Assuring consumer safety without animals

References

• EC. Notes of Guidance Testing of Cosmetic Ingredients for their Safety Evaluation 1999; Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products Intended for Consumers (SCCNFP) http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/sccp/documents/out12_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Macchiarini P, Jungebluth P, Go T, Asnaghi MA, Rees LE, Cogan TA, et al. Clinical transplantation of a tissue-engineered airway. Lancet 2008; 2023 - 2030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemicals Testing Guidelines 2009; Paris, France Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) www.oecd.org/department/0,3355,en_2649_34377_1_1_1_1_1,00.html
   Google Scholar
• EC. Council regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REAHC). Official Journal of the European Union 2008; L142:1 - 739
   Google Scholar
• Home Office Statistics of Scientific Procedures on Living Animals 2007 2008; London The Stationary Office Ltd http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs08/spanimals07.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EC. Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the member states relating to cosmetic products'. Official Journal of the European Union 2003; 66:26 - 35 European Commission
   Google Scholar
• EC. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restrictions of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Official Journal of the European Union 2006; 396:1 - 849
   Google Scholar
• EC. Council Directive 76/768/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products. Official Journal of the European Union 1976; 262:169 - 200
   Google Scholar
• Worth AP, Balls M. The principles of validation and the ECVAM validation process. Altern Lab Anim 2002; 30:15 - 21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojima H. Trend on alternative to animal testing. Int J Cosmet Sci 2007; 29:331
   Google Scholar
• Draize J, Woodard G, Calvery H. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1944; 82:377 - 390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botham PA, Earl LK, Fentem JH, Roguet R, van de Sandt JJM. Alternative Methods for Skin Irritation Testing: the Current Status ECVAM Skin Irritation Task Force Report 1. ATLA 1998; 26:195 - 211
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane M, Jones P, Goebel C, Dufour E, Rowland J, Araki D, et al. A tiered approach to the use of alternative approaches for the safety assessment of cosmetics: Skin irritation. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2009;
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotovio J, Grandidier MH, Portes P, Roguet R, Rubinstenn G. The in vitro skin irritation of chemicals: optimisation of the EPISKIN prediction model within the framework of the ECVAM validation process. Altern Lab Anim 2005; 33:329 - 349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandarova H, Liebsch M, Schmidt E, Genschow E, Traue D, Spielmann H, et al. Assessment of the skin irritation potential of chemicals by using the SkinEthic reconstructed human epidermal model and the common skin irritation protocol evaluated in the ECVAM skin irritation validation study. Altern Lab Anim 2006; 34:393 - 406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandarova H, Liebsch M, Gerner I, Schmidt E, Genschow E, Traue D, Spielmann H. The EpiDerm test protocol for the upcoming ECVAM validation study on in vitro skin irritation tests—an assessment of the performance of the optimised test. Altern Lab Anim 2005; 33:351 - 367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebsch M, Traue D, Barrabas C, Spielmann H, Uphill P, Wilkins S, et al. The ECVAM prevalidation study on the use of EpiDerm for skin corrosivity testing. ATLA 2000; 28:371 - 401
   Google Scholar
• OECD. OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals 431- In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Human Skin Model Test 2002; Paris, France ROECD http://www.oecd.org/document/22/0,,2340,en_2649_34377_1916054_1_1_1_1,00.htm
   Google Scholar
• ESAC. Statement on the Scientific Validity of In-Vitro Tests for Skin Irritation Testing 2008; Ispra, Italy European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) http://ecvam.jrc.it/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• OECD. OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals—In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RhE) Test Method 2009; Paris, France OECD www.oecd.org/dataoecd/37/0/42402187.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals 432—In Vitro 3T3 NRU Phototoxicity Test 2002; Paris, France OECD
   Google Scholar
• Spielmann H, Lovell WW, Holzle E, Johnson BE, Maurer T, Miranda MA, et al. In Vitro Phototoxicity Testing: The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 2. Altern Lab Anim 1994; 22:314 - 348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones PA, Lovell WW, King AV, Earl LK. In vitro testing for phototoxic potential using the EpiDerm 3-D reconstructed human skin model. Toxicol Mech Methods 2001; 11:1 - 19
   Google Scholar
• OECD. OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals 427—In vivo method: skin absorption 2002; Paris, France OECD
   Google Scholar
