Private channels in plant–pollinator mutualisms

References

• Williams NH, Dodson CH. Selective attraction of male euglossine bees to orchid floral fragrances and its importance in long-distance pollen flow. Evolution 1972; 26:84 - 95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson H. Floral volatiles in insect biology. Insect-Plant Interact 1994; 5:47 - 81
   Google Scholar
• Raguso RA. Wake up and smell the roses: the ecology and evolution of floral scent. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 2008; 39:549 - 569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anstett MC, Hossaert-McKey M, Kjellberg F. Figs and fig pollinators: Evolutionary conflicts in a coevolved mutualism. Trends Ecol Evol 1997; 12:94 - 99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• à van Noort S, Ware AB, Compton SG. Pollinator specific volatile attractants released from the figs of Ficus burtt-davyi. South Afr J Sci 1989; 85:323 - 324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware AB, Kaye PT, Compton SG, à van Noort S. Fig volatiles—Their role in attracting pollinators and maintaining pollinator specificity. Plant Syst Evol 1993; 186:147 - 156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossaert-McKey M, Gibernau M, Frey JE. Chemosensory attraction of fig wasps to substances produced by receptive figs. Ent Exp Appl 1994; 70:185 - 191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware AB, Compton SG. Responses of fig wasps to host-plant volatile cues. J Chem Ecol 1994; 20:785 - 802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibernau M, Hossaert-McKey M, Frey J, Kjellberg F. Are olfactory signals sufficient to attract fig pollinators?. Ecoscience 1998; 5:306 - 311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grison L, Edwards AA, Hossaert-McKey M. Interspecies variation in floral fragrances emitted by tropical Ficus species. Phytochemistry 1999; 52:1293 - 1299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proffit M, Cornille A, Hossaert-McKey M, Johnson SD. Role of floral scent in promoting the co-occurrence of two pollinating wasps in Ficus natalensis natalensis in the KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa). South Afr J Bot 2009; 75:416 - 417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song QS, Yang DR, Zhang GM, Yang CR. Volatiles from Ficus hispida and their attractiveness to fig wasps. J Chem Ecol 2001; 27:1929 - 1942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grison-Pige L, Hossaert-McKey M, Greeff JM, Bessiere JM. Fig volatile compounds—a first comparative study. Phytochemistry 2002; 61:61 - 71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proffit M, Chen C, Soler C, Bessiere JM, Schatz B, Hossaert-McKey M. Can chemical signals, responsible for mutualistic partner encounter, promote the specific exploitation of nursery pollination mutualisms? The case of figs and fig wasps. Ent Exp Appl 2009; 131:46 - 57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proffit M, Johnson SD. Specificity of the signal emitted by figs to attract their pollinating wasps: Comparison of volatile organic compounds emitted by receptive syconia of Ficus sur and F. sycomorus in Southern Africa. South Afr J Bot 2009; 75:771 - 777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Song QS, Proffit M, Bessiere JM, Li ZB, Hossaert-McKey M. Private channel: a single unusual compound assures specific pollinator attraction in Ficus semicordata. Funct Ecol 2009; 23:941 - 950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudsen JT, Eriksson R, Gershenzon J, Stahl B. Diversity and distribution of floral scent. Bot Rev 2006; 72:1 - 120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossaert-McKey M, Soler C, Schatz B, Proffit M. Floral scents: their roles in nursery pollination mutualisms. Chemoecology 2010; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00049-010-0043-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer HM, Schaefer V, Levey DJ. How plant-animal interactions signal new insights in communication. Trends Ecol Evol 2004; 19:577 - 584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook J, Rasplus J. Mutualists with attitude: coevolving fig wasps and figs. Trends Ecol Evol 2003; 18:241 - 248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proffit M, Schatz B, Borges RM, Hossaert-Mckey M. Chemical mediation and niche partitioning in non-pollinating fig-wasp communities. J Anim Ecol 2007; 76:296 - 303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson GP, Hickman MO, Bartram S, Boland W, Pellmyr O, Raguso RA. Chemistry and geographic variation of floral scent in Yucca filamentosa (Agavaceae). Am J Bot 2005; 92:1624 - 1631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patt JM, Hartman TG, Creekmore RW, Elliott JJ, Schal C, Lech J, et al. The floral odor of Peltandra virginica contains novel trimethyl-2,5-dioxabicyclo 3.2.1 nonanes. Phytochemistry 1992; 31:487 - 491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrom G, Groth I, Pellmyr O, Endress PK, Thien LB, Hubener A, et al. Chemical basis of a highly specific mutualism—chiral esters attract pollinating beetles in Eupomatiaceae. Phytochemistry 1991; 30:3221 - 3225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson G, Okamoto T, Kawakita A, Goto R, Kato M. Chemical ecology of obligate pollination mutualisms: testing the ‘private channel’ hypothesis in the Breynia-Epicephala association. New Phytol 2010; 186:995 - 1004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eltz T, Roubik D, Lunau K. Experience-dependent choices ensure species-specific fragrance accumulation in male orchid bees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2005; 59:149 - 156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitten WM, Williams NH, Armbruster WS, Battiste MA, Strekowski L, Lindquist N. Carvone oxide—An example of convergent evolution in euglossine pollinated plants. Syst Bot 1986; 11:222 - 228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayasse M, Schiestl FP, Paulus HF, Ibarra F, Francke W. Pollinator attraction in a sexually deceptive orchid by means of unconventional chemicals. Proc Royal Soc London B 2003; 270:517 - 522
   Google Scholar
• Schiestl FP, Ayasse M. Post-pollination emission of a repellent compound in a sexually deceptive orchid: a new mechanism for maximising reproductive success?. Oecologia 2001; 126:531 - 534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• à Düfay M, Hossaert-McKey M, Anstett MC. When leaves act like flowers: how dwarf palms attract their pollinators. Ecol Letts 2003; 6:28 - 34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar