The elaborate structure of spider silk

References

• Gerritsen VB. An airbus could tiptoe on spider silk. Protein Spotlight 2000; 24:1 - 2
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan D, Adams WW, Farmer B, Viney C. Silk polymers: material science and biotechnology 1993; 1st ed Washington DC ACS Symposium Series
   Google Scholar
• Fraser RD, MacRae TP. Conformation in Fibrous Proteins 1973; 1st ed New York Academic Press
   Google Scholar
• Vollrath F. Strength and structure of spiders' silks. J Biotechnol 2000; 74:67 - 83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nentwig W. Why do only certain insects escape from a spider's web?. Oecologica 1982; 53:412 - 417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zschokke S. The influence of the auxiliary spiral on the capture spiral in Araneus diadematus Clerck (Araneidae). Bull Br Arachnol Soc 1993; 9:167 - 173
   Google Scholar
• Gosline JM, DeMont EM, Denny MW. The structure and properties of spider silk. Endeavour 1986; 10:37 - 43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Yuan J, Wang X, Vasanthavada K, Falick AM, Jones PR, et al. Analysis of aqueous glue coating proteins on the silk fibers of the cob weaver, Latrodectus hesperus. Biochemistry 2007; 46:3294 - 3303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao H, Yao H. Shape insensitive optimal adhesion of nanoscale fibrillar structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:7851 - 7856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arzt E, Gorb S, Spolenak R. From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:10603 - 10606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townley MA, Tillinghast EK, Neefus CD. Changes in composition of spider orb web sticky droplets with starvation and web removal and synthesis of sticky droplet compounds. J Exp Biol 2006; 209:1463 - 1486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollrath F, Tillinghast EK. Glycoprotein glue beneath a spider web's aqueous coat. Naturwissenschaften 2005; 78:557 - 559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rising A, Nimmervoll H, Grip S, Fernandez-Arias A, Storckenfeldt E, Knight DP, et al. Spider silk proteins—mechanical property and gene sequence. Zoolog Sci 2005; 22:273 - 281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu M, Lewis RV. Structure of a protein superfiber: spider dragline silk. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:7120 - 7124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis RV. Spider silk: Ancient ideas for new biomaterials. Chem Rev 2006; 106:3762 - 3774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi CY, Lewis RV. Evidence from flagelliform silk cDNA for the structural basis of elasticity and modular nature of spider silks. J Mol Biol 1998; 275:773 - 784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi CY, Lewis RV. Spider flagelliform silk: Lessons in protein design, gene structure and molecular evolution. Bioessays 2001; 23:750 - 756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Beek JD, Hess S, Vollrath F, Meier BH. The molecular structure of spider dragline silk: folding and orientation of the protein backbone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:10266 - 10271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons AH, Michal CA, Jelinski LW. Molecular orientation and two-component nature of the crystalline fraction of spider dragline silk. Science 1996; 271:84 - 87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosline JM, Denny MW, DeMont EM. Spider silk as rubber. Nature 1994; 309:551 - 552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termonia Y. Monte Carlo diffusion model of polymer coagulation. Phys Rev Lett 1994; 72:3678 - 3681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker N, Oroudjev E, Mutz S, Cleveland JP, Hansma PK, Hayashi CY, et al. Molecular nanosprings in spider capture-silk threads. Nat Mater 2003; 2:278 - 283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheibel T. Protein fibers as performance proteins: new technologies and applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2005; 16:427 - 433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rising A, Hjälm G, Engström W, Johansson J. N-terminal nonrepetitive domain common to dragline, flagelliform and cylindriform spider silk proteins. Biomacromolecules 2006; 7:3120 - 3124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ittah S, Michaeli A, Goldblum A, Gat U. A model for the structure of the C-terminal domain of dragline spider silk and the role of its conserved cysteine. Biomacromolecules 2007; 8:2768 - 2773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sponner A, Vater W, Rommerskirch W, Vollrath F, Unger E, Grosse F, et al. The conserved C-termini contribute to the properties of spider silk fibroins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005; 