226
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The plasticity of professional boundaries: A case study of collaborative care in maternity services

Pages 341-352 | Received 20 Jun 2005, Accepted 12 Aug 2006, Published online: 17 Dec 2014

References

  • Abbott, A. (1988) The System of the Professions, London: Univ-Chicago Press.
  • Allen, D. (2002[2000]) ‘Doing occupational demarcation: the boundary work of nurse managers in a district general hospital’, in Rafferty, A.M. and Traynor, M. (eds) Exemplary Research for Nursing and Midwifery, London: Routledge.
  • Ball, D. and Malik, M. (1998) The nuclear crisis in Asia: the Indian and Pakistani nuclear programmes, Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, Canberra: Australian National University.
  • Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society, London: Sage.
  • Beniot, C., Wrede, S., Bourgeault, I., Sandall, J., De Vries, R., and van Teijlingen, E. R. (2005) ‘Understanding the social organisation of maternity care systems: midwifery as a touchstone’ Sociology of Health & Illness 27: 722–745.
  • Biro, M., Waldenstrom, U., Pannifex, J. (2000) ‘Team midwifery care in a tertiary level obstetric service: a randomized controlled trial’ Birth Issues in Perinatal Care 27(3): 168–173.
  • Bolton, S. (2002) ‘Mixed feelings: Emotion management in a caring profession’ in M. Dent and S. Whitehead (eds) Managing Professional Identities; Knowledge, Performativity and the ‘New’ Professional, London: Routledge.
  • Blackmore, J. and Sachs, J. (2007) Performing and Reforming Leaders. Gender, Educational Restructuring and Organisational Change, New York: SUNY Press.
  • Davies, C. (1992) ‘Gender, history and management style in nursing: Towards a theoretical synthesis in M. Savage and A. Witz (eds) Gender and Bureaucracy, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Degeling, P., Kennedy, J., Hill, M., Carnegie, M., Holt, J. (1988) Professional Sub-Cultures and Hospital Reform, The Centre for Hospital Management and Information Systems Research, University of New South Wales, Australia and the Department of Social Policy, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne.
  • Degeling, P., Hill, M., Kennedy, J., Maxwell, S. (2000) ‘A cross-national study of differences in the identities of nursing in England and Australia and how this has affected nurses’ capacity to respond to hospital reform’ Nursing Inquiry 7: 120–35.
  • Dent, M. and Whitehead, S. (2002) ‘Configuring the ‘new’ professional’ in M. Dent and S. Whitehead (eds) Managing Professional Identities; Knowledge, Performativity and the ‘New’ Professional, London: Routledge.
  • Department of Human Services (2004) New Directions in Maternity Care, Victoria.
  • Du Gay, P. (1992) ‘The cult(ure) of the customer’ Journal of Management Studies 29(4): 615–33.
  • Flint, C. and Poulengeris, P. (1989) ‘The ‘Know Your Midwife’ scheme – a randomized trial of continuity of care by a team of midwives’ Midwifery 5: 11–16.
  • Foucault, M. (1975) The Birth of the Clinic: An Archeology of Medical Perception, New York: Vintage Books.
  • Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews with Michel Foucault 1971–1977, Brighton: Harvester Press.
  • Fournier, V. (2000) ‘Boundary work and the ’unmaking of the professions’ in N. Malin (ed) Professionalism, Boundaries and the Workplace, London: Routledge.
  • Fournier, V. (2002) ‘Amateurism, quackery and professional conduct: The constitution of ’proper’ aromatherapy practice’ in M. Dent and S. Whitehead (eds) pp. 116–137 Managing Professional Identities; Knowledge, Performativity and the ‘New’ Professional, London: Routledge.
  • Freidson, E. (2001) Professionalism: The Third Logic, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Goleman, D. (1995) Emotional Intelligence, New York: Bantam Books.
  • Guilliland, K. and Pairman, S. (1995) The Midwifery Partnership: A Model for Practice,Victoria University, Wellington: Department of Nursing and Midwifery Monograph Series.
  • Hodnett, E.D. (1999) ‘Caregiver support for women during childbirth’ (Cochrane Review) in The Cochrane Library 3, Oxford: Update Software.
