27
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentaries

On changing the social relations of Australian childbirth: a cautionary note

Pages 87-94 | Published online: 18 Dec 2014

References

  • Arms, Suzanne (1975) Immaculate deception Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • The Boston Women’s Health Book Collective (1976) Our bodies, ourselves New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • The Boston Women’s Health Book Collective (1985) The new our bodies, ourselves: a book by and for women (2nd edition) Melbourne: Penguin Books Australia.
  • Chard, T. and Richards, M. P. M. (1977) Benefits and hazards of the new obstetrics Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.
  • Cochrane, Arch L. (1971) Effectiveness and efficiency: random reflections on health services Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust.
  • Gosden, Diane (1996) Dissenting voices: conflict and complexity in the home birth movement in Australia unpublished MA Hons Thesis, Sydney: Macquarie University, Department of Anthropology.
  • Gosden, Diane and Noble, Carolyn (2001) ‘Social mobilisation around the act of childbirth: subjectivity and politics’ Annual review of health social sciences 10: 69-79.
  • Lane, Karen (2001) ‘Multiple visions or multiple aversions: consumer representation, consultation and participation in maternity issues’ Annual review of health social sciences 10: 43-52.
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1992) Homebirth guidelines for parents Canberra: NHMRC.
  • NSW Health Department (1993) Final report of the NSW nurse practitioner project, stage III Sydney.
  • Nurses Tribunal Enquiry under Section 61 of the Nurses Act 1991 (1998) ‘Reasons for decision. Matter; Margaret Gillian Watson Lecky-Thompson’ in Standing orders: NSW Nurses Registration Board.
  • Oakley, Ann (1992) Social support and motherhood: the natural history of a research project Oxford UK: Cambridge.
  • Reiger, Kerreen (2001) ‘The politics of midwifery in Australia: tensions, debates and opportunities’ Annual review of health social sciences 10: 53-64.
  • Riley, D. (1977) ‘What do women want? The question of choice in the conduct of labour’ in T. Chard and M. P. M. Richards (eds) Benefits and hazards of the new obstetrics London: Spastics International Medicine Publications.
  • Rothman, Barbara K. (2001) ‘Response to Karen Lane and Kerreen Reiger’ Annual review of health social sciences 10: 65-67.
  • Tew, Marjorie (1995) Safer childbirth? A critical history of maternity care London: Chapman and Hall.
  • Treichler, Paula (1990) ‘Feminism, medicine and the meaning of childbirth’ in M. Jacobus; E. Fox Keller and S. Shuttleworth (eds) Body/politics: women and the discourses of science New York: Routledge.
  • Willis, Evan (1983; 1989) Medical dominance: the division of labour in Australian health care Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.