338:897 - 902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sponner A, Unger E, Grosse F, Weisshart K. Conserved C-termini of Spidroins are secreted by the major ampullate glands and retained in the silk thread. Biomacromolecules 2004; 5:840 - 845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huemmerich D, Helsen CW, Quedzuweit S, Oschmann J, Rudolph R, Scheibel T. Primary structure elements of spider dragline silks and their contribution to protein solubility. Biochemistry 2004; 43:13604 - 13612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Vasanthavada K, Kohler K, McNary S, Moore AM, Vierra CA. Molecular mechanisms of spider silk. Cell Mol Life Sci 2006; 63:1986 - 1999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motriuk-Smith D, Smith A, Hayashi CY, Lewis RV. Analysis of the conserved N-terminal domains in major ampullate spider silk proteins. Biomacromolecules 2005; 6:3152 - 3159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayoub NA, Garb JE, Tinghitella RM, Collin MA, Hayashi CY. Blueprint for a high-performance biomaterial: full-length spider dragline silk genes. PLoS ONE 2007; 2:514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo-Davis CI, Mekhedov SL, Hartl DL, Koonin EV, Kondrashov FA. Selection for short introns in highly expressed genes. Nat Genet 2002; 31:415 - 418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exler JH, Hummerich D, Scheibel T. The amphiphilic properties of spider silks are important for spinning. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2007; 46:3559 - 3562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermanson KD, Huemmerich D, Scheibel T, Bausch AR. Engineered Microcapsules Fabricated from Reconstituted Spider Silk. Advanced Materials 2007; 19:1810 - 1815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin HJ, Kaplan DL. Mechanism of silk processing in insects and spiders. Nature 2003; 424:1057 - 1061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollrath F, Knight DP. Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk. Nature 2001; 410:541 - 548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riekel C, Bränden C, Craig C, Ferrero C, Heidelbach F, Müller M. Aspects of X-ray diffraction on single spider fibers. Int J Biol Macromol 1999; 24:179 - 186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosline JM, Guerette PA, Ortlepp CS, Savage KN. The mechanical design of spider silks: From fibroin sequence to mechanical function. J Exp Biol 1999; 202:3295 - 3303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubik S. High-performance fibers from spider silk. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2002; 41:2721 - 2723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi CY, Shipley NH, Lewis RV. Hypotheses that correlate the sequence, structure and mechanical properties of spider silk proteins. Int J Biol Macromol 1999; 24:271 - 275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammensee S, Huemmerich D, Hermanson KD, Scheibel T, Bausch A. Rheological characterisation of recombinant spider silk nanofiber networks. Appl Phys A 2006; 82:261 - 264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicko C, Kenney JM, Knight D, Vollrath F. Transition to a beta-sheet-rich structure in spidroin in vitro: The effects of pH and cations. Biochemistry 2004; 43:14080 - 14087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hijirida DH, Do KG, Michal C, Wong S, Zax D, Jelinski LW. 13C NMR of Nephila clavipes major ampullate silk gland. Biophys J 1996; 71:3442 - 3447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SenGupta S, Scheibel T. Zbilut JP, Scheibel T. Folding, self-assembly and conformational switches of proteins. Protein folding and misfolding 2007; New York Nova Publishers 1 - 34
   Google Scholar
• Scheibel T. Spider silks: Recombinant synthesis, assembly, spinning and engineering of synthetic proteins. Microb Cell Fact 2004; 3:14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko FK, Jovicic J. Modeling of mechanical properties and structural design of spider web. Biomacromolecules 2004; 5:780 - 785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vendrely C, Scheibel T. Biotechnological production of spider-silk proteins enables new applications. Macromol Biosci 2007; 7:401 - 409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emile O, Le Floch A, Vollrath F. Biopolymers: Shape memory in spider draglines. Nature 2006; 440:621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emile O, Le Floch A, Vollrath F. Time-resolved torsional relaxation of spider draglines by an optical technique. Phys Rev Lett 2007; 98:167402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Shao Z, Vollrath F. Relationships between supercontraction and mechanical properties of spider silk. Nat Mater 2005; 4:901 - 905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez Rigueiro J, Elices