48
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The impact of moral suasion on Internet HIV/AIDS support groups: Evidence from a discussion of seropositivity disclosure ethics

Pages 237-247 | Received 07 Mar 2007, Accepted 18 Jul 2007, Published online: 18 Dec 2014

References

  • AIDS Alert (2003a) ‘The Internet’s role as modern bathhouse is being scrubbed: On-line hookups increasingly popular among MSM’ AIDS Alert 18(10):121.
  • AIDS Alert (2003b) ‘Interventions can ease dangers of cybersex: Counselors educate while in chatrooms’ AIDS Alert 18(10):124.
  • American Civil Liberties Union (2004) State Criminal Statutes on HIV Transmission: 2004 (Lesbian and Gay Rights Project AIDS Project).
  • American Sociological Association (1999) Code of Ethics [approved June 1997].
  • Bargh, J.A.; McKenna, K.Y.A. and Fitzsimons, F.M. (2002) ‘Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet’ Journal of Social Issues 58(1):33-48.
  • Bray, S.J. (2003) Criminal Prosecutions for HIV Exposure: Overview and Analysis Yale University Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Working Paper 3(1):Fall.
  • British Sociological Association (2002) Statement of Ethical Practice for the British Sociological Association (March).
  • Bromseth, J.C.H. (2006) Genre Trouble and the Body that Mattered PhD dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
  • Broom, A. (2005) ‘The eMale: Prostate cancer, masculinity and online support as a challenge to medical expertise’ Journal of Sociology 41(1):87-104.
  • Brown, P. and Mikkelsen, E.J. (1990) No Safe Place Berkeley: California.
  • CDC (2007) HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, 2005 Vol. 17 [revised edition, June] CDC: Atlanta.
  • Charmaz, K. (1991) Good Days, Bad Days Rutgers: New Brunswick.
  • Ciccarone, D.H.; Kanouse, D.E.; Collins, R.L.; Miu, A.; Chen, J.L.; Morton, S.C. and Stall, R. (2003) ‘Sex without disclosure of positive HIV serostatus in a US probability sample of persons receiving medical care for HIV infection’ American Journal of Public Health 93(6):949-54.
  • Connery, B.A. (1997) ‘IMHO: Authority and egalitarian rhetoric in the virtual coffeehouse’ in D. Porter (ed) Internet Culture Routledge: NY. pp. 161-79.
  • Cummings, J.N.; Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S.B. (2002) ‘Beyond hearing: Where real-world and online support meet’ Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 6(1):78-88.
  • Davis, M.; Hart, G.; Bolding, G.; Sherr, L. and Elford, J. (2006) ‘E-dating, identity, and HIV prevention: Theorising sexualities, risk and network society’ Sociology of Health and Illness 28(4):457-78.
  • Esquivel, A.; Meric-Bernstam, F.; Bernstam, E.V. (2006) ‘Accuracy and self-correction of information received from an Internet breast cancer list: Analysis of posting content’ British Medical Journal 332(22 April):939-42.
  • Ess, C. (1996) ‘The political computer: Democracy, CMC and Habermas’ in Ess, C. (ed) Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication SUNY: Albany. pp. 197-230.
  • Ess, C. and the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (2002) Ethical Decision-making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (approved 27 November).
  • Foucault, M. ([1978]1991) ‘Governmentality’ in G. Burchell; C. Gordon, and P. Miller (eds) The Foucault Effect Chicago: Chicago. pp. 87-104.
  • Foucault, M. ([1980]1991) ‘Questions of method’ in G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller (eds.), The Foucault Effect Chicago: Chicago. pp. 73-86.
  • Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory Aldine de Gruyter: NY.
  • Greene, K.; Derlega, V.J.; Yep, G.A. and Petronio, S. (2003) Privacy and Disclosure of HIV in Interpersonal Relationships Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah.
  • Guadagno, R. and Cialdini, R. (2005) ‘Online persuasion and compliance: Social influence on the Internet and beyond’ in Y. Amichai-Hamburger (ed) The Social Net Oxford: Oxford. pp. 91-113.
