I didn’t Interview Myself: The Researcher as Participant in Narrative Research

References

• Bola, M. (1995) ‘Questions of legitimacy? The fit between researcher and researched’, Feminism & Psychology, 5: 290–293.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1986) Actual Minds, Possible World, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1987) ‘Life as narrative’, Social Research, 54: 11–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1990) Acts of Meaning, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Burchfield, R.w. (1996) The New Fowler’s Modern English Usage (3rd edition), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Flax, J. (1990) ‘Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory’. In L.J. Nicholson (ed), FeminismJPostmodernism, Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, S. (1990) ‘Deconstructing “desperateness”: The social construction of infertility in popular representations of new reproductive technologies’. In M. McNeil, I. Varcoe, & S. Yearley (eds) The New Reproductive Technologies, Macmillan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Garro, L. C. (1994) ‘Narrative representations of chronic illness experience: Cultural models of illness, mind, and body in stories concerning the temperomandibular joint (TMJ)’, Social Science and Medicine, 38: 775–788.
   Google Scholar
• Gavey, N. (1989) ‘Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis: Contributions to feminist psychology’, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13: 459–475.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R (1995) ‘Relativism, reflexivity, and politics: Interrogating discourse analysis from a feminist perspective’. In S. Wilkinson & C. Kitsinger (cds) Feminism and Discourse: Psychological perspectives, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Gluck, S.B. & Patai, D. (cds) (1991) Women’s Words: The feminist practice of oral history, Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Good, B.J. (1994) Medicine, Rationality and Experience: An anthropological perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, J.A. & Wisniewski, R (1995) ‘Life history and narrative: Questions, issues, and exemplary works’. In J.A Hatch & R. Wisniewski (eds), Life History and Narratie, Falmer Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Hallway, W. (1989) Subjectiity and Method in Psychology: Gender, meaning and science, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S.J. (1997) ‘Reflexivity and feminist practice: Ethical dilemmas in negotiating meaning’. Feminism & Psychology, 7: 348–353.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, M. (1997) Plots and Disruptions: Narratives, infertility, and Ivomen’s lives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, M. (1999a) ‘Infertile mothers: A perspective from research and experience’. In R Jansen & D. Mortimer (cds). Towards Reproductive Certainty: Fertility and genetics heyond 1999, Parthenon, Lancashire.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman. M. (1999b) Re ising the plot: Autobiographical narrati es after infertility. Published on the Internet by the Association for Qualitative Research: http://www.lalrohe.edu.au/www/aqr/offer/conferen.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, M. (in press) ‘Thinking of something to say: Public and private narratives of infertility’, Health Care for Women International.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, M, & Kirkman, L. (1988) My Sister’s Child, Penguin Books, Ringwood.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, M & Rosenthal, D.A (1999) ‘Representations of reproductive technologies in women’s narratives of infertility’, Women and Health, 29: 17–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, M, Rosenthal, D, & Smith, A.M.A (1998) ,Adolescent sex and the romantic narrative: Why some young heterosexuals use condoms to prevent pregnancy but not disease’, Psychology, Health and Medicine, 3: 357–372.
   Google Scholar
• Mattingley, C. (1998) Healing Dramas and Clinical Plots: The narrative structure of experience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, K.D. (1995) ‘Narratology’. In J.A Smith, R Harre, & L. Van Langenhove (eds) Rethinking Psychology, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolson, P. (1995) ‘Feminism and psychology’. In J.A Smith, R Harre, & L. Van Langenhove (eds) Rethinking Psychology, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, A (1981) ‘Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms’. In H. Roberts (cd) Doing Feminist Research, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, K. (1995) ‘Life story research’. In R.A. Smith, R Harre, & L. Van Langenhove (eds.), Rethinking Methods in Psychology, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, D. (1996) ‘Dealing with difficult differences: Retlcxivity and social class in feminist research’, Feminism & Psychology, 6: 443–456.
   Google Scholar
• Reinharz, S. (1992) Feminist Methods in Social Research, Oxford University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ribbens, J. (1989) ‘Interviewing - an “unnatural situation”?’, Women’s Studies International Forum, 12: 579–592.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenwald, G.c., & Ochberg, RC. (eds) (1992) Storied Li es: The cultural politics of selfunderstanding, Yale University Press, New Haven.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1979) ‘Feminist research, feminist consciousness and experience of sexism’, Women’s Studies International Quarterly, 2: 359–374.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1983) “’Back into the personal” or: Our attempt to construct “feminist research”’. In G. Bowles & R.D. Klein (eds) Theories of Women’s Studies, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
   Google Scholar
• Steedman, C. (1987) Landscape for a Good Woman: A story of two lies, Virago, London.
   Google Scholar
• West, R. (1988) ‘Surrogate motherhood - but is it sisterhood?’, The Age, June 15: 21.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. (1995) Re-authoring Lies: Interiews and essays, Dulwich Centre Publications, Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson. S. (1988) ‘The role of reflexivity in feminist psychology’, Women’s Studies International Forum, 11: 493–502.
   Google Scholar