M, Guinea GV. Controled supercontraction tailors the tensile behaviour of spider silk. Polymer 2003; 44:3733 - 3736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao Z, Vollrath F, Sirichaisit J, Young RJ. Analysis of spider silk in native and supercontracted states using raman spectroscopy. Polymer 1999; 40:2493 - 2500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z. Supercontraction and backbone dynamics in spider silk: C-12 and H-2 NMR studies. J Am Chem Soc 2000; 122:9019 - 9025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollrath F, Madsen B, Shao Z. The effect of spinning conditions on the mechanics of a spider's dragline silk. Proc Biol Sci 2001; 268:2339 - 2346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilding MA, Hearle J. Salamone JC. Fiber structure. Polymeric materials encyclopedia 1996; 11:Bota Raton CRC 8307 - 8322
   Google Scholar
• Shao Z, Vollrath F. Surprising strength of silkworm silk. Nature 2002; 418:741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono S, Mello C, Kaplan D, Cheley S, Bayley H. Purification and characterization of recombinant spider silk expressed in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1998; 49:31 - 38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahnestock SR, Bedzyk LA. Production of synthetic spider dragline silk protein in Pichia pastoris. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1997; 47:33 - 39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheller J, Gührs KH, Grosse F, Conrad U. Production of spider silk proteins in tobacco and potato. Nat Biotechnol 2001; 19:573 - 577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivedi BP. Lab spins artificial spider silk, paving the way to new materials 2002; http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/01/0117_020117TVspidermammals.html
   Google Scholar
• Lazaris A, Arcidiacono S, Huang Y, Zhou JF, Duguay F, Chretien N, et al. Spider silk fibers spun from soluble recombinant silk produced in mammalian cells. Science 2002; 295:472 - 476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao Y, Zhang Y, Nakagaki K, Zhao T, Zhao A, Meng Y, et al. Expression of spider flagelliform silk protein in Bombyx mori cell line by a novel Bac-to-Bac/BmNPV baculovirus expression system. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2006; 71:192 - 199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huemmerich D, Scheibel T, Vollrath F, Cohen S, Gat U, Ittah S. Novel assembly properties of recombinant spider dragline silk proteins. Curr Biol 2004; 14:2070 - 2074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padgett KA, Sorge JA. Creating seamless junctions independent of restriction sites in PCR cloning. Gene 1996; 168:31 - 35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Römer L, Strehle M, Scheibel T. Conquering isoleucine auxotrophy of Escherichia coli BLR(DE3) to recombinantly produce spider silk proteins in minimal media. Biotechnol Lett 2007; 29:1741 - 1744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelinski LW, Blye A, Liivak O, Michal C, LaVerde G, Seidel A, et al. Orientation, structure, wet-spinning and molecular basis for supercontraction of spider dragline silk. Int J Biol Macromol 1999; 24:197 - 201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel A, Liivak O, Jelinski LW. Artificial spinning of spider silk. Macromolecules 1998; 31:6733 - 6736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono S, Mello CM, Butler M, Welsh E, Soares JW, Allen A. Aqueous processing and fiber spinning of recombinant silks. Macromolecules 2002; 35:1262 - 1266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vendrely C, Ackerschott C, Römer L, Scheibel T. Modular design of performance proteins with repetitive sequences: recombinant flagelliform spider silk as basis for biomaterials. Methods in Molecular Biology 2008; 474:3 - 14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slotta U, Tammer M, Kremer F, Koelsch P, Scheibel T. Structural analysis of spider silk films. Supramol Chem 2006; 18:465 - 471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metwalli E, Slotta U, Darko C, Roth SV, Scheibel T, Papadakis CM. Structural changes of thin films from recombinant spider silk proteins upon post treatment. Appl Phys A 2007; 89:655 - 661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huemmerich D, Slotta U, Scheibel T. Films from recombinant spider silk proteins. Appl Phys A 2006; 82:219 - 222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney JM, Knight D, Wise MJ, Vollrath F. Amyloidogenic nature of spider silk. Eur J Biochem 2002; 269:4159 - 4163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slotta U, Hess S, Spiess K, Stromer T, Serpell L, Scheibel T. Spider silk and amyloid fibrils: A structural comparison. Macromol Biosci 2007; 7:183 - 188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar