Importance of plant integrity in crop research, breeding, and production

References

• Bláha L, Hnilička F, Hořejší P, Novák V. Influence of abiotic stresses on the yield, seed and root traits at winter wheat (Tritium aestivum L.). Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica. 2003; 34:1 - 7
   Google Scholar
• Bláha L, et al. Rostlina a stres, (Plant and stress). Prague: VÚRV, 2003
   Google Scholar
• Bláha L, Hnilička F, eds. Aktuální kapitoly z fyziologie rostlin a ze zemědělského výzkumu, (Current topics in plant physiology and agricultural research). Prague, 2011: 256
   Google Scholar
• Toppi LS, Skowroňska BP, eds. Abiotic stresses in Plants. Kluwer, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Bláha L, Šerá B, eds. Význam celistvosti rostliny ve výzkumu, šlechtění, a produkci (The importance of plant integrity in research, breeding and plant production) Prague: Powerprint, 2013
   Google Scholar
• X Congress of the European Society Agronomy. Proceedings from conference. Bologna, Italy. September 15-19, 2008. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 2008: 3:(3)
   Google Scholar
• XI Congress of the European Society of Agronomy. Montpellier, France. August 29- September 3. Proceedings of Agro, 2010
   Google Scholar
• Alpi A, Amrhein N, Bertl A, Blatt MR, Blumwald E, Cervone F, Dainty J, De Michelis MI, Epstein E, Galston AW, et al. Plant neurobiology: no brain, no gain?. Trends Plant Sci 2007; 12:135 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.03.002; PMID: 17368081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlander SK. Communication between scientists and consumers. Outlook Agric 1991; •••:73 - 7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwey RD. Agricultural Research priorities. Outlook Agric 1989; 18:73 - 7
   Google Scholar
• Mais que font les agronomes? Public discussion between scientists and agriculture praxis. Montpellier, France. August 29, 2010. Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Dostál R. Zemědělská botanika 2 -Fyziologie rostlin, (Agricultural botany 2 Plant Physiology). ČSAZV SZN, 1962: 631
   Google Scholar
• Vidovič J. Predpoveď impaktu globálnej klimatickej zmeny na úrodu pšenice letnej-ozimnej (Prediction of impacts of global climate change on yield of winter wheat). In: Výskum pestovateľských technológií rozhodujúcich poľnýchplodín pre nové ekonomické podmienky (Research cultivation technologies of the main field crops to new economic conditions). Piešťany: VURV, 2002
   Google Scholar
• Vidovič J. Produkčná fyziológia ozimnej pšenice (Physiology of productivity of winter wheat). Piešťany: VÚRV, 1991: 56
   Google Scholar
• Crane PR, Herendeen P, Friis EM. Fossils and plant phylogeny. Am J Bot 2004; 91:1683 - 99; http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.10.1683; PMID: 21652317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvaček Z, et al. Základy systematické paleontologie. Učební texty (Basics of Systematic Palaeontology. Textbooks of Charles University, Prague). Prague: Karolinum, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Bazzaz FA, Ackerly DD, Reekie EG. Reproductive Allocations in Plants. In: Fenner M, ed. Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities. Oxon: CABI Publishing, 2000: 410
   Google Scholar
• Darwin C. The Power of Movements in Plants. London: John Murray, 1880: 645
   Google Scholar
• Fageria NK. Embrapa, Santo Antonio de Goiásm, GO Brazil. The role of the plant roots in crop production. CRC Press, 2012:467.
   Google Scholar
• Bláha L, Marková V. Posouzení odolnosti jetelovin vůči suchu. (Assessment of clover resistance to drought). Úroda, 2011: 79-81.
   Google Scholar
• Baluška F, ed. Long-Distance Systemic Signaling and Communication in Plants. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer–Verlag, 2013
   Google Scholar
• Baluška F. Stress perception and adaptation in plant from neurobiology perspective. In: Bláha L, ed. Vliv abiotických a biotických stresorů na vlastnosti rostlin. 2009: 19-21
   Google Scholar
• Baluška F, Mancuso S, Volkmann D. Communication in Plants: Neuronal Aspects of Plant Life. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer–Verlag, 2006: 19-35
   Google Scholar
• Baluška F, Mancuso S. Plant neurobiology as a paradigm shift not only in the plant sciences. Plant Signal Behav 2007; 2:205 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.2.4.4550; PMID: 19516989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baluška F, Volkmann D, Hlavacka A, Mancuso S, Barlow PW. Neurobiological view of plants and their body plan. In: Communication in Plants. 2006: 19-35
   Google Scholar
• Baluška F, Mancuso S. Plant neurobiology: From stimulus perception to adaptive behavior of plants, via integrated chemical and electrical signaling. Plant Signal Behav 2009; 4:475 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.4.6.8870; PMID: 19816121
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barlow PW. Reflections on ‘plant neurobiology’. Biosystems 2008; 92:132 - 47; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2008.01.004; PMID: 18336993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bláha L, Pazderů K. Influence of the root and seed traits on tolerance to abiotic stress. In: Agricultural Chemistry. Croatia, 2013
   Google Scholar
• Linkies A, Graeber K, Knight C, Leubner-Metzger G. The evolution of seeds. New Phytol 2010; 186:817 - 31; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03249.x; PMID: 20406407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bláha L, Klíma M, Vyvadilová M. The influence of the seed traits on the yield of selected genotypes of winter rape. In: New knowledges of genetics and breeding of field crops. Piešťany, 2011: 69-72
   Google Scholar
• Pazderů K. From the Seed to the Plant. In: Importance of Plant Integrity in Research, Plant Breeding and Production. Prague: Crop Research Institute, 2013:61-67
   Google Scholar
• Pazderů K, Bláha L. Trends in Plant Breeding and Seed Production to Improve Abiotic Stress Tolerance. In: 11th Scientific and Technical Seminar on Seed and Seedlings. Prague: CULS, 2013: 29-33
   Google Scholar
• Morison IL, Morecroft ME, Viner D, James IL, Wallace M, Wallace C. Recent and future climate change and the implications for plant growth. In: Plant Growth and climate change. Wallingford, UK: Blackwell Publishing, 2006: 1-17
   Google Scholar