• Pendlington RU. Wilcott RP, Price S. In vitro percutaneous absorption measurements. Principles and Practice of Skin Toxicology 2008; Chichester Wiley
   Google Scholar
• OECD. OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals 428—In vitro method: Skin absorption 2002; Paris, France OECD
   Google Scholar
• Hayden PJ, Ayehunie S, Jackson GR, Kupfer-Lamore S, Last TJ, Klausner M, Kubilus J. Salem H, Katz SA. In Vitro skin equivalent models for toxicity testing. Alternative Toxicological Methods 2003; Boca Raton CRC Press LLC 229 - 247
   Google Scholar
• Netzlaff F, Lehr CM, Wertz PW, Schaefer UF. The human epidermis models EpiSkin, SkinEthic and EpiDerm: an evaluation of morphology and their suitability for testing phototoxicity, irritancy, corrosivity and substance transport. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2005; 60:167 - 178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasonen-Seppanen S, Suhonen TM, Kirjavainen M, Suihko E, Urtti A, Miettinen M, et al. Vitamin C enhances differentiation of a continuous keratinocyte cell line (REK) into epidermis with normal stratum corneum ultrastructure and functional permeability barrier. Histochem Cell Biol 2001; 116:287 - 297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponec M, Weerheim A, Kempenaar J, Mulder A, Gooris GS, Bouwstra J, Mommaas AM. The formation of competent barrier lipids in reconstructed human epidermis requires the presence of vitamin C. J Invest Dermatol 1997; 109:348 - 355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poumay Y, Coquette A. Modelling the human epidermis in vitro: tools for basic and applied research. Arch Dermatol Res 2007; 298:361 - 369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamee P, Hibatallah J, Costabel-Farkas M, Goebel C, Araki D, Dufour E, et al. A tiered approach to the use of Alternatives to Animal Testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: Eye irritation. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2009;
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavilikolanu P, Lazaro C, Mun G, Hilberer A, Hyder M, Raabe H, Curren R. The utilization of the epiocular human tissue model to assess and compare the irritation potetnial of multiple surfactant systems used in shampoos and facial cleansers. Toxicologist 2008; 102:66
   Google Scholar
• Van Goethem F, Adriaens E, Alepee N, Straube F, De Wever B, Cappadoro M, et al. Prevalidation of a new in vitro reconstituted human cornea model to assess the eye irritating potential of chemicals. Toxicol In Vitro 2006; 20:1 - 17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fentem J, Chamberlain M, Sangster B. The feasibility of replacing animal testing for assessing consumer safety: a suggested future direction. Altern Lab Anim 2004; 32:617 - 623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC. Council NR. Toxicity testing in the 21^st century: A vision and a strategy 2007; The National Academies Press
   Google Scholar
• Smith CK, Hotchkiss SA. Allergic Contact Dermatitis 2001; New York Taylor & Francis, Inc
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell G, Aleksic M, Aptula A, Carmichael P, Fentem J, Gilmour N, et al. Assuring consumer safety without animal testing: a feasibility case study for skin sensitisation. Altern Lab Anim 2008; 36:557 - 568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell G, Mackay C. Application of a systems biology approach for skin allergy risk assessment. AATEX 2008; 14:381 - 388
   Google Scholar
• Giese C, Demmler CD, Ammer R, Hartmann S, Lubitz A, Miller L, et al. A human lymph node in vitro—challenges and progress. Artif Organs 2006; 30:803 - 808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaauboer BJ. The contribution of in vitro toxicity data in hazard and risk assessment: current limitations and future perspectives. Toxicol Lett 2008; 180:81 - 84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combes R, Balls M, Illing P, Bhogal N, Dale J, Duve G, et al. Possibilities for a new approach to chemicals risk assessment—the report of a FRAME workshop. Altern Lab Anim 2006; 34:621 - 649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzei D, Vozzi F, Cisternino A, Vozzi G, Ahluwalia A. A high-throughput bioreactor system for simulating physiological environments. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron 2008; 55:9
   Google Scholar
• Vozzi F, Heinrich JM, Bader A, Ahluwalia AD. Connected Culture of Murine Hepatocytes and HUVEC in a Multicompartmental Bioreactor. Tissue Eng Part A 2008;
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napolitano AP, Chai P, Dean DM, Morgan JR. Dynamics of the self-assembly of complex cellular aggregates on micromolded nonadhesive hydrogels. Tissue Eng 2007; 13:2087 - 2094
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rago AP, Napolitano AP, Dean DM, Chai PR, Morgan JR. Miniaturization of an Anoikis assay using non-adhesive micromolded hydrogels. Cytotechnology 2008; 56:81 - 90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NC3Rs. Tissue engineering solutions for replacing animal experiments 2007; www.nc3rs.org.uk/tissueengineeringpriority. National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs)
   Google Scholar
• Pampaloni F, Reynaud EG, Stelzer EH. The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue. Nat Rev 2007; 8:839 - 845
   Google Scholar