Capacity, consent, and mental health legislation: Time for a new standard?

References

• Appelbaum, P. S. (1994). Almost a revolution. Mental health law and the limits of change. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, P. S. (1998). Ought we to require emotional capacity as part of decisional competence. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 8(4), 377–387.
   Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, P. S. (2007). Assessment of patients’ competence to consent. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(18), 1834–1840.
   Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, P. S., & Grisso, T. (1995). The MacArthur treatment competence study I. Law and Human Behavior, 19(2), 105–126.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S., and Brookbanks, W. (2005). Mental health law in New Zealand (2nd ed.). Wellington: Brookers.
   Google Scholar
• Benner, P. (1989). The primacy of caring: Stress and coping in health and illness. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Breeze, J. (1998). Can paternalism be justified in mental health care? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(2), 260–265.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. (2004). Mental capacity, legal competence and consent to treatment. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 97(9), 415–420.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, R., Maddock, C., Buchanan, A., David, A. S., Hayward, P., & Richardson, G. (2005). Reliability of mental capacity assessments in psychiatric in-patients. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 187(4), 372–378.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, T. (1994). Mental health law: Institutionalised discrimination. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 28, 554–559.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, T. (2007). Mental health legislation in the commonwealth. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 20(5), 482–485.
   Google Scholar
• Castel, R. (1988). The regulation of madness. The origins of incarceration in France. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charland, L. C. (1998). Appreciation and emotion: Theoretical reflections on the MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 8(4), 359–376.
   Google Scholar
• Chiswick, D. (2005). Test of capacity has little practical benefit. BMJ, 331(7530), 1469–1470.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, J., & Mullen, R. (2008). Insight and use of community treatment orders. Journal of Mental Health, 17(3), 269–280.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, J., & Szmukler, G. (2006). Fusion of mental health and incapacity legislation. British Journal of Psychiatry, 188(6), 504–509.
   Google Scholar
• Diesfeld, K., & McKenna, B. G. (2006). Insight and other puzzles: Undefined terms in the New Zealand Mental Health Review Tribunal. Summary Report. Wellington: Mental Health Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Doyal, L., & Sheather, J. (2005). Mental health legislation should respect decision making capacity. BMJ, 331(7530), 1467–1469.
   Google Scholar
• Drane, J. F. (1985). The many faces of competency. The Hastings Center Report, 15(2), 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Fistein, E. C., Holland, A. J., Clare, I. C. H., & Gunn, M. J. (2009). A comparison of mental health legislation from diverse Commonwealth countries. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 32(3), 147–155.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, B. (1998). Ethical practice and legal responsibility for duly authorized officers: Achieving a balance. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 7(1), 41–45.
   Google Scholar
• Fulford, K. M. (1998). Replacing the Mental Health Act 1983? How to change the game without losing the baby with the bath water or shooting ourselves in the foot. Psychiatric Bulletin, 22, 666–668.
   Google Scholar
• Gillette, G. (2004). Bioethics in the clinic. Hippocratic reflections. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. E., & O’Reilly, R. L. (2001). Clinically significant differences among Canadian Mental Health Acts. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 46, 315–321.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, R., & Trenagh, C. (2008). Deprivation of liberty safeguards. British Journal of Community Nursing, 13(11), 532–537.
   Google Scholar
• Grisso, T., and Appelbaum, P. S. (1995). The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. III: Abilities of patients to consent to psychiatric and medical treatments. Law & Human Behavior, 19(2), 149–174.
   Google Scholar
• Hellman, D. (2008). When is discrimination wrong? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hiday, V. A. (2003). Outpatient commitment. The state of empirical research on its outcomes. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 9(1/2), 8–32.
   Google Scholar
• Houlihan, G. D. (2005). The powers and duties of psychiatric nurses under the Mental Health Act 1983: A review of the statutory provisions in England and Wales. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 12, 317–324.
   Google Scholar
• Hurley, J., & Linsley, P. (2006). Proposed changes to the Mental Health Act of England and Wales: Research indicating future educational and training needs for mental health nurses. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 13(1), 48–54.
   Google Scholar
• Kitamura, F., Tomoda, A., Tsukada, K., Tanaka, M., Kawakami, I., Mishima, S., et al. (1998). Method for assessment of competency to consent in the mentally ill: Rationale, development, and comparison with the medically ill. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 21(3), 223–244.