  • Habermas, J. ([1962]1991) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (translated by T. Burger) MIT: Cambridge.
  • Habermas, J. ([1983]1990) ‘Discourse ethics: Notes on a program of philosophical justification’ in Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (translated by C. Lenhardt and S.W. Nicholsen) MIT: Cambridge. pp. 43-115.
  • Hering, S. (2000) The Internet: A Liberating Medium? The Illness Narratives of Those Affected by AIDS as Shaped and Presented in Virtual Support Groups on the Internet Master’s thesis, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Bar-Ilan University.
  • Hoffman, H. (2006) ‘Criticism as deviance and social control in Alcoholics Anonymous’ Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35(6):669-95.
  • Indyk, D. and Rier, D. (1993) ‘Grassroots AIDS knowledge: Implications for the boundaries of science and collective action’ Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 15(1):3-43.
  • Jacobs, A. (2006) ‘Battling HIV where sex meets crystal meth’ New York Times 21 Feb.
  • King, S.A. (1996) ‘Researching Internet communities: Proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of the results’ The Information Society 12(2):119-27.
  • Klitzman, R. and Bayer, R. (2003) Mortal Secrets Johns Hopkins: Baltimore.
  • Lawyers’ Collective HIV/AIDS Unit (2004) ‘The duty to disclose’ Positive Dialogue 17(June):1-4.
  • Maman, S. and Medley, A. (2004) Gender Dimensions of HIV Status Disclosure to Sexual Partners Department of Gender and Women’s Health, WHO: Geneva.
  • McKnight, J. ([1978]1990) ‘Politicizing health care’ in P. Conrad and R. Kern (eds) The Sociology of Health and Illness (3d ed) St. Martin’s Press: NY. pp. 432-36.
  • McPhee, J. and Stewart, C. (2005) ‘Recent developments in law’ Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2(3):122-29.
  • Ormerod, D.C. and Gunn, M.J. (1996) ‘Criminal liability for the transmission of HIV’ Web Journal of Current Legal Issues (No. 1).
  • Parsons, J.T.; VanOra, J.; Missildine, W.; Purcell, D.W. and Gomez, C.A. (2004) ‘Positive and negative consequences of HIV disclosure among seropositive injection drug users’ AIDS Education and Prevention 16(5):459-75.
  • Petersen, A. and Lupton, D. (1996). The New Public Health Sage: London.
  • Poster, M. (1997) ‘Cyberdemocracy: Internet and the public sphere’ in D. Porter (ed) Internet Culture Routledge: NY. pp. 201-17.
  • Rier, D.A. (2007) ‘Internet social support groups as moral agents: The ethical dynamics of HIV+ status disclosure’ Accepted for publication Sociology of Health and Illness. ePub 30 Aug 2007
  • Robinson, K.M. (2001) ‘Unsolicited narratives from the Internet: A rich source of qualitative data’ Qualitative Health Research 11(5):706-14.
  • Serovich, J.M.; Mason, T.L.; Bautista, D. and Toviessi, P. (2006) ‘Gay men’s report of regret of HIV disclosure to family, friends, and sex partners’ AIDS Education and Prevention 18(2):132-38.
  • Sharf, A. (1997) ‘Communicating breast cancer on line: Support and empowerment on the Internet’ Women and Health 26:65-84.
  • Strauss, A. (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists Cambridge: Cambridge.
  • Suler, J. (2004) ‘The online disinhibition effect’ CyberPsychology and Behavior 7(3):321-326.
  • Turkle, S. (1995) Life on the Screen Simon and Schuster: NY.
  • UNAIDS and WHO (2006) AIDS Epidemic Update [December] WHO: Geneva.
  • Wallace, P. (2001) The Psychology of the Internet Cambridge: Cambridge.
  • Walstrom, M.K. (2000) ‘“You know, who’s the thinnest?”: Combating surveillance and creating safety in coping with eating disorders online’ CyberPsychology and Behavior 3(5):761-83.
  • Walther, J.B. (2002) ‘Research ethics in Internetenabled research: Human subjects issues and methodological myopia’ Ethics and Information Technology 4(3):205-16.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.