  • Homer, C., Davis, G., Brodie, P., Sheehan, A., Barclay, L., Wills, J. and Chapman, G., (2001) ‘Collaboration in maternity care: A randomised controlled trial comparing community-based continuity of care with standard hospital care’ British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 108: 16–22.
  • Hochschild, A. (1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • James, N. (2005) ‘Care = organisation + physical labour + emotional labour’ in Annandale, E., Elston, M.A. and Prior, L., (eds) Medical Work, Medial Knowledge and Health Care, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Johnson, T. (1972) Professions and Power, London: Macmillan.
  • Lane, K. (2000) ‘Consumers as arbiters of professional practice? What does this mean for users of maternity services?’ Refereed Proceedings: Conference of The Australian Sociological Association.
  • Lane, K. (2005) ‘Consumer participation and collaborative care and midwifery practice’ in R.E. Balin (ed) Trends in Midwifery Research, New York: Nova Biomedical Books.
  • Larson, M. (1977) The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Leap, N. and Hunter, B. (1993) The Midwife’s Tale: An Oral History from Handywoman to Professional Midwife, London: Scarlet Press.
  • Misztal, B.A. (2002) ‘Trusting the professional’ in C. Morgan and S. Murgatroyd (eds) (1994) Total Quality Management in the Public Sector, Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Nancarrow, S. A. and Borthwick, A. M. (2005) ‘Dynamic professional boundaries in the healthcare workforce’ Sociology of Health & Illness 27(7): 897–919.
  • Neave, G. (1988) ‘On the cultivation of quality, efficiency and enterprise: An Overview of Recent Trends in Higher Education in Western Europe, 1986–1988’ European Journal of Education 23(1/2):7–23.
  • New South Wales Government (2000) NSW Framework for Maternity Services, 2000–2005.
  • Oakley, A., Rajan, L., Grant, A. (1990) ‘Social support and pregnancy outcome’ British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 97: 155–162.
  • Power, M. (1999) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Reiger, K. (2006) ‘A neoliberal quickstep: Contradictions in Australian maternity policy’ Health Sociology Review 15(4): 330–340.
  • Rose, N.and Miller, P. (1992) ‘Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government’ British Journal of Sociology 43(2): 173–205.
  • Rothfield, P. (1995) ‘Bodies and subjects: medical ethics and feminism’ in P.A. Komesaroff (ed) Troubled Bodies: Critical Perspectives on Postmodernism, Medical Ethics and the Body, London: Duke University Press.
  • Rowley, M., Hensley, M., Brinsmead, M., and Wlodarczyk, J. (1995) ‘Continuity of care by a midwife team versus routine care during pregnancy and birth: A randomised trial’ Medical Journal of Australia 163(9): 289–293.
  • Saks, M. (1995) Professions and the Public Interest: Medical Power, Altruism and Alternative Medicine, London: Routledge.
  • Sandall, J. (1998) ‘Occupational burnout in midwives: new ways of working and the relationship between organizational factors and psychological health and wellbeing’ Risk Decision and Policy 3(3): 213–232.
  • Sandall, J., Davies, C., Warwick, C. (2001) Evaluation of the Albany Midwifery Practice, Final Report, Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, London: King’s College.
  • Tully, E., Mortlock, B. (2004) ‘Professionals and practices’ in K. Dew and P. Davis (eds) Health and Society in Aotearoa New Zealand (2nd edn) pp 130–45, South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
  • Turnbull, D., Holmes, A., Shields, N., Cheyne, H., Twaddle, S., Harper-Gilmour, W., McGinley, M., Reid, M., Johnston, I., Geer, I., McIllwaine, J., Burnett J., and Lunan, C. (1966) ‘Randomised controlled trial of efficacy of midwife-managed care’ The Lancet 348(9022): 213–218.
  • Weber, M. (1987) ‘The limits of professionalism’ in S. Weber. (ed) Institution and Interpretation, Theory and History of Literature, Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press. 31: 19–32.
  • Witz, A. (1992) Professions and Patriarchy, London: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.