Rights, responsibilities and citizenship in heterosexual women’s talk about sex: promoting women’s sexual health and safety

References

• Albury, K. (2001) ‘Full-body-mega-kundalinigasm: “sacred” sex and sexual politics’ Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies 15(2): 201–215.
   Google Scholar
• Albury, K. (2002) Yes Means Yes: Getting Explicit about Heterosex, Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (1995a) Masculinities, Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R.W. (1995b) ‘Democracies of pleasure: thoughts on the goals of radical sexual politics’ in L. Nicholson and S. Seidman (eds) Social Postmodernism: Beyond Identity Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, C. and Lees, S. (1981) ’Slags or drags’ Feminist Review 9: 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N.K. (1989) The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Method, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dowsett, G.W. (1996) Practicing Desire: Homosexual Sex in the Era of AIDS, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilfoyle, J., Wilson, J. & Brown (1992) ‘Sex, organs and audiotape: A discourse analytic approach to talking about heterosexual sex and relationships’ Feminism and Psychology 2 (2): 209–230.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Scott, S., Sharpe, S. & Thomson, R. (1991) ‘Pressure, resistance, empowerment: Young women and the negotiation of safer sex’ in P. Aggleton, G. Hart & P. Davies (eds) AIDS: Rights, Risk and Reason, London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Scott, S., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1992) ‘Risk, power and the possibility of pleasure: Young women and safer sex’_AIDS Care 4 (3): 273–283.
   Google Scholar
• Hollway, W. (1984) ‘Gender difference and the production of subjectivity’ in J. Henriques, W. Hollway, C. Urwin, C. Venn & V. Walkerdine (eds) Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation and Subjectivity, London: Methuen and Company, pp.227–263.
   Google Scholar
• Hollway, W. (1989) Subjectivity and Method in Psychology: Gender, Meaning and Science, London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kippax, S., Crawford, J., Waldby, C. & Benton, P. (1990) ‘Women negotiating heterosex: Implications for AIDS prevention’ Women’s Studies International Forum 13 (6): 533–542.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1995) ‘ “I’m sexually attractive but I’m powerful”: young women negotiating sexual reputation’ Women’s Studies International Forum 18 (2): 187–196.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W. (1982) ‘Speech actions and reactions in personal narrative’ in D. Tannen (ed) Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 219–247.
   Google Scholar
• Lear, D. (1995) ‘Sexual communication in the age of AIDS: The construction of risk and trust among young adults’ Social Science and Medicine 41 (9): 1311–1323.
   Google Scholar
• Leca, J. (1992) ‘Questions on citizenship’ in C. Mouffe (ed) Dimensions of Democracy, London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lister, R. (1997) ‘Citizenship: Towards a feminist analysis’ Feminist Review 57: 28–48.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T.H. (1950) Citizenship and Social Class, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, C. & Boyle, M. (1995) ‘Risky heterosexual practices amongst women over 30: Gender, power and long term relationships’ AIDS Care 7 (3): 277–293.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, K. (1995) Telling Sexual Stories: Power, Change and Social Worlds, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, A. (2000) ‘“The essence of the hard on”: Hegemonic masculinity and the cultural construction of “erectile dysfunction”’ Men & Masculinities 3 (1): 85–103.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, A. (2001) ‘The man with two brains: Hegemonic masculine subjectivity and the discursive construction of the unreasonable penis-self’ Journal of Gender Studies 10 (2): 145–156.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, A. (2002) The Science/Fiction of Sex: Feminist Deconstruction and the Vocabularies of Heterosex, East Sussex: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson E.H. and Turner, B.S. (2001) ‘Sexual, intimate or reproductive citizenship?’ Citizenship Studies 5 (3): 329–338.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, D. (1998) ‘Sexuality and citizenship’ Sociology 32 (1): 83–100.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, D. (2000) ‘Constructing sexual citizenship: Theorising sexual rights’ Critical Social Policy 20 (1): 105–135.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman, C.K. (1993) Narrative Analysis, Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, C., Kippax, S., Waldby, C., Crawford, J., 1995, ‘Faking it: the story of “ooh!”’ Women’s Studies Forum International 18 (5/6): 523–532.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. (2000) ‘Feminism and sexual freedom in an age of AIDS’ Sexualities 4 (1): 91–107.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, A. (1994) Damned Whores and God’s Police, Ringwood: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Tiefer, L. (2002) ‘The emerging global discourse of sexual rights’ Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 28 (5): 439–444.
   Google Scholar
• Ussher, J.M. (1994) ‘Theorizing female sexuality: Social constructionist and poststructuralist accounts’ in P.Y.L. Choi & P. Nicolson (eds) Female Sexuality: Psychology, Biology and Social Context, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 149–173.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, K. (2005) ‘Citizenship, identity, blood donation’ Body and Society 11 (2): 113–128.
   Google Scholar
• Warr, D.J. (2001) ‘The importance of love and understanding: speculation on romance in safe sex health promotion’ Women’s Studies International Forum 24 (2): 241–252.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, J. (1998) ‘The sexual citizen’ Theory, Culture and Society 15 (3–4): 35–52.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N. (1991) ‘The citizenship debate: women, ethnic processes and the state’ Feminist Review 39: 58–68.
   Google Scholar