   Google Scholar
• Large, M., Nielssen, O., Ryan, J., & Hayes, R. (2008). Mental health laws that require dangerousness for involuntary admission may delay the initial treatment of schizophrenia. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 43(3), 251–256.
   Google Scholar
• Lauder, W., Ludwick, R., Zeller, R., & Winchell, J. (2006). Factors influencing nurses’ judgements about self-neglect cases. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 13, 279–287.
   Google Scholar
• Linhorst (2006). Empowerment of people with severe mental illness. A practical guide. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, B. G., O’Brien, A. J., Dal Din, T., & Thom, K. (2006). Registered nurses as responsible clinicians under the New Zealand Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 1992. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 15(2), 128–134.
   Google Scholar
• Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act. (1992). Wellington: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Milne, D. H., O’Brien, A. J., & McKenna, B. G. (2009). Community Treatment Orders and competence to consent. Psychiatric Bulletin, 17(4), 273–278.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health. (2006). Office of the Director of Mental Health. Annual Report 2005. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health. (2008). Office of the Director of Mental Health. Annual report 2007. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Minkowitz, T. (2006). No-force advocacy by users and survivors of psychiatry. Wellington: Mental Health Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Okai, D., Owen, G., McGuire, H., Singh, S., Churchill, R., & Hotopf, M. (2007). Mental capacity in psychiatric patients: Systematic review. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 191(4), 291–297.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, D. P. (1998). Toward an ethical standard for coerced mental health treatment: Least restrictive or most therapeutic? Journal of Clinical Ethics, 9(3), 235–246.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, G., Okai, D., & Hotopf, M. (2007). Mental capacity. Psychiatry, 6(2), 69–71.
   Google Scholar
• Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act. (1988). Wellington: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Ranjith, G., & Hotopf, M. (2004). ‘Refusing treatment – please see’: An analysis of capacity assessments carried out by a liaison psychiatry service. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 97(10), 480–482.
   Google Scholar
• Raymont, V., Bingley, W., Buchanan, A., David, A. S., Hayward, P., & Wessely, S. (2004). Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: Cross-sectional study. Lancet, 364(9443), 1421–1427.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, G. (2005). The European convention and mental health law in England and Wales: Moving beyond process? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 28, 127–129.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenman, S. (1994). Mental health law: An idea whose time has passed. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 28(4), 560–565.
   Google Scholar
• Rutledgea, E., Kennedy, M., O’Neilla, H., & Kennedy, H. G. (2008). Functional mental capacity is not independent of the severity of psychosis. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31(1), 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Sayce, L. (1998). Transcending mental health law. Psychiatric Bulletin, 22, 669–670.
   Google Scholar
• Sjostrom, S. (2003). Party or patient? Discursive practices relating to coercion in psychiatric and legal settings. Umeå: Boréa bokförlag.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, G. S., Ryan, T., & Anderson, S. (2009). Principles, patient welfare and the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 32, 120–126.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, G. S., Ryan, T., & Anderson, S. (2009). Principles, patient welfare and the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 32, 120–126.
   Google Scholar
• Street, A., & Walsh, C. (1994). The legalisation of the therapeutic role: Implications for the practice of community mental health nurses using the New Zealand Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) act of 1992. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 3(2), 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Street, A., and Walsh, C. (1998). Nursing assessments in New Zealand mental health. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27(3), 553–559.
   Google Scholar
• Szmukler, G. (2004). Mental health legislation is discriminating and stigmatizing. In A. H. Crisp (Ed.), Every family in the land. Understanding prejudice and discrimination against people with mental illness (Revised edition) (pp. 287–289). London: Sir Robert Mond Memorial Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Szmukler, G., & Holloway, F. (1998). Mental health legislation is now a harmful anachronism. Psychiatric Bulletin, 22, 662–665.
   Google Scholar
• Thom, K., O’Brien, A. J., & McKenna, B. G. (2008). Judging nursing practice: Implications of habeas corpus rulings for mental health nurses in New Zealand. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 15(1), 131–139.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, L. D. G. (2005). The Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003: Civil legislation. Psychiatric Bulletin, 29(10), 381–384.
   Google Scholar
• Wand, T., & Chiarella, M. (2006). A conversation: Challenging the relevance and wisdom of separate mental health legislation. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 15(2), 119–127.
   Google Scholar