Do Lawyers need Philosophy?

Bibliography

• Bernstein, R. 1987. “One Step Forward, Two Steps Backward”: Richard Rorty on Liberal Democracy and Philosophy. Political Theory. pp.538–563.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, E. 1910. Reflections on the Revolution in France. London: Dent.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. E. 1998. The Will, Capital Punishment, and Cultural War, in A Sarat (Ed). The Killing State: Capital Punishment in Law, Politics and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 1992. Force of Law: The “Mystical Foundation of Authority”, in D Cornell, M Rosenfeld and D Carlson (Eds). Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. 1997. In Praise of Theory. Arizona State Law Journal. 29:353–376.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. 1986. Law’s Empire. London: Fontana.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, S. 1984. Fish v Fiss. Stanford Law Review. 36:1325–1347.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, S. 1987. Dennis Martinez and the Uses of Theory. The Yale Law Journal. 96: 1773–2000.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, S. 1988. Don’t Know Much About the Middle Ages: Posner on Law and Literature. The Yale Law Journal. 97: 777–793.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, S. 1989. Doing What Comes Naturally: Change Rhetoric and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies. Duke University Press: Durham.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, S. 1993. The Law Wishes to Have a Formal Existence, in A Norrie (Ed). Closure or Critique: New Directions in Legal Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press, pp.157–174.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, S. 1995. Professional Correctness: Literary Studies and Political Change. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, S. 1999. The Trouble With Principle. Harvard, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, S. 2000. Theory Minimalism. San Diego Law Review. 37:761–776.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1977. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. D Bouchard (Ed). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1982. The Subject and Power, in: H. Dreyfus and P Rabinow (Eds.). Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Brighton: The Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1990 (1976). The Will to Knowledge: The History of Sexuality: Vol. 1. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 1989. Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geuss, R. 2001. History and illusion in Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodrich, P. 1996. Law in the Courts of Love: Literature and Other Minor Jurisprudences. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, A. 2000. It’s All in the Game: A Non-Foundationalist Account of Law and Adjudication. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, M. 1999. In the Realm of Legal and Moral Philosophy. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2002. Which Public Sphere for a Democratic Society?. Theoria. 99:55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. 1986. Human All Too Human. R. J. Hollinger. (trans). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oakeshott, M. 1962. Rationalism in Politics. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. 1971. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1983. Post-Modernist Bourgeois Liberalism. Journal of Philosophy. pp.583–589.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1987. Thugs and Theorists: A Reply to Richard Bernstein. Political Theory. pp.564–580.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1990. The Banality of Pragmatism and the Poetry of Justice. Southern California Law Review. 63:1811–1819.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1991. Objectivity, Relativism and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1992. “What Can You Expect From Anti-foundationalist Philosophers?”: A Reply to Lynn Baker. Virginia Law Review. 78:719–727.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1996. Response to Simon Critchley. in: Deconstruction and Pragmatism. C. Mouffe (Ed). Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1998. Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shusterman, R. 1997. Pragmatism and the Philosophical Life. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J. 1989. Should Lawyers Care About Philosophy?. Duke Law Journal. pp. 1752–1783.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, B. 1986. The Politics of Truth and the Problem of Hegemony. in D C Hoy (Ed.). Foucault: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar