flammarion; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Ogata Y, Katsura K. Maximum Likelihood Estimates of the Fractal Dimension for Random Spatial Patterns. Biometrika 1991; 78:463 - 74; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/78.3.463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozaki T, Kaizu K, Pack C-G, Tamura S, Tani T, Hihara S, Nagai T, Takahashi K, Maeshima K. Flexible and dynamic nucleosome fiber in living mammalian cells. Nucleus 2013; 4:349 - 56; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/nucl.26053; PMID: 23945462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbieri M, Chotalia M, Fraser J, Lavitas L-M, Dostie J, Pombo A, Nicodemi M. Complexity of chromatin folding is captured by the strings and binders switch model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109:16173 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204799109; PMID: 22988072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibcus JH, Dekker J. The hierarchy of the 3D genome. Mol Cell 2013; 49:773 - 82; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.011; PMID: 23473598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergé A, Bertaux N, Rigneault H, Marguet D. Dynamic multiple-target tracing to probe spatiotemporal cartography of cell membranes. Nat Methods 2008; 5:687 - 94; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1233; PMID: 18604216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley A. Spatial Point Process Modelling and Its Applications. Castellón de la Plana; Universitat Jaume I; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan YY. Earthquake spatial distribution: the correlation dimension. Geophys J Int 2007; 168:1175 - 94; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03251.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar