239
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A woman centred service in termination of pregnancy: A grounded theory study

Pages 9-19 | Received 19 Feb 2008, Accepted 06 Aug 2008, Published online: 17 Dec 2014

References

  • Alderson P (1991) Abstract bio-ethics ignores human emotions. Bulletin of Medical Ethics 68: 13–21.
  • Alex L and Hammarstrom A (2004) Women’s experiences in connection with induced abortion – a feminist perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science 18: 160–168.
  • Allmark P (1995) Can there be an ethics of care? Journal of Medical Ethics 21: 19–24.
  • Appleton J (1995) Analysing qualitative interview data: Addressing issues of validity and reliability. Journal of Advanced Nursing 22: 993–997.
  • Bolton SC (2000) Who cares? Offering emotion work as a ‘gift’ in the nursing labour process. Journal of Advanced Nursing 32(3): 580–586.
  • Calcutt C (2007) Abortion services in Australia. Obstetrics and Gynaecology Magazine 9(4): 27–28.
  • Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Decerf M, Deworme C, Dumont C and Gesche M (2000) Family planning professionals at centers where abortions are performed: Their beliefs, their coping strategies and their global state of health. Bulletin de Psychologie Scolaire et d’Orientation 49(3): 93–117.
  • Department of Health (2006) Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2006. London: Department of Health.
  • Eposito C and Basow S (1995) College student’s attitudes towards abortion: The role of knowledge and demographic variables. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25: 1996–2017.
  • Ferris LE, McMain-Klein M and Iron K (1998) Factors influencing the delivery of abortion services in Ontario: A descriptive study. Family Planning Perspectives 30(3): 134.
  • Fielding SL, Edmunds E and Schaff EA (2002) Having an abortion using mifepristone and home misoprostol: A qualitative analysis of women’s experiences. Perspectives on Sexual & Reproductive Health 34(1): 34.
  • Froggatt K (1998) The place of metaphor and language in exploring nurses’ emotional work. Journal of Advanced Nursing 28(2): 332–338.
  • Gilligan C (1982) In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hemmerling A, Siedentopf F and Kentenich H (2005) Emotional impact and acceptability of medical abortion with mifepristone: A German experience. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology 26(1): 23–31.
  • Henshaw S (1995) Factors hindering access to abortion services. Family Planning Perspectives 27(2): 54–87.
  • Horsburgh D (2002) Evaluation of qualitative research. Journal of Clinical Nursing 12: 307–312.
  • House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (2007) Scientific developments relating to the Abortion Act 1967. In House of Commons (Ed.) 12th Report of the session 2006 Vol. 1: 1–93: TSO.
  • Huntington A (2002) Working with women experiencing mid-trimester termination of pregnancy: The integration of nursing and feminist knowledge in the gynaecological setting. Journal of Clinical Nursing 11: 273–279.
  • Joffe C (1999) Reactions to medical abortion among providers of surgical abortion: An early snapshot. Family Planning Perspectives 31(1): 35–38.
  • Johns C and Freshwater D (Eds) (1998) Transforming nursing through reflective practice. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
  • King K (1994) Method and methodology in feminist research: What is the difference. Journal of Advanced Nursing 20: 19–22.
  • Koh A (1999) Non-judgemental care as a professional obligation. Nursing Standard 13(37): 38–41.
  • Lipp A (2007) Developing the reflexive dimension of reflection: A framework for debate. Multiple Research Approaches 1(1): 18–26.
  • McCreight BS (2005) Perinatal grief and emotional labour: A study of nurses’ experiences in gynae wards. International Journal of Nursing Studies 42(4): 439.
  • McQueen A (1997) The emotional work of caring, with an emphasis on gynaecological nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing 6: 233–240.
  • Norwood S (2000) Research strategies for advanced nurse practitioners. London: Prentice-Hall.
  • O’Grady H (2005) Woman’s relationship with herself. Hove: Routledge.
  • Phillips S (1996) Labouring the emotions: Expanding the remit of nursing work? Journal of Advanced Nursing 24: 139–143.
  • RANZCOG (2005) Termination of pregnancy: A resource for health professionals. Retrieved 19 February 2008 from http://www.ranzcog.edu.au/womenshealth/termination-of-pregnancy.shtml
  • RCOG (2004) The care of women requesting induced abortion: Evidence-based clinical Guideline No. 7. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
  • Rorbye C, Norgaard M and Nilas L (2005) Medical versus surgical abortion: Comparing satisfaction and potential confounders in a partly randomized study. Human Reproduction 20(3): 834–838.
  • Say L, Kulier R, Gulmezoglu A and Campana A (2002) Medical versus surgical methods for first trimester termination of pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4.
  • Seibold C (2000) Qualitative research from a feminist perspective in the postmodern era: Methodological, ethical and reflexive concerns. Nursing Inquiry 7(3): 147.
  • Sherwin S (1989) Feminist and medical ethics: Two different approaches to contextual ethics. Hypatia 4(2): 17–31.
  • Smith P (1992) The emotional labour of nursing. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  • Strauss A and Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, London.
  • Strauss A and Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
  • Ventura M (1999) Where nurses stand on abortion. Registered Nurse 62(3): 44–47.
  • Webb C (1984) Nurses’ attitudes to therapeutic abortion. Nursing Times 81(1): 44–47.
  • Weidner G and Griffitt W (1984) Abortion as a stigma: In the eyes of the beholder. Journal of Research in Personality 18(3): 359.
  • Wuest J (1995) Feminist grounded theory: An exploration of the congruency and tensions between two traditions in knowledge discovery. Qualitative Health Research 5(1): 125